Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 8/2017

01-08-2017 | Original Article

Risk-stratifying capacity of PET/CT metabolic tumor volume in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

Authors: Joshua H. Finkle, Stephanie Y. Jo, Mark K. Ferguson, Hai-Yan Liu, Chenpeng Zhang, Xuee Zhu, Cindy Yuan, Yonglin Pu

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 8/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is heterogeneous in tumor burden, and its treatment is variable. Whole-body metabolic tumor volume (MTVWB) has been shown to be an independent prognostic index for overall survival (OS). However, the potential of MTVWB to risk-stratify stage IIIA NSCLC has previously been unknown. If we can identify subgroups within the stage exhibiting significant OS differences using MTVWB, MTVWB may lead to adjustments in patients’ risk profile evaluations and may, therefore, influence clinical decision making regarding treatment. We estimated the risk-stratifying capacity of MTVWB in stage IIIA by comparing OS of stratified stage IIIA with stage IIB and IIIB NSCLC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 330 patients with clinical stage IIB, IIIA, and IIIB NSCLC diagnosed between 2004 and 2014. The patients’ clinical TNM stage, initial MTVWB, and long-term survival data were collected. Patients with TNM stage IIIA disease were stratified by MTVWB. The optimal MTVWB cutoff value for stage IIIA patients was calculated using sequential log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier OS analysis with log-rank tests were performed.

Results

The optimal MTVWB cut-point was 29.2 mL for the risk-stratification of stage IIIA. We identified statistically significant differences in OS between stage IIB and IIIA patients (p < 0.01), between IIIA and IIIB patients (p < 0.01), and between the stage IIIA patients with low MTVWB (below 29.2 mL) and the stage IIIA patients with high MTVWB (above 29.2 mL) (p < 0.01). There was no OS difference between the low MTVWB stage IIIA and the cohort of stage IIB patients (p = 0.485), or between the high MTVWB stage IIIA patients and the cohort of stage IIIB patients (p = 0.459). Similar risk-stratification capacity of MTVWB was observed in a large range of cutoff values from 15 to 55 mL in stage IIIA patients.

Conclusions

Using MTVWB cutoff points ranging from 15 to 55 mL with an optimal value of 29.2 mL, stage IIIA NSCLC may be effectively stratified into subgroups with no significant survival difference from stages IIB or IIIB NSCLC. This may result in more accurate survival estimation and more appropriate risk adapted treatment selection in stage IIIA NSCLC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812f3c1a.CrossRefPubMed Goldstraw P, Crowley J, Chansky K, Giroux DJ, Groome PA, Rami-Porta R, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:706–14. doi:10.​1097/​JTO.​0b013e31812f3c1a​.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ, Kennedy C, Krasnik M, Sobin LH, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:694–705. doi:10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812d05d5.CrossRefPubMed Groome PA, Bolejack V, Crowley JJ, Kennedy C, Krasnik M, Sobin LH, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: validation of the proposals for revision of the T, N, and M descriptors and consequent stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification of malignant tumours. J Thorac Oncol. 2007;2:694–705. doi:10.​1097/​JTO.​0b013e31812d05d5​.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest. 1997;111:1710–7.CrossRefPubMed Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest. 1997;111:1710–7.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:39–51. doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009.CrossRefPubMed Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, Rami-Porta R, Asamura H, Eberhardt WE, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:39–51. doi:10.​1016/​j.​jtho.​2015.​09.​009.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Albain KS, Rusch VW, Crowley JJ, Rice TW, Turrisi Iii AT, Weick JK, et al. Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus chest radiotherapy followed by surgery for stages IIIA(N2) and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: mature results of Southwest Oncology Group Phase II Study 8805. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1880–92.CrossRefPubMed Albain KS, Rusch VW, Crowley JJ, Rice TW, Turrisi Iii AT, Weick JK, et al. Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus chest radiotherapy followed by surgery for stages IIIA(N2) and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer: mature results of Southwest Oncology Group Phase II Study 8805. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1880–92.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, Turrisi Iii AT, Shepherd FA, Smith C, et al. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:379–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, Turrisi Iii AT, Shepherd FA, Smith C, et al. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:379–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Choi NC, Carey RW, Daly W, Mathisen D, Wain J, Wright C, et al. Potential impact on survival of improved tumor downstaging and resection rate by preoperative twice-daily radiation and concurrent chemotherapy in stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:712–22.CrossRefPubMed Choi NC, Carey RW, Daly W, Mathisen D, Wain J, Wright C, et al. Potential impact on survival of improved tumor downstaging and resection rate by preoperative twice-daily radiation and concurrent chemotherapy in stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:712–22.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Nishikawa H, Takada Y, Kudoh S, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2692–9.CrossRefPubMed Furuse K, Fukuoka M, Kawahara M, Nishikawa H, Takada Y, Kudoh S, et al. Phase III study of concurrent versus sequential thoracic radiotherapy in combination with mitomycin, vindesine, and cisplatin in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:2692–9.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Roth JA, Fossella F, Komaki R, Ryan MB, Putnam Jr JB, Lee JS, et al. A randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:673–80.CrossRefPubMed Roth JA, Fossella F, Komaki R, Ryan MB, Putnam Jr JB, Lee JS, et al. A randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy and surgery with surgery alone in resectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:673–80.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference van Meerbeeck JP, Kramer GWPM, Van Schil PEY, Legrand C, Smit EF, Schramel F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:442–50. doi:10.1093/jnci/djk093.CrossRefPubMed van Meerbeeck JP, Kramer GWPM, Van Schil PEY, Legrand C, Smit EF, Schramel F, et al. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:442–50. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djk093.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vokes EE, Herndon Ii JE, Kelley MJ, Cicchetti MG, Ramnath N, Neill H, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1698–704. doi:10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3569.CrossRefPubMed Vokes EE, Herndon Ii JE, Kelley MJ, Cicchetti MG, Ramnath N, Neill H, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1698–704. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2006.​07.​3569.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Scott WJ, Howington J, Feigenberg S, Movsas B, Pisters K. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:234S–42S. doi:10.1378/chest.07-1378.CrossRefPubMed Scott WJ, Howington J, Feigenberg S, Movsas B, Pisters K. Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer stage I and stage II: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:234S–42S. doi:10.​1378/​chest.​07-1378.CrossRefPubMed
18.
20.
go back to reference Chung HW, Lee KY, Kim HJ, Kim WS, So Y. FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:89–98. doi:10.1007/s00432-013-1545-7.CrossRefPubMed Chung HW, Lee KY, Kim HJ, Kim WS, So Y. FDG PET/CT metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis predict prognosis in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014;140:89–98. doi:10.​1007/​s00432-013-1545-7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Im HJ, Pak K, Cheon GJ, Kang KW, Kim SJ, Kim IJ, et al. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00259-014-2903-7. Im HJ, Pak K, Cheon GJ, Kang KW, Kim SJ, Kim IJ, et al. Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-014-2903-7.
22.
go back to reference Liao S, Penney BC, Wroblewski K, Zhang H, Simon CA, Kampalath R, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:27–38. doi:10.1007/s00259-011-1934-6.CrossRefPubMed Liao S, Penney BC, Wroblewski K, Zhang H, Simon CA, Kampalath R, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012;39:27–38. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-011-1934-6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ohri N, Duan F, Machtay M, Gorelick JJ, Snyder BS, Alavi A, et al. Pretreatment FDG-PET metrics in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv004. Ohri N, Duan F, Machtay M, Gorelick JJ, Snyder BS, Alavi A, et al. Pretreatment FDG-PET metrics in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107. doi:10.​1093/​jnci/​djv004.
24.
go back to reference Satoh Y, Onishi H, Nambu A, Araki T. Volume-based parameters measured by using FDG PET/CT in patients with stage I NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: prognostic value. Radiology. 2014;270:275–81. doi:10.1148/radiol.13130652.CrossRefPubMed Satoh Y, Onishi H, Nambu A, Araki T. Volume-based parameters measured by using FDG PET/CT in patients with stage I NSCLC treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: prognostic value. Radiology. 2014;270:275–81. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​13130652.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Zhang H, Wroblewski K, Appelbaum D, Pu Y. Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8:181–91.CrossRefPubMed Zhang H, Wroblewski K, Appelbaum D, Pu Y. Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013;8:181–91.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Hyun SH, Ahn HK, Ahn MJ, Ahn YC, Kim J, Shim YM, et al. Volume-based assessment with 18F-FDG PET/CT improves outcome prediction for patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:623–8. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13847.CrossRefPubMed Hyun SH, Ahn HK, Ahn MJ, Ahn YC, Kim J, Shim YM, et al. Volume-based assessment with 18F-FDG PET/CT improves outcome prediction for patients with stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:623–8. doi:10.​2214/​AJR.​14.​13847.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Rami-Porta R. Revised (8th) edition of TNM staging system for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:S69.CrossRef Rami-Porta R. Revised (8th) edition of TNM staging system for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:S69.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rami-Porta RBV, Crowley J, Ball D, Kim J, Lyons G, Rice T, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:990–1003.CrossRefPubMed Rami-Porta RBV, Crowley J, Ball D, Kim J, Lyons G, Rice T, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revisions of the T descriptors in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10:990–1003.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mandrekar JN, Mandrekar SJ. Cutpoint determination methods in survival analysis using SAS. The 28th SAS Users Group International Conference (SUGI). Seattle; 2003. Mandrekar JN, Mandrekar SJ. Cutpoint determination methods in survival analysis using SAS. The 28th SAS Users Group International Conference (SUGI). Seattle; 2003.
33.
go back to reference Tunes-da-Silva G, Klein JP. Cutpoint selection for discretizing a continuous covariate for generalized estimating equations. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2011;55:226–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tunes-da-Silva G, Klein JP. Cutpoint selection for discretizing a continuous covariate for generalized estimating equations. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2011;55:226–35.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Pérez Hoyos S. Cutpoint determination in continuous predictive variables in survival analysis. 2014 Spanish Stata Users Group meeting. Barcelona; 2014. Pérez Hoyos S. Cutpoint determination in continuous predictive variables in survival analysis. 2014 Spanish Stata Users Group meeting. Barcelona; 2014.
35.
go back to reference Bazan JG, Duan F, Snyder BS, Horng D, Graves EE, Siegel BA, et al. Metabolic tumor volume predicts overall survival and local control in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated in ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:17–24. doi:10.1007/s00259-016-3520-4.CrossRefPubMed Bazan JG, Duan F, Snyder BS, Horng D, Graves EE, Siegel BA, et al. Metabolic tumor volume predicts overall survival and local control in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated in ACRIN 6668/RTOG 0235. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:17–24. doi:10.​1007/​s00259-016-3520-4.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4357–68. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.08.120.CrossRefPubMed Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, Dahmen G, Mueller SP, Beyer T, et al. Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4357–68. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2004.​08.​120.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Fischer BM, Mortensen J, Langer SW, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Petersen BI, et al. A prospective study of PET/CT in initial staging of small-cell lung cancer: comparison with CT, bone scintigraphy and bone marrow analysis. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:338–45. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdl374.CrossRefPubMed Fischer BM, Mortensen J, Langer SW, Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Petersen BI, et al. A prospective study of PET/CT in initial staging of small-cell lung cancer: comparison with CT, bone scintigraphy and bone marrow analysis. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:338–45. doi:10.​1093/​annonc/​mdl374.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Ohno Y, Koyama H, Onishi Y, Takenaka D, Nogami M, Yoshikawa T, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment—utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 2008;248:643–54. doi:10.1148/radiol.2482072039.CrossRefPubMed Ohno Y, Koyama H, Onishi Y, Takenaka D, Nogami M, Yoshikawa T, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment—utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology. 2008;248:643–54. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2482072039.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Plathow C, Aschoff P, Lichy MP, Eschmann S, Hehr T, Brink I, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in staging of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer—initial results. Investig Radiol. 2008;43:290–7. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e318163273a.CrossRef Plathow C, Aschoff P, Lichy MP, Eschmann S, Hehr T, Brink I, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in staging of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer—initial results. Investig Radiol. 2008;43:290–7. doi:10.​1097/​RLI.​0b013e318163273a​.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1059–66.PubMed Shankar LK, Hoffman JM, Bacharach S, Graham MM, Karp J, Lammertsma AA, et al. Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1059–66.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Daisne JF, Duprez T, Weynand B, Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology. 2004;233:93–100. doi:10.1148/radiol.2331030660.CrossRefPubMed Daisne JF, Duprez T, Weynand B, Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, et al. Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen. Radiology. 2004;233:93–100. doi:10.​1148/​radiol.​2331030660.CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Obara P, Liu H, Wroblewski K, Zhang CP, Hou P, Jiang Y, et al. Quantification of metabolic tumor activity and burden in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Is manual adjustment of semiautomatic gradient-based measurements necessary? Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:782–9. doi:10.1097/MNM.0000000000000317.CrossRefPubMed Obara P, Liu H, Wroblewski K, Zhang CP, Hou P, Jiang Y, et al. Quantification of metabolic tumor activity and burden in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: Is manual adjustment of semiautomatic gradient-based measurements necessary? Nucl Med Commun. 2015;36:782–9. doi:10.​1097/​MNM.​0000000000000317​.CrossRefPubMed
47.
49.
go back to reference Werner-Wasik M, Nelson AD, Choi W, Arai Y, Faulhaber PF, Kang P, et al. What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1164–71. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.055.CrossRefPubMed Werner-Wasik M, Nelson AD, Choi W, Arai Y, Faulhaber PF, Kang P, et al. What is the best way to contour lung tumors on PET scans? Multiobserver validation of a gradient-based method using a NSCLC digital PET phantom. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:1164–71. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ijrobp.​2010.​12.​055.CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Graves EE, Quon A, Loo Jr BW. RT_Image: an open-source tool for investigating PET in radiation oncology. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:111–21.CrossRefPubMed Graves EE, Quon A, Loo Jr BW. RT_Image: an open-source tool for investigating PET in radiation oncology. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2007;6:111–21.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Risk-stratifying capacity of PET/CT metabolic tumor volume in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer
Authors
Joshua H. Finkle
Stephanie Y. Jo
Mark K. Ferguson
Hai-Yan Liu
Chenpeng Zhang
Xuee Zhu
Cindy Yuan
Yonglin Pu
Publication date
01-08-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 8/2017
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3659-7

Other articles of this Issue 8/2017

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 8/2017 Go to the issue