Skip to main content
Top

01-03-2017 | Editorial

Rapid on-site evaluation of cytology for EUS- and EBUS-guided fine-needle aspiration

Author: Kartik Ramakrishna

Published in: Indian Journal of Gastroenterology | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Excerpt

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)- and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) are being increasingly used as a safe and non-surgical method to sample tissue from mediastinal, para-aortic, and perihilar masses and lymph nodes. EUS- and EBUS-guided FNAC have greatly enhanced our diagnostic armamentarium in pulmonary medicine and gastroenterology. The diagnosis of tuberculosis is confirmed by the finding of granulomatous inflammation and the isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in culture by FNAC of mediastinal or retroperitoneal nodes. The diagnosis and staging of malignancy are also aided by these techniques. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X, et al. Diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Chest. 2011;140:1557–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ost DE, Ernst A, Lei X, et al. Diagnostic yield of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: results of the AQuIRE Bronchoscopy Registry. Chest. 2011;140:1557–66.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–45.CrossRefPubMed Song TJ, Kim JH, Lee SS, et al. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:1739–45.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Madhoun M, Wani SB, Early DS, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22- and 25-gauge needles in EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:AB154.CrossRef Madhoun M, Wani SB, Early DS, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22- and 25-gauge needles in EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:AB154.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H, et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:546390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Kakutani H, et al. A prospective comparison of EUS-guided FNA using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2009;2009:546390.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Xu MM, Jia HY, Yan LL, Li SS, Zheng Y. Comparison of two different size needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e5802. Xu MM, Jia HY, Yan LL, Li SS, Zheng Y. Comparison of two different size needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e5802.
6.
go back to reference LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:475–81.CrossRefPubMed LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MT, et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:475–81.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Iglesias-Garcia J, Lariño-Noia J, Abdulkader I, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9451–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Iglesias-Garcia J, Lariño-Noia J, Abdulkader I, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:9451–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Alper E, Onur I, Arabul M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling: how can we improve the results? Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:1–3.CrossRefPubMed Alper E, Onur I, Arabul M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling: how can we improve the results? Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016;27:1–3.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schmidt RL, Walker BS, Howard K, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3280–6.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt RL, Walker BS, Howard K, Layfield LJ, Adler DG. Rapid on-site evaluation reduces needle passes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesions: a risk-benefit analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:3280–6.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van Riet PA, Cahen DL, Poley JW, Bruno MJ. Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E360–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Riet PA, Cahen DL, Poley JW, Bruno MJ. Mapping international practice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling: outcome of a global survey. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E360–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Kong F, Zhu J, Kong X, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation does not improve endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration adequacy in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kong F, Zhu J, Kong X, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation does not improve endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration adequacy in pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis and systematic review. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163056.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Lee LS, Nieto J, Watson RR, et al. Randomized noninferiority trial comparing diagnostic yield of cytopathologist-guided versus 7 passes for EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2015; doi:10.1111/den.12594. Lee LS, Nieto J, Watson RR, et al. Randomized noninferiority trial comparing diagnostic yield of cytopathologist-guided versus 7 passes for EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2015; doi:10.​1111/​den.​12594.
13.
go back to reference Sharma SS, Jain M, Maharshi S. High diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration without onsite cytopathologist. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017; 36: doi 10.1007/s12664-017-0730-z. Sharma SS, Jain M, Maharshi S. High diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration without onsite cytopathologist. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017; 36: doi 10.​1007/​s12664-017-0730-z.
14.
go back to reference Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Yoshida M, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:656–63.CrossRefPubMed Hayashi T, Ishiwatari H, Yoshida M, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation by endosonographer during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid masses. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:656–63.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:322–8.CrossRefPubMed Hikichi T, Irisawa A, Bhutani MS, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses with rapid on-site cytological evaluation by endosonographers without attendance of cytopathologists. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:322–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Rapid on-site evaluation of cytology for EUS- and EBUS-guided fine-needle aspiration
Author
Kartik Ramakrishna
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer India
Published in
Indian Journal of Gastroenterology / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0254-8860
Electronic ISSN: 0975-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12664-017-0739-3
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.