Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2022

Open Access 01-12-2022 | Rectal Cancer | Research article

Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study

Authors: Jacob Damgaard Eriksen, Henriette Vind Thaysen, Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen, Anders Husted Madsen, Anders Tøttrup, Charlotte Buchard Nørager, Ken Ljungmann, Niels Thomassen, Conor Patrick Delaney, Lene Hjerrild Iversen

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite increasing focus on the technical performance of total mesorectal excision over recent decades, anastomotic leakage (AL) continues to be a serious complication for many patients, even in the hands of experienced surgical teams. This study describes implementation of standardized surgical technique in an effort to reduce variability, decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, and improve associated short-term outcomes for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted restorative rectal resection (RRR).

Methods

We evaluated all rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR at Aarhus University Hospital between 2017 and 2020. Six standardized surgical steps directed to improve anastomotic healing were mandatory for all RRR. Additional changes were made during the period with prohibition of systemic dexamethasone and limiting the use of endoscopic stapling devices.

Results

The use of the full standardization, including all six surgical steps, increased from 40.3% (95% CI, 0.28–0.54) to 86.2% (95% CI, 0.68–0.95). The incidence of AL decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12–0.33) to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01–0.23). Length of hospital stay (LOS) decreased from 6 days (range 2–50) to 5 days (range 2–26). The rate of patients readmitted within 90 days decreased from 21.0% (95% CI, 0.12–0.33), to 6.9% (95% CI, 0.01–0.23).

Conclusion

The full standardization was effectively implemented for rectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted RRR. The risk of AL, LOS and readmission decreased during the study period. A team focus on high-reliability and peri-operative complications can improve patient outcomes.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.CrossRef Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RDH. The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, et al. Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):589–95.CrossRef Fleshman J, Branda ME, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George VV, Abbas MA, et al. Disease-free survival and local recurrence for laparoscopic resection compared with open resection of stage II to III rectal cancer: follow-up results of the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):589–95.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324–32.CrossRef Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MHGM, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324–32.CrossRef
6.
7.
go back to reference Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets G l., Pierie J-P, Wiggers T, et al. Laparoscopic versus open Total Mesorectal Excision for rectal cancer (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4). Vennix S, Pelzers L, Bouvy N, Beets G l., Pierie J-P, Wiggers T, et al. Laparoscopic versus open Total Mesorectal Excision for rectal cancer (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4).
8.
go back to reference van der Pas MHGM, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WCJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): Short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8.CrossRef van der Pas MHGM, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Fürst A, Lacy AM, Hop WCJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): Short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(3):210–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, Putter H, Påahlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):1066–75.CrossRef Den Dulk M, Marijnen CAM, Collette L, Putter H, Påahlman L, Folkesson J, et al. Multicentre analysis of oncological and survival outcomes following anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2009;96(9):1066–75.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Rutegård M. Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS open. 2019;3(1):106–11.CrossRef Boström P, Haapamäki MM, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Rutegård M. Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS open. 2019;3(1):106–11.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hain E, Maggiori L, Manceau G, Mongin C, Prost à la Denise J, Panis Y. Oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):288–95.CrossRef Hain E, Maggiori L, Manceau G, Mongin C, Prost à la Denise J, Panis Y. Oncological impact of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic mesorectal excision. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):288–95.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kverneng Hultberg D, Svensson J, Jutesten H, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Lydrup M-L, et al. The impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term function after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(5):619–28.CrossRef Kverneng Hultberg D, Svensson J, Jutesten H, Rutegård J, Matthiessen P, Lydrup M-L, et al. The impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term function after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(5):619–28.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Arezzo A, Migliore M, Chiaro P, Arolfo S, Filippini C, Di Cuonzo D, et al. The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(7):649–63.CrossRef Arezzo A, Migliore M, Chiaro P, Arolfo S, Filippini C, Di Cuonzo D, et al. The REAL (REctal Anastomotic Leak) score for prediction of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer surgery. Tech Coloproctol. 2019;23(7):649–63.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2):207–14.CrossRef Matthiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegård J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(2):207–14.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ellebæk MB, Rahr HB, Boye S, Fristrup C, Qvist N. Detection of early anastomotic leakage by intraperitoneal microdialysis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study. Color Dis. 2019;21(12):1387–96.CrossRef Ellebæk MB, Rahr HB, Boye S, Fristrup C, Qvist N. Detection of early anastomotic leakage by intraperitoneal microdialysis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective cohort study. Color Dis. 2019;21(12):1387–96.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Color Dis. 2010;12(1):37–43.CrossRef Bertelsen CA, Andreasen AH, Jørgensen T, Harling H. Anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer: risk factors. Color Dis. 2010;12(1):37–43.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(21):2247–60.CrossRef Sciuto A, Merola G, De Palma GD, Sodo M, Pirozzi F, Bracale UM, et al. Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(21):2247–60.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Damgaard Eriksen J, Emmertsen KJ, Madsen AH, Erichsen R, Bachmann TN, Hjerrild Iversen L. The impact of multiple firings on the risk of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive restorative rectal cancer resection and the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis [Internet]. 2022;37(6):1335–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04171-1.CrossRefPubMed Damgaard Eriksen J, Emmertsen KJ, Madsen AH, Erichsen R, Bachmann TN, Hjerrild Iversen L. The impact of multiple firings on the risk of anastomotic leakage after minimally invasive restorative rectal cancer resection and the impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival: a population-based study. Int J Colorectal Dis [Internet]. 2022;37(6):1335–48. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00384-022-04171-1.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lindsetmo RO, Delaney CP. A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(11):2059–63.CrossRef Lindsetmo RO, Delaney CP. A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(11):2059–63.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Aslak KK, Bulut O. The implementation of a standardized approach to laparoscopic rectal surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2012;16(2):264–70.CrossRef Aslak KK, Bulut O. The implementation of a standardized approach to laparoscopic rectal surgery. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2012;16(2):264–70.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H, et al. Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):716–22.CrossRef Miskovic D, Foster J, Agha A, Delaney CP, Francis N, Hasegawa H, et al. Standardization of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a structured international expert consensus. Ann Surg. 2015;261(4):716–22.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lange MM, Martz JE, Ramdeen B, Brooks V, Boachie-Adjei K, Van De Velde CJH, et al. Long-term results of rectal cancer surgery with a systematical operative approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1806–15.CrossRef Lange MM, Martz JE, Ramdeen B, Brooks V, Boachie-Adjei K, Van De Velde CJH, et al. Long-term results of rectal cancer surgery with a systematical operative approach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(6):1806–15.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bullock M, Nasir IUI, Hemandas A, Qureshi T, Figueiredo N, Heald R, et al. Standardised approach to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective multi-centre analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2019;404(5):547–55.CrossRef Bullock M, Nasir IUI, Hemandas A, Qureshi T, Figueiredo N, Heald R, et al. Standardised approach to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a prospective multi-centre analysis. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2019;404(5):547–55.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Christensen HK, Thaysen HV, Rodt SÅ, Carlsson P, Laurberg S. Short hospital stay and low complication rate are possible with a fully implemented fast-track model after elective colonic surgery. Eur Surg Res. 2011;46(3):156–61.CrossRef Christensen HK, Thaysen HV, Rodt SÅ, Carlsson P, Laurberg S. Short hospital stay and low complication rate are possible with a fully implemented fast-track model after elective colonic surgery. Eur Surg Res. 2011;46(3):156–61.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147(3):339–51.CrossRef Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147(3):339–51.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):462–79.CrossRef McDermott FD, Heeney A, Kelly ME, Steele RJ, Carlson GL, Winter DC. Systematic review of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leaks. Br J Surg. 2015;102(5):462–79.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):665–71.CrossRef Park JS, Choi GS, Kim SH, Kim HR, Kim NK, Lee KY, et al. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal cancer excision: the Korean laparoscopic colorectal surgery study group. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):665–71.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Maw A. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(7):988–99.CrossRef Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S, Maw A. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing high and low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(7):988–99.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Zeng J, Su G. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):1–11.CrossRef Zeng J, Su G. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during sigmoid colon and rectal cancer surgery increases the risk of anastomotic leakage: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):1–11.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rutegård M, Hemmingsson O, Matthiessen P, Rutegård J. High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg. 2012;99(1):127–32.CrossRef Rutegård M, Hemmingsson O, Matthiessen P, Rutegård J. High tie in anterior resection for rectal cancer confers no increased risk of anastomotic leakage. Br J Surg. 2012;99(1):127–32.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ludwig KA, Kosinski L. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection another view. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1198–200.CrossRef Ludwig KA, Kosinski L. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection another view. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1198–200.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Ketana N, Dolich MO, Stamos MJ. Predictive factors of splenic injury in colorectal surgery: Data from the nationwide inpatient sample, 2006–2008. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):324–9.CrossRef Masoomi H, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Ketana N, Dolich MO, Stamos MJ. Predictive factors of splenic injury in colorectal surgery: Data from the nationwide inpatient sample, 2006–2008. Arch Surg. 2012;147(4):324–9.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Chand M, Miskovic D, Parvaiz AC. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1195–7.CrossRef Chand M, Miskovic D, Parvaiz AC. Is splenic flexure mobilization necessary in laparoscopic anterior resection. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(11):1195–7.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Balciscueta Z, Uribe N, Caubet L, López M, Torrijo I, Tabet J, et al. Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(9):919–25.CrossRef Balciscueta Z, Uribe N, Caubet L, López M, Torrijo I, Tabet J, et al. Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(9):919–25.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Qu H, Liu Y, Bi D-s. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(12):3608–17.CrossRef Qu H, Liu Y, Bi D-s. Clinical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(12):3608–17.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Dowling WF. Hawthorne revisited: the legend and the legacy. Organ Dyn. 1975;3(3):66–80.CrossRef Dowling WF. Hawthorne revisited: the legend and the legacy. Organ Dyn. 1975;3(3):66–80.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study
Authors
Jacob Damgaard Eriksen
Henriette Vind Thaysen
Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen
Anders Husted Madsen
Anders Tøttrup
Charlotte Buchard Nørager
Ken Ljungmann
Niels Thomassen
Conor Patrick Delaney
Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01809-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Surgery 1/2022 Go to the issue