Top

Published in:

27-07-2023 | Sleeve Gastrectomy | 2023 SAGES Oral

Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety

Authors: Juan S. Barajas-Gamboa, Soon Moon, Gustavo Romero-Velez, Andrew T. Strong, Matthew Allemang, Salvador Navarrete, Ricard Corcelles, John Rodriguez, Matthew Kroh, Jerry T. Dang

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 11/2023

Abstract

Background

Conversion from sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass (SADI) is becoming increasingly common, but data regarding safety is of these conversions is scarce. As such, the objective of this study was to compare the 30-day rate of serious complications and mortality of primary SADI (p-SADI-S) with SG to SADI (SG-SADI) conversions.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed the MBSAQIP database. Patients undergoing p-SADI-S and SG-SADI were included. Data collection was limited to 2020 and 2021. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed between groups to determine if SG-SADI was an independent predictor of 30-day serious complications or mortality.

Results

A total of 783 patients were included in this study, 488 (62.3%) underwent p-SADI-S and 295 (37.6%) underwent SG-SADI. The mean body mass index (BMI) at the time of surgery was lower in the SG-SADI cohort (45.1 vs 51.4 kg/m², p < 0.001). Indications for revision in the SG-SADI cohort included weight recurrence (50.8%), inadequate weight loss (41.0%), other (3.0%), GERD (2.7%), and persistent comorbidities (2.5%). SG-SADI had longer operative times (156.7 vs 142.1 min, p < 0.001) and was not associated with a higher rate of serious complications (5.7 vs 6.9%, p = 0.508) compared to p-SADI-S. p-SADI-S was associated with a higher rate of pneumonia (1.2 vs 0.0%, p < 0.001), and SG-SADI was not correlated with higher rates of reoperation (3.0 vs 3.2%, p = 0.861), readmission (5.4 vs 5.5%, p = 0.948) and death (0.0 vs 0.2%, p = 0.437). On multivariable analysis, SG-SADI was not independently predictive of serious complications (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.52, p = 0.514) when adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities, and operative time.

Conclusions

The prevalence of SG-SADI is high, representing 37.6% of SADI-S procedures. Conversion from sleeve to SADI, is safe, and as opposed to other studies of revisional bariatric surgery, has similar 30-day complication rates to primary SADI-S.

Admella V, Lazzara C, Sobrino L, Acrich E, Biondo S, Pujol-Gebellí J, Osorio J (2023) Patient-reported outcomes and quality of life after single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a cross-sectional study with 283 patients from a single institution. Obes Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06554-xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tat C, Del Gobbo GD, Klingler M, Corcelles R (2020) How I do it: robotic single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADIS). J Gastrointest Surg 24(12):2893–2895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04789-yCrossRefPubMed

Marincola G, Velluti V, Voloudakis N, Gallucci P, Ciccoritti L, Greco F, Sessa L, Salvi G, Iaconelli A, Aquilanti B, Guidone C, Capristo E, Mingrone G, Pennestrì F, Raffaelli M (2023) Medium-term nutritional and metabolic outcome of single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Nutrients 15(3):742. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15030742CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rao R, Mehta M, Sheth DR, Hogan G (2023) Four-year nutritional outcomes in single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy patients: an Australian experience. Obes Surg 33(3):750–760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06461-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Admella V, Osorio J, Sorribas M, Sobrino L, Casajoana A, Pujol-Gebellí J (2021) Direct and two-step single anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S): unicentric comparative analysis of 232 cases. Cir Esp 99(7):514–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.017CrossRefPubMed

Surve A, Cottam D, Medlin W, Richards C, Belnap L, Horsley B, Cottam S, Cottam A (2020) Long-term outcomes of primary single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Surg Obes Relat Dis 16(11):1638–1646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.07.019CrossRefPubMed

Andalib A, Bouchard P, Alamri H, Bougie A, Demyttenaere S, Court O (2021) Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): short-term outcomes from a prospective cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 17(2):414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2020.09.015CrossRefPubMed

Zaveri H, Surve A, Cottam D, Cottam A, Medlin W, Richards C, Belnap L, Cottam S, Horsley B (2018) Mid-term 4-year outcomes with single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy surgery at a single US center. Obes Surg 28(10):3062–3072. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3358-xCrossRefPubMed

Pennestrì F, Sessa L, Prioli F, Salvi G, Gallucci P, Ciccoritti L, Greco F, De Crea C, Raffaelli M (2022) Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): experience from a high-bariatric volume center. Langenbecks Arch Surg 407(5):1851–1862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02501-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MÁR, Ferré NP, Rodríguez CS, Marcuello C, Pañella C, Antoñanzas LL, Torres A, Pérez-Aguirre E (2022) Long-term results of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg 32(3):682–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05879-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Zalasky A, Dang J, Kung JY, Switzer NJ, Birch DW, Karmali S (2022) Evaluation of metabolic outcomes following SADI-S: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 32(4):1049–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05824-wCrossRefPubMed

12.

Wang L, Wuyun Q, Du D, Sang Q, Zheng X, Lian D, Zhang N (2021) Primary SADI-S in Chinese with diabetes and BMI < 35 kg/m²: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Obes Surg 31(7):3116–3122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05371-4CrossRefPubMed

13.

Spinos D, Skarentzos K, Esagian SM, Seymour KA, Economopoulos KP (2021) The effectiveness of single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS): an updated systematic review. Obes Surg 31(4):1790–1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05188-7CrossRefPubMed

14.

Yashkov Y, Bordan N, Torres A, Malykhina A, Bekuzarov D (2021) SADI-S 250 vs. Roux-en-Y Duodenal switch (RY-DS): results of 5-year observational study. Obes Surg 31(2):570–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05031-zCrossRefPubMed

15.

Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Jogiat U, Forbes H, Switzer NJ, Birch DW, Karmali S (2022) Patient selection and 30-day outcomes of SADI-S compared to RYGB: a retrospective cohort study of 47,375 patients. Obes Surg 32(7):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06068-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Clapp B, Mosleh KA, Corbett J, Hage K, Moore RL, Billy H, Ponce J, Ghanem OM (2023) One anastomosis gastric bypass versus single anastomosis duodenoileostomy with sleeve: comparative analysis of 30-day outcomes using the MBSAQIP. Obes Surg 33(3):720–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06452-2CrossRefPubMed

17.

Clapp B, Corbett J, Jordan M, Portela R, Ghanem OM (2023) Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve in the United States: a first comparative safety analysis of the metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis 19(1):11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.08.016CrossRefPubMed

18.

Robert M, Poghosyan T, Delaunay D, Pelascini E, Iceta S, Sterkers A, Barsamian C, Khamphommala L, Bin Dorel S, Maucort-Boulch D, Czernichow S, Disse E (2020) Prospective multicentre randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB): SADISLEEVE study protocol. BMJ Open 10(9):e037576. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037576CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Surve A, Cottam D, Richards C, Medlin W, Belnap L (2021) A matched cohort comparison of long-term outcomes of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus single-anastomosis duodeno-ileostomy with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). Obes Surg 31(4):1438–1448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05131-wCrossRefPubMed

20.

Gebellí JP, Lazzara C, de Gordejuela AGR, Nora M, Pereira AM, Sánchez-Pernaute A, Osorio J, Sobrino L, García AJT (2022) Duodenal switch vs. single-anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S) for the treatment of grade IV obesity: 5-year outcomes of a multicenter prospective cohort comparative study. Obes Surg 32(12):3839–3846. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06317-0CrossRef

21.

Qudah Y, Alhareb A, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Del Gobbo GD, Rodriguez J, Kroh M, Corcelles R (2022) Robotic revisional single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass after sleeve gastrectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 32(10):1027–1031. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0470CrossRef

22.

Finno P, Osorio J, García-Ruiz-de-Gordejuela A, Casajoana A, Sorribas M, Admella V, Serrano M, Marchesini JB, Ramos AC, Pujol-Gebellí J (2020) Single versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch: single-site comparative cohort study in 440 consecutive patients. Obes Surg 30(9):3309–3316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04566-5CrossRefPubMed

23.

Nakanishi H, Matar RH, Vahibe A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Galvani C, Pullatt R, Davis SS Jr, Clapp B, Ghanem OM (2022) Single versus double anastomosis duodenal switch in the management of obesity: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutaneous Tech 32(5):595–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001102CrossRef

24.

Vilallonga R, Nedelcu A, Cirera de Tudela A, Palermo M, Pérez-Aguirre E, Josa-Martínez BM, Armengol Carrasco M, Noel P, Torres A, Nedelcu M (2021) Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass as a revisional procedure following sleeve gastrectomy: review of the literature. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0511CrossRefPubMed

25.

Dijkhorst PJ, Al Nawas M, Heusschen L, Hazebroek EJ, Swank DJ, Wiezer RMJ, Aarts EO (2021) Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass after failed sleeve gastrectomy: medium-term outcomes. Obes Surg 31(11):4708–4716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05609-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, Gong F, Wu A, Dong G (2018) Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 14(11):1686–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2018.08.008CrossRefPubMed

27.

Osorio J, Lazzara C, Admella V, Franci-León S, Pujol-Gebellí J (2021) Revisional laparoscopic SADI-S vs. duodenal switch following failed primary sleeve gastrectomy: a single-center comparison of 101 consecutive cases. Obes Surg 31(8):3667–3674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05469-9CrossRefPubMed

28.

Moon RC, Alkhairi L, Wier AJ, Teixeira AF, Jawad MA (2020) Conversions of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to duodenal switch (SADI-S and BPD-DS) for weight regain. Surg Endosc 34(10):4422–4428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07219-6CrossRefPubMed

Title: Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety
Authors: Juan S. Barajas-Gamboa
Soon Moon
Gustavo Romero-Velez
Andrew T. Strong
Matthew Allemang
Salvador Navarrete
Ricard Corcelles
John Rodriguez
Matthew Kroh
Jerry T. Dang
Publication date: 27-07-2023
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Sleeve Gastrectomy
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Bariatric Surgery
Bariatric Surgery
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 11/2023
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10305-5

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Primary single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) versus sleeve gastrectomy to SADI conversions: a comparison study of prevalence and safety

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 11/2023

Laparoscopic dissection around the superior mesenteric artery by left posterior approach during pancreaticoduodenectomy

Association of clinical characteristics and recurrence of conventional colorectal adenomas with patient age: a single-center study

Skill transference and learning curves in novice learners: a randomized comparison of robotic and laparoscopic platforms

Endoscopic therapies for patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Survival analysis of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors based on the SEER database: a population-based study

Risk factors and natural history of bedside percutaneous endoscopic versus fluoroscopy-guided gastrostomy tubes in intensive care unit patients