Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research

Is there enough research output of EU projects available to assess and improve health system performance? An attempt to understand and categorise the output of EU projects conducted between 2002 and 2012

Authors: Britta Zander, Reinhard Busse

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Adequate performance assessment benefits from the use of disaggregated data to allow a proper evaluation of health systems. Since routinely collected data are usually not disaggregated enough to allow stratified analyses of healthcare needs, utilisation, cost and quality across different sectors, international research projects could fill this gap by exploring means to data collection or even providing individual-level data. The aim of this paper is therefore to (1) study the availability and accessibility of relevant European-funded health projects, and (2) to analyse their contents and methodologies.

Methods

The European Commission Public Health Projects Database and CORDIS were searched for eligible projects, which were then analysed by information openly available online.

Results

Overall, only a few of the 39 identified projects produced data useful for proper performance assessment, due to, for example, lacking available or accessible data, or poor linkage of health status to costs and patient experiences. Other problems were insufficient databases to identify projects and poor communication of project contents and results.

Conclusions

A new approach is necessary to improve accessibility to and coverage of data on outcomes, quality and costs of health systems enabling decision-makers and health professionals to properly assess performance.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Papanicolas I, Smith PC, editors. Health System Performance Comparison: An agenda for policy, information and research. Maidenhead: Open University Press and WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2013.
2.
3.
Charlesworth K, Galsworthy MJ, Ernst K, Irwin R, Wismar M, McKee M. Health research in the European Union: over-controlled but under-measured? Eur J Public Health. 2009;21(4):404–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2007;18(2):MR000005.
5.
Galsworthy MJ, Irwin R, Charlesworth K, Ernst K, Hristovski D, Wismar M, McKee M. An analysis of subject areas and country participation for all health-related projects in the EU’s FP5 and FP6 programmes. Eur J Public Health. 2013;24(3):514–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Campbell DM, Redman S, Jorm L, et al. Increasing the use of evidence in health policy: practice and views of policy makers and researchers. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
Conceição C, McCarthy M. Public health research systems in the European union. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9:38.
9.
10.
Galsworthy MJ, Hristovski D, Lusa L, et al. Academic output of 9 years of EU investment into health research. Lancet. 2012;380:971–2.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet. 2009;374:86–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Head MG, Fitchett JR, Nageshwaran V, Kumari N, Hayward A, Atun R. Research Investments in Global Health: A Systematic Analysis of UK Infectious Disease Research Funding and Global Health Metrics, 1997–2013. EBioMedicine 3: 180–190. 2016. Health-EU portal. http://​ec.​europa.​eu/​health/​index_​en.​htm. Accessed 8 Jan 2015.
13.
Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A. UK research spend in 2008 and 2012: comparing stroke, cancer, coronary heart disease and dementia. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e006648. doi:10.​1136/​bmjopen-2014-006648.
14.
Metadata
Title
Is there enough research output of EU projects available to assess and improve health system performance? An attempt to understand and categorise the output of EU projects conducted between 2002 and 2012
Authors
Britta Zander
Reinhard Busse
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-016-0165-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2017 Go to the issue

Opinion

Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?

Research

Improving health promotion through central rating of interventions: the need for Responsive Guidance

Research

Global toxocariasis research trends from 1932 to 2015: a bibliometric analysis

Review

Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature

Research

Validity and reliability of the Evidence Utilisation in Policymaking Measurement Tool (EUPMT)

Research

Why European and United States drug regulators are not speaking with one voice on anti-influenza drugs: regulatory review methodologies and the importance of ‘deep’ product reviews