Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 6/2020

01-12-2020 | Original Article

Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82Rb PET/CT

Authors: Jonathan T. Abele, MD, Monique Raubenheimer, MD, Vincent G. Bain, MD, Greg Wandzilak, MRT(NM), Naji AlHulaimi, MD, Richard Coulden, MD, Robert A. deKemp, PhD, Ran Klein, PhD, Randall G. Williams, MD, Robert S. Warshawski, MD, Lucille D. Lalonde, MD

Published in: Journal of Nuclear Cardiology | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Our aim was to determine if end-stage liver disease (ESLD) is associated with an attenuated response to vasodilator-stress or dobutamine-stress using 82Rb-PET MPI with blood flow quantification.

Methods and Results

Pre-liver transplant patients who had a normal dipyridamole-stress (n = 27) or dobutamine-stress (n = 26) 82Rb PET/CT MPI study with no identifiable coronary artery calcium were identified retrospectively and compared to a prospectively identified low-risk of liver disease dipyridamole-stress control group (n = 20). The dipyridamole-stress liver disease group had a lower myocardial flow reserve (MFR) (1.89 ± 0.79) than the control group (2.79 ± 0.96, P < .05). The dobutamine-stress group had a higher MFR than both other groups (3.69 ± 1.49, P < .05). A moderate negative correlation between MELD score and MFR was demonstrated for the dipyridamole-stress liver disease group (r = − 0.473, P < .05). This correlation was not observed for the dobutamine-stress liver disease group (r = − 0.253, P = .21). The liver failure group as a whole (n = 53) had a higher resting myocardial blood flow (0.97 ± 0.33 mL/min/g) than the control group (0.82 ± 0.26, P < .05).

Conclusion

Dipyridamole demonstrates an attenuated vasodilatory response in ESLD patients compared to a non-ESLD control group related to higher resting blood flow and comparatively reduced stress blood flow. Dobutamine does not demonstrate this effect implying it may be the preferred pharmacologic MPI stress agent for ESLD patients.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hogan BJ, Gonsalkorala E, Heneghan MA. Evaluation of coronary artery disease in potential liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 2017;23:386-95.CrossRef Hogan BJ, Gonsalkorala E, Heneghan MA. Evaluation of coronary artery disease in potential liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 2017;23:386-95.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Donovan RJ, Choi C, Ali A, Heuman DM, Fuchs M, Bavry AA, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for orthotopic liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:26-34.CrossRef Donovan RJ, Choi C, Ali A, Heuman DM, Fuchs M, Bavry AA, et al. Perioperative cardiovascular evaluation for orthotopic liver transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 2017;62:26-34.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sonny A, Kelly D, Hammel JP, Albeldawi M, Zein N, Cywinski JB. Predictors of poor outcome among older liver transplant recipients. Clin Transpl 2015;29:197-203.CrossRef Sonny A, Kelly D, Hammel JP, Albeldawi M, Zein N, Cywinski JB. Predictors of poor outcome among older liver transplant recipients. Clin Transpl 2015;29:197-203.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Manoushagian S, Meshkov A. Evaluation of solid organ transplant candidates for coronary artery disease. Am J Transpl 2014;14:2228-34.CrossRef Manoushagian S, Meshkov A. Evaluation of solid organ transplant candidates for coronary artery disease. Am J Transpl 2014;14:2228-34.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zaky A, Bendjelid K. Appraising cardiac dysfunction in liver transplantation: An ongoing challenge. Liver Int 2015;35:12-9.CrossRef Zaky A, Bendjelid K. Appraising cardiac dysfunction in liver transplantation: An ongoing challenge. Liver Int 2015;35:12-9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Raval Z, Harinstein ME, Flaherty JD. Role of cardiovascular intervention as a bridge to liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:10651-7.CrossRef Raval Z, Harinstein ME, Flaherty JD. Role of cardiovascular intervention as a bridge to liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:10651-7.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Moller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and liver. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2804-11.CrossRef Moller S, Bernardi M. Interactions of the heart and liver. Eur Heart J 2013;34:2804-11.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lentine KL, Costa SP, Weir MR, Robb JF, Fleischer LA, Kasiske BL, et al. Cardiac disease evaluation and management among kidney and liver transplantation candidates. JACC 2012;60:434-80.CrossRef Lentine KL, Costa SP, Weir MR, Robb JF, Fleischer LA, Kasiske BL, et al. Cardiac disease evaluation and management among kidney and liver transplantation candidates. JACC 2012;60:434-80.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Singh V, Nilesakumar JP, Rodriguez AP, Shantha G, Arora S, Deshmukh A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with end-stage liver disease. Am J Cardiol 2016;117:1729-34.CrossRef Singh V, Nilesakumar JP, Rodriguez AP, Shantha G, Arora S, Deshmukh A, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with end-stage liver disease. Am J Cardiol 2016;117:1729-34.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Davidson CJ, Gheorghiade M, Flaherty JD, Elliot MD, Reddy SP, Wang NC, et al. Predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in liver transplant candidates. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:359-60.CrossRef Davidson CJ, Gheorghiade M, Flaherty JD, Elliot MD, Reddy SP, Wang NC, et al. Predictive value of stress myocardial perfusion imaging in liver transplant candidates. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:359-60.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Aydinalp A, Bal U, Atar I, Ertan C, Aktas A, Yildirir A, et al. Value of stress myocardial perfusion scanning in diagnosis of severe coronary artery disease in liver transplantation candidates. Transpl Proc 2009;41:3757-60.CrossRef Aydinalp A, Bal U, Atar I, Ertan C, Aktas A, Yildirir A, et al. Value of stress myocardial perfusion scanning in diagnosis of severe coronary artery disease in liver transplantation candidates. Transpl Proc 2009;41:3757-60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bhutani S, Tobis J, Gevorgyan R, Sinha A, Suh W, Honda HM, et al. Accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging to diagnose coronary artery disease in end stage liver disease patients. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1057-61.CrossRef Bhutani S, Tobis J, Gevorgyan R, Sinha A, Suh W, Honda HM, et al. Accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging to diagnose coronary artery disease in end stage liver disease patients. Am J Cardiol 2013;111:1057-61.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Martinez-Palli G, Cardenas A. Pre operative cardio pulmonary assessment of the liver transplant candidate. Ann Hepatol 2011;10:421-33.CrossRef Martinez-Palli G, Cardenas A. Pre operative cardio pulmonary assessment of the liver transplant candidate. Ann Hepatol 2011;10:421-33.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Schindler TH. Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;57:588-606.CrossRef Schindler TH. Positron-emitting myocardial blood flow tracers and clinical potential. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2015;57:588-606.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schindler TH. Cardiac PET/computed tomography applications and cardiovascular outcome. PET Clin 2015;10:441-59.CrossRef Schindler TH. Cardiac PET/computed tomography applications and cardiovascular outcome. PET Clin 2015;10:441-59.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Murthy VL, Lee BC, Sitek A. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1952-8.CrossRef Murthy VL, Lee BC, Sitek A. Comparison and prognostic validation of multiple methods of quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb PET. J Nucl Med 2014;55:1952-8.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Slomka P, Berman DS, Alexanderson E, Germano G. The role of PET quantification in cardiovascular imaging. Clin Transl Imaging 2014;2:343-58.CrossRef Slomka P, Berman DS, Alexanderson E, Germano G. The role of PET quantification in cardiovascular imaging. Clin Transl Imaging 2014;2:343-58.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Renaud JM, DaSilva JN, Beanlands RSB, deKemp R. Characterizing the normal range of myocardial blood flow with 82rubidium and 13N-ammonia PET imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:578-91.CrossRef Renaud JM, DaSilva JN, Beanlands RSB, deKemp R. Characterizing the normal range of myocardial blood flow with 82rubidium and 13N-ammonia PET imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:578-91.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Nakazato R, Berman DS, Alexanderson E, Slomka P. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. Imaging Med 2013;5:35-46.CrossRef Nakazato R, Berman DS, Alexanderson E, Slomka P. Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET. Imaging Med 2013;5:35-46.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Saraste A, Kajander S, Han C, Nesterov SV, Knuuti J. PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality? J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1044-59.CrossRef Saraste A, Kajander S, Han C, Nesterov SV, Knuuti J. PET: Is myocardial flow quantification a clinical reality? J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:1044-59.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Resch K, Sonnex E, Abele JT, Coulden R. Value of visual assessment of coronary artery calcium on non-gated attenuation correction CT performed for Rb82 myocardial perfusion PET CT. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1514. Resch K, Sonnex E, Abele JT, Coulden R. Value of visual assessment of coronary artery calcium on non-gated attenuation correction CT performed for Rb82 myocardial perfusion PET CT. J Nucl Med 2015;56:1514.
22.
go back to reference Renaud JM, Mylonas I, McArdle B, Dowsley T, Yip K, Turcotte E, et al. Clinical interpretation standards and quality assurance for the multicenter PET/CT trial Rubidium-ARMI. J Nucl Med 2014;55:58-64.CrossRef Renaud JM, Mylonas I, McArdle B, Dowsley T, Yip K, Turcotte E, et al. Clinical interpretation standards and quality assurance for the multicenter PET/CT trial Rubidium-ARMI. J Nucl Med 2014;55:58-64.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:606-39.CrossRef Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 2016;23:606-39.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference de Kemp RA, Declerk J, Klein R, Pan X, Nakazato R, Tonge C, et al. Multisoftware reproducibility study of stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 3D dynamic PET/CT and a 1-tissue-compartment model of 82Rb kinetics. J Nucl Med 2013;54:571-7.CrossRef de Kemp RA, Declerk J, Klein R, Pan X, Nakazato R, Tonge C, et al. Multisoftware reproducibility study of stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 3D dynamic PET/CT and a 1-tissue-compartment model of 82Rb kinetics. J Nucl Med 2013;54:571-7.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Meintjes M, Sathekge M, Makanjee CR. Comparison of rubidium-82 myocardial blood flow quantification with coronary calcium score for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Nucl Med Commun 2016;37:197-206.CrossRef Meintjes M, Sathekge M, Makanjee CR. Comparison of rubidium-82 myocardial blood flow quantification with coronary calcium score for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis. Nucl Med Commun 2016;37:197-206.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tadamura E, Iida H, Matsumoto K, Mamede M, Kubo S, Toyoda H, et al. Comparison of myocardial blood flow during dobutamine-atropine infusion with that after dipyridamole administration in normal men. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:130-6.CrossRef Tadamura E, Iida H, Matsumoto K, Mamede M, Kubo S, Toyoda H, et al. Comparison of myocardial blood flow during dobutamine-atropine infusion with that after dipyridamole administration in normal men. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:130-6.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bin JP, Pelberg RA, Wei K, Le E, Goodman NC, Kaul S. Dobutamine versus dipyridamole for inducing reversible perfusion defects in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:167-74.CrossRef Bin JP, Pelberg RA, Wei K, Le E, Goodman NC, Kaul S. Dobutamine versus dipyridamole for inducing reversible perfusion defects in chronic multivessel coronary artery stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:167-74.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Perera V, Gross AS, Xu H, McLachlan AJ. Pharmacokinetics of caffeine in plasma and saliva, and the influence of caffeine abstinence on CYP1A2 metrics. JPP 2011;63:1161-8.CrossRef Perera V, Gross AS, Xu H, McLachlan AJ. Pharmacokinetics of caffeine in plasma and saliva, and the influence of caffeine abstinence on CYP1A2 metrics. JPP 2011;63:1161-8.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Guo Y, Hu B, Xie Y, Billiar TR, Sperry JL, Huang M, et al. Regulation of drug metabolizing enzymes by local and systemic liver injuries. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016;12:245-51.CrossRef Guo Y, Hu B, Xie Y, Billiar TR, Sperry JL, Huang M, et al. Regulation of drug metabolizing enzymes by local and systemic liver injuries. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2016;12:245-51.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Quantitative blood flow evaluation of vasodilation-stress compared with dobutamine-stress in patients with end-stage liver disease using 82Rb PET/CT
Authors
Jonathan T. Abele, MD
Monique Raubenheimer, MD
Vincent G. Bain, MD
Greg Wandzilak, MRT(NM)
Naji AlHulaimi, MD
Richard Coulden, MD
Robert A. deKemp, PhD
Ran Klein, PhD
Randall G. Williams, MD
Robert S. Warshawski, MD
Lucille D. Lalonde, MD
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 1071-3581
Electronic ISSN: 1532-6551
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12350-018-01516-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 6/2020 Go to the issue