Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
European Radiology
Published in: European Radiology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Pulmonary Nodule | Chest

Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study

Authors: Satoshi Takagi, Tatsuya Yaegashi, Masayori Ishikawa

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To clarify the relationship between entrance surface dose (ESD) and physical image quality of original and bone-suppressed chest radiographs acquired using high and low tube voltages.

Methods

An anthropomorphic chest phantom and a 12-mm diameter spherical simulated nodule with a CT value of approximately + 100 HU were used. The lung field in the chest radiograph was divided into seven areas, and the nodule was set in a total of 66 positions. A total of 264 chest radiographs were acquired using four ESD conditions: approximately 0.3 mGy at 140 and 70 kVp and approximately 0.2 and 0.1 mGy at 70 kVp. The radiographs were processed to produce bone-suppressed images. Differences in contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) values of the nodule between each condition and between the original and bone-suppressed images were analyzed by a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results

In the areas not overlapping with the ribs, both contrast and CNR values were significantly increased with the bone-suppression technique (p < 0.01). In the bone-suppressed images, these values of the three conditions at 70 kVp were equal to or significantly higher than those of the condition at 140 kVp. There was no apparent decrease in these values between the ESD of approximately 0.3 and 0.1 mGy at 70 kVp.

Conclusion

By using the shortest exposure time and the lowest tube voltage possible not to increase in blurring artifact and image noise, it is possible to improve the image quality of bone-suppressed images and reduce the patient dose.

Key Points

• The effectiveness of bone-suppression techniques differs in areas of lung field.
• Image quality of bone-suppressed chest radiographs is improved by lower tube voltage.
• Applying lower tube voltage to bone-suppressed chest radiographs leads to dose reduction.
Literature
1.
Huda W, Abrahams RB (2015) Radiographic techniques, contrast, and noise in X-ray imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:W126–W131CrossRef
2.
3.
Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Hunt RA, Alm Carlsson G (2006) Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling. Phys Med Biol 51:2729–2743CrossRef
4.
Uffmann M, Neitzel U, Prokop M et al (2005) Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality. Radiology 235:642–650CrossRef
5.
Metz S, Damoser P, Hollweck R et al (2005) Chest radiography with a digital flat-panel detector: experimental receiver operating characteristic analysis. Radiology 234:776–784CrossRef
6.
Szucs-Farkas Z, Patak MA, Yuksel-Hatz S, Ruder T, Vock P (2008) Single-exposure dual-energy subtraction chest radiography: detection of pulmonary nodules and masses in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 18:24–31CrossRef
7.
Li F, Engelmann R, Doi K, MacMahon H (2008) Improved detection of small lung cancers with dual-energy subtraction chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:886–891CrossRef
8.
Schalekamp S, van Ginneken B, Meiss L et al (2013) Bone-suppressed images improve radiologists’ detection performance for pulmonary nodules in chest radiographs. Eur J Radiol 82:2399–2405CrossRef
9.
Freedman MT, Lo SC, Seibel JC, Bromley CM (2011) Pulmonary nodules: improved detection with software that suppresses the rib and clavicle on chest radiographs. Radiology 260:265–273CrossRef
10.
Li F, Hara T, Shiraishi J, Engelmann R, MacMahon H, Doi K (2011) Improved detection of subtle pulmonary nodules by use of chest radiographs with bone-suppression imaging: receiver operating characteristic analysis with and without localization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W535–W541CrossRef
11.
Li F, Engelmann R, Pesce L, Armato SG 3rd, Macmahon H (2012) Improved detection of focal pneumonia by chest radiography with bone-suppression imaging. Eur Radiol 22:2729–2735CrossRef
12.
Takagi S, Yaegashi T, Ishikawa M (2019) Relationship between tube voltage and physical image quality of pulmonary nodules on chest radiographs obtained using the bone-suppression technique. Acad Radiol 26:e174–e179CrossRef
13.
EC (1996) European guidelines of quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images. EUR 16260 EN. European Commission
14.
Bernhardt TM, Rapp-Bernhardt U, Lenzen H et al (2004) Low-voltage digital selenium radiography: detection of simulated interstitial lung disease, nodules, and catheters―a phantom study. Radiology 232:693–700CrossRef
15.
Bernhardt TM, Rapp-Bernhardt U, Lenzen H et al (2004) Diagnostic performance of a flat-panel detector at low tube voltage in chest radiography: a phantom study. Invest Radiol 39:97–103CrossRef
16.
ICRP (1991) 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 60. Ann ICRP 21(1–3) Oxford, Pergamon Press
17.
Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M et al (2005) Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration. Radiology 237:691–700CrossRef
18.
Dobbins JT 3rd, Samei E, Chotas HG et al (2003) Chest radiography: optimization of X-ray spectrum for cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Radiology 226:221–230CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study
Authors
Satoshi Takagi
Tatsuya Yaegashi
Masayori Ishikawa
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06375-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

European Radiology 1/2020 Go to the issue

Breast

Whole-lesion histogram and texture analyses of breast lesions on inline quantitative DCE mapping with CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE

Chest

The relationship between CT scout landmarks and lung boundaries on chest CT: guidelines for minimizing excess z-axis scan length

Gastrointestinal

Gastric cancer and image-derived quantitative parameters: Part 2—a critical review of DCE-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT findings

Musculoskeletal

Well-founded practice or personal preference: a comparison of established techniques for measuring ulnar variance in healthy children and adolescents

Hepatobiliary-Pancreas

Intraobserver and interobserver reliability in sonographic size measurements of gallbladder polyps

Gastrointestinal

Long-term imaging characteristics of clinical complete responders during watch-and-wait for rectal cancer—an evaluation of over 1500 MRIs