Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Current Opinion

Big Data: Will It Improve Patient-Centered Care?

Author: Denzil G. Fiebig

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Within a generation, empirical researchers have experienced unprecedented increases in the availability of data. ‘Big data’ has arrived with considerable hype and a sense that these are dramatic shifts in the research environment that have wide-reaching implications across many disciplines. There is no doubt that the analysis of new and varied sources of data currently available to researchers in health have the potential to better measure, monitor and describe health outcomes of patients and to uncover interesting patterns in how patients respond to treatments and interact with the health system. What is less clear is whether answers are readily available to more nuanced and substantive research questions. Here, the data-rich environment needs to be complemented by considerable research effort developing novel research designs and generating new and improved methods of analysis. Importantly, this will require researchers to be able to combine data from multiple sources and to be pro-active in data collection.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Griliches Z. Economic data issues. In: Griliches Z, Intriligator MD, editors. Handbook of econometrics. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1986. Griliches Z. Economic data issues. In: Griliches Z, Intriligator MD, editors. Handbook of econometrics. Amsterdam: North Holland; 1986.
4.
go back to reference Coale AJ, Stephan FF. The case of the Indians and the teen-age widows. J Am Stat Assoc. 1962;57(298):338–47.CrossRefPubMed Coale AJ, Stephan FF. The case of the Indians and the teen-age widows. J Am Stat Assoc. 1962;57(298):338–47.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ellis RP, Fiebig DG, Johar M, Jones G, Savage E. Explaining health care expenditure: large-sample evidence using linked survey and health administrative data. Health Econ. 2013;22:1093–110.CrossRefPubMed Ellis RP, Fiebig DG, Johar M, Jones G, Savage E. Explaining health care expenditure: large-sample evidence using linked survey and health administrative data. Health Econ. 2013;22:1093–110.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Doiron D, Fiebig DG, Suziedelyte A. Hips and hearts: the variation in incentive effects of insurance across hospital procedures. J Health Econ. 2014;37:81–97.CrossRefPubMed Doiron D, Fiebig DG, Suziedelyte A. Hips and hearts: the variation in incentive effects of insurance across hospital procedures. J Health Econ. 2014;37:81–97.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Suziedelyte A. How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals’ demand for health care services? Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1828–35.CrossRefPubMed Suziedelyte A. How does searching for health information on the Internet affect individuals’ demand for health care services? Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1828–35.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Levitt SD, List JA, Neckermann S, Nelson D. Quantity discounts on a virtual good: the results of a massive pricing experiment at King Digital Entertainment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(27):7323–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Levitt SD, List JA, Neckermann S, Nelson D. Quantity discounts on a virtual good: the results of a massive pricing experiment at King Digital Entertainment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(27):7323–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Currie J. ‘Big data’ versus ‘big brother’: on the appropriate use of large-scale data collections in paediatrics. Pediatrics. 2015;131:S127–32.CrossRef Currie J. ‘Big data’ versus ‘big brother’: on the appropriate use of large-scale data collections in paediatrics. Pediatrics. 2015;131:S127–32.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Keller SA, Shipp S, Schroeder A. Does big data change the privacy landscape? A review of the issues. Ann Rev Stat Appl. 2016;3:161–80.CrossRef Keller SA, Shipp S, Schroeder A. Does big data change the privacy landscape? A review of the issues. Ann Rev Stat Appl. 2016;3:161–80.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Lundy JJ, O’Donohoe P, O’Gorman H, Malizia W. Capturing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data electronically: the past, present, and promise of ePRO measurement in clinical trials. Patient. 2015;8:301–9.CrossRefPubMed Coons SJ, Eremenco S, Lundy JJ, O’Donohoe P, O’Gorman H, Malizia W. Capturing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data electronically: the past, present, and promise of ePRO measurement in clinical trials. Patient. 2015;8:301–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Koulayev S, Simeonova E, Skipper N. Can physicians affect patient adherence with medication. Health Econ. doi:10.1002/hec.3357. [Epub 16 June 2016]. Koulayev S, Simeonova E, Skipper N. Can physicians affect patient adherence with medication. Health Econ. doi:10.​1002/​hec.​3357. [Epub 16 June 2016].
16.
go back to reference Finkelstein A, Taubman S, Wright B, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse JP, Allen H, Baicker K, Oregon Health Study Group. The Oregon health insurance experiment: evidence from the first year. Q J Econ. 2012;127(3):1057–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Finkelstein A, Taubman S, Wright B, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse JP, Allen H, Baicker K, Oregon Health Study Group. The Oregon health insurance experiment: evidence from the first year. Q J Econ. 2012;127(3):1057–106.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Baicker K, Taubman S, Allen H, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse JP, Schneider E, Wright B, Zaslavsky A, Finkelstein A, Oregon Health Study Group. The Oregon experiment: effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(18):1713–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baicker K, Taubman S, Allen H, Bernstein M, Gruber J, Newhouse JP, Schneider E, Wright B, Zaslavsky A, Finkelstein A, Oregon Health Study Group. The Oregon experiment: effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(18):1713–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Nordin M, Dackehag M, Gerdtham UG. Socioeconomic inequalities in drug utilization for Sweden: evidence for linked survey and register data. Soc Sci Med. 2013;77:106–17.CrossRefPubMed Nordin M, Dackehag M, Gerdtham UG. Socioeconomic inequalities in drug utilization for Sweden: evidence for linked survey and register data. Soc Sci Med. 2013;77:106–17.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kesternich I, Heiss F, McFadden D, Winter J. Suit the action to the word, the word to the action: hypothetical choices and real decisions in Medicare Part D. J Health Econ. 2013;32:1313–24.CrossRefPubMed Kesternich I, Heiss F, McFadden D, Winter J. Suit the action to the word, the word to the action: hypothetical choices and real decisions in Medicare Part D. J Health Econ. 2013;32:1313–24.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Fiebig DG, Knox SA, Viney R, Haas M, Street D. Preferences for new and existing contraception products. Health Econ. 2011;20(S1):35–52.CrossRefPubMed Fiebig DG, Knox SA, Viney R, Haas M, Street D. Preferences for new and existing contraception products. Health Econ. 2011;20(S1):35–52.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference King MT, Hall JP, Lancsar EJ, Fiebig DG, Hossain I, Louviere JJ, Reddell HK, Jenkins CR. Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2007;16:703–17.CrossRefPubMed King MT, Hall JP, Lancsar EJ, Fiebig DG, Hossain I, Louviere JJ, Reddell HK, Jenkins CR. Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ. 2007;16:703–17.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Benning TM, Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Boersma LJ, Dellaert BGC. Combining individual-level discrete choice experiment estimates and costs to inform health care management decisions about customized care: the case of follow-up strategies after breast cancer treatment. Value Health. 2012;15:680–9.CrossRefPubMed Benning TM, Kimman ML, Dirksen CD, Boersma LJ, Dellaert BGC. Combining individual-level discrete choice experiment estimates and costs to inform health care management decisions about customized care: the case of follow-up strategies after breast cancer treatment. Value Health. 2012;15:680–9.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Joyce C, Scott A, Jeon S, Humphreys J, Kalb G, Witt J, Leahy A. The ‘Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL)’ longitudinal survey: protocol and baseline data for a prospective cohort study of Australian doctors’ workforce participation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:10–50.CrossRef Joyce C, Scott A, Jeon S, Humphreys J, Kalb G, Witt J, Leahy A. The ‘Medicine in Australia: Balancing Employment and Life (MABEL)’ longitudinal survey: protocol and baseline data for a prospective cohort study of Australian doctors’ workforce participation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:10–50.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2011.
Metadata
Title
Big Data: Will It Improve Patient-Centered Care?
Author
Denzil G. Fiebig
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0201-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 2/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.