Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urology and Nephrology 1/2020

01-01-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Urology - Original Paper

Predictors of poor response to first-generation anti-androgens as criteria for alternate treatments for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Authors: Kenichiro Fukuoka, Jun Teishima, Hirotaka Nagamatsu, Shogo Inoue, Tetsutaro Hayashi, Koji Mita, Masanobu Shigeta, Kanao Kobayashi, Mitsuru Kajiwara, Yuichi Kadonishi, Takatoshi Tacho, Akio Matsubara

Published in: International Urology and Nephrology | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

There are no criteria for administering first- or second-generation anti-androgens (FGA and SGA, respectively) to patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). This study aimed to assess the efficacy of alternative FGA therapy in nmCRPC patients and the prognosis of these patients and to identify factors for predicting patients potentially responsive to FGA.

Methods

Data from 63 men with nmCRPC who underwent alternative FGA therapy (bicalutamide, flutamide, or chlormadinone acetate) as first-line therapy after failure of primary androgen-deprivation therapy (PADT) between 2004 and 2017 at Hiroshima University Hospital and affiliated hospitals were retrospectively investigated. The associations of clinicopathological parameters with overall survival (OS) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS) of alternative FGA-treated patients were analyzed.

Results

Time to CRPC [p = 0.007, hazard ratio (HR) = 4.77], regional lymph node involvement at the diagnosis of CRPC (p = 0.022, HR = 2.42), and PSA-PFS of alternative FGA therapy ≤ 6 months (p = 0.020, HR = 2.39) were identified as prognostic factors using a multivariate analysis. Additionally, Cox proportional hazard models revealed that PSA nadir value > 1 ng/mL during PADT (p = 0.034, HR = 2.40) and time from starting PADT to PSA nadir ≤ 1 year (p = 0.047, HR = 1.85) were predictive factors for worse PSA-PFS in alternative FGA therapy.

Conclusions

Shorter time to CRPC, regional lymph node involvement, PSA nadir during PADT > 1 ng/mL, and time from starting PADT to PSA nadir ≤ 1 year might suggest the potential benefit of immediate commencement of SGA, compared to FGA administration after nmCRPC diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Akaza H, Usami M, Hinotsu S et al (2004) Characteristics of patients with prostate cancer who have initially been treated by hormone therapy in Japan: J-CaP surveillance. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:329–336CrossRef Akaza H, Usami M, Hinotsu S et al (2004) Characteristics of patients with prostate cancer who have initially been treated by hormone therapy in Japan: J-CaP surveillance. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:329–336CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F et al (2018) Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 378:2465–2474CrossRef Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F et al (2018) Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 378:2465–2474CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S et al (2018) Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 378:1408–1418CrossRef Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S et al (2018) Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 378:1408–1418CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mizokami A, Kadono Y, Kitagawa Y et al (2017) Therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer in a new era: the indication of vintage hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and the new medicines. Int J Urol 24:566–572CrossRef Mizokami A, Kadono Y, Kitagawa Y et al (2017) Therapies for castration-resistant prostate cancer in a new era: the indication of vintage hormonal therapy, chemotherapy and the new medicines. Int J Urol 24:566–572CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R et al (2016) Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: the STRIVE Trial. J Clin Oncol 34:2098–2106CrossRef Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R et al (2016) Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: the STRIVE Trial. J Clin Oncol 34:2098–2106CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Iguchi T, Tamada S, Kato M et al (2019) Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: study protocol for a multicenter randomized phase II trial (the OCUU-CRPC study). BMC Cancer 19:339CrossRef Iguchi T, Tamada S, Kato M et al (2019) Enzalutamide versus flutamide for castration-resistant prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade therapy with bicalutamide: study protocol for a multicenter randomized phase II trial (the OCUU-CRPC study). BMC Cancer 19:339CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mori K, Kimura T, Ito K et al (2018) Earlier use of androgen receptor-axis-targeted drugs may improve overall survival in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 78:766–772CrossRef Mori K, Kimura T, Ito K et al (2018) Earlier use of androgen receptor-axis-targeted drugs may improve overall survival in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate 78:766–772CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Suzuki H, Okihara K, Miyake H et al (2008) Alternative nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy for advanced prostate cancer that relapsed after initial maximum androgen blockade. J Urol 180:921–927CrossRef Suzuki H, Okihara K, Miyake H et al (2008) Alternative nonsteroidal antiandrogen therapy for advanced prostate cancer that relapsed after initial maximum androgen blockade. J Urol 180:921–927CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fujikawa K, Matsui Y, Fukuzawa S et al (2000) Prostate-specific antigen levels and clinical response to flutamide as the second hormone therapy for hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. Eur Urol 37:218–222CrossRef Fujikawa K, Matsui Y, Fukuzawa S et al (2000) Prostate-specific antigen levels and clinical response to flutamide as the second hormone therapy for hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma. Eur Urol 37:218–222CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H (2005) Clinical outcome of maximum androgen blockade using flutamide as second-line hormonal therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int 96:791–795CrossRef Miyake H, Hara I, Eto H (2005) Clinical outcome of maximum androgen blockade using flutamide as second-line hormonal therapy for hormone-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int 96:791–795CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Okihara K, Ukimura O, Kanemitsu N et al (2007) Clinical efficacy of alternative antiandrogen therapy in Japanese men with relapsed prostate cancer after first-line hormonal therapy. Int J Urol 14:128–132CrossRef Okihara K, Ukimura O, Kanemitsu N et al (2007) Clinical efficacy of alternative antiandrogen therapy in Japanese men with relapsed prostate cancer after first-line hormonal therapy. Int J Urol 14:128–132CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nishimura K, Arichi N, Tokugawa S et al (2007) Effects of flutamide as a second-line agent for maximum androgen blockade of hormone refractory prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14:264–267CrossRef Nishimura K, Arichi N, Tokugawa S et al (2007) Effects of flutamide as a second-line agent for maximum androgen blockade of hormone refractory prostate cancer. Int J Urol 14:264–267CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Yasui M, Uemura K, Yoneyama S et al (2016) Predictors of poor response to secondary alternative antiandrogen therapy with flutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:1042–1046CrossRef Yasui M, Uemura K, Yoneyama S et al (2016) Predictors of poor response to secondary alternative antiandrogen therapy with flutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 46:1042–1046CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Akaza H, Hinotsu S, Usami M et al (2009) Combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 115:3437–3445CrossRef Akaza H, Hinotsu S, Usami M et al (2009) Combined androgen blockade with bicalutamide for advanced prostate cancer. Cancer 115:3437–3445CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kwak C, Jeong SJ, Park MS et al (2002) Prognostic significance of the nadir prostate specific antigen level after hormone therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 168:995–1000CrossRef Kwak C, Jeong SJ, Park MS et al (2002) Prognostic significance of the nadir prostate specific antigen level after hormone therapy for prostate cancer. J Urol 168:995–1000CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Altwein JE, Schmidt A (2002) Prostate-specific antigen dynamics predict risk of progression in advanced prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide plus castration. Urol Int 68:220–225CrossRef Altwein JE, Schmidt A (2002) Prostate-specific antigen dynamics predict risk of progression in advanced prostate cancer treated with bicalutamide plus castration. Urol Int 68:220–225CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Benaim EA, Pace CM, Lam PM et al (2002) Nadir prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Urology 59:73–78CrossRef Benaim EA, Pace CM, Lam PM et al (2002) Nadir prostate-specific antigen as a predictor of progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Urology 59:73–78CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Morote J, Trilla E, Esquena S et al (2004) Nadir prostate-specific antigen best predicts the progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 108:877–881CrossRef Morote J, Trilla E, Esquena S et al (2004) Nadir prostate-specific antigen best predicts the progression to androgen-independent prostate cancer. Int J Cancer 108:877–881CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Park SC, Rim JS, Choi HY et al (2009) Failing to achieve a nadir prostate-specific antigen after combined androgen blockade: predictive factors. Int J Urol 16:670–675CrossRef Park SC, Rim JS, Choi HY et al (2009) Failing to achieve a nadir prostate-specific antigen after combined androgen blockade: predictive factors. Int J Urol 16:670–675CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sim HG, Lau WK, Cheng CW et al (2004) Predictors of androgen independence in metastatic prostate cancer. BJU Int 93:1221–1224CrossRef Sim HG, Lau WK, Cheng CW et al (2004) Predictors of androgen independence in metastatic prostate cancer. BJU Int 93:1221–1224CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Teoh JY, Tsu JH, Yuen SK et al (2017) Survival outcomes of Chinese metastatic prostate cancer patients following primary androgen deprivation therapy in relation to prostate-specific antigen nadir level. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 13:e65–e71CrossRef Teoh JY, Tsu JH, Yuen SK et al (2017) Survival outcomes of Chinese metastatic prostate cancer patients following primary androgen deprivation therapy in relation to prostate-specific antigen nadir level. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol 13:e65–e71CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Tomioka A, Tanaka N, Yoshikawa M et al (2014) Nadir PSA level and time to nadir PSA are prognostic factors in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. BMC Urol 14:33CrossRef Tomioka A, Tanaka N, Yoshikawa M et al (2014) Nadir PSA level and time to nadir PSA are prognostic factors in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. BMC Urol 14:33CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Sasaki T, Ohnishi T, Hoshina A (2011) Nadir PSA level and time to PSA nadir following primary androgen deprivation therapy are the early survival predictors for prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 14:248–252CrossRef Sasaki T, Ohnishi T, Hoshina A (2011) Nadir PSA level and time to PSA nadir following primary androgen deprivation therapy are the early survival predictors for prostate cancer patients with bone metastasis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 14:248–252CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Huang SP, Bao BY, Wu MT et al (2011) Impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and time to PSA nadir on disease progression in prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy. Prostate 71:1189–1197CrossRef Huang SP, Bao BY, Wu MT et al (2011) Impact of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and time to PSA nadir on disease progression in prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy. Prostate 71:1189–1197CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Teoh JY, Tsu JH, Yuen SK et al (2015) Prognostic significance of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and its relationship to survival beyond time to PSA nadir for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases after primary androgen deprivation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1385–1391CrossRef Teoh JY, Tsu JH, Yuen SK et al (2015) Prognostic significance of time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir and its relationship to survival beyond time to PSA nadir for prostate cancer patients with bone metastases after primary androgen deprivation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22:1385–1391CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Teoh JY, Tsu JH, Yuen SK et al (2017) Association of time to prostate-specific antigen nadir and logarithm of prostate-specific antigen velocity after progression in metastatic prostate cancer with prior primary androgen deprivation therapy. Asian J Androl 19:98–102PubMed Teoh JY, Tsu JH, Yuen SK et al (2017) Association of time to prostate-specific antigen nadir and logarithm of prostate-specific antigen velocity after progression in metastatic prostate cancer with prior primary androgen deprivation therapy. Asian J Androl 19:98–102PubMed
32.
go back to reference Choueiri TK, Xie W, D’Amico AV et al (2009) Time to prostate-specific antigen nadir independently predicts overall survival in patients who have metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy. Cancer 115:981–987CrossRef Choueiri TK, Xie W, D’Amico AV et al (2009) Time to prostate-specific antigen nadir independently predicts overall survival in patients who have metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen-deprivation therapy. Cancer 115:981–987CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictors of poor response to first-generation anti-androgens as criteria for alternate treatments for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Authors
Kenichiro Fukuoka
Jun Teishima
Hirotaka Nagamatsu
Shogo Inoue
Tetsutaro Hayashi
Koji Mita
Masanobu Shigeta
Kanao Kobayashi
Mitsuru Kajiwara
Yuichi Kadonishi
Takatoshi Tacho
Akio Matsubara
Publication date
01-01-2020
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
International Urology and Nephrology / Issue 1/2020
Print ISSN: 0301-1623
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-019-02281-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

International Urology and Nephrology 1/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.