Top

Health Research Policy and Systems

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Review

Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review

Authors: Susan C. Slade, Kathleen Philip, Meg E. Morris

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Abstract

Background

Although allied health clinicians play a key role in the provision of healthcare, embedding a culture of research within public and private health systems remains a challenge. In this rapid review we critically evaluate frameworks for embedding research into routine allied health practice, as the basis for high quality, safe, efficient and consumer-focused care.

Methods

A rapid review (PROSPERO: CRD42017075699) was conducted to evaluate frameworks designed to create and embed research in the health sector. Included were full-text, English-language, peer-reviewed publications or Government reports of frameworks that could inform the implementation of an allied health research framework. Eight electronic databases and four government websites were searched, using search terms such as models, frameworks and research capacity-building. Two independent researchers conducted all review stages and used content and thematic analysis to interpret the results.

Results

Sixteen framework papers were finally included. Content analysis identified 44 system and regulatory level items that informed the research frameworks, 125 healthcare organisation items and 76 items relating to individual clinicians. Thematic analysis identified four major themes. Firstly, sustainable change requires allied health research policies, regulation, governance and organisational structures that support and value evidence-based practice. Secondly, research capability, receptivity, advocacy and literacy of healthcare leaders and managers are key to successful research implementation. Third, organisational factors that facilitate a research culture include dedicated staff research positions, time allocated to research, mentoring, professional education and research infrastructure. When healthcare agencies had strong partnerships with universities and co-located research leaders, research implementation was strengthened. Finally, individual attributes of clinicians, such as their research skills and capabilities, motivation, and participation in research teams, are essential to embedding research into practice.

Conclusion

Theoretical frameworks were identified that informed processes to embed a culture of allied health research into healthcare services. Research-led and evidence-informed allied health practice enables optimisation of workforce capability and high-quality care.

Available only for authorised users

Nancarrow SA, Young G, O’Callaghan K, Jenkins M, Philip K, Barlow K. Shape of allied health: an environmental scan of 27 allied health professions in Victoria. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(3):327–35. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH16026 CrossRefPubMed

Nancarrow SA, Roots A, Grace S, Moran AM, Vanniekerk-Lyons K. Implementing large-scale workforce change: learning from 55 pilot sites of allied health workforce redesign in Queensland, Australia. Human Res Health. 2013;11:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-66.CrossRef

The Australian Government Department of Health. http://www.health.gov.au/internet/publications/publishing.nsf/Content/work-review-australian-government-health-workforce-programs-toc~chapter-8-developing-dental-allied-health-workforce~chapter-8-allied-health-workforce. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

Perry A, Morris M, Unsworth C, Duckett S, Skeat J, Dodd K, Taylor N, Reilly K. Therapy outcome measures for allied health practitioners in Australia: the AusTOMs. Internat J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(4):285–91.CrossRef

Nancarrow SA, Moran A, Sullivan R. Mechanisms for the effective implementation of an allied health assistant trainee: A qualitative study of a speech language pathology assistant. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39(1):101–8.CrossRefPubMed

Harding KE, Porter J, Horne-Thompson A, Donley E, Taylor NF. Not enough time or a low priority? Barriers to evidence-based practice for allied health clinicians. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. 2014;34(4):224–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.21255 CrossRef

Stephens D, Taylor NF, Leggat SG. Research experience and research interests of allied health professionals. J Allied Health. 2009;38(4):e107–11.PubMed

Harding KE, Stephens D, Taylor NF, Chu E, Wilby A. Development and evaluation of an allied health research training scheme. J Allied Health. 2010;39(4):e143–8.PubMed

Harding K, Lynch L, Porter J. Taylor NF Organisational benefits of a strong research culture in a health service: a systematic review. Aust Health Rev. 2017;41(1):45–53.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Haas R, Sarkies M, Bowles K-A, O'Brien L, Haines T. Early commencement of physical therapy in the acute phase following elective lower limb arthroplasty produces favourable outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis examining allied health service models. Osteoarthritis Cartil. 2016;24(10):1667–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.05.005 CrossRef

11.

Philip K. Allied health: untapped potential in the Australian health system. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39(3):244–7.CrossRefPubMed

12.

Wenke R, Mickan S. The role and impact of research positions within health care settings in allied health: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:355. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-016-1606-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Sackett DL, Rosenberg W, McGray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2. doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Wenke RJ, Mickan S, Bisset L. A cross sectional observational study of research activity of allied health teams: is there a link with self reported success, motivators and barriers to undertaking research? BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:114.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Dizon JMR, Grimmer-Somers KA, Kumar S. Current evidence on evidence-based practice training in allied health: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2012;10:347–60.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Stephens D, Taylor NF, Taylor N, et al. Research experience and research interests of allied health professionals. J Allied Health. 2009;38:e107–11.PubMed

17.

Borkowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchett M, Williams C, Haines T. Research culture in allied health: A systematic review. Aust J Primary Health. 2016;22(4):294–3. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY15122.CrossRef

18.

Rastrick S. AHPs into Action: Using Allied Health Professionals to Transform Health, Care and Wellbeing. 2017. https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/qual-clin-lead/ahp. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

19.

Farmer E, Weston K. A conceptual model for capacity building in Australian primary health care research. Aust Fam Phys. 2002;31(12):1139–42.

20.

Misso ML, Ilic D, Haines TP, Hutchinson AM, East CE, Teede HJ. Development, implementation and evaluation of a clinical research engagement and leadership capacity building program in a large Australian health care service. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0525-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Dimond EP, Germain DS, Nacpil LM, Zaren HA, et al. Creating a “culture of research” in a community hospital: Strategies and tools from the National Cancer Institute Community Cancer Centers Program. Clin Trials. 2015;12(3):246–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774515571141 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Redman S, Turner T, Davies H, Williamson A, et al. The SPIRIT Action Framework: a structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. Soc Sci Med. 2015:147–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.009

23.

NSW Health. A Framework for Building Capacity to Improve Health. Better Health Centre – Publications Warehouse. Locked Mail Bag 5003 Gladesville, NSW 2111. 2001. www.health.nsw.gov.au. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

24.

Hotte N, Simmons L, Beaton K, the LDCP Workgroup. Scoping Review of Evaluation Capacity Building Strategies. Cornwall; 2015. https://www.publichealthontario.ca/en/eRepository/Scoping_Review_Evaluation_Capacity_LDCP_2015.pdf. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

25.

Golenko X, Pager S, Holden L. A thematic analysis of the role of the organisation in building allied health research capacity: a senior managers' perspective. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:276. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-276 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Cooke J. A framework to evaluate research capacity building in health care. BMC Fam Pract. 2005;6:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-44 CrossRef

27.

Holden L, Pager S, Golenko X, Ware RS. Validation of the research capacity and culture (RCC) tool: measuring RCC at individual, team and organisation levels. Aust J Primary Health. 2012;18(1):62–7. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY10081 CrossRef

28.

Hulcombe J, Sturgess J, Souvlis T, Fitzgerald C. An approach to building research capacity for health practitioners in a public health environment: an organisational perspective. Aust Health Rev. 2014;38(3):252–8. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH13066 CrossRefPubMed

29.

Pickstone C, Nancarrow S, Cooke J, Vernon W, Mountain G, Boyce R, Campbell J. Building research capacity in the allied health professions. Evid Policy. 2008;4(1):53–68. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426408783477864.CrossRef

30.

Whitworth A, Haining S, Stringer H. Enhancing research capacity across healthcare and higher education sectors: development and evaluation of an integrated model. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:287. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-287 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

O’Byrne L, Smith S. Models to enhance research capacity and capabilities in clinical nurses: a narrative review. J Clin Nurs. 2011;20(9–10):1365–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03282.x CrossRefPubMed

32.

Segrott J, McIvor M, Green B. Challenges and strategies in developing nursing research capacity: a review of the literature. Intern J Nurs Stud. 2006;43(5):637–51.CrossRef

33.

Gerrish K, Chapman H. Implementing clinical academic careers in nursing: an exemplar of a large healthcare organisation in the United Kingdom. J Res Nurs. 2017;22(3):214–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987116689133.CrossRef

34.

Wenke RJ, Ward EC, Hickman I, Hulcombe J, Phillips R, Mickan S. Allied health research positions: a qualitative evaluation of their impact. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0166-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Skinner EH, Williams CM, Haines TP. Embedding research culture and productivity in hospital physiotherapy departments: Challenges and opportunities. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39(3):312–4.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Probst H, Harris R, McNair HA, Baker A, Miles EA, Beardmore C. Research from therapeutic radiographers: An audit of research capacity within the UK. Radiography. 2015;21(2):112–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2014.10.009.CrossRef

37.

Grange A, Herne S, Casey A, Wordsworth L. Building research capacity. Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2005;12(7):32–7.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Varshney D, Atkins S, Das A, Diwan V. Understanding collaboration in a multi-national research capacity-building partnership: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0132-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Byrne G, Topping A, Kendall S, Golding B. Developing a national mentorship scheme to enhance the contribution of clinical academics to health care. Nurs Res. 2014;22(2):23–8. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.22.2.23.e1288 CrossRef

40.

Cooke J, Nancarrow S, Dyas J, Williams M. An evaluation of the 'Designated Research Team' approach to building research capacity in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-9-37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester: Wiley Online Library; 2011.

42.

Feathersone RM, Dryden DM, Foisy M, Guise JM, Mitchell MD, Paynter RA, Robinson KA, Umscheid CA, Hartling L. Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews. Syst Rev. 2015;4:50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0040-4.CrossRef

43.

