Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 02-05-2024 | Ruxolitinib | Original Research Article

Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies

Authors: Lawrence F. Eichenfield, Eric L. Simpson, Kim Papp, Jacek C. Szepietowski, Andrew Blauvelt, Leon Kircik, Jonathan I. Silverberg, Elaine C. Siegfried, Michael E. Kuligowski, May E. Venturanza, Howard Kallender, Haobo Ren, Amy S. Paller

Published in: American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a highly pruritic, inflammatory skin disease, affects approximately 7% of adolescents globally. A topical formulation of ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor, demonstrated safety and efficacy among adolescents/adults in two phase 3 studies (TRuE-AD1/TRuE-AD2).

Objective

To describe safety and efficacy of 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle and long-term disease control of ruxolitinib cream among adolescents aged 12–17 years from pooled phase 3 study data.

Methods

Patients [≥ 12 years old with AD for ≥ 2 years, Investigator’s Global Assessment score (IGA) 2/3, and 3–20% affected body surface area (BSA) at baseline] were randomized 2:2:1 to ruxolitinib cream (0.75%/1.5%) or vehicle for 8 weeks of continuous use followed by a long-term safety (LTS) period up to 52 weeks with as-needed use. Patients originally applying vehicle were rerandomized 1:1 to 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream. Efficacy measures at week 8 included IGA treatment success (IGA-TS; i.e., score of 0/1 with ≥ 2 grade improvement from baseline), ≥ 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75), and ≥ 4-point improvement in itch numerical rating scale (NRS4). Measures of disease control during the LTS period included IGA score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) and percentage affected BSA. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

Results

Of 1249 randomized patients, 245 (19.6%) were aged 12–17 years. Of these, 45 patients were randomized to vehicle and 92 patients to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream. A total of 104/137 (75.9%) patients continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the LTS period [82/92 (89.1%) continued on 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; 22/45 (48.9%) patients on vehicle were reassigned to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream], and 83/104 (79.8%) of these patients completed the LTS period. At week 8, substantially more patients who applied 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle achieved IGA-TS (50.6% versus 14.0%), EASI-75 (60.9% versus 34.9%), and NRS4 (52.1% versus 17.4%; P = 0.009). The mean (SD) reduction in itch NRS scores was significantly greater in patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream versus vehicle from day 2 [− 0.9 (1.9) versus −0.2 (1.4); P = 0.03]. During the LTS period, mean (SD) trough steady-state ruxolitinib plasma concentrations at weeks 12/52 were 27.2 (55.7)/15.5 (31.5) nM. The percentage of patients achieving IGA score of 0 or 1 was sustained or further increased with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream; mean affected BSA was generally low (< 3%; i.e., mild disease). Through 52 weeks, application site reactions occurred in 1.8% of adolescent patients applying 1.5% ruxolitinib cream at any time; no patients had serious adverse events. There were no serious infections, malignancies, major adverse cardiovascular events, or thromboembolic events.

Conclusions

Meaningful anti-inflammatory and antipruritic effects were demonstrated with 1.5% ruxolitinib cream in the subset of adolescent patients with AD, comparable with those observed in the overall study population; long-term, as-needed use maintained disease control and was well tolerated.

Clinical Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03745638 (registered 19 November 2018) and NCT03745651 (registered 19 November 2018).
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
9.
15.
go back to reference Opzelura™ (ruxolitinib cream). Full prescribing information. Wilmington: Incyte Corporation; 2023. Opzelura™ (ruxolitinib cream). Full prescribing information. Wilmington: Incyte Corporation; 2023.
16.
go back to reference Opzelura™ (ruxolitinib cream). Summary of product characteristics. Amsterdam: Incyte Biosciences Distribution B.V.; 2023. Opzelura (ruxolitinib cream). Summary of product characteristics. Amsterdam: Incyte Biosciences Distribution B.V.; 2023.
17.
go back to reference Opzelura™. ruxolitinib cream. Leatherhead: Incyte Biosciences UK Ltd; 2023. Opzelura. ruxolitinib cream. Leatherhead: Incyte Biosciences UK Ltd; 2023.
21.
go back to reference Silverberg JI, Lai JS, Patel KR, Singam V, Vakharia PP, Chopra R, et al. Measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) Itch Questionnaire: itch severity assessments in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(5):891–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.18978.CrossRefPubMed Silverberg JI, Lai JS, Patel KR, Singam V, Vakharia PP, Chopra R, et al. Measurement properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS®) Itch Questionnaire: itch severity assessments in adults with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(5):891–8. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bjd.​18978.CrossRefPubMed
22.
36.
39.
go back to reference Eichenfield LF, Stein Gold LF, Simpson EL, Zaenglein AL, Armstrong AW, Tollefson MM et al. A phase 3 study of ruxolitinib cream in children aged 2–<12 years with atopic dermatitis (TRuE-AD3): 8-week analysis. 32nd European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; 2023 October 11–14; Berlin, Germany. Eichenfield LF, Stein Gold LF, Simpson EL, Zaenglein AL, Armstrong AW, Tollefson MM et al. A phase 3 study of ruxolitinib cream in children aged 2–<12 years with atopic dermatitis (TRuE-AD3): 8-week analysis. 32nd European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Congress; 2023 October 11–14; Berlin, Germany.
Metadata
Title
Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Disease Control of Ruxolitinib Cream Among Adolescents with Atopic Dermatitis: Pooled Results from Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies
Authors
Lawrence F. Eichenfield
Eric L. Simpson
Kim Papp
Jacek C. Szepietowski
Andrew Blauvelt
Leon Kircik
Jonathan I. Silverberg
Elaine C. Siegfried
Michael E. Kuligowski
May E. Venturanza
Howard Kallender
Haobo Ren
Amy S. Paller
Publication date
02-05-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Print ISSN: 1175-0561
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1888
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40257-024-00855-2