Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021

Open Access 01-07-2021 | Proton Pump Inhibitors

Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication

Authors: Luigi Bonavina, Thomas Horbach, Sebastian F. Schoppmann, Janet DeMarchi

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) is a surgical intervention for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) which has been evaluated in numerous studies and has shown beneficial effects. Long-term effectiveness data for MSA as well as laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) in patients with GERD are needed.

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the 3-year outcomes for MSA and LF in patients with GERD.

Methods

This prospective, multi-center, observational registry study evaluated MSA and LF in clinical practice over 3 years (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01624506). Data collection included baseline characteristics, reflux symptoms, medication use, satisfaction and complications. Post-surgical evaluations were collected at yearly intervals.

Results

Between December 2009 and December 2014, 631 patients (465 MSA and 166 LF) were enrolled in the registry. Both MSA and LF resulted in improvements in total GERD-HRQL score (mean reduction in GERD-HRQL from baseline to 3 years post-surgery: MSA 22.0 to 4.6 and LF 23.6 to 4.9) and in satisfaction (GERD-HRQL satisfaction increase from baseline to 3 years: MSA 4.6% to 78.2% and LF 3.7% to 76.5%). Most patients were able to belch as needed with both therapies (MSA 97.6% and LF 91.7% at 3 years). MSA allowed a higher percentage of patients the ability to vomit as needed (MSA 91.2% and LF 68.0% at 3 years). PPI usage declined from baseline to 3 years for both groups after surgery (MSA 97.8% to 24.2% and LF 95.8% to 19.5%). The mean procedure time was shorter for MSA than for LF. Intraoperative and procedure-related complication rates (≤ 2%) were low for both therapies.

Conclusions

This 3-year prospective observational registry study contributes to the mounting evidence for the effectiveness of MSA and LF. Despite the more severe nature of GERD in the LF group, the clinical outcomes for MSA and LF were favorable from an effectiveness and safety standpoint.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF (2013) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 3:308–329CrossRef Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF (2013) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 3:308–329CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Toghanian S, Johnson DA, Stalhammar NO, Zerbib F (2011) Burden of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with persistent and intense symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: A post hoc analysis of the 2007 national health and wellness survey. Clin Drug Investig 1:703–715CrossRef Toghanian S, Johnson DA, Stalhammar NO, Zerbib F (2011) Burden of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with persistent and intense symptoms despite proton pump inhibitor therapy: A post hoc analysis of the 2007 national health and wellness survey. Clin Drug Investig 1:703–715CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yadlapati R, Dakhoul L, Pandolfino JE, Keswani RN (2017) The Quality of Care for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Dig Dis Sc 3:569–576CrossRef Yadlapati R, Dakhoul L, Pandolfino JE, Keswani RN (2017) The Quality of Care for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Dig Dis Sc 3:569–576CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD (2010) Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 11:2647–2669CrossRef Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, Reardon PR, Richardson WS, Fanelli RD (2010) Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 11:2647–2669CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ganz R (2016) A Review of New Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:424–431 Ganz R (2016) A Review of New Surgical and Endoscopic Therapies for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 7:424–431
6.
go back to reference Moore M, Afaneh C, Benhuri D, Antonacci C, Abelson J, Zarnegar R (2016) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review of surgical decision making. World J Gastrointest Surg 1:77–83CrossRef Moore M, Afaneh C, Benhuri D, Antonacci C, Abelson J, Zarnegar R (2016) Gastroesophageal reflux disease: a review of surgical decision making. World J Gastrointest Surg 1:77–83CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Patti M (2016) An evidence-based approach to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA Surg 1:73–78CrossRef Patti M (2016) An evidence-based approach to the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. JAMA Surg 1:73–78CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Richter JE (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepato 5:465–471CrossRef Richter JE (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepato 5:465–471CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ganz RA (2017) A modern magnetic implant for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1326–1337CrossRef Ganz RA (2017) A modern magnetic implant for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:1326–1337CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelman WA, Smout AJ, Dunn D (2016) Long-term outcomes of patients receiving a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:671–677CrossRef Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelman WA, Smout AJ, Dunn D (2016) Long-term outcomes of patients receiving a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:671–677CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Ganz RA, Bonavina L, Saino G, Dunn DH, Fockens P, Bemelmen W (2012) The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years. Surg Endosc 10:2944–2949CrossRef Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Ganz RA, Bonavina L, Saino G, Dunn DH, Fockens P, Bemelmen W (2012) The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years. Surg Endosc 10:2944–2949CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Warren HF, Reynolds JL, Lipham JC, Zehetner J, Bildzukewicz NA, Taiganides PA, Mickley J, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Louie BE (2016) Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 8:3289–3296CrossRef Warren HF, Reynolds JL, Lipham JC, Zehetner J, Bildzukewicz NA, Taiganides PA, Mickley J, Aye RW, Farivar AS, Louie BE (2016) Multi-institutional outcomes using magnetic sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc 8:3289–3296CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Saino G, Bonavina L, Lipham JC, Dunn D, Ganz RA (2015) Magnetic Sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux at 5 years: final results of a pilot study show long-term acid reduction and symptom improvement. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:787–792CrossRef Saino G, Bonavina L, Lipham JC, Dunn D, Ganz RA (2015) Magnetic Sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux at 5 years: final results of a pilot study show long-term acid reduction and symptom improvement. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 10:787–792CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith CD, DeVault KR, Buchanan M (2014) Introduction of mechanical sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease into practice: early clinical outcomes and keys to successful adoption. J Am Coll Surg 4:776–781CrossRef Smith CD, DeVault KR, Buchanan M (2014) Introduction of mechanical sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease into practice: early clinical outcomes and keys to successful adoption. J Am Coll Surg 4:776–781CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Skubleny D, Switzer NJ, Dang J, Gill RS, Shi X, de Gara C, Birch DW, Wong C, Hutter MM, Karmali S (2017) LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 8:3078–3084CrossRef Skubleny D, Switzer NJ, Dang J, Gill RS, Shi X, de Gara C, Birch DW, Wong C, Hutter MM, Karmali S (2017) LINX® magnetic esophageal sphincter augmentation versus Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 8:3078–3084CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Nieh A, Bildzukewicz N, Sandhu K, Katkhouda K, Lipham JC (2016) Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD. Surg Endos 8:3225–3230CrossRef Reynolds JL, Zehetner J, Nieh A, Bildzukewicz N, Sandhu K, Katkhouda K, Lipham JC (2016) Charges, outcomes, and complications: a comparison of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of GERD. Surg Endos 8:3225–3230CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ganz RA (2013) The esophageal sphincter device for treatment of GERD. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 10:661–663 Ganz RA (2013) The esophageal sphincter device for treatment of GERD. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 10:661–663
18.
go back to reference Prakash D, Campbell B, Wajed S (2018) Introduction into the NHS of magnetic sphincter augmentation: an innovative surgical therapy for reflux—results and challenges. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 4:251–256CrossRef Prakash D, Campbell B, Wajed S (2018) Introduction into the NHS of magnetic sphincter augmentation: an innovative surgical therapy for reflux—results and challenges. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 4:251–256CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Aiolfi A, Asti E, Bernardi D, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Siboni S, Bonavina L (2018) Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:82–88PubMedCrossRef Aiolfi A, Asti E, Bernardi D, Bonitta G, Rausa E, Siboni S, Bonavina L (2018) Early results of magnetic sphincter augmentation versus fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 52:82–88PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D, Sironi A, Lazzari V (2013) One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center. J Am Coll Surg 4:577–585CrossRef Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D, Sironi A, Lazzari V (2013) One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: 6 years of clinical experience from a single center. J Am Coll Surg 4:577–585CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Bonavina L, Saino G, Lipham JC, Demeester TR (2013) LINX® Reflux Management System in chronic gastroesophageal reflux: a novel effective technology for restoring the natural barrier to reflux. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 4:261–268CrossRef Bonavina L, Saino G, Lipham JC, Demeester TR (2013) LINX® Reflux Management System in chronic gastroesophageal reflux: a novel effective technology for restoring the natural barrier to reflux. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 4:261–268CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bell R, Lipham J, Louie B, Williams V, Luketich J, Hill M, Richards W, Dunst C, Lister D, McDowell-Jacobs L, Reardon P, Woods K, Gould J, Buckley FP III, Kothari S, Khaitan L, Smith CD, Park A, Smith C, Jacobsen G, Abbas G, Katz P (2019) Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors for management of moderate-to-severe regurgitation in GERD: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1:14–22CrossRef Bell R, Lipham J, Louie B, Williams V, Luketich J, Hill M, Richards W, Dunst C, Lister D, McDowell-Jacobs L, Reardon P, Woods K, Gould J, Buckley FP III, Kothari S, Khaitan L, Smith CD, Park A, Smith C, Jacobsen G, Abbas G, Katz P (2019) Laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation versus double-dose proton pump inhibitors for management of moderate-to-severe regurgitation in GERD: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 1:14–22CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Riegler M, Schoppman SF, Bonavina L, Ashton D, Horbach T, Kemen M (2015) Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study. Surg Endosc 5:1123–1129CrossRef Riegler M, Schoppman SF, Bonavina L, Ashton D, Horbach T, Kemen M (2015) Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study. Surg Endosc 5:1123–1129CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Warren HF, Louie BE, Farivar AS, Wilshire C, Aye RW (2017) Manometric changes to the lower esophageal sphincter after magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1:99–104CrossRef Warren HF, Louie BE, Farivar AS, Wilshire C, Aye RW (2017) Manometric changes to the lower esophageal sphincter after magnetic sphincter augmentation in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 1:99–104CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 2:130–134CrossRef Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 2:130–134CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, Tapia FV, Harkabus MA (1996) Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg 3:217–224 Velanovich V, Vallance SR, Gusz JR, Tapia FV, Harkabus MA (1996) Quality of life scale for gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Coll Surg 3:217–224
27.
go back to reference Dreyer NA, Schneeweiss S, McNeil BJ, Berger ML, Walker AM, Ollendorf DA, Gliklich RE (2010) GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness. Am J Manag Care 6:467–471 Dreyer NA, Schneeweiss S, McNeil BJ, Berger ML, Walker AM, Ollendorf DA, Gliklich RE (2010) GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness. Am J Manag Care 6:467–471
28.
go back to reference Schneeweiss S, Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Ruhl M, Rassen JA (2011) Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 6:777–790CrossRef Schneeweiss S, Gagne JJ, Glynn RJ, Ruhl M, Rassen JA (2011) Assessing the comparative effectiveness of newly marketed medications: methodological challenges and implications for drug development. Clin Pharmacol Ther 6:777–790CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Adams ME, McCall NT, Gray DT, Orza MJ, Chalmers TC (1992) Economic analysis in randomized control trials. Med Care 3:231–243CrossRef Adams ME, McCall NT, Gray DT, Orza MJ, Chalmers TC (1992) Economic analysis in randomized control trials. Med Care 3:231–243CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Bonavina L, Boyle N, Dunn C, Horbach T, Knowles TB, Lipham JC, Louie BE, Markar S, Schoppmann SF, Zehetner J (2020) Comment on Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11567PubMedCrossRef Bonavina L, Boyle N, Dunn C, Horbach T, Knowles TB, Lipham JC, Louie BE, Markar S, Schoppmann SF, Zehetner J (2020) Comment on Systematic review of the introduction and evaluation of magnetic augmentation of the lower oesophageal sphincter for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​bjs.​11567PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sox HC (2010) Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right. Med Care 6:S7–8CrossRef Sox HC (2010) Defining comparative effectiveness research: the importance of getting it right. Med Care 6:S7–8CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Chang TI, Winkelmayer WC (2012) Comparative effectiveness research: what is it and why do we need it in nephrology? Nephrol Dial Transplant 6:2156–2161CrossRef Chang TI, Winkelmayer WC (2012) Comparative effectiveness research: what is it and why do we need it in nephrology? Nephrol Dial Transplant 6:2156–2161CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Richards WO, McRae C (2018) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation for the treatment of medically refractory GERD. Am Surg 11:1762–1767CrossRef Richards WO, McRae C (2018) Comparative analysis of laparoscopic fundoplication and magnetic sphincter augmentation for the treatment of medically refractory GERD. Am Surg 11:1762–1767CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA, Lederman AB, Hunter JG (2005) When fundoplication fails: redo? Ann Surg 6:861–869CrossRef Smith CD, McClusky DA, Rajad MA, Lederman AB, Hunter JG (2005) When fundoplication fails: redo? Ann Surg 6:861–869CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Bell RC, Hufford RJ, Fearon J, Freeman KD (2013) Revision of failed traditional fundoplication using EsophyX transoral fundoplication. Surg Endosc 3:761–767CrossRef Bell RC, Hufford RJ, Fearon J, Freeman KD (2013) Revision of failed traditional fundoplication using EsophyX transoral fundoplication. Surg Endosc 3:761–767CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelmen WA, Smout AJ, Dunn D (2016) Long-term outcomes of patients receiving a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:671–677CrossRef Ganz RA, Edmundowicz SA, Taiganides PA, Lipham JC, Smith CD, DeVault KR, Horgan S, Jacobsen G, Luketich JD, Smith CC, Schlack-Haerer SC, Kothari SN, Dunst CM, Watson TJ, Peters J, Oelschlager BK, Perry KA, Melvin S, Bemelmen WA, Smout AJ, Dunn D (2016) Long-term outcomes of patients receiving a magnetic sphincter augmentation device for gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:671–677CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Ayazi S, Zheng P, Zaidi AH, Chovanec K, Salvitti M, Newhams K, Hoppo T, Jobe BA (2020) Clinical outcomes and predictors of favorable result after laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation: single-institution experience with more than 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 230(5):733–743PubMedCrossRef Ayazi S, Zheng P, Zaidi AH, Chovanec K, Salvitti M, Newhams K, Hoppo T, Jobe BA (2020) Clinical outcomes and predictors of favorable result after laparoscopic magnetic sphincter augmentation: single-institution experience with more than 500 patients. J Am Coll Surg 230(5):733–743PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Gerson LB, Fass R (2009) A systematic review of the definitions, prevalence, and response to treatment of nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:372–378CrossRef Gerson LB, Fass R (2009) A systematic review of the definitions, prevalence, and response to treatment of nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:372–378CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Mody R, Bolge SC, Kannan H, Fass R (2009) Effects of gastroesophageal reflux disease on sleep and outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:953–959CrossRef Mody R, Bolge SC, Kannan H, Fass R (2009) Effects of gastroesophageal reflux disease on sleep and outcomes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:953–959CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Three-year clinical experience with magnetic sphincter augmentation and laparoscopic fundoplication
Authors
Luigi Bonavina
Thomas Horbach
Sebastian F. Schoppmann
Janet DeMarchi
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07792-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021 Go to the issue