Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Critical Care 3/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Review

The coming era of precision medicine for intensive care

Author: Jean-Louis Vincent

Published in: Critical Care | Special Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Recent advances in technology and better understanding of mechanisms underlying disease are beginning to enable us to better characterize critically ill patients. Instead of using nonspecific syndromic groupings, such as sepsis or acute respiratory distress syndrome, we can now classify individual patients according to various specific characteristics, such as immune status. This “personalized” medicine approach will enable us to distinguish patients who have similar clinical presentations but different cellular and molecular responses that will influence their need for and responses (both negative and positive) to specific treatments. Treatments will be able to be chosen more accurately for each patient, resulting in more rapid institution of appropriate, effective therapy. We will also increasingly be able to conduct trials in groups of patients specifically selected as being most likely to respond to the intervention in question. This has already begun with, for example, some new interventions being tested only in patients with coagulopathy or immunosuppressive patterns. Ultimately, as we embrace this era of precision medicine, we may be able to offer precision therapies specifically designed to target the molecular set-up of an individual patient, as has begun to be done in cancer therapeutics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vincent JL. We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S534–8.CrossRefPubMed Vincent JL. We should abandon randomized controlled trials in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:S534–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vincent JL. Improved survival in critically ill patients: are large RCTs more useful than personalized medicine? No Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1778–80.CrossRef Vincent JL. Improved survival in critically ill patients: are large RCTs more useful than personalized medicine? No Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1778–80.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cohen J, Vincent JL, Adhikari NK, Machado FR, Angus DC, Calandra T, et al. Sepsis: a roadmap for future research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:581–614.CrossRefPubMed Cohen J, Vincent JL, Adhikari NK, Machado FR, Angus DC, Calandra T, et al. Sepsis: a roadmap for future research. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:581–614.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Man M, Close SL, Shaw AD, Bernard GR, Douglas IS, Kaner RJ, et al. Beyond single-marker analyses: mining whole genome scans for insights into treatment responses in severe sepsis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13:218–26.CrossRefPubMed Man M, Close SL, Shaw AD, Bernard GR, Douglas IS, Kaner RJ, et al. Beyond single-marker analyses: mining whole genome scans for insights into treatment responses in severe sepsis. Pharmacogenomics J. 2013;13:218–26.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709.CrossRefPubMed Bernard GR, Vincent JL, Laterre PF, LaRosa SP, Dhainaut JF, Lopez-Rodriguez A, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:699–709.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shakoory B, Carcillo JA, Chatham WW, Amdur RL, Zhao H, Dinarello CA, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor blockade is associated with reduced mortality in sepsis patients with features of macrophage activation syndrome: reanalysis of a prior phase III trial. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:275–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shakoory B, Carcillo JA, Chatham WW, Amdur RL, Zhao H, Dinarello CA, et al. Interleukin-1 receptor blockade is associated with reduced mortality in sepsis patients with features of macrophage activation syndrome: reanalysis of a prior phase III trial. Crit Care Med. 2016;44:275–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Binnie A, Tsang JL, dos Santos CC. Biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:47–55.CrossRefPubMed Binnie A, Tsang JL, dos Santos CC. Biomarkers in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20:47–55.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference McMahon BA, Koyner JL. Risk stratification for acute kidney injury: are biomarkers enough? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016;23:167–78.CrossRefPubMed McMahon BA, Koyner JL. Risk stratification for acute kidney injury: are biomarkers enough? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016;23:167–78.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gibot S, Bene MC, Noel R, Massin F, Guy J, Cravoisy A, et al. Combination biomarkers to diagnose sepsis in the critically ill patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:65–71.CrossRefPubMed Gibot S, Bene MC, Noel R, Massin F, Guy J, Cravoisy A, et al. Combination biomarkers to diagnose sepsis in the critically ill patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:65–71.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ware LB, Koyama T, Zhao Z, Janz DR, Wickersham N, Bernard GR, et al. Biomarkers of lung epithelial injury and inflammation distinguish severe sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2013;17:R253.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ware LB, Koyama T, Zhao Z, Janz DR, Wickersham N, Bernard GR, et al. Biomarkers of lung epithelial injury and inflammation distinguish severe sepsis patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2013;17:R253.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Langley RJ, Tipper JL, Bruse S, Baron RM, Tsalik EL, Huntley J, et al. Integrative “omic” analysis of experimental bacteremia identifies a metabolic signature that distinguishes human sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndromes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:445–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Langley RJ, Tipper JL, Bruse S, Baron RM, Tsalik EL, Huntley J, et al. Integrative “omic” analysis of experimental bacteremia identifies a metabolic signature that distinguishes human sepsis from systemic inflammatory response syndromes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:445–55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference McHugh L, Seldon TA, Brandon RA, Kirk JT, Rapisarda A, Sutherland AJ, et al. A molecular host response assay to discriminate between sepsis and infection-negative systemic inflammation in critically ill patients: discovery and validation in independent cohorts. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McHugh L, Seldon TA, Brandon RA, Kirk JT, Rapisarda A, Sutherland AJ, et al. A molecular host response assay to discriminate between sepsis and infection-negative systemic inflammation in critically ill patients: discovery and validation in independent cohorts. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001916.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:611–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2014;2:611–20.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Davenport EE, Burnham KL, Radhakrishnan J, Humburg P, Hutton P, Mills TC, et al. Genomic landscape of the individual host response and outcomes in sepsis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:259–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Davenport EE, Burnham KL, Radhakrishnan J, Humburg P, Hutton P, Mills TC, et al. Genomic landscape of the individual host response and outcomes in sepsis: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:259–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Wong HR, Cvijanovich NZ, Anas N, Allen GL, Thomas NJ, Bigham MT, et al. Developing a clinically feasible personalized medicine approach to pediatric septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:309–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wong HR, Cvijanovich NZ, Anas N, Allen GL, Thomas NJ, Bigham MT, et al. Developing a clinically feasible personalized medicine approach to pediatric septic shock. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:309–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Vincent JL. Individual gene expression and personalised medicine in sepsis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:242–3.CrossRefPubMed Vincent JL. Individual gene expression and personalised medicine in sepsis. Lancet Respir Med. 2016;4:242–3.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Dzau VJ, Ginsburg GS. Realizing the full potential of precision medicine in health and health care. JAMA. 2016;316:1659–60.CrossRefPubMed Dzau VJ, Ginsburg GS. Realizing the full potential of precision medicine in health and health care. JAMA. 2016;316:1659–60.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ahasic AM, Christiani DC. Personalized critical care medicine: how far away are we? Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:809–22.CrossRefPubMed Ahasic AM, Christiani DC. Personalized critical care medicine: how far away are we? Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:809–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference MacKenzie M, Hall R. Pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics for the intensive care unit: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64:45–64.CrossRefPubMed MacKenzie M, Hall R. Pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics for the intensive care unit: a narrative review. Can J Anaesth. 2017;64:45–64.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The coming era of precision medicine for intensive care
Author
Jean-Louis Vincent
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Critical Care / Issue Special Issue 3/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1364-8535
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1910-z

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2017

Critical Care 3/2017 Go to the issue