Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 4/2014

01-08-2014 | Review Article

The Economic Considerations and Implications of the Stratification of Future Oncology Therapeutics

Authors: Maria Gazouli, Kyriakos Souliotis

Published in: Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy | Issue 4/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Cancer accounts for approximately 13 % of all deaths worldwide. Development of stratification biomarkers, for cancer screening, diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment optimization, is a vital concept to facilitate disease prevention and drug development. The advent of stratified medicine should result in the safer, more effective use of therapeutic drugs to treat cancer, and in reducing the cost associated with inappropriate therapeutic regimens; however, many barriers delay the use of biomarkers in drug development and clinical practice. Since the incorporation of biomarkers in clinical practice might have additional initial costs, the question arises regarding whether the improvement in outcomes is reached at a realistic additional cost. This review presents an overview of economic issues surrounding biomarkers in cancer treatment optimization.
Literature
5.
go back to reference US Congress. Technological change and the growth of health care spending. DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2008. US Congress. Technological change and the growth of health care spending. DC: Congressional Budget Office; 2008.
7.
go back to reference Dienstmann R, Vilar E, Tabernero J. Molecular predictors of response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer J. 2011;17:114–26.PubMedCrossRef Dienstmann R, Vilar E, Tabernero J. Molecular predictors of response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer J. 2011;17:114–26.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wilson CL, Schultz S, Waldman SA. Cancer biomarkers where medicine, business and public policy intersect. Biotechnol Healthc. 2007;4:33–42.PubMedCentralPubMed Wilson CL, Schultz S, Waldman SA. Cancer biomarkers where medicine, business and public policy intersect. Biotechnol Healthc. 2007;4:33–42.PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jaffe CC. Pathology and imaging in biomarker development. MD: NCI; 2001. Jaffe CC. Pathology and imaging in biomarker development. MD: NCI; 2001.
10.
go back to reference Drummond M, McGuire A. Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. Drummond M, McGuire A. Economic evaluation in health care: merging theory with practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
11.
go back to reference Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D, Buxton M, Chalkidou K. Searching for cost effectiveness thresholds in the NHS. Health Policy. 2009;91:239–45.PubMedCrossRef Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D, Buxton M, Chalkidou K. Searching for cost effectiveness thresholds in the NHS. Health Policy. 2009;91:239–45.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nass SJ, Moses HL. Cancer biomarkers: the promises and challenges of improving detection and treatment. DC: The National Academies Press; 2007. Nass SJ, Moses HL. Cancer biomarkers: the promises and challenges of improving detection and treatment. DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
13.
go back to reference Mittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, O’Callaghan CJ, Isogai PK, et al. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1182–92.PubMedCrossRef Mittmann N, Au HJ, Tu D, O’Callaghan CJ, Isogai PK, et al. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1182–92.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference ImClone LLC. Prescribing information for Erbitux. In: Company ELa, editor. Indianapolis: ImClone LLC; 2012. ImClone LLC. Prescribing information for Erbitux. In: Company ELa, editor. Indianapolis: ImClone LLC; 2012.
15.
go back to reference Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, Hamilton SR, Hammond EH, Hayes DF, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–6.PubMedCrossRef Allegra CJ, Jessup JM, Somerfield MR, Hamilton SR, Hammond EH, Hayes DF, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: testing for KRAS gene mutations in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma to predict response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2091–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Behl AS, Goddard KA, Flottemesch TJ, Veenstra D, Meenan RT, Lin JS, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1785–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Behl AS, Goddard KA, Flottemesch TJ, Veenstra D, Meenan RT, Lin JS, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1785–95.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hess LM, Carter G, Smolen L, Bowman L, von Hohnhorst P, Seagle C. Re: cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:djt370.PubMedCrossRef Hess LM, Carter G, Smolen L, Bowman L, von Hohnhorst P, Seagle C. Re: cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for KRAS and BRAF mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106:djt370.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™: colon cancer v2.2010. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology™: colon cancer v2.2010.
20.
go back to reference Vijayaraghavan A, Efrusy MB, Göke B, Kirchner T, Santas CC, Goldberg RM. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:438–45.PubMedCrossRef Vijayaraghavan A, Efrusy MB, Göke B, Kirchner T, Santas CC, Goldberg RM. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:438–45.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Blank PR, Moch H, Szucs TD, Schwenkglenks M. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6338–46.PubMedCrossRef Blank PR, Moch H, Szucs TD, Schwenkglenks M. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:6338–46.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Papagianopoulou V, Christodoulopoulou A, Bracco A, Yfantopoulos I. Estimating the cost saving from the introduction of KRAS testing in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients receiving panitumumab in Greece. Value Health. 2008;11:A464–5.CrossRef Papagianopoulou V, Christodoulopoulou A, Bracco A, Yfantopoulos I. Estimating the cost saving from the introduction of KRAS testing in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients receiving panitumumab in Greece. Value Health. 2008;11:A464–5.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lange A, Prenzler A, Frank M, Kirstein M, Vogel A, von der Schulenburg JM. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:40–9.PubMedCrossRef Lange A, Prenzler A, Frank M, Kirstein M, Vogel A, von der Schulenburg JM. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies for metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:40–9.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Schneider JE, Sidhu MK, Doucet C, Kiss N, Ohsfeldt RL, Chalfin D. Economic of cancer biomarkers. Pers Med. 2012;9:829–37.CrossRef Schneider JE, Sidhu MK, Doucet C, Kiss N, Ohsfeldt RL, Chalfin D. Economic of cancer biomarkers. Pers Med. 2012;9:829–37.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Wong WB, Carlson JJ, Thariani R, Veenstra DL. Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:1001–13.PubMedCrossRef Wong WB, Carlson JJ, Thariani R, Veenstra DL. Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28:1001–13.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Trusheim MR, Berndt ER, Douglas FL. Stratified medicine: strategic and economic implications of combining drugs and clinical biomarkers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:287–93.PubMedCrossRef Trusheim MR, Berndt ER, Douglas FL. Stratified medicine: strategic and economic implications of combining drugs and clinical biomarkers. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:287–93.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ. 1996;313:275–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ. 1996;313:275–83.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Moja L, Tagliabue L, Balduzzi S, Parmelli E, Pistotti V, Guarneri V, et al. Trastuzumab containing regimens for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD006243.PubMed Moja L, Tagliabue L, Balduzzi S, Parmelli E, Pistotti V, Guarneri V, et al. Trastuzumab containing regimens for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;4:CD006243.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Valk PJ, Verhaak RG, Beijen MA, Erpelinck CA, Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Boer JM, et al. Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1617–28.PubMedCrossRef Valk PJ, Verhaak RG, Beijen MA, Erpelinck CA, Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Boer JM, et al. Prognostically useful gene-expression profiles in acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1617–28.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bilcke J, Beutels P, Brisson M, Jit M. Accounting for methodological, structural, and parameter uncertainty in decision-analytic models: a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:675–92.PubMedCrossRef Bilcke J, Beutels P, Brisson M, Jit M. Accounting for methodological, structural, and parameter uncertainty in decision-analytic models: a practical guide. Med Decis Making. 2011;31:675–92.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Payne K, Shabaruddin FH. Cost-effectiveness analysis in pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:643–6.PubMedCrossRef Payne K, Shabaruddin FH. Cost-effectiveness analysis in pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics. 2010;11:643–6.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Soares MO, Bojke L, Dumville J, Iglesias C, Cullum N, Claxton K. Methods to elicit experts’ beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration. Stat Med. 2011;30:2363–80.PubMedCrossRef Soares MO, Bojke L, Dumville J, Iglesias C, Cullum N, Claxton K. Methods to elicit experts’ beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration. Stat Med. 2011;30:2363–80.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Van Bebber SL. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmacogenomic interventions. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:1139–49.PubMedCrossRef Phillips KA, Van Bebber SL. A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses of pharmacogenomic interventions. Pharmacogenomics. 2004;5:1139–49.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Vegter S, Boersma C, Rozenbaum M, Wilffert B, Navis G, Postma MJ. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of pharmacogenetic and genomic screening programmes: a systematic review on content and adherence to guidelines. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:569–87.PubMedCrossRef Vegter S, Boersma C, Rozenbaum M, Wilffert B, Navis G, Postma MJ. Pharmacoeconomic evaluations of pharmacogenetic and genomic screening programmes: a systematic review on content and adherence to guidelines. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26:569–87.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Smith EM. Cancer. In: Wallace RB, editor. Public health and preventive medicine. 15th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008. Dennis LK, Lynch CF, Smith EM. Cancer. In: Wallace RB, editor. Public health and preventive medicine. 15th ed. NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2008.
36.
go back to reference Kumar S, Mohan A, Guleria R. Biomarkers in cancer screening, research and detection: present and future: a review. Biomarkers. 2006;11:385–405.PubMedCrossRef Kumar S, Mohan A, Guleria R. Biomarkers in cancer screening, research and detection: present and future: a review. Biomarkers. 2006;11:385–405.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Phillips KA, Ann Sakowski J, Trosman J, Douglas MP, Liang SY, Neumann P. The economic value of personalized medicine tests: what we know and what we need to know. Genet Med. 2014;16(3):251–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Phillips KA, Ann Sakowski J, Trosman J, Douglas MP, Liang SY, Neumann P. The economic value of personalized medicine tests: what we know and what we need to know. Genet Med. 2014;16(3):251–7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference IJzerman MJ. Is there a need for a comprehensive research program in health economics and personalized medicine? IP12, ISPOR 16th Annual European Congress, Dublin; 2013. IJzerman MJ. Is there a need for a comprehensive research program in health economics and personalized medicine? IP12, ISPOR 16th Annual European Congress, Dublin; 2013.
39.
go back to reference Marshall D. Patient preferences have important implications for determining the value of personalized medicine. IP12, ISPOR 16th Annual European Congress, Dublin; 2013. Marshall D. Patient preferences have important implications for determining the value of personalized medicine. IP12, ISPOR 16th Annual European Congress, Dublin; 2013.
40.
go back to reference Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Hammitt JK, Concannon TW, Auerbach HR, Fang C, Kent DM. Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents. Health Econ. 2012;21:238–51.PubMedCrossRef Neumann PJ, Cohen JT, Hammitt JK, Concannon TW, Auerbach HR, Fang C, Kent DM. Willingness-to-pay for predictive tests with no immediate treatment implications: a survey of US residents. Health Econ. 2012;21:238–51.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Towse A, Garrison L. Economic incentives for evidence generation: promoting an efficient path to personalized medicine. Value Health. 2014;16:S39–43.CrossRef Towse A, Garrison L. Economic incentives for evidence generation: promoting an efficient path to personalized medicine. Value Health. 2014;16:S39–43.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The Economic Considerations and Implications of the Stratification of Future Oncology Therapeutics
Authors
Maria Gazouli
Kyriakos Souliotis
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy / Issue 4/2014
Print ISSN: 1177-1062
Electronic ISSN: 1179-2000
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-014-0102-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2014

Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 4/2014 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.