Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Obesity Surgery 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Obesity | Original Contributions

SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y Duodenal Switch (RY-DS): Results of 5-Year Observational Study

Authors: Yury Yashkov, Natalya Bordan, Antonio Torres, Alexandra Malykhina, Dmitry Bekuzarov

Published in: Obesity Surgery | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There are only a small number of studies providing a comparison between SADI-S and Hess-Marceau’s BPD/Duodenal Switch (RY-DS) operations. We aimed to compare 5-year results of SADI-S 250 (common limb 250 cm) with RY-DS.

Material and Methods

Data of patients who underwent open SADI-S (n 226) and RY-DS (n 528) were retrospectively studied. EWL(%), EBMIL(%), TWL(%), antidiabetic effect, complications, and revision rate were compared between the two groups.

Results

After the first 12 months, EWL% (77.0% vs 73.3%) and TWL% (39.4% vs 38.9%) were statistically significantly better after SADI-S (p < 0.01, and p < 0.05 respectively), but not EBMIL% (p > 0.05). At nadir to 24–36 months, EWL, TBWL, and EBMIL after SADI-S was comparable to the RY-DS group. Up to the fourth and fifth year, better weight loss (TBWL, EBMIL, EWL) was observed after RY-DS than after SADI-S. Early complication rate was less (2.65%) in the SADI-S group vs 5.1% in the RY-DS. Protein deficiency and small bowel obstruction rates were also lower after SADI-S. 93.4% of patients achieved total remission of their diabetes. 7.5% of patients in the SADI-S group had symptoms of bile reflux, which was a main indication for revisions.

Conclusion

SADI-S has many advantages over RY-DS. However, weight loss and antidiabetic effects after the third year were marginally lower after SADI-S compared to RY-DS. SADI-S is less dangerous in terms of malabsorption and looks to be a reasonable alternative to RY-DS as a metabolic operation. RY-DS could be implemented for weight regain and/or bile reflux after SADI-S.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRef Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Weight and type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2009;122(3):248–56.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ramos A, Kow L, Brown W. et al. Fifth IFSO Global registry report 2019. Published by Dendrite Clinical Systems 2019 Ramos A, Kow L, Brown W. et al. Fifth IFSO Global registry report 2019. Published by Dendrite Clinical Systems 2019
3.
go back to reference Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):936–46.CrossRef Scopinaro N, Adami GF, Marinari GM, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):936–46.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82.CrossRef Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Marceau P, Biron S, Georges RS, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(4):381–7.CrossRef Marceau P, Biron S, Georges RS, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with gastrectomy as surgical treatment of morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 1991;1(4):381–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRef Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1421–30.CrossRef Marceau P, Biron S, Hould FS, et al. Duodenal switch: long-term results. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1421–30.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRef Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio Herrera MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Proximal duodenal-ileal end-to-side bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: proposed technique. Obes Surg. 2007;17:1614–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MAR, Pérez-Aguirre, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Herrera MAR, Pérez-Aguirre, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno–ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S). One to three-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2010;20(12):1720–6.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1092–8.CrossRef Sanchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Cabrerizo L, et al. Single anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) for obese diabetic patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:1092–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Pérez Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2098–104.CrossRef Mitzman B, Cottam D, Goriparthi R, et al. Stomach intestinal pylorus sparing (SIPS) surgery for morbid obesity: retrospective analyses of our preliminary experience. Obes Surg. 2016;26:2098–104.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef Shoar S, Poliakin L, Rubenstein R, et al. Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS): a systematic review of efficacy and safety. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):104–13.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2017;13:1306–12.CrossRef Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2017;13:1306–12.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1207–16.CrossRef Brown WA, Ooi G, Higa K, et al. Single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy/one anastomosis duodenal switch (SADI-S/OADS) IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1207–16.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Prachand VN, Ward M, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):211–20.CrossRef Prachand VN, Ward M, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14(2):211–20.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee Y, Ellenbogen Y, Doumouras AG, et al. Single or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2019;15(4):556–66.CrossRef Lee Y, Ellenbogen Y, Doumouras AG, et al. Single or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2019;15(4):556–66.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ruiz AG, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Badia AC, et al. Laparoscopic duodenal switch: one or two loops? SOARD. 2015;11(6):S74. Ruiz AG, Sanchez-Pernaute A, Badia AC, et al. Laparoscopic duodenal switch: one or two loops? SOARD. 2015;11(6):S74.
22.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Kim J, Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRef Brethauer SA, Kim J, Chaar M, et al. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, et al. How we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2133–5.CrossRef Buse JB, Caprio S, Cefalu WT, et al. How we define cure of diabetes? Diabetes Care. 2009;32:2133–5.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ershova ЕV, Yashkov YI. Status of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after biliopancreatic diversion surgery. Obes Metab. 2013;10(3):28–36.CrossRef Ershova ЕV, Yashkov YI. Status of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after biliopancreatic diversion surgery. Obes Metab. 2013;10(3):28–36.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two -year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;27:454–61.CrossRef Cottam A, Cottam D, Portenier D, et al. A matched cohort analysis of stomach intestinal pylorus saving (SIPS) surgery versus biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with two -year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2016;27:454–61.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.CrossRef Balibrea JM, Vilallonga R, Hidalgo M, et al. Mid-term results and responsiveness predictors after two-step single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1302–8.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2015;11(2):351–5.CrossRef Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MÁ, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2015;11(2):351–5.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2018;14(11):1686–90.CrossRef Wu A, Tian J, Cao L, et al. Single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a revisional surgery. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2018;14(11):1686–90.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Scopinaro N. Biliopancreatic diversion: mechanisms of action and long-term results. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):683–9.CrossRef Scopinaro N. Biliopancreatic diversion: mechanisms of action and long-term results. Obes Surg. 2006;16(6):683–9.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kim J. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issue Committee. Statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2016;12(5): 944–945. Kim J. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Clinical Issue Committee. Statement on single-anastomosis duodenal switch. Surg Obes Rel Dis. 2016;12(5): 944–945.
31.
go back to reference De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass – one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) – IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206.CrossRef De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass – one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB) – IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
SADI-S 250 vs Roux-en-Y Duodenal Switch (RY-DS): Results of 5-Year Observational Study
Authors
Yury Yashkov
Natalya Bordan
Antonio Torres
Alexandra Malykhina
Dmitry Bekuzarov
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Obesity Surgery / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Electronic ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05031-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Obesity Surgery 2/2021 Go to the issue