Thomas J, Newman M, Oliver S. Rapid evidence assessments of research to inform social policy: taking stock and moving forward. Evid Policy. 2013;9:5–27. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426413X662572.CrossRef

44.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:332–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.CrossRef

45.

Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver SA, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Oxford Dictionary. Theory. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/theory. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

47.

Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Pace R, Pluye P, Bartlett G, Macaulay AC, Salsberg J, Jagosh J, Seller R. Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review. Internat J Nurs Studies. 2012;49(1):47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002 CrossRef

49.

CASP. Critical Skills Appraisal Programme: 10 Questions to Help you Make Sense of Qualitative Research. Milton Keynes: Milton Keynes Primary Care Trust; 2002.

50.

The National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. http://www.nccmt.ca/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

51.

Miles M, Huberman AM, Saldaña J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2014.

52.

Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics in Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1998.

53.

Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.; 2006.

54.

Brennan SE, McKenzie JE, Turner T, Redman S, Makkar S, Williamson A, Haynes A, Green SA. Development and validation of SEER (Seeking, Engaging with and Evaluating Research): a measure of policymakers' capacity to engage with and use research. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017;15:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0162-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Fleisher L, Kornfeld J, Davis S, Morra ME, Squiers L. The NCI's Cancer Information Services Research Continuum Framework: integrating research into cancer education practice (1999-2004). J Cancer Educ. 2007;22:S41–8.CrossRefPubMed

56.

Gullick JG, West SH. Building research capacity and productivity among advanced practice nurses: an evaluation of the Community of Practice model. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(3):605–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12850 CrossRefPubMed

57.

McCance TV, Fitzsimons D, Armstrong NC. Developing a best practice framework to benchmark research and development activity in nursing and midwifery. J Res Nurs. 2006;11(2):160–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987106062839 CrossRef

58.

Makkar SR, Turner T, Williamson A, Louviere J, Redman S, Haynes A, Green S, Brennan S. The development of ORACLe: a measure of an organisation’s capacity to engage in evidence-informed health policy. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-015-0069-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Makkar SR, Brennan S, Turner T, Williamson A, Redman S, Green S. The development of SAGE: A tool to evaluate how policymakers’ engage with and use research in health policymaking. Res Eval. 2016;25(3):315–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv044.CrossRef

60.

Ried K, Farmer EA, Weston KM. Setting directions for capacity building in primary health care: a survey of a research network. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-7-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

62.

The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency. https://www.ahpra.gov.au/. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.

63.

Oliver K, Innvar S, Lorenc T, Woodman J, Thomas J. A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Du Plessis D, Human SP. Opinions on a strategy to promote nurses’ health research contribution in South Africa. Health SA Gesondheid. 2007;12(4):25–35.

65.

Elphinstone RA, Pager S. Untapped potential: Psychologists leading research in clinical practice. Aust Psych. 2015;50(2):115–21.

66.

Friesen EL, Comino EJ. Research culture and capacity in community health services: Results of a structured survey of staff. Aust J Prim Health. 2017;23(2):123–131.

67.

Frontera WR, Fuhrer MJ, Jette AM, Chan L, Cooper RA, Duncan PW, et al. Rehabilitation Medicine Summit: Building Research Capacity: executive summary. Am J Occup Ther. 2006;60(2):165–76.

68.

Janssen J, Hale L, Mirfin-Veitch B, Harland T. Building the research capacity of clinical physical therapists using a participatory action research approach. Phys Ther. 2013;93(7):923–34.

69.

Joss N, Keleher H. Workforce development to embed mental health promotion research and evaluation into organisational practice. Health Prom J Aust. 2005;18(3):255–9.

70.

Judd J, Keleher H. Building health promotion capacity in a primary health care workforce in the Northern Territory: some lessons from practice. Health Prom J Aust. 2013;24(3):163–9.

71.

Moore A, Gosling S, Fitch F. Council for allied health professions research: Collaborative initiative to develop and promote research capacity and influence. Physiother. 2015;101:eS1027–eS1028.

72.

Williams C, Miyazaki K, Borowski D, McKinstry C, Cotchet M, Haines T. Research capacity and culture of the Victorian public health allied health workforce is influenced by key research support staff and location. Aust Health Rev. 2015;39(3):303–11.

Title: Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review
Authors: Susan C. Slade
Kathleen Philip
Meg E. Morris
Publication date: 01-12-2018
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0304-2

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers

Regulatory scientists’ work has important ramifications for public health and should be open to public scrutiny

What adaptation to research is needed following crises: a comparative, qualitative study of the health workforce in Sierra Leone and Nepal

Estimating the returns to United Kingdom publicly funded musculoskeletal disease research in terms of net value of improved health outcomes

Developing the National Knowledge Platform in India: a policy and institutional analysis

The AGING Initiative experience: a call for sustained support for team science networks