Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2/2017

Open Access 01-04-2017 | Practical Application

Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)

Authors: Maarten de Wit, John R. Kirwan, Peter Tugwell, Dorcas Beaton, Maarten Boers, Peter Brooks, Sarah Collins, Philip G. Conaghan, Maria-Antonietta D’Agostino, Cathie Hofstetter, Rod Hughes, Amye Leong, Ann Lyddiatt, Lyn March, James May, Pamela Montie, Pamela Richards, Lee S. Simon, Jasvinder A. Singh, Vibeke Strand, Marieke Voshaar, Clifton O. Bingham III, Laure Gossec

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

There is increasing interest in making patient participation an integral component of medical research. However, practical guidance on optimizing this engagement in healthcare is scarce. Since 2002, patient involvement has been one of the key features of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) international consensus effort. Based on a review of cumulative data from qualitative studies and internal surveys among OMERACT participants, we explored the potential benefits and challenges of involving patient research partners in conferences and working group activities. We supplemented our review with personal experiences and reflections regarding patient participation in the OMERACT process. We found that between 2002 and 2016, 67 patients have attended OMERACT conferences, of whom 28 had sustained involvement; many other patients contributed to OMERACT working groups. Their participation provided face validity to the OMERACT process and expanded the research agenda. Essential facilitators have been the financial commitment to guarantee sustainable involvement of patients at these conferences, procedures for recruitment, selection and support, and dedicated time allocated in the program for patient issues. Current challenges include the representativeness of the patient panel, risk of pseudo-professionalization, and disparity in patients’ and researchers’ perception of involvement. In conclusion, OMERACT has embedded long-term patient involvement in the consensus-building process on the measurement of core health outcomes. This integrative process continues to evolve iteratively. We believe that the practical points raised here can improve participatory research implementation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Haywood KL, Brett J, Tutton L. Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution. Patient. 2012;5:79–87.CrossRefPubMed Staniszewska S, Haywood KL, Brett J, Tutton L. Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution. Patient. 2012;5:79–87.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Wright MT, Roche B, von Unger H, Block M, Gardner B. A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health. Health Promot Int. 2010;25:115–22.CrossRefPubMed Wright MT, Roche B, von Unger H, Block M, Gardner B. A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health. Health Promot Int. 2010;25:115–22.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Slager M, Tritter JQ. Exchanging knowledge on participation by EU health consumers and patients in research, quality and policy [conference report]. Health Expect. 2013;16:128–9.CrossRef Slager M, Tritter JQ. Exchanging knowledge on participation by EU health consumers and patients in research, quality and policy [conference report]. Health Expect. 2013;16:128–9.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7:387–95.CrossRefPubMed Brett J, Staniszewska S, Mockford C, Herron-Marx S, Hughes J, Tysall C, et al. A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities. Patient. 2014;7:387–95.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA. 2014;312:1513–4.CrossRefPubMed Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV. The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA. 2014;312:1513–4.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Miller JL, Teare SR, Marlett N, Shklarov S, Marshall DA. Support for living a meaningful life with osteoarthritis: a patient-to-patient research study. Patient. 2016;9(5):457–64.CrossRefPubMed Miller JL, Teare SR, Marlett N, Shklarov S, Marshall DA. Support for living a meaningful life with osteoarthritis: a patient-to-patient research study. Patient. 2016;9(5):457–64.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, Heiberg T, Leong A, Judd M, et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect. 2005;8:352–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shea B, Santesso N, Qualman A, Heiberg T, Leong A, Judd M, et al. Consumer-driven health care: building partnerships in research. Health Expect. 2005;8:352–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference de Wit MP, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Croucher L, et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:722–6.CrossRefPubMed de Wit MP, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Croucher L, et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:722–6.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cheung PP, de Wit M, Bingham CO 3rd, Kirwan JR, Leong A, March LM, et al. Recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP. J Rheumatol 2016;43:187–93. Cheung PP, de Wit M, Bingham CO 3rd, Kirwan JR, Leong A, March LM, et al. Recommendations for the involvement of patient research partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP. J Rheumatol 2016;43:187–93.
14.
go back to reference de Wit MPT, Campbell W, Orbai AM, Tillett W, FitzGerald O, Gladman D, et al. Building bridges between researchers and patient research partners: a report from the GRAPPA 2014 annual meeting. J Rheumatol. 2015;42:1021–6.CrossRef de Wit MPT, Campbell W, Orbai AM, Tillett W, FitzGerald O, Gladman D, et al. Building bridges between researchers and patient research partners: a report from the GRAPPA 2014 annual meeting. J Rheumatol. 2015;42:1021–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kiltz U, van der Heijde D, Mielants H, Feldtkeller E, Braun J. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: the patient version. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1381–6.CrossRefPubMed Kiltz U, van der Heijde D, Mielants H, Feldtkeller E, Braun J. ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis: the patient version. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:1381–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kjeken I, Ziegler C, Skrolsvik J, Bagge J, Smedslund G, Tøvik A, et al. Research priorities, attitudes and experiences among individuals with rheumatic diseases in Scandinavia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:793. Kjeken I, Ziegler C, Skrolsvik J, Bagge J, Smedslund G, Tøvik A, et al. Research priorities, attitudes and experiences among individuals with rheumatic diseases in Scandinavia. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:793.
17.
go back to reference de Wit MP, Elberse JE, Broerse JE, Abma TA. Do not forget the professional - the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research. Health Expect. 2015;18:489–503.CrossRefPubMed de Wit MP, Elberse JE, Broerse JE, Abma TA. Do not forget the professional - the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research. Health Expect. 2015;18:489–503.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference De Wit M, Kvien T, Gossec L. Patient participation as an integral part of patient reported outcomes development guarantees the representativeness of the patient voice—a case-study from the field of rheumatology. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000129.PubMedPubMedCentral De Wit M, Kvien T, Gossec L. Patient participation as an integral part of patient reported outcomes development guarantees the representativeness of the patient voice—a case-study from the field of rheumatology. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000129.PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:13–21.CrossRefPubMed Forsythe LP, Ellis LE, Edmundson L, Sabharwal R, Rein A, Konopka K, et al. Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learned. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:13–21.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kirwan J, de Wit MPT. What have we learned from a decade of patient involvement in OMERACT and its effect on trial outcome assessments? Trials. 2011;12(suppl 1):A80.CrossRefPubMedCentral Kirwan J, de Wit MPT. What have we learned from a decade of patient involvement in OMERACT and its effect on trial outcome assessments? Trials. 2011;12(suppl 1):A80.CrossRefPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference de Wit MPT, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, Collins S, Abma TA, Kirwan JR. “If I wasn’t this robust”: patients’ expectations and experiences at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Conference 2010. Patient. 2013;6:179–87. de Wit MPT, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, Collins S, Abma TA, Kirwan JR. “If I wasn’t this robust”: patients’ expectations and experiences at the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Conference 2010. Patient. 2013;6:179–87.
24.
go back to reference de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open. 2013;3. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002241. de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open. 2013;3. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2012-002241.
25.
go back to reference Boers M, Tugwell P, Felson DT, van Riel PL, Kirwan JR, Edmonds JP, et al. World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology core endpoints for symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1994;41:86–9.PubMed Boers M, Tugwell P, Felson DT, van Riel PL, Kirwan JR, Edmonds JP, et al. World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology core endpoints for symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol Suppl. 1994;41:86–9.PubMed
26.
go back to reference Wells G, Anderson J, Beaton D, Bellamy N, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:452–4.PubMed Wells G, Anderson J, Beaton D, Bellamy N, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda. J Rheumatol. 2001;28:452–4.PubMed
27.
go back to reference de Wit MP, Abma TA, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, Collins S, Kirwan J. What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT? J Rheumatol. 2014;41:177–84.CrossRefPubMed de Wit MP, Abma TA, Koelewijn-van Loon MS, Collins S, Kirwan J. What has been the effect on trial outcome assessments of a decade of patient participation in OMERACT? J Rheumatol. 2014;41:177–84.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Hewlett SA. Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:877–9.PubMed Hewlett SA. Patients and clinicians have different perspectives on outcomes in arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:877–9.PubMed
29.
go back to reference de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-Van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences–lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-Van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences–lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e003311.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Flurey CA, Kirwan JR, Hadridge P, Richards P, Grosskleg S, Tugwell PS. The spirit of OMERACT: Q methodology analysis of conference characteristics valued by delegates. J Rheumatol. 2015. doi:10.3899/jrheum.150113. Flurey CA, Kirwan JR, Hadridge P, Richards P, Grosskleg S, Tugwell PS. The spirit of OMERACT: Q methodology analysis of conference characteristics valued by delegates. J Rheumatol. 2015. doi:10.​3899/​jrheum.​150113.
31.
go back to reference Gossec L, Kirwan J, de Wit MPT. Patient perspective in outcome measures developed by OMERACT. Indian J Rheumatol. 2013;8:17–22.CrossRef Gossec L, Kirwan J, de Wit MPT. Patient perspective in outcome measures developed by OMERACT. Indian J Rheumatol. 2013;8:17–22.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hewlett S, De Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:676–80.CrossRefPubMed Hewlett S, De Wit M, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, et al. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;55:676–80.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:28–38.CrossRefPubMed Mockford C, Staniszewska S, Griffiths F, Herron-Marx S. The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care. 2012;24:28–38.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Lindenmeyer A, Hearnshaw H, Sturt J, Ormerod R, Aitchison G. Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study. Health Expect. 2007;10:268–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lindenmeyer A, Hearnshaw H, Sturt J, Ormerod R, Aitchison G. Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care Research User Group: a qualitative case study. Health Expect. 2007;10:268–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Bingham CO 3rd, Alten R, de Wit MP. The importance of patient participation in measuring rheumatoid arthritis flares. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1107–9.CrossRefPubMed Bingham CO 3rd, Alten R, de Wit MP. The importance of patient participation in measuring rheumatoid arthritis flares. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:1107–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hewlett S, Dures E, Almeida C. Measures of fatigue: Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF MDQ), Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Numerical Rating Scales (BRAF NRS) for Severity, Effect, and Coping, Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ), Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20R and CIS8R), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy (Fatigue) (FACIT-F), Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF), Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), Pediatric Quality Of Life (PedsQL) Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Scale, Profile of Fatigue (ProF), Short Form 36 Vitality Subscale (SF-36 VT), and Visual Analog Scales (VAS). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S263–86.CrossRef Hewlett S, Dures E, Almeida C. Measures of fatigue: Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional Questionnaire (BRAF MDQ), Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Numerical Rating Scales (BRAF NRS) for Severity, Effect, and Coping, Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire (CFQ), Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20R and CIS8R), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy (Fatigue) (FACIT-F), Multi-Dimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF), Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI), Pediatric Quality Of Life (PedsQL) Multi-Dimensional Fatigue Scale, Profile of Fatigue (ProF), Short Form 36 Vitality Subscale (SF-36 VT), and Visual Analog Scales (VAS). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(Suppl 11):S263–86.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1371–7.CrossRefPubMed Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, et al. Reporting disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: EULAR/ACR collaborative recommendations. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1371–7.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Khan NA, Spencer HJ, Abda E, Aggarwal A, Alten R, Ancuta C, et al. Determinants of discordance in patients’ and physicians’ rating of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:206–14.CrossRef Khan NA, Spencer HJ, Abda E, Aggarwal A, Alten R, Ancuta C, et al. Determinants of discordance in patients’ and physicians’ rating of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64:206–14.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Bykerk VP, Lie E, Bartlett SJ, Alten R, Boonen A, Christensen R, et al. Establishing a core domain set to measure rheumatoid arthritis flares: report of the OMERACT 11 RA flare Workshop. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:799–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bykerk VP, Lie E, Bartlett SJ, Alten R, Boonen A, Christensen R, et al. Establishing a core domain set to measure rheumatoid arthritis flares: report of the OMERACT 11 RA flare Workshop. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:799–809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Jinks C, Carter PE, Rhodes C, Beech R, Dziedzic K, Hughes R, et al. Sustaining patient and public involvement in research: a case study of a research centre. J Care Serv Manag. 2013;7:146–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jinks C, Carter PE, Rhodes C, Beech R, Dziedzic K, Hughes R, et al. Sustaining patient and public involvement in research: a case study of a research centre. J Care Serv Manag. 2013;7:146–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:391–9.CrossRefPubMed Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2011;27:391–9.CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, van de Griendt J, Abma TA. Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expect. 2012;15:242–54.CrossRefPubMed Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, van de Griendt J, Abma TA. Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expect. 2012;15:242–54.CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Abma TA, Nierse C, Widdershoven G. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res. 2009;19:401–15.CrossRefPubMed Abma TA, Nierse C, Widdershoven G. Patients as partners in responsive research: methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research teams. Qual Health Res. 2009;19:401–15.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1033–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Frank L, Forsythe L, Ellis L, Schrandt S, Sheridan S, Gerson J, et al. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1033–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
go back to reference Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative: its role in improving Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:ED000041. Williamson P, Clarke M. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative: its role in improving Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;5:ED000041.
47.
go back to reference Haywood K, Brett J, Salek S, Marlett N, Penman C, Shklarov S, et al. Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1069–76. doi:10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3.CrossRefPubMed Haywood K, Brett J, Salek S, Marlett N, Penman C, Shklarov S, et al. Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(5):1069–76. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-014-0796-3.CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Kirwan JR, Bartlett SJ, Beaton DE, Boers M, Bosworth A, Brooks PM, et al. Updating the OMERACT filter: implications for patient-reported outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:1011–5. Kirwan JR, Bartlett SJ, Beaton DE, Boers M, Bosworth A, Brooks PM, et al. Updating the OMERACT filter: implications for patient-reported outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:1011–5.
49.
go back to reference Kirwan JR, Fries JF, Hewlett SE, Osborne RH, Newman S, Ciciriello S, et al. Patient perspective workshop: moving towards OMERACT guidelines for choosing or developing instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1711–5.CrossRefPubMed Kirwan JR, Fries JF, Hewlett SE, Osborne RH, Newman S, Ciciriello S, et al. Patient perspective workshop: moving towards OMERACT guidelines for choosing or developing instruments to measure patient-reported outcomes. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1711–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Successful Stepwise Development of Patient Research Partnership: 14 Years’ Experience of Actions and Consequences in Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT)
Authors
Maarten de Wit
John R. Kirwan
Peter Tugwell
Dorcas Beaton
Maarten Boers
Peter Brooks
Sarah Collins
Philip G. Conaghan
Maria-Antonietta D’Agostino
Cathie Hofstetter
Rod Hughes
Amye Leong
Ann Lyddiatt
Lyn March
James May
Pamela Montie
Pamela Richards
Lee S. Simon
Jasvinder A. Singh
Vibeke Strand
Marieke Voshaar
Clifton O. Bingham III
Laure Gossec
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0198-4

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.