Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 2/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Quality of life of liver donors following donor hepatectomy

Authors: Biju Chandran, Viju Kumar Bharathan, Johns Shaji Mathew, Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma, Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan, Dinesh Balakrishnan, Ramachandran Narayana Menon, Puneet Dhar, Sudheer Othiyil Vayoth, Sudhindran Surendran

Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although morbidity following living liver donation is well characterized, there is sparse data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of donors.

Methods

HRQOL of 200 consecutive live liver donors from 2011–2014 performed at an Indian center were prospectively collected using the SF-36 version 2, 1 year after surgery. The effect of donor demographics, operative details, post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo and 50-50 criteria), and recipient mortality on the quality-of-life (QOL) scoring was analyzed.

Results

Among 200 donors (female/male=141:59), 77 (38.5%) had complications (14.5%, 16.5%, 4.5%, and 3.5%, Clavien-Dindo grades I–IV, respectively). The physical composite score (PCS) of donors 1 year after surgery was less than ideal (48.75±9.5) while the mental composite score (MCS) was good (53.37±6.16). Recipient death was the only factor that showed a statistically significant correlation with both PCS (p<0.001) and MCS (p=0.05). Age above 50 years (p<0.001), increasing body mass index (BMI) (p=0.026), and hospital stay more than 14 days ( p= 0.042) negatively affected the physical scores while emergency surgery (p<0.001) resulted in lower mental scores. Gender, postoperative complications, type of graft, or fulfillment of 50-50 criteria did not influence HRQOL. On asking the hypothetical question whether the donors would be willing to donate again, 99% reiterated there will be no change in their decision.

Conclusion

Recipient death, donation in emergency setting, age above 50, higher BMI, and prolonged hospital stay are factors that lead to impaired HRQOL following live liver donation. Despite this, 99% donors did not repent the decision to donate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trotter JF, Wachs M, Everson GT, Kam I. Adult-to-adult transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1074–82.CrossRefPubMed Trotter JF, Wachs M, Everson GT, Kam I. Adult-to-adult transplantation of the right hepatic lobe from a living donor. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:1074–82.CrossRefPubMed
2.
4.
go back to reference Takada Y, Suzukamo Y, Oike F, et al. Long-term quality of life of donors after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1343–52.CrossRefPubMed Takada Y, Suzukamo Y, Oike F, et al. Long-term quality of life of donors after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1343–52.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cheah YL, Simpson MA, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA. Incidence of death and potentially life-threatening near-miss events in living donor hepatic lobectomy: a world-wide survey. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:499–506.CrossRefPubMed Cheah YL, Simpson MA, Pomposelli JJ, Pomfret EA. Incidence of death and potentially life-threatening near-miss events in living donor hepatic lobectomy: a world-wide survey. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:499–506.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Middleton PF, Duffield M, Lynch SV, et al. Living donor liver transplantation—adult donor outcomes: a systematic review. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:24–30.CrossRefPubMed Middleton PF, Duffield M, Lynch SV, et al. Living donor liver transplantation—adult donor outcomes: a systematic review. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:24–30.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Parikh ND, Ladner D, Abecassis M, Butt Z. Quality of life for donors after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:1352–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parikh ND, Ladner D, Abecassis M, Butt Z. Quality of life for donors after living donor liver transplantation: a review of the literature. Liver Transpl. 2010;16:1352–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Erim Y, Beckmann M, Kroencke S, et al. Psychological strain in urgent indications for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:886–95.CrossRefPubMed Erim Y, Beckmann M, Kroencke S, et al. Psychological strain in urgent indications for living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:886–95.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.CrossRef WHO Expert Consultation. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004;363:157–63.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Qu B, Guo HQ, Liu J, Zhang Y, Sun G. Reliability and validity testing of the SF-36 questionnaire for the evaluation of the quality of life of Chinese urban construction workers. J Int Med Res. 2009;37:1184–90.CrossRefPubMed Qu B, Guo HQ, Liu J, Zhang Y, Sun G. Reliability and validity testing of the SF-36 questionnaire for the evaluation of the quality of life of Chinese urban construction workers. J Int Med Res. 2009;37:1184–90.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Simon GE, Revicki DA, Grothaus L, Vonkorff M. SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care. 1998;36:567–72.CrossRefPubMed Simon GE, Revicki DA, Grothaus L, Vonkorff M. SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? Med Care. 1998;36:567–72.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr KM, Nyland HI. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Med Care. 2000;38:1022–8.CrossRefPubMed Nortvedt MW, Riise T, Myhr KM, Nyland HI. Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population. Med Care. 2000;38:1022–8.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M. Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Qual Life Res. 2001;10:395–404.CrossRefPubMed Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M. Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Qual Life Res. 2001;10:395–404.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ware JE, Kosinski M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:405–13. discussion 15-20CrossRefPubMed Ware JE, Kosinski M. Interpreting SF-36 summary health measures: a response. Qual Life Res. 2001;10:405–13. discussion 15-20CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, et al. The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;242:824–8. discussion 8-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Balzan S, Belghiti J, Farges O, et al. The “50-50 criteria” on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;242:824–8. discussion 8-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Jin SG, Xiang B, Yan LN, et al. Quality of life and psychological outcome of donors after living donor liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:182–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jin SG, Xiang B, Yan LN, et al. Quality of life and psychological outcome of donors after living donor liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:182–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Chan SC, Liu CL, Lo CM, Lam BK, Lee EW, Fan ST. Donor quality of life before and after adult-to-adult right liver live donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1529–36.CrossRefPubMed Chan SC, Liu CL, Lo CM, Lam BK, Lee EW, Fan ST. Donor quality of life before and after adult-to-adult right liver live donor liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2006;12:1529–36.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJ, Arokiasamy P. Validity and reliability of MOS short form health survey (SF-36) for use in India. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:22–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinha R, van den Heuvel WJ, Arokiasamy P. Validity and reliability of MOS short form health survey (SF-36) for use in India. Indian J Community Med. 2013;38:22–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Fujita S, Kim ID, Uryuhara K, et al. Hepatic grafts from live donors: donor morbidity for 470 cases of live donation. Transpl Int. 2000;13:333–9.CrossRefPubMed Fujita S, Kim ID, Uryuhara K, et al. Hepatic grafts from live donors: donor morbidity for 470 cases of live donation. Transpl Int. 2000;13:333–9.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Brown Jr RS, Russo MW, Lai M, et al. A survey of liver transplantation from living adult donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:818–25.CrossRefPubMed Brown Jr RS, Russo MW, Lai M, et al. A survey of liver transplantation from living adult donors in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:818–25.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fukunishi I, Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Surman OS. Pain in liver donors. Psychosomatics. 2003;44:172–3.CrossRefPubMed Fukunishi I, Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Surman OS. Pain in liver donors. Psychosomatics. 2003;44:172–3.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Trotter JF, Hill-Callahan MM, Gillespie BW, et al. Severe psychiatric problems in right hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2007;83:1506–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trotter JF, Hill-Callahan MM, Gillespie BW, et al. Severe psychiatric problems in right hepatic lobe donors for living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2007;83:1506–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Quality of life of liver donors following donor hepatectomy
Authors
Biju Chandran
Viju Kumar Bharathan
Johns Shaji Mathew
Binoj Sivasankara Pillai Thankamony Amma
Unnikrishnan Gopalakrishnan
Dinesh Balakrishnan
Ramachandran Narayana Menon
Puneet Dhar
Sudheer Othiyil Vayoth
Sudhindran Surendran
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0254-8860
Electronic ISSN: 0975-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0743-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Indian Journal of Gastroenterology 2/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.