Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Setting strategy for system change: using concept mapping to prioritise national action for chronic disease prevention

Authors: Sonia Wutzke, Nick Roberts, Cameron Willis, Allan Best, Andrew Wilson, William Trochim

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Chronic diseases are a serious and urgent problem, requiring at-scale, multi-component, multi-stakeholder action and cooperation. Despite numerous national frameworks and agenda-setting documents to coordinate prevention efforts, Australia, like many countries internationally, is yet to substantively impact the burden from chronic disease. Improved evidence on effective strategies for the prevention of chronic disease is required. This research sought to articulate a priority set of important and feasible action domains to inform future discussion and debate regarding priority areas for chronic disease prevention policy and strategy.

Methods

Using concept mapping, a mixed-methods approach to making use of the best available tacit knowledge of recognised, diverse and well-experienced actors, and national actions to improve the prevention of chronic disease in Australia were identified and then mapped. Participants (ranging from 58 to 78 in the various stages of the research) included a national sample of academics, policymakers and practitioners. Data collection involved the generation and sorting of statements by participants. A series of visual representations of the data were then developed.

Results

A total of 95 statements were distilled into 12 clusters for action, namely Inter-Sectoral Partnerships; Systems Perspective/Action; Governance; Roles and Responsibilities; Evidence, Feedback and Learning; Funding and Incentive; Creating Demand; Primary Prevention; Social Determinants and Equity; Healthy Environments; Food and Nutrition; and Regulation and Policy. Specific areas for more immediate national action included refocusing the health system to prevention over cure, raising the profile of public health with health decision-makers, funding policy- and practice-relevant research, improving communication about prevention, learning from both global best-practice and domestic successes and failures, increasing the focus on primary prevention, and developing a long-term prevention strategy with an explicit funding commitment.

Conclusions

Preventing chronic diseases and their risk factors will require at-scale, multi-component, multi-stakeholder action and cooperation. The concept mapping procedures used in this research have enabled the synthesis of views across different stakeholders, bringing both divergent and convergent perspectives to light, and collectively creating signals for where to prioritise national action. Previous national strategies for chronic disease prevention have not collated the tacit knowledge of diverse actors in the prevention of chronic disease in this structured way.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: WHO; 2013.
2.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2011. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2010. Geneva: WHO; 2011.
3.
go back to reference Dobbs R, Sawers C, Thompson F, Manyika J, Woetzel J, Child P, McKenna S, Spatharou A. Overcoming obesity: An initial economic analysis. The McKinsey Global Institute. 2014. http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business%20Functions/Economic%20Studies%20TEMP/Our%20Insights/How%20the%20world%20could%20better%20fight%20obesity/MGI_Overcoming_obesity_Full_report.ashx Dobbs R, Sawers C, Thompson F, Manyika J, Woetzel J, Child P, McKenna S, Spatharou A. Overcoming obesity: An initial economic analysis. The McKinsey Global Institute. 2014. http://​www.​mckinsey.​com/​~/​media/​McKinsey/​Business%20Functions/Economic%20Studies%20TEMP/Our%20Insights/How%20the%20world%20could%20better%20fight%20obesity/MGI_Overcoming_obesity_Full_report.ashx
4.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Health for All by the Year 2000. Geneva: WHO; 1981. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Health for All by the Year 2000. Geneva: WHO; 1981.
5.
go back to reference Better Health Commission (Australia). Looking Forward to Better Health. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1986. Better Health Commission (Australia). Looking Forward to Better Health. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1986.
6.
go back to reference Targets H, Committee I. Health for all Australians: report to the Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council and the Australian Health Ministers' Conference. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1988. Targets H, Committee I. Health for all Australians: report to the Australian Health Ministers' Advisory Council and the Australian Health Ministers' Conference. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1988.
7.
go back to reference Nutbeam D, Wise M, Harris E, Bauman A, Leeder S. Goals and Targets for Australia's Health in the Year 2000 and Beyond: Report prepared for the Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1993. Nutbeam D, Wise M, Harris E, Bauman A, Leeder S. Goals and Targets for Australia's Health in the Year 2000 and Beyond: Report prepared for the Commonwealth Department of Health, Housing and Community Services. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1993.
8.
go back to reference Department of Human Services and Health. Better Health Outcomes for Australians: National Goals, Targets and Strategies for Better Health Outcomes into the Next Century. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1994. Department of Human Services and Health. Better Health Outcomes for Australians: National Goals, Targets and Strategies for Better Health Outcomes into the Next Century. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service; 1994.
10.
go back to reference National Health Priority Action Council. National Chronic Disease Strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2006. National Health Priority Action Council. National Chronic Disease Strategy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing; 2006.
11.
go back to reference Council of Australian Governments. National Partnership Agreement on Preventive Health. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2008. Council of Australian Governments. National Partnership Agreement on Preventive Health. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2008.
12.
go back to reference Taskforce NPH. Australia: Healthiest Country by 2020 – National Preventative Health Strategy – Overview. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009. Taskforce NPH. Australia: Healthiest Country by 2020 – National Preventative Health Strategy – Overview. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.
13.
go back to reference Australian Government. Taking Preventative Action – A Response to Australia: The Healthiest Country by 2020. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010. Australian Government. Taking Preventative Action – A Response to Australia: The Healthiest Country by 2020. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.
14.
go back to reference Moodie R, Tolhurst P, Martin J. Australia’s health: being accountable for prevention. Med J Aust. 2016;204(6):223–5.CrossRefPubMed Moodie R, Tolhurst P, Martin J. Australia’s health: being accountable for prevention. Med J Aust. 2016;204(6):223–5.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989;12(1):1–16.CrossRef Trochim W. An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation. Eval Program Plann. 1989;12(1):1–16.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: An introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(3):187–91.CrossRefPubMed Trochim W, Kane M. Concept mapping: An introduction to structured conceptualization in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005;17(3):187–91.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Caelli K. Shared understandings: negotiating the meanings of health via concept mapping. Nurse Educ Today. 1998;18(4):317–21.CrossRefPubMed Caelli K. Shared understandings: negotiating the meanings of health via concept mapping. Nurse Educ Today. 1998;18(4):317–21.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dawson AP, Cargo M, Stewart H, Chong A, Daniel M. Identifying multi-level culturally appropriate smoking cessation strategies for Aboriginal health staff: a concept mapping approach. Health Education Res. 2013;28(1):31–45.CrossRef Dawson AP, Cargo M, Stewart H, Chong A, Daniel M. Identifying multi-level culturally appropriate smoking cessation strategies for Aboriginal health staff: a concept mapping approach. Health Education Res. 2013;28(1):31–45.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Vaughn LM, Jacquez F, McLinden D. The use of concept mapping to identify community-driven intervention strategies for physical and mental health. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(5):675–85.CrossRefPubMed Vaughn LM, Jacquez F, McLinden D. The use of concept mapping to identify community-driven intervention strategies for physical and mental health. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(5):675–85.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Anderson LA, Day KL, Vandenberg AE. Using a concept map as a tool for strategic planning: The Healthy Brain Initiative. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(5):A117.PubMedPubMedCentral Anderson LA, Day KL, Vandenberg AE. Using a concept map as a tool for strategic planning: The Healthy Brain Initiative. Prev Chronic Dis. 2011;8(5):A117.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Coxon APM. Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.CrossRef Coxon APM. Sorting Data: Collection and Analysis. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Osborn AF. Your Creative Power. New York: Scribner; 1948. Osborn AF. Your Creative Power. New York: Scribner; 1948.
26.
go back to reference Weller SC, Romney AK. Systematic Data Collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1988.CrossRef Weller SC, Romney AK. Systematic Data Collection. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1988.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Rosenberg S, Park KM. The method of sorting as a data gathering procedure in multivariate research. Multivariate Behav Res. 1975;10:489–502.CrossRefPubMed Rosenberg S, Park KM. The method of sorting as a data gathering procedure in multivariate research. Multivariate Behav Res. 1975;10:489–502.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Anderberg MR. Cluster Analysis For Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; 1973. Anderberg MR. Cluster Analysis For Applications. New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.; 1973.
29.
go back to reference Inselberg A. Parallel Coordinates: Visual Multidimensional Geometry and its Applications. London: Springer; 2009.CrossRef Inselberg A. Parallel Coordinates: Visual Multidimensional Geometry and its Applications. London: Springer; 2009.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35(2):236–45.CrossRefPubMed Rosas SR, Kane M. Quality and rigor of the concept mapping methodology: A pooled study analysis. Eval Program Plann. 2012;35(2):236–45.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Finegood DT, Karanfil O, Matteson CL. Getting from analysis to action: framing obesity research, policy and practice with a solution-oriented complex systems lens. Healthc Pap. 2008;9(1):36–41. Discussion 62–67.CrossRefPubMed Finegood DT, Karanfil O, Matteson CL. Getting from analysis to action: framing obesity research, policy and practice with a solution-oriented complex systems lens. Healthc Pap. 2008;9(1):36–41. Discussion 62–67.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Everybody's Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes. WHO's Framework for Action. Geneva: WHO; 2007. World Health Organization. Everybody's Business: Strengthening Health Systems to Improve Health Outcomes. WHO's Framework for Action. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
33.
go back to reference Vandenbroeck P, Goossens J, Clemens M. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices - Building the Obesity System Map. Government Office For Science: London; 2007. Vandenbroeck P, Goossens J, Clemens M. Tackling Obesities: Future Choices - Building the Obesity System Map. Government Office For Science: London; 2007.
Metadata
Title
Setting strategy for system change: using concept mapping to prioritise national action for chronic disease prevention
Authors
Sonia Wutzke
Nick Roberts
Cameron Willis
Allan Best
Andrew Wilson
William Trochim
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0231-7

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue