Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2020

01-07-2020 | Original Research

Responsibilities, Strategies, and Practice Factors in Clinical Cost Conversations: a US Physician Survey

Authors: Rahma Warsame, MD, Lindsay Riordan, BA, Sarah Jenkins, MA, Kandace Lackore, BA, Joel Pacyna, MA, Ryan Antiel, MD, MSME, Timothy Beebe, PhD, MA, Mark Liebow, MD, MPH, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, MD, Michael Grover, DO, Matthew Wynia, MD, MPH, Susan Dorr Goold, MD, MHSA, MA, Matthew DeCamp, MD, PhD, Marion Danis, MD, Jon Tilburt, MD

Published in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Issue 7/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Physicians play a key role in mitigating and managing costs in healthcare which are rising.

Objective

Conduct a cross-sectional survey in 2017, comparing results to a 2012 survey to understand US physicians’ evolving attitudes and strategies concerning healthcare costs.

Participants

Random sample of 1200 US physicians from the AMA Masterfile.

Measures

Physician views on responsibility for costs of care, enthusiasm for cost-saving strategies, cost-consciousness scale, and practice strategies on addressing cost.

Key Results

Among 1200 physicians surveyed in 2017, 489 responded (41%). In 2017, slightly more physicians reported that physicians have a major responsibility for addressing healthcare costs (32% vs. 27%, p = 0.03). In 2017, more physicians attributed “major responsibility” for addressing healthcare costs to pharmaceutical companies (68% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and hospital and health systems (63% vs. 56%%, p = 0.008) in contrast to 2012. Fewer respondents in 2017 attributed major responsibility for addressing costs to trial lawyers (53% vs. 59%, p = 0.007) and patients (42% vs. 52%, p < 0.0001) as compared to 2012. Physician enthusiasm for patient-focused cost-containment strategies like high deductible health plans and higher co-pays (62% vs. 42%, p < 0.0001 and 62% vs. 39%, p < 0.0001, not enthusiastic, respectively) declined. Physicians reported that when they discussed cost, it resulted in a change in disease management 56% of the time. Cost-consciousness within surveyed physicians had not changed meaningfully in 2017 since 2012 (31.7 vs. 31.2). Most physicians continued to agree that decision support tools showing costs would be helpful in their practice (> 70%). After adjusting for specialty, political affiliation, practice setting, age, and gender, only democratic/independent affiliation remained a significant predictor of cost-consciousness.

Conclusions and Relevance

US physicians increasingly attribute responsibility for rising healthcare costs to organizations and express less enthusiasm for strategies that increase patient out-of-pocket cost. Interventions that focus on physician knowledge and communication strategies regarding cost of care may be helpful.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sisko AM, Keehan SP, Poisal JA, Cuckler GA, Smith SD, Madison AJ, et al. National Health Expenditure Projections, 2018-27: Economic And Demographic Trends Drive Spending And Enrollment Growth. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2019;38(3):491–501.CrossRef Sisko AM, Keehan SP, Poisal JA, Cuckler GA, Smith SD, Madison AJ, et al. National Health Expenditure Projections, 2018-27: Economic And Demographic Trends Drive Spending And Enrollment Growth. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2019;38(3):491–501.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Institute PLHR. The Price of Excess: Identifying Waste in Healthcare Spending: PricewaterhouseCoopers' Health Research Institute. 2008. Institute PLHR. The Price of Excess: Identifying Waste in Healthcare Spending: PricewaterhouseCoopers' Health Research Institute. 2008.
4.
go back to reference Cassel CK, Guest JA. Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. Jama. 2012;307(17):1801–2.CrossRef Cassel CK, Guest JA. Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. Jama. 2012;307(17):1801–2.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Borelli MC, Bujanda M, Maier K. The Affordable Care Act Insurance Reforms: Where Are We Now, and What’s Next? Clin Diabetes 2016;34(1):58–64.CrossRef Borelli MC, Bujanda M, Maier K. The Affordable Care Act Insurance Reforms: Where Are We Now, and What’s Next? Clin Diabetes 2016;34(1):58–64.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kerr EA, Kullgren JT, Saini SD. Choosing Wisely: How To Fulfill The Promise In The Next 5 Years. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2017;36(11):2012–8.CrossRef Kerr EA, Kullgren JT, Saini SD. Choosing Wisely: How To Fulfill The Promise In The Next 5 Years. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2017;36(11):2012–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, Thorsteinsdottir B, James KM, Egginton JS, et al. Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. Jama. 2013;310(4):380–8.CrossRef Tilburt JC, Wynia MK, Sheeler RD, Thorsteinsdottir B, James KM, Egginton JS, et al. Views of US physicians about controlling health care costs. Jama. 2013;310(4):380–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Antiel RM, James KM, Egginton JS, Sheeler RD, Liebow M, Goold SD, et al. Specialty, political affiliation, and perceived social responsibility are associated with U.S. physician reactions to health care reform legislation. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(2):399–403.CrossRef Antiel RM, James KM, Egginton JS, Sheeler RD, Liebow M, Goold SD, et al. Specialty, political affiliation, and perceived social responsibility are associated with U.S. physician reactions to health care reform legislation. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(2):399–403.CrossRef
12.
14.
go back to reference American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th ed.Lenexa, KS: AAPOR; 2011 American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. 7th ed.Lenexa, KS: AAPOR; 2011
17.
go back to reference Choudhry NK, Saya UY, Shrank WH, Greenberg JO, Melia C, Bilodeau A, et al. Cost-related medication underuse: prevalence among hospitalized managed care patients. J Hosp Med 2012;7(2):104–9.CrossRef Choudhry NK, Saya UY, Shrank WH, Greenberg JO, Melia C, Bilodeau A, et al. Cost-related medication underuse: prevalence among hospitalized managed care patients. J Hosp Med 2012;7(2):104–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Alpern JD, Stauffer WM, Kesselheim AS. High-cost generic drugs--implications for patients and policymakers. N Engl J Med 2014;371(20):1859–62.CrossRef Alpern JD, Stauffer WM, Kesselheim AS. High-cost generic drugs--implications for patients and policymakers. N Engl J Med 2014;371(20):1859–62.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schumock GT, Li EC, Suda KJ, Wiest MD, Stubbings J, Matusiak LM, et al. National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2016. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016;73(14):1058–75.CrossRef Schumock GT, Li EC, Suda KJ, Wiest MD, Stubbings J, Matusiak LM, et al. National trends in prescription drug expenditures and projections for 2016. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2016;73(14):1058–75.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Russel LB. Preventio’s potnential for slowing the growth of Medical Spending. Washington D.C.: National Coaliatio on Healthcare; 2007. Russel LB. Preventio’s potnential for slowing the growth of Medical Spending. Washington D.C.: National Coaliatio on Healthcare; 2007.
21.
go back to reference Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Jama. 2004;291(10):1238–45.CrossRef Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. Jama. 2004;291(10):1238–45.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(1):52–61.CrossRef Maciosek MV, Coffield AB, Edwards NM, Flottemesch TJ, Goodman MJ, Solberg LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med 2006;31(1):52–61.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Zafar SY, Chino F, Ubel PA, Rushing C, Samsa G, Altomare I, et al. The utility of cost discussions between patients with cancer and oncologists. Am J Manag Care 2015;21(9):607–15.PubMed Zafar SY, Chino F, Ubel PA, Rushing C, Samsa G, Altomare I, et al. The utility of cost discussions between patients with cancer and oncologists. Am J Manag Care 2015;21(9):607–15.PubMed
24.
go back to reference Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Meltzer DO. Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. Jama. 2003;290(7):953–8.CrossRef Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Meltzer DO. Patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. Jama. 2003;290(7):953–8.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pham HH, Alexander GC, O’Malley AS. Physician consideration of patients’ out-of-pocket costs in making common clinical decisions. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(7):663–8.CrossRef Pham HH, Alexander GC, O’Malley AS. Physician consideration of patients’ out-of-pocket costs in making common clinical decisions. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(7):663–8.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Richman IB, Brodie M. A National study of burdensome health care costs among non-elderly Americans. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:435.CrossRef Richman IB, Brodie M. A National study of burdensome health care costs among non-elderly Americans. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:435.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Patel MR, Shah KS, Shallcross ML. A qualitative study of physician perspectives of cost-related communication and patients’ financial burden with managing chronic disease. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:518.CrossRef Patel MR, Shah KS, Shallcross ML. A qualitative study of physician perspectives of cost-related communication and patients’ financial burden with managing chronic disease. BMC Health Serv Res 2015;15:518.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bestvina CM, Zullig LL, Rushing C, Chino F, Samsa GP, Altomare I, et al. Patient-oncologist cost communication, financial distress, and medication adherence. J Oncol Pract 2014;10(3):162–7.CrossRef Bestvina CM, Zullig LL, Rushing C, Chino F, Samsa GP, Altomare I, et al. Patient-oncologist cost communication, financial distress, and medication adherence. J Oncol Pract 2014;10(3):162–7.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schmittdiel JA, Steers N, Duru OK, Ettner SL, Brown AF, Fung V, et al. Patient-provider communication regarding drug costs in Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes: a TRIAD Study. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:164.CrossRef Schmittdiel JA, Steers N, Duru OK, Ettner SL, Brown AF, Fung V, et al. Patient-provider communication regarding drug costs in Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes: a TRIAD Study. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:164.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Altomare I, Irwin B, Zafar SY, Houck K, Maloney B, Greenup R, et al. Physician Experience and Attitudes Toward Addressing the Cost of Cancer Care. J Oncol Pract 2016;12(3):e281–8, 47-8.CrossRef Altomare I, Irwin B, Zafar SY, Houck K, Maloney B, Greenup R, et al. Physician Experience and Attitudes Toward Addressing the Cost of Cancer Care. J Oncol Pract 2016;12(3):e281–8, 47-8.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Tseng CW, McFadden D, Meltzer DO. Barriers to patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19(8):856–60.CrossRef Alexander GC, Casalino LP, Tseng CW, McFadden D, Meltzer DO. Barriers to patient-physician communication about out-of-pocket costs. J Gen Intern Med 2004;19(8):856–60.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Danis M, Sommers R, Logan J, Weidmer B, Chen S, Goold S, et al. Exploring public attitudes towards approaches to discussing costs in the clinical encounter. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(1):223–9.CrossRef Danis M, Sommers R, Logan J, Weidmer B, Chen S, Goold S, et al. Exploring public attitudes towards approaches to discussing costs in the clinical encounter. J Gen Intern Med 2014;29(1):223–9.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Sommers R, Goold SD, McGlynn EA, Pearson SD, Danis M. Focus groups highlight that many patients object to clinicians’ focusing on costs. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2013;32(2):338–46.CrossRef Sommers R, Goold SD, McGlynn EA, Pearson SD, Danis M. Focus groups highlight that many patients object to clinicians’ focusing on costs. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2013;32(2):338–46.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Goetz C, Rotman SR, Hartoularos G, Bishop TF. The effect of charge display on cost of care and physician practice behaviors: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(6):835–42.CrossRef Goetz C, Rotman SR, Hartoularos G, Bishop TF. The effect of charge display on cost of care and physician practice behaviors: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2015;30(6):835–42.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Riordan L, Warsame R, Jenkins S, Lackore K, Paycna J, Antiel R, et. al. U.S. Physician Reactions to ACA Implementation, 2012–2017. Health Affairs September 2019;238(9):1530–1536. Riordan L, Warsame R, Jenkins S, Lackore K, Paycna J, Antiel R, et. al. U.S. Physician Reactions to ACA Implementation, 2012–2017. Health Affairs September 2019;238(9):1530–1536.
37.
go back to reference Jacobs LR, Mettler S. Liking Health Reform But Turned Off By Toxic Politics. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2016;35(5):915–22.CrossRef Jacobs LR, Mettler S. Liking Health Reform But Turned Off By Toxic Politics. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2016;35(5):915–22.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Responsibilities, Strategies, and Practice Factors in Clinical Cost Conversations: a US Physician Survey
Authors
Rahma Warsame, MD
Lindsay Riordan, BA
Sarah Jenkins, MA
Kandace Lackore, BA
Joel Pacyna, MA
Ryan Antiel, MD, MSME
Timothy Beebe, PhD, MA
Mark Liebow, MD, MPH
Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir, MD
Michael Grover, DO
Matthew Wynia, MD, MPH
Susan Dorr Goold, MD, MHSA, MA
Matthew DeCamp, MD, PhD
Marion Danis, MD
Jon Tilburt, MD
Publication date
01-07-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Issue 7/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Electronic ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05807-0

Other articles of this Issue 7/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 7/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.