Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Correspondence

Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’

Authors: Katherine A. Pohlman, Kristian Anderson, Beth Carleo, Brian Gleberzon

Published in: BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Correspondence from Yu et al. identify methodological issues with the systematic review of manual therapy for pediatric manuscript. Like any research study, limitations are important for readers to keep in consideration when reviewing study findings. The primary authors maintain full confidence in the use of the review to provide practicing clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the limited and low-quality available evidence regarding manual therapies for the pediatric patient.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bussières AE, Al Zoubi F, Stuber K, French SD, Boruff J, Corrigan J, et al. Evidence-based practice, research utilization, and knowledge translation in chiropractic: a scoping review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16:216.CrossRef Bussières AE, Al Zoubi F, Stuber K, French SD, Boruff J, Corrigan J, et al. Evidence-based practice, research utilization, and knowledge translation in chiropractic: a scoping review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2016;16:216.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.CrossRef Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26:91–108.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Coulter ID. Evidence summaries and synthesis: necessary but insufficient approach for determining clinical practice of integrated medicine? Integr Cancer Ther. 2006;5:282–6.CrossRef Coulter ID. Evidence summaries and synthesis: necessary but insufficient approach for determining clinical practice of integrated medicine? Integr Cancer Ther. 2006;5:282–6.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Linde K, Coulter I. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In: Lewith G, Jonas W, H W, editors. Clinical research in complementary therapies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2011. p. 119–34. Linde K, Coulter I. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. In: Lewith G, Jonas W, H W, editors. Clinical research in complementary therapies. 2nd ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2011. p. 119–34.
6.
go back to reference Clar C, Tsertsvadze A, Court R, Hundt GL, Clarke A, Sutcliffe P. Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014;22:12.CrossRef Clar C, Tsertsvadze A, Court R, Hundt GL, Clarke A, Sutcliffe P. Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report. Chiropr Man Therap. 2014;22:12.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Response to ‘Methodological flaws on “manual therapy for the pediatric population: a systematic review” by Prevost et al. (2019)’
Authors
Katherine A. Pohlman
Kristian Anderson
Beth Carleo
Brian Gleberzon
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 2662-7671
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-03165-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 1/2021 Go to the issue