Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 5/2021

01-10-2021 | Sarcoidosis | Original Article

Assessing the qualitative and quantitative impacts of simple two-class vs multiple tissue-class MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac PET/MR

Authors: Philip M. Robson, PhD, Vittoria Vergani, MD, Thomas Benkert, PhD, Maria Giovanna Trivieri, MD, PhD, Nicolas A. Karakatsanis, PhD, Ronan Abgral, MD, PhD, Marc R. Dweck, MD, PhD, Pedro R. Moreno, MD, Jason C. Kovacic, MD, PhD, Kai Tobias Block, PhD, Zahi A. Fayad, PhD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 5/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hybrid PET/MR imaging has significant potential in cardiology due to its combination of molecular PET imaging and cardiac MR. Multi-tissue-class MR-based attenuation correction (MRAC) is necessary for accurate PET quantification. Moreover, for thoracic PET imaging, respiration is known to lead to misalignments of MRAC and PET data that result in PET artifacts. These factors can be addressed by using multi-echo MR for tissue segmentation and motion-robust or motion-gated acquisitions. However, the combination of these strategies is not routinely available and can be prone to errors. In this study, we examine the qualitative and quantitative impacts of multi-class MRAC compared to a more widely available simple two-class MRAC for cardiac PET/MR.

Methods and Results

In a cohort of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis, we acquired MRAC data using multi-echo radial gradient-echo MR imaging. Water-fat separation was used to produce attenuation maps with up to 4 tissue classes including water-based soft tissue, fat, lung, and background air. Simultaneously acquired 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET data were subsequently reconstructed using each attenuation map separately. PET uptake values were measured in the myocardium and compared between different PET images. The inclusion of lung and subcutaneous fat in the MRAC maps significantly affected the quantification of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose activity in the myocardium but only moderately altered the appearance of the PET image without introduction of image artifacts.

Conclusion

Optimal MRAC for cardiac PET/MR applications should include segmentation of all tissues in combination with compensation for the respiratory-related motion of the heart. Simple two-class MRAC is adequate for qualitative clinical assessment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Robson PM, Dey D, Newby DE, Berman D, Li D, Fayad ZA, et al. MR/PET imaging of the cardiovascular system. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:1165-79.CrossRef Robson PM, Dey D, Newby DE, Berman D, Li D, Fayad ZA, et al. MR/PET imaging of the cardiovascular system. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:1165-79.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schindler TH. Cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: Quo vadis? J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:1007-18.CrossRef Schindler TH. Cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: Quo vadis? J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:1007-18.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G, Bundschuh RA, Chefd’hotel C, Ziegler SI, et al. Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med 2009;50:520-6.CrossRef Martinez-Möller A, Souvatzoglou M, Delso G, Bundschuh RA, Chefd’hotel C, Ziegler SI, et al. Tissue classification as a potential approach for attenuation correction in whole-body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT data. J Nucl Med 2009;50:520-6.CrossRef
4.
5.
go back to reference Leynes AP, Yang J, Shanbhag DD, Kaushik SS, Seo Y, Hope TA, et al. Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR-based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI. Med Phys 2017;44:902-13.CrossRef Leynes AP, Yang J, Shanbhag DD, Kaushik SS, Seo Y, Hope TA, et al. Hybrid ZTE/Dixon MR-based attenuation correction for quantitative uptake estimation of pelvic lesions in PET/MRI. Med Phys 2017;44:902-13.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Aasheim LB, Karlberg A, Goa PE, Håberg A, Sørhaug S, Fagerli U-M, et al. PET/MR brain imaging: Evaluation of clinical UTE-based attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1439-46.CrossRef Aasheim LB, Karlberg A, Goa PE, Håberg A, Sørhaug S, Fagerli U-M, et al. PET/MR brain imaging: Evaluation of clinical UTE-based attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1439-46.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hofmann M, Bezrukov I, Mantlik F, Aschoff P, Steinke F, Beyer T, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: Quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1392-9.CrossRef Hofmann M, Bezrukov I, Mantlik F, Aschoff P, Steinke F, Beyer T, et al. MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: Quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods. J Nucl Med 2011;52:1392-9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Robson PM, Dweck MR, Trivieri MG, Abgral R, Karakatsanis NA, Contreras J, et al. Coronary artery PET/MR imaging: Feasibility, limitations, and solutions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:1103-12.CrossRef Robson PM, Dweck MR, Trivieri MG, Abgral R, Karakatsanis NA, Contreras J, et al. Coronary artery PET/MR imaging: Feasibility, limitations, and solutions. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;10:1103-12.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lassen ML, Rasul S, Beitzke D, Stelzmüller M-E, Cal-Gonzalez J, Hacker M, et al. Assessment of attenuation correction for myocardial PET imaging using combined PET/MRI. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;26:1107-18.CrossRef Lassen ML, Rasul S, Beitzke D, Stelzmüller M-E, Cal-Gonzalez J, Hacker M, et al. Assessment of attenuation correction for myocardial PET imaging using combined PET/MRI. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;26:1107-18.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kolbitsch C, Neji R, Fenchel M, Mallia A, Marsden P, Schaeffter T. Respiratory-resolved MR-based attenuation correction for motion-compensated cardiac PET-MR. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:135008.CrossRef Kolbitsch C, Neji R, Fenchel M, Mallia A, Marsden P, Schaeffter T. Respiratory-resolved MR-based attenuation correction for motion-compensated cardiac PET-MR. Phys Med Biol 2018;63:135008.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ai H, Pan T. Feasibility of using respiration-averaged MR images for attenuation correction of cardiac PET/MR imaging. J Appl Clin Med Phys Am Coll Med Phys 2015;16:5194. Ai H, Pan T. Feasibility of using respiration-averaged MR images for attenuation correction of cardiac PET/MR imaging. J Appl Clin Med Phys Am Coll Med Phys 2015;16:5194.
13.
go back to reference Ladefoged CN, Hansen AE, Keller SH, Holm S, Law I, Beyer T, et al. Impact of incorrect tissue classification in Dixon-based MR-AC: Fat-water tissue inversion. EJNMMI Phys 2014;1:101.CrossRef Ladefoged CN, Hansen AE, Keller SH, Holm S, Law I, Beyer T, et al. Impact of incorrect tissue classification in Dixon-based MR-AC: Fat-water tissue inversion. EJNMMI Phys 2014;1:101.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Karakatsanis N, Robson P, Dweck M, Abgral R, Trivieri M, Sanz J, et al. MR-based attenuation correction in cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: Challenges and practical solutions for cardiorespiratory motion and tissue class segmentation. J Nucl Med 2016;57:452-3. Karakatsanis N, Robson P, Dweck M, Abgral R, Trivieri M, Sanz J, et al. MR-based attenuation correction in cardiovascular PET/MR imaging: Challenges and practical solutions for cardiorespiratory motion and tissue class segmentation. J Nucl Med 2016;57:452-3.
15.
go back to reference Benkert T, Feng L, Sodickson DK, Chandarana H, Block KT. Free-breathing volumetric fat/water separation by combining radial sampling, compressed sensing, and parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2017;78:565-76.CrossRef Benkert T, Feng L, Sodickson DK, Chandarana H, Block KT. Free-breathing volumetric fat/water separation by combining radial sampling, compressed sensing, and parallel imaging. Magn Reson Med 2017;78:565-76.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Lau JMC, Laforest R, Sotoudeh H, Nie X, Sharma S, McConathy J, et al. Evaluation of attenuation correction in cardiac PET using PET/MR. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:839-46.CrossRef Lau JMC, Laforest R, Sotoudeh H, Nie X, Sharma S, McConathy J, et al. Evaluation of attenuation correction in cardiac PET using PET/MR. J Nucl Cardiol 2017;24:839-46.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dweck MR, Abgral R, Trivieri MG, Robson PM, Karakatsanis N, Mani V, et al. Hybrid magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose to diagnose active cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;11:94-107.CrossRef Dweck MR, Abgral R, Trivieri MG, Robson PM, Karakatsanis N, Mani V, et al. Hybrid magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose to diagnose active cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2017;11:94-107.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kershah S, Partovi S, Traughber BJ, Muzic RF, Schluchter MD, O’Donnell JK, et al. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population. Mol Imaging Biol MIB 2013;15:776-85.CrossRef Kershah S, Partovi S, Traughber BJ, Muzic RF, Schluchter MD, O’Donnell JK, et al. Comparison of standardized uptake values in normal structures between PET/CT and PET/MRI in an oncology patient population. Mol Imaging Biol MIB 2013;15:776-85.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Oldan JD, Shah SN, Brunken RC, DiFilippo FP, Obuchowski NA, Bolen MA. Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information? J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:1102-9.CrossRef Oldan JD, Shah SN, Brunken RC, DiFilippo FP, Obuchowski NA, Bolen MA. Do myocardial PET-MR and PET-CT FDG images provide comparable information? J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:1102-9.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Vontobel J, Liga R, Possner M, Clerc OF, Mikulicic F, Veit-Haibach P, et al. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: Comparison with standard CT attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1574-80.CrossRef Vontobel J, Liga R, Possner M, Clerc OF, Mikulicic F, Veit-Haibach P, et al. MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac FDG PET on a hybrid PET/MRI scanner: Comparison with standard CT attenuation correction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1574-80.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Nensa F, Poeppel TD, Beiderwellen K, Schelhorn J, Mahabadi AA, Erbel R, et al. Hybrid PET/MR imaging of the heart: Feasibility and initial results. Radiology 2013;268:366-73.CrossRef Nensa F, Poeppel TD, Beiderwellen K, Schelhorn J, Mahabadi AA, Erbel R, et al. Hybrid PET/MR imaging of the heart: Feasibility and initial results. Radiology 2013;268:366-73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Assessing the qualitative and quantitative impacts of simple two-class vs multiple tissue-class MR-based attenuation correction for cardiac PET/MR
Authors
Philip M. Robson, PhD
Vittoria Vergani, MD
Thomas Benkert, PhD
Maria Giovanna Trivieri, MD, PhD
Nicolas A. Karakatsanis, PhD
Ronan Abgral, MD, PhD
Marc R. Dweck, MD, PhD
Pedro R. Moreno, MD
Jason C. Kovacic, MD, PhD
Kai Tobias Block, PhD
Zahi A. Fayad, PhD
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 5/2021
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-019-02002-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2021

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 5/2021 Go to the issue