Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 9/2019

01-09-2019 | Chest

Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study

Authors: Chie Kuwahara, Takatoshi Aoki, Nobuhiro Oda, Jun Kawabata, Koichiro Sugimoto, Michiko Kobayashi, Masami Fujii, Yukunori Korogi

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To investigate optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector (FPD) system by semi-quantitatively assessment using a realistic lung phantom.

Materials and methods

Chest FPD radiographs were obtained on a realistic lung phantom with simulated lung opacities using various X-ray tube voltage levels (90–140 kV) with/without copper filter. Entrance skin dose was set to maintain identical for all images (0.1 mGy). Three chest radiologists unaware of the exposure settings independently evaluated the image quality of each simulated opacity and normal structure using a 5-point scale (+ 2: clearly superior to the standard; + 1: slightly superior to the standard; 0: equal to the standard; − 1: slightly inferior to the standard; − 2: clearly inferior to the standard). The traditional FPD image obtained at a tube voltage of 120 kV was used as the standard. The scores of image quality were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon rank test with Bonferroni correction.

Results

FPD images using 90-kV shot with copper filter were superior to the traditional 120-kV shot without filter with respect to the visibility of vertebra, pulmonary vessels, and nodules overlapping diaphragm and heart (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference with respect to the visibility of all other simulated lung opacities (lung nodules except for overlying diaphragm/heart and honeycomb opacity) between each tube voltage level with/without copper filter and the traditional 120-kV shot without filter.

Conclusion

Image quality of FPD images using 90 kV with copper filtration is superior to that using standard tube voltage when dose is identical.

Key Points

• FPD image quality using 90 kV with filter is superior to that using traditional beam.
• Ninety-kilovolt shot with copper filter may be suitable for chest FPD image.
• Clinical study dealing with chest FPD beam optimization would be warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Körner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Treitl M (2007) Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. Radiographics 27:675–686CrossRefPubMed Körner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Treitl M (2007) Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. Radiographics 27:675–686CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vaño E, Fernández JM, Ten JI et al (2007) Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patients radiation doses at projection radiography. Radiology 243:461–466CrossRefPubMed Vaño E, Fernández JM, Ten JI et al (2007) Transition from screen-film to digital radiography: evolution of patients radiation doses at projection radiography. Radiology 243:461–466CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Asada Y, Suzuki S, Kobayashi K et al (2012) Summary of results of the patients exposures in diagnostic radiography in 2011 questionnaire-focus on radiographic conditions. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 68:1261–1268CrossRefPubMed Asada Y, Suzuki S, Kobayashi K et al (2012) Summary of results of the patients exposures in diagnostic radiography in 2011 questionnaire-focus on radiographic conditions. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 68:1261–1268CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Matsunaga Y, Kawaguchi A, Kobayashi K et al (2017) Patients exposure during plain radiography and mammography in Japan in 1974-2014. Radiat Prot Dosim 176:347–353CrossRef Matsunaga Y, Kawaguchi A, Kobayashi K et al (2017) Patients exposure during plain radiography and mammography in Japan in 1974-2014. Radiat Prot Dosim 176:347–353CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Oda N, Nakata H, Murakami S, Terada K, Nakamura K, Yoshida A (1996) Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography. Invest Radiol 31:126–131CrossRefPubMed Oda N, Nakata H, Murakami S, Terada K, Nakamura K, Yoshida A (1996) Optimal beam quality for chest computed radiography. Invest Radiol 31:126–131CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Launders JH, Cowen AR, Bury RF, Hawkridge P (1998) A case study into the effect of radiographic factors on image quality and dose for a selenium based digital chest radiography system. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:279–282CrossRef Launders JH, Cowen AR, Bury RF, Hawkridge P (1998) A case study into the effect of radiographic factors on image quality and dose for a selenium based digital chest radiography system. Radiat Prot Dosim 80:279–282CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Chotas HG, Floyd CE Jr, Dobbins JT 3rd, Ravin CE (1993) Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. Radiology 186:395–398CrossRefPubMed Chotas HG, Floyd CE Jr, Dobbins JT 3rd, Ravin CE (1993) Digital chest radiography with photostimulable storage phosphors: signal-to-noise ratio as a function of kilovoltage with matched exposure risk. Radiology 186:395–398CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Uffmann M, Neitzel U, Prokop M et al (2005) Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality. Radiology 235:642–650CrossRefPubMed Uffmann M, Neitzel U, Prokop M et al (2005) Flat-panel-detector chest radiography: effect of tube voltage on image quality. Radiology 235:642–650CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Hunt RA, Alm Carlsson G (2006) Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling. Phys Med Biol 51:2729–2743CrossRefPubMed Ullman G, Sandborg M, Dance DR, Hunt RA, Alm Carlsson G (2006) Towards optimization in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo modelling. Phys Med Biol 51:2729–2743CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Willemink MJ, Leiner T, Budde RP et al (2012) Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1241–1246CrossRefPubMed Willemink MJ, Leiner T, Budde RP et al (2012) Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:1241–1246CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Xueqian X, Zhao Y, Snijder RA et al (2013) Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur Radiol 23:139–147CrossRef Xueqian X, Zhao Y, Snijder RA et al (2013) Sensitivity and accuracy of volumetry of pulmonary nodules on low-dose 16- and 64-row multi-detector CT: an anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur Radiol 23:139–147CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hashemi S, Mehrez H, Cobbold RS, Paul NS (2014) Optimal image reconstruction for detection and characterization of small pulmonary nodules during low-dose CT. Eur Radiol 24:1239–1250 Hashemi S, Mehrez H, Cobbold RS, Paul NS (2014) Optimal image reconstruction for detection and characterization of small pulmonary nodules during low-dose CT. Eur Radiol 24:1239–1250
14.
go back to reference Koyama S, Aoyama T, Oda N, Yamauchi-Kawaura C (2010) Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom. Med Phys 37:4298–4306CrossRefPubMed Koyama S, Aoyama T, Oda N, Yamauchi-Kawaura C (2010) Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examinations with an anthropomorphic phantom. Med Phys 37:4298–4306CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1995) “Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest,” NISTIR 5632 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersdurg, MD Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM (1995) “Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest,” NISTIR 5632 National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersdurg, MD
16.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dobbins JT 3rd, Samei E, Chotas HG et al (2003) Chest radiography: optimization of x-ray spectrum for cesium iodide–amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Radiology 226:221–230CrossRefPubMed Dobbins JT 3rd, Samei E, Chotas HG et al (2003) Chest radiography: optimization of x-ray spectrum for cesium iodide–amorphous silicon flat-panel detector. Radiology 226:221–230CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21 1–3 ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann ICRP 21 1–3
19.
go back to reference Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M et al (2005) Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration. Radiology 237:691–700CrossRefPubMed Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M et al (2005) Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration. Radiology 237:691–700CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study
Authors
Chie Kuwahara
Takatoshi Aoki
Nobuhiro Oda
Jun Kawabata
Koichiro Sugimoto
Michiko Kobayashi
Masami Fujii
Yukunori Korogi
Publication date
01-09-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-5998-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

European Radiology 9/2019 Go to the issue