Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Sclerotherapy | Research

Modified rubber band ligation for treatment of grade II/III hemorrhoids: clinical efficacy and safety evaluation—a retrospective study

Authors: Jiazi Yu, Jie Zhong, Tao Peng, Liangbin Jin, Leibin Shen, Mian Yang

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Massive, delayed bleeding (DB) is the most common major complication of Rubber Band Ligation (RBL) for internal hemorrhoids caused by premature band slippage. In this study we modified conventional RBL to prevent early rubber band slippage and evaluated its clinical efficacy and safety.

Methods

Study participants were consecutive patients with grade II or III internal hemorrhoids treated with RBL at Ningbo Medical Center of Lihuili Hospital from January 2019 to December 2020. Postoperative minor complications such as pain, swelling, anal edema, prolapse recurrence and major complications like DB were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

A total of 274 patients were enrolled, including 149 patients treated with modified RBL and 125 treated with conventional RBL. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups at baseline. Five cases of postoperative DB have been observed in the conventional RBL group, compared to none in the modified ones, with a significant difference (P < 0.05). Within three months after surgery, 8 cases in the modified RBL group experienced a recurrence rate of 5.4%, whereas 17 patients in the conventional RBL group experienced a recurrence rate of 13.6%. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The VAS score, edema, and incidence of sensation of prolapse between the two groups were not significantly different at 3 and 7 days after surgery (P < 0.05). There were also no significant differences in HDSS and SHS scores between the two groups after surgery (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Modified RBL may be associated with a lower rate of complications, especially with lower DB rate in comparison with standard RBL. Further studies in larger samples and different design are necessary to confirm these results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gallo G, Sacco R, Sammarco G. Epidemiology of hemorrhoidal disease. In: Ratto C, Parello A, Litta F, editors. Hemorrhoids Coloproctology. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 3–7.CrossRef Gallo G, Sacco R, Sammarco G. Epidemiology of hemorrhoidal disease. In: Ratto C, Parello A, Litta F, editors. Hemorrhoids Coloproctology. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 3–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pata F, Sgró A, Ferrara F, Vigorita V, Gallo G, et al. Anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of hemorrhoids. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2021;16(2):75–80.CrossRef Pata F, Sgró A, Ferrara F, Vigorita V, Gallo G, et al. Anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of hemorrhoids. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2021;16(2):75–80.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeon. Practice parameters for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:992–3.CrossRef The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeon. Practice parameters for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 1990;33:992–3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pata F, Gallo G, Pellino G, et al. Evolution of surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease: an historical overview. Front Surg. 2021;8: 727059.CrossRef Pata F, Gallo G, Pellino G, et al. Evolution of surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease: an historical overview. Front Surg. 2021;8: 727059.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(3):284–92.CrossRef Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, Migaly J, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(3):284–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cocorullo G, Tutino R, Falco N, Licari L, Orlando G, Fontana T, et al. The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review. G Chir. 2017;38(1):5–14.CrossRef Cocorullo G, Tutino R, Falco N, Licari L, Orlando G, Fontana T, et al. The non-surgical management for hemorrhoidal disease. A systematic review. G Chir. 2017;38(1):5–14.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(2):145–64.CrossRef Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, et al. Consensus statement of the Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(2):145–64.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM, Biggs K, Shephard N, Wailoo AJ, et al. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10042):356–64.CrossRef Brown SR, Tiernan JP, Watson AJM, Biggs K, Shephard N, Wailoo AJ, et al. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation versus rubber band ligation for the management of symptomatic second-degree and third-degree haemorrhoids (HubBLe): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10042):356–64.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barron J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg. 1963;105:563–70.CrossRef Barron J. Office ligation of internal hemorrhoids. Am J Surg. 1963;105:563–70.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Albuquerque A. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: a guide for complications. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(9):614–20.CrossRef Albuquerque A. Rubber band ligation of hemorrhoids: a guide for complications. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;8(9):614–20.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, et al. Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage: a single-institution prospective study of 4880 consecutive closed hemorrhoidectomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(8):1096–9.CrossRef Chen HH, Wang JY, Changchien CR, Chen JS, Hsu KC, Chiang JM, et al. Risk factors associated with posthemorrhoidectomy secondary hemorrhage: a single-institution prospective study of 4880 consecutive closed hemorrhoidectomies. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(8):1096–9.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Beattie GC, Rao MM, Campbell WJ. Secondary haemorrhage after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids in patients taking clopidogrel—a cautionary note. Ulster Med J. 2004;73(2):139–41.PubMedPubMedCentral Beattie GC, Rao MM, Campbell WJ. Secondary haemorrhage after rubber band ligation of haemorrhoids in patients taking clopidogrel—a cautionary note. Ulster Med J. 2004;73(2):139–41.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hite N, Klinger AL, Miller P, et al. Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix) does not increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing rubber band ligation for symptomatic hemorrhoids. J Surg Res. 2018;229:230–3.CrossRef Hite N, Klinger AL, Miller P, et al. Clopidogrel bisulfate (Plavix) does not increase bleeding complications in patients undergoing rubber band ligation for symptomatic hemorrhoids. J Surg Res. 2018;229:230–3.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Jacobs D. Clinical practice. Hemorrhoids. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):944–51.CrossRef Jacobs D. Clinical practice. Hemorrhoids. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(10):944–51.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.CrossRef Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495–9.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, vol. 5. London: Baillière Tindall; 1984. p. 98–149. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, vol. 5. London: Baillière Tindall; 1984. p. 98–149.
