Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Insights into Imaging 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Prostate Cancer | Critical Review

Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Yun Tang, Xingsheng Li, Qing Jiang, Lingyun Zhai

Published in: Insights into Imaging | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Ultrasound (US) technology has recently made advances that have led to the development of modalities including elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The use of different US modalities in combination may increase the accuracy of PCa diagnosis. This study aims to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS) in the PCa diagnosis.

Methods

Through September 2023, we searched through Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Google Scholar for relevant studies. We used standard methods recommended for meta-analyses of diagnostic evaluation. We plot the SROC curve, which stands for summary receiver operating characteristic. To determine how confounding factors affected the results, meta-regression analysis was used.

Results

Finally, 1004 patients from 8 studies that were included in this research were examined. The diagnostic odds ratio for PCa was 20 (95% confidence interval (CI), 8–49) and the pooled estimates of mpUS for diagnosis were as follows: sensitivity, 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81–0.93); specificity, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.59–0.83); positive predictive value, 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63–0.87); and negative predictive value, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.71–0.93). The area under the SROC curve was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86–0.92). There was a significant heterogeneity among the studies (p < 0.01). According to meta-regression, both the sensitivity and specificity of mpUS in the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) were inferior to any PCa.

Conclusion

The diagnostic accuracy of mpUS in the diagnosis of PCa is moderate, but the accuracy in the diagnosis of csPCa is significantly lower than any PCa. More relevant research is needed in the future.

Critical relevance statement

This study provides urologists and sonographers with useful data by summarizing the accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer.

Key points

• Recent studies focused on the role of multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
• This meta-analysis revealed that multiparametric ultrasound has moderate diagnostic accuracy for prostate cancer.
• The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer is significantly lower than any prostate cancer.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stabile A, Giganti F, Rosenkