Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2015

01-05-2015

Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study

Authors: Martin Riegler, Sebastian F. Schoppman, Luigi Bonavina, David Ashton, Thomas Horbach, Matthias Kemen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The techniques available for antireflux surgery have expanded with the introduction of the magnetic sphincter augmentation device (MSAD) for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods

A prospective, multicenter registry evaluated MSAD and laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01624506). Data collection included baseline characteristics, reflux symptoms, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) use, side effects, and complications. Post-surgical evaluations were collected at one year.

Results

At report, 249 patients (202 MSAD patients and 47 LF patients) had completed one-year follow-up. The LF group was older and had a greater frequency of large hiatal hernias and Barrett’s esophagus than the MSAD group (P < 0.001). The median GERD-health related quality of life score improved from 20.0 to 3.0 after MSAD and 23.0 to 3.5 after LF. Moderate or severe regurgitation improved from 58.2 to 3.1 % after MSAD and 60.0 to 13.0 % after LF (P = 0.014). Discontinuation of PPIs was achieved by 81.8 % of patients after MSAD and 63.0 % after LF (P = 0.009). Excessive gas and abdominal bloating were reported by 10.0 % of patients after MSAD and 31.9 % following LF (P ≤ 0.001). Following MSAD, 91.3 % of patients were able to vomit if needed, compared with 44.4 % of those undergoing LF (P < 0.001). Reoperation rate was 4.0 % following MSAD and 6.4 % following LF.

Conclusion

Antireflux surgery should be individualized to the characteristics of each patient, taking into consideration anatomy and propensity and tolerance of side effects. Both MSAD and LF showed significant improvements in reflux control, with similar safety and reoperation rates. In the treatment continuum of antireflux surgery, MSAD should be considered as a first-line surgical option in appropriately selected patients without Barrett’s esophagus or a large hiatal hernia in order to avoid unnecessary dissection and preserve the patient’s native gastric anatomy. MSAD is an important treatment option and will expand the surgeon’s role in treating GERD.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Savarino V, Di Mario F, Scarpignato C (2009) Proton pump inhibitors in GORD An overview of their pharmacology, efficacy and safety. Pharmacol Res 59:135–153CrossRefPubMed Savarino V, Di Mario F, Scarpignato C (2009) Proton pump inhibitors in GORD An overview of their pharmacology, efficacy and safety. Pharmacol Res 59:135–153CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hershcovici T, Fass R (2010) An algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of refractory GERD. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24:923–936CrossRefPubMed Hershcovici T, Fass R (2010) An algorithm for diagnosis and treatment of refractory GERD. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 24:923–936CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cheng P, Li JS, Gong J, Zhang LF, Chen RZ (2011) Effects of refluxate pH values on duodenogastroesophageal reflux-induced esophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 17:3060–3065CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Cheng P, Li JS, Gong J, Zhang LF, Chen RZ (2011) Effects of refluxate pH values on duodenogastroesophageal reflux-induced esophageal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 17:3060–3065CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
4.
go back to reference Gutschow CA, Bludau M, Vallböhmer D, Schröder W, Bollschweiler E, Hölscher AH (2008) Dig Dis Sci 53:3076–3081CrossRefPubMed Gutschow CA, Bludau M, Vallböhmer D, Schröder W, Bollschweiler E, Hölscher AH (2008) Dig Dis Sci 53:3076–3081CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fohl AL, Regal RE (2011) Proton pump inhibitor-associated pneumonia: Not a breath of fresh air after all? World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2:17–26CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Fohl AL, Regal RE (2011) Proton pump inhibitor-associated pneumonia: Not a breath of fresh air after all? World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2:17–26CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ali T, Roberts DN, Tierney WM (2009) Long-term safety concerns with proton pump inhibitors. Am J Med 122:896–903 Ali T, Roberts DN, Tierney WM (2009) Long-term safety concerns with proton pump inhibitors. Am J Med 122:896–903
7.
go back to reference Spivak H, Lelcuk S, Hunter JG (1999) Laparoscopic surgery of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 23:356–367CrossRefPubMed Spivak H, Lelcuk S, Hunter JG (1999) Laparoscopic surgery of the gastroesophageal junction. World J Surg 23:356–367CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Grant AM, Cotton SC, Boachie C, Ramsay CR, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, Campbell MK (2013) REFLUX Trial Group. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX). BMJ. doi:10.1136/bmj.f1908 Grant AM, Cotton SC, Boachie C, Ramsay CR, Krukowski ZH, Heading RC, Campbell MK (2013) REFLUX Trial Group. Minimal access surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: five year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial (REFLUX). BMJ. doi:10.​1136/​bmj.​f1908
9.
go back to reference Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Långström G, Lind T, Lundell L (2011) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305:1969–1977CrossRefPubMed Galmiche JP, Hatlebakk J, Attwood S, Ell C, Fiocca R, Eklund S, Långström G, Lind T, Lundell L (2011) Laparoscopic antireflux surgery vs esomeprazole treatment for chronic GERD: the LOTUS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 305:1969–1977CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Katz PO, Zavala S (2010) Proton pump inhibitors in the management of GERD. J Gastrointest Surg 14(Suppl 1):S62–S66CrossRefPubMed Katz PO, Zavala S (2010) Proton pump inhibitors in the management of GERD. J Gastrointest Surg 14(Suppl 1):S62–S66CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Castell DO, Kahrilas PJ, Richer JE et al (2002) Esomeprazole (40 mg) compared with lansoprazole (30 mg) in the treatment of erosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 97:575–583CrossRefPubMed Castell DO, Kahrilas PJ, Richer JE et al (2002) Esomeprazole (40 mg) compared with lansoprazole (30 mg) in the treatment of erosive esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol 97:575–583CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ganz RA, Gostout CJ, Grudem J, Swanson W, Berg T, DeMeester TR (2008) Use of a magnetic sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 67:287–294CrossRefPubMed Ganz RA, Gostout CJ, Grudem J, Swanson W, Berg T, DeMeester TR (2008) Use of a magnetic sphincter for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc 67:287–294CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Ganz RA, Bonavina L, Saino G, Dunn DH, Fockens P, Bemelman W (2012) The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years. Surg Endosc 26:2944–2949CrossRefPubMed Lipham JC, DeMeester TR, Ganz RA, Bonavina L, Saino G, Dunn DH, Fockens P, Bemelman W (2012) The LINX® reflux management system: confirmed safety and efficacy now at 4 years. Surg Endosc 26:2944–2949CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ganz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S et al (2013) Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med 368:719–727CrossRefPubMed Ganz RA, Peters JH, Horgan S et al (2013) Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease. N Engl J Med 368:719–727CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D et al (2013) One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: six years of clinical experience from a single center. J Am Coll Surg 217:577–585CrossRefPubMed Bonavina L, Saino G, Bona D et al (2013) One hundred consecutive patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease: six years of clinical experience from a single center. J Am Coll Surg 217:577–585CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lipham JC, Taiganides PA, Louie BE, Ganz RA, DeMeester TR (2014) Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus; epublished March 2014 doi:10.1111/dote.12199. Lipham JC, Taiganides PA, Louie BE, Ganz RA, DeMeester TR (2014) Safety analysis of first 1000 patients treated with magnetic sphincter augmentation for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus; epublished March 2014 doi:10.​1111/​dote.​12199.
17.
go back to reference Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130–134CrossRefPubMed Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20:130–134CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Venkataraman J, Krishnan A (2012) Long-term medical management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: how long and when to consider surgery? Trop Gastroenterol 33:21–32CrossRefPubMed Venkataraman J, Krishnan A (2012) Long-term medical management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: how long and when to consider surgery? Trop Gastroenterol 33:21–32CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM (2010) Magnitude and economic effect of overuse of antisecretory therapy in the ambulatory care setting. Am J Manag Care 16:e228–e234PubMed Heidelbaugh JJ, Goldberg KL, Inadomi JM (2010) Magnitude and economic effect of overuse of antisecretory therapy in the ambulatory care setting. Am J Manag Care 16:e228–e234PubMed
20.
go back to reference Patti MG, Goldberg HI, Arcerito M, Bortolasi L, Tong J, Way LW (1996) Hiatal hernia size affects lower esophageal sphincter function, esophageal acid exposure, and the degree of mucosal injury. Am J Surg 171:182–186CrossRefPubMed Patti MG, Goldberg HI, Arcerito M, Bortolasi L, Tong J, Way LW (1996) Hiatal hernia size affects lower esophageal sphincter function, esophageal acid exposure, and the degree of mucosal injury. Am J Surg 171:182–186CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lord RV, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Elyssina D, Sheth CT et al (2009) Hiatal Hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence, and effectiveness of nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 13:602–610CrossRefPubMed Lord RV, DeMeester SR, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Elyssina D, Sheth CT et al (2009) Hiatal Hernia, lower esophageal sphincter incompetence, and effectiveness of nissen fundoplication in the spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 13:602–610CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Richter JE (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:465–471CrossRefPubMed Richter JE (2013) Gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: side effects and complications of fundoplication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:465–471CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Magnetic sphincter augmentation and fundoplication for GERD in clinical practice: one-year results of a multicenter, prospective observational study
Authors
Martin Riegler
Sebastian F. Schoppman
Luigi Bonavina
David Ashton
Thomas Horbach
Matthias Kemen
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3772-7

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2015 Go to the issue