Published in:
01-09-2010 | Article
QT interval prolongation during spontaneous episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes: the impact of heart rate correction
Authors:
T. F. Christensen, L. Tarnow, J. Randløv, L. E. Kristensen, J. J. Struijk, E. Eldrup, O. K. Hejlesen
Published in:
Diabetologia
|
Issue 9/2010
Login to get access
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
Prolongation of the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) is seen during episodes of hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes. We studied the relationship between spontaneous hypoglycaemia and the QT interval and hypothesised that the choice of heart rate correction affects the observed change in QTc.
Methods
Twenty-one participants with type 1 diabetes (aged 58 ± 10 years with duration of diabetes 34 ± 12 years) had continuous glucose and ECG monitoring for 72 h. QT and RR intervals were measured during hypoglycaemia (blood glucose or continuous glucose measurements ≤3.5 mmol/l) and compared with euglycaemia (5–12 mmol/l). QT intervals were measured using the semi-automated tangent method from signal-averaged ECG and corrected using Bazett’s formula, Fridericia’s formula, the nomogram method and a linear subject-specific method.
Results
Hypoglycaemia was present in 14 participants. With Bazett’s formula, QTc changed significantly from euglycaemia to hypoglycaemia (422 ± 30 vs 432 ± 33 ms; p = 0.02). Heart rate, QT intervals and QTc corrected with formulas other than Bazett’s were not associated with a significant change (p = 0.07–0.29). During hypoglycaemia, significantly lower values of QTc compared with the subject-specific method were seen for Fridericia’s formula (p = 0.02) and the nomogram method (p = 0.04).
Conclusions/interpretation
Spontaneous hypoglycaemia was associated with a modest increase in QTc. Bazett’s formula resulted in overcorrection of QTc while both Fridericia’s formula and the nomogram method undercorrected the QTc compared with the subject-specific method during hypoglycaemia. The results may indicate that the use of a fixed heart rate correction formula can lead to misleading results in investigations of spontaneous hypoglycaemia.