17.
go back to reference Rørvik HD, Styr K, Ilum L, et al. Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health ScaleHD: new tools to evaluate symptoms and health-related quality of life in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(3):333–42.CrossRef Rørvik HD, Styr K, Ilum L, et al. Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score and Short Health ScaleHD: new tools to evaluate symptoms and health-related quality of life in hemorrhoidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019;62(3):333–42.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mott T, Latimer K, Edwards C. Hemorrhoids: diagnosis and treatment options. Am Fam Phys. 2018;97(3):172–9. Mott T, Latimer K, Edwards C. Hemorrhoids: diagnosis and treatment options. Am Fam Phys. 2018;97(3):172–9.
19.
go back to reference Trompetto M, Clerico G, Cocorullo GF, Giordano P, Marino F, Martellucci J, et al. Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(10):567–75.CrossRef Trompetto M, Clerico G, Cocorullo GF, Giordano P, Marino F, Martellucci J, et al. Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement. Tech Coloproctol. 2015;19(10):567–75.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, Chalasani S, Buie WD, Rafferty JL, Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(9):1059–64.CrossRef Rivadeneira DE, Steele SR, Ternent C, Chalasani S, Buie WD, Rafferty JL, Standards Practice Task Force of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Practice parameters for the management of hemorrhoids (revised 2010). Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(9):1059–64.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Salgueiro P, Garrido M, Gaio R, et al. Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy versus rubber band ligation in hemorrhoidal disease grades I/II/III: randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;65(7):e718–27.CrossRef Salgueiro P, Garrido M, Gaio R, et al. Polidocanol foam sclerotherapy versus rubber band ligation in hemorrhoidal disease grades I/II/III: randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021;65(7):e718–27.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Moser KH, Mosch C, Walgenbach M, Bussen DG, Kirsch J, Joos AK, Gliem P, Sauerland S. Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam in comparison with fluid sclerosant in the treatment of first-grade haemorrhoidal disease: a randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(10):1439–47.CrossRef Moser KH, Mosch C, Walgenbach M, Bussen DG, Kirsch J, Joos AK, Gliem P, Sauerland S. Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy with polidocanol foam in comparison with fluid sclerosant in the treatment of first-grade haemorrhoidal disease: a randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre trial. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013;28(10):1439–47.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Gallo G, Pietroletti R, Novelli E, et al. A multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using 3% polidocanol foam to treat second-degree haemorrhoids (SCLEROFOAM). Tech Coloproctol. 2022:1–10. Gallo G, Pietroletti R, Novelli E, et al. A multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using 3% polidocanol foam to treat second-degree haemorrhoids (SCLEROFOAM). Tech Coloproctol. 2022:1–10.
24.
go back to reference Wald A, Bharucha AE, Cosman BC, Whitehead WE. ACG clinical guide line: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(8):1141–57.CrossRef Wald A, Bharucha AE, Cosman BC, Whitehead WE. ACG clinical guide line: management of benign anorectal disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(8):1141–57.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Expert group of hemorrhoid ligation therapy of Chinese Professional Committee of Colonic and Anal Diseases of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine. Consensus of Chinese experts on hemorrhoid ligation therapy (2015 edition). Gastrointest Surg. 2015;18(12):1183–5. Expert group of hemorrhoid ligation therapy of Chinese Professional Committee of Colonic and Anal Diseases of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine. Consensus of Chinese experts on hemorrhoid ligation therapy (2015 edition). Gastrointest Surg. 2015;18(12):1183–5.
26.
go back to reference El Nakeeb AM, Fikry AA, Omar WH, Fouda EM, El Metwally TA, Ghazy HE, et al. Rubber band ligation for 750 cases of symptomatic hemorrhoids out of 2200 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(42):6525–30.CrossRef El Nakeeb AM, Fikry AA, Omar WH, Fouda EM, El Metwally TA, Ghazy HE, et al. Rubber band ligation for 750 cases of symptomatic hemorrhoids out of 2200 cases. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(42):6525–30.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Iyer VS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Long-term outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(8):1364–70.CrossRef Iyer VS, Shrier I, Gordon PH. Long-term outcome of rubber band ligation for symptomatic primary and recurrent internal hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47(8):1364–70.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Odelowo OO, Mekasha G, Johnson MA. Massive life-threatening lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage following hemorrhoidal rubber band ligation. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(12):1089–92.PubMedPubMedCentral Odelowo OO, Mekasha G, Johnson MA. Massive life-threatening lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage following hemorrhoidal rubber band ligation. J Natl Med Assoc. 2002;94(12):1089–92.PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Kang DW, Kim BS, Kim JH, Kim KR, Kang GS. A Comparative Study of Rubber Band Ligation Versus BANANA-Clip in Grade 1 to 3 Internal Hemorrhoids. Ann Coloproctol. 2021. Kang DW, Kim BS, Kim JH, Kim KR, Kang GS. A Comparative Study of Rubber Band Ligation Versus BANANA-Clip in Grade 1 to 3 Internal Hemorrhoids. Ann Coloproctol. 2021.
30.
go back to reference Pata F, Bracchitta LM, D’Ambrosio G, Bracchitta S. Sclerobanding (combined rubber band ligation with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy) for the treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoidal disease: feasibility and short-term outcomes. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):218.CrossRef Pata F, Bracchitta LM, D’Ambrosio G, Bracchitta S. Sclerobanding (combined rubber band ligation with 3% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy) for the treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoidal disease: feasibility and short-term outcomes. J Clin Med. 2021;11(1):218.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modified rubber band ligation for treatment of grade II/III hemorrhoids: clinical efficacy and safety evaluation—a retrospective study
Authors
Jiazi Yu
Jie Zhong
Tao Peng
Liangbin Jin
Leibin Shen
Mian Yang
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01688-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue