Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Public Health | Research

European policies for public health in border regions: no European mindset as yet

Authors: Brigitte A.M. van der Zanden, Christian J.P.A. Hoebe, Klasien Horstman

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The sudden emergence of COVID-19 in 2020 demonstrated that Europe was not prepared for a public health crisis like this pandemic. In the European Union, matters of health have remained primarily under the jurisdiction of individual Member States. However, certain events, such as the Kohll-Decker ruling on free mobility of health services and the COVID-19 pandemic, compelled the EU to address health matters in border regions. This study examines how EU policies address public health in border regions. To that end, we have drawn from border studies, a field that provides insight into the fluidity and complexity of borders in everyday life. Besides that we used constructivist policy studies as a lens for the analysis of EU policy documents.

Methods

A policy discourse analysis was conducted to explore how European policy addresses the development of a transnational, European public health in border regions. Key European policy documents published between 2002 and 2027 were analysed to understand how policies are constructed and problems are framed. The analysis was guided by research questions and the theoretical approach.

Results

The analysis reveals that, while having limited competences in the field of health care, the EU is slowly developing a rationale and a knowledge base to increase its competences in health care. It also shows that in the field of public health, the EU argues for addressing health determinants and promoting healthy lifestyles, though it does not address health promotion in border regions. The EU’s authority in public health in border regions revolves primarily around addressing physical, biological and chemical threats rather than social health problems.

Conclusion

Though the EU has carefully developed a transnational perspective on health care, the EU has not developed any authority with respect to transnational public health. Though public health and health promotion in border regions have been confronted with specific challenges, neither specific Member States nor the EU have a transnational collaborative perspective that does justice to the characteristics of border regions. When it comes to public health in border regions, there is no European mindset as yet.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Medeiros E. Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions. Case Stud Transp Policy. 2019;7(1):1–12.MathSciNetCrossRef Medeiros E. Cross-border transports and cross-border mobility in EU border regions. Case Stud Transp Policy. 2019;7(1):1–12.MathSciNetCrossRef
2.
go back to reference European Commission and Eurostat. Methodological manual on territorial typologies: 2018 edition. Publications Office; 2019. European Commission and Eurostat. Methodological manual on territorial typologies: 2018 edition. Publications Office; 2019.
3.
go back to reference Omarjee Y. Report on EU border regions: living labs of European integration (2021/2202(INI)). 2022: Brussels. p. 19. Omarjee Y. Report on EU border regions: living labs of European integration (2021/2202(INI)). 2022: Brussels. p. 19.
4.
go back to reference European Council. The Schengen as referred to in Article 1(2) of Council Decision 1999/435/EC of 20 May 1999, in L239, European Union, Editor. 2000: Brussels. p. 474. European Council. The Schengen as referred to in Article 1(2) of Council Decision 1999/435/EC of 20 May 1999, in L239, European Union, Editor. 2000: Brussels. p. 474.
5.
go back to reference European Communities. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2002;45(C325):1–184. European Communities. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty establishing the European Community. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2002;45(C325):1–184.
6.
go back to reference European Union. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. 2016;59(C202):1–412. European Union. Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union. 2016;59(C202):1–412.
7.
go back to reference Horstman K, Hackert V, Kamenshikova A, van der Zanden B, Hoebe C. The development of COVID-19 in the border area of the Netherlands, North-Rhine-Westphalia and Belgium. Maastricht University: Maastricht; 2021. pp. 1–95. Horstman K, Hackert V, Kamenshikova A, van der Zanden B, Hoebe C. The development of COVID-19 in the border area of the Netherlands, North-Rhine-Westphalia and Belgium. Maastricht University: Maastricht; 2021. pp. 1–95.
8.
go back to reference European court of Justice. Raymond Kohll versus Union Des Caisse De Maladie, in European Court reports 1998 I-01931, Court of Justice, Editor. Luxembourg; 1998. pp. 1935–52. European court of Justice. Raymond Kohll versus Union Des Caisse De Maladie, in European Court reports 1998 I-01931, Court of Justice, Editor. Luxembourg; 1998. pp. 1935–52.
9.
go back to reference European court of Justice. Nicolas Decker versus Caisse De Maladie Des Employés Privés, in European Court reports 1998 I-01831, Court of Justice, Editor. Luxembourg; 1998. pp. 1871–87. European court of Justice. Nicolas Decker versus Caisse De Maladie Des Employés Privés, in European Court reports 1998 I-01831, Court of Justice, Editor. Luxembourg; 1998. pp. 1871–87.
10.
go back to reference Dates M, Voarino L, Stewart K, Quartermain J, Antonielli M, Deimel L, Thiel R, Gutheil M. Study supporting the evaluation of the Directive 2011/24/EU to ensure patients’ rights in the EU in cross-border healthcare. European Union: Brussels; 2022. Dates M, Voarino L, Stewart K, Quartermain J, Antonielli M, Deimel L, Thiel R, Gutheil M. Study supporting the evaluation of the Directive 2011/24/EU to ensure patients’ rights in the EU in cross-border healthcare. European Union: Brussels; 2022.
11.
go back to reference Mullan C, Guillermo-Ramirez M. Cross-border patient mobility in selected EU regions Final Report. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE): Brussels; 2021. European Commission. Mullan C, Guillermo-Ramirez M. Cross-border patient mobility in selected EU regions Final Report. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety (DG SANTE): Brussels; 2021. European Commission.
12.
go back to reference Henley J. Norwegian sugar tax sends sweet-lovers over border to Sweden, in The Guardian. 2019. Henley J. Norwegian sugar tax sends sweet-lovers over border to Sweden, in The Guardian. 2019.
13.
go back to reference Aure M. Borders of Understanding: re-making frontiers in the Russian–Norwegian contact zone. Ethnopolitics. 2011;10:171–86.CrossRef Aure M. Borders of Understanding: re-making frontiers in the Russian–Norwegian contact zone. Ethnopolitics. 2011;10:171–86.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Patel K, Schot J. Twisted paths to European Integration: Comparing Agriculture and Transport Policies in a transnational perspective. Contemp Eur History. 2011;20(4):383–403.CrossRef Patel K, Schot J. Twisted paths to European Integration: Comparing Agriculture and Transport Policies in a transnational perspective. Contemp Eur History. 2011;20(4):383–403.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Walters W. The frontiers of the European Union: a geostrategic perspective. Geopolitics. 2004;9(3):674–98.CrossRef Walters W. The frontiers of the European Union: a geostrategic perspective. Geopolitics. 2004;9(3):674–98.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pysz J, Puksas A. National Minorities and Organizing Cross-border Cultural Cooperation: Evidence from the Polish-Lithuanian Borderland 2020. Pysz J, Puksas A. National Minorities and Organizing Cross-border Cultural Cooperation: Evidence from the Polish-Lithuanian Borderland 2020.
17.
go back to reference Kolossov V, Scott J. Selected conceptual issues in border studies Belgeo, 2013. 2013. Kolossov V, Scott J. Selected conceptual issues in border studies Belgeo, 2013. 2013.
18.
go back to reference Walters W. The SAGE Handbook of European Studies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009. Walters W. The SAGE Handbook of European Studies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2009.
19.
go back to reference Ulnicane I, Knight W, Leach T, Stahl B, Wanjiku W. Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy. Policy Soc. 2020;40(2):158–77.CrossRef Ulnicane I, Knight W, Leach T, Stahl B, Wanjiku W. Framing governance for a contested emerging technology:insights from AI policy. Policy Soc. 2020;40(2):158–77.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Barry A, Walters W. From EURATOM to Complex systems: Technology and European Government. Alternatives. 2003;28(3):305–29.CrossRef Barry A, Walters W. From EURATOM to Complex systems: Technology and European Government. Alternatives. 2003;28(3):305–29.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Barry A. Political situations: knowledge controversies in transnational governance. Crit Policy Stud. 2012;6(3):324–36.CrossRef Barry A. Political situations: knowledge controversies in transnational governance. Crit Policy Stud. 2012;6(3):324–36.CrossRef
22.
23.
go back to reference Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives, and public policies (with an epilogue on Health Care), updated Edition: Pearson New International Edition. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education, Limited; 2013. Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives, and public policies (with an epilogue on Health Care), updated Edition: Pearson New International Edition. Harlow, United Kingdom: Pearson Education, Limited; 2013.
24.
go back to reference Bacchi C, Goodwin S. Poststructural policy analysis: a guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY; 2016. Bacchi C, Goodwin S. Poststructural policy analysis: a guide to practice. Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY; 2016.
25.
go back to reference Bacchi C. The politics of research management: reflections on the gap between what we ‘know’ (about SDH) and what we do. Health Sociol Rev. 2008;17(2):165–76.CrossRef Bacchi C. The politics of research management: reflections on the gap between what we ‘know’ (about SDH) and what we do. Health Sociol Rev. 2008;17(2):165–76.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bacchi C. Problematizations in Health Policy:questioning how problems are constituted in policies. SAGE Open. 2016;6(2):2158244016653986.CrossRef Bacchi C. Problematizations in Health Policy:questioning how problems are constituted in policies. SAGE Open. 2016;6(2):2158244016653986.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Bacchi C. Why Study Problematizations? Making politics visible. Open J Political Sci. 2012;02No01:8. Bacchi C. Why Study Problematizations? Making politics visible. Open J Political Sci. 2012;02No01:8.
28.
go back to reference Asdal K. What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents. Distinktion: J Social Theory. 2015;16(1):74–90.CrossRef Asdal K. What is the issue? The transformative capacity of documents. Distinktion: J Social Theory. 2015;16(1):74–90.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Dalglish S, Khalid H, McMahon S. Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Policy Plann. 2020;35(10):1424–31.CrossRef Dalglish S, Khalid H, McMahon S. Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Policy Plann. 2020;35(10):1424–31.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference European Communities. Decision 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003–2008) - commission statements. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2002;45(L271):1–12. European Communities. Decision 1786/2002/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2003–2008) - commission statements. Official Journal of the European Communities. 2002;45(L271):1–12.
31.
go back to reference European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Decision 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2008–2013). Official Journal of the European Union. 2007;50(301):3–13. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Decision 1350/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 adopting a programme of Community action in the field of public health (2008–2013). Official Journal of the European Union. 2007;50(301):3–13.
32.
go back to reference European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 on the establishment of a third Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (2014–2020) and repealing decision 1350/2007/EC text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union. 2014;57(L86):1–13. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 on the establishment of a third Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (2014–2020) and repealing decision 1350/2007/EC text with EEA relevance. Official Journal of the European Union. 2014;57(L86):1–13.
33.
go back to reference European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/522 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 establishing a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (‘EU4Health Programme’) for the period 2021–2027, and repealing regulation (EU) 282/2014 (text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union. 2021;64(107):1–29. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2021/522 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 March 2021 establishing a Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (‘EU4Health Programme’) for the period 2021–2027, and repealing regulation (EU) 282/2014 (text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union. 2021;64(107):1–29.
34.
go back to reference European, Union. Regulation (ec) 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems. Official Journal of the European Union. 2004;47(L166):1–123. European, Union. Regulation (ec) 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems. Official Journal of the European Union. 2004;47(L166):1–123.
35.
go back to reference European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Official Journal of the European Union. 2011;54(88):45–65. European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Official Journal of the European Union. 2011;54(88):45–65.
36.
go back to reference European Commission. European cross-border cooperation on health: theory and practice. Publications Office; 2017. p. 100. European Commission. European cross-border cooperation on health: theory and practice. Publications Office; 2017. p. 100.
37.
go back to reference DG Health and Food Safety, European Union. Strategic Plan 2020–2024 DG Health and Food Safety (SANTE). DG Sante: Brussels; 2019. pp. 1–55. DG Health and Food Safety, European Union. Strategic Plan 2020–2024 DG Health and Food Safety (SANTE). DG Sante: Brussels; 2019. pp. 1–55.
38.
go back to reference European Court of Auditors. EU actions for cross-border healthcare: significant ambitions but improved management required. Special report no 07, 2019. Publications Office; 2019. p. 54. European Court of Auditors. EU actions for cross-border healthcare: significant ambitions but improved management required. Special report no 07, 2019. Publications Office; 2019. p. 54.
39.
go back to reference Leloup F. Research for REGI Committee– cross-border cooperation in healthcare. Brussels; 2021. Leloup F. Research for REGI Committee– cross-border cooperation in healthcare. Brussels; 2021.
40.
go back to reference Directorate-General for Health and, Food Safety. Commission Report on the operation of Directive 2011/24/EU on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Publications Office of the European Union: Brussels; 2022. Directorate-General for Health and, Food Safety. Commission Report on the operation of Directive 2011/24/EU on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. Publications Office of the European Union: Brussels; 2022.
41.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, et al., Cross-border health care in Europe. Policy brief, 9 et al. 2005, Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, et al., Cross-border health care in Europe. Policy brief, 9 et al. 2005, Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
42.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, et al., Cross-border health care in the European Union: mapping and analysing practices and policies. Observatory Studies Series: 22 et al. 2011, Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe, et al., Cross-border health care in the European Union: mapping and analysing practices and policies. Observatory Studies Series: 22 et al. 2011, Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe.
43.
go back to reference World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. et al., Cross-border health care in Europe. Policy summary: 14. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2014. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. et al., Cross-border health care in Europe. Policy summary: 14. Copenhagen: World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2014.
44.
go back to reference Unger F. Health in regions: cross border health care: harmonization in European regions. Edition Weimar (Series); v. 16. Salzburg, Austria: European Institute of Health of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts; 2012. Unger F. Health in regions: cross border health care: harmonization in European regions. Edition Weimar (Series); v. 16. Salzburg, Austria: European Institute of Health of the European Academy of Sciences and Arts; 2012.
45.
go back to reference Acitores M, Schwartz P. Cross-border or Transnational - Does it matter? 2021, Interact. p. 32. Acitores M, Schwartz P. Cross-border or Transnational - Does it matter? 2021, Interact. p. 32.
46.
go back to reference Radaelli C. The europeanization of Public Policy. The politics of europeanization. Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 29. K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli, Editors. Radaelli C. The europeanization of Public Policy. The politics of europeanization. Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 29. K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli, Editors.
47.
go back to reference Martinsen D. The europeanization of Health Care: processes and factors, in Research Design in European studies: establishing causality in europeanization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2012. pp. 141–59. Martinsen D. The europeanization of Health Care: processes and factors, in Research Design in European studies: establishing causality in europeanization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2012. pp. 141–59.
Metadata
Title
European policies for public health in border regions: no European mindset as yet
Authors
Brigitte A.M. van der Zanden
Christian J.P.A. Hoebe
Klasien Horstman
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Public Health
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18175-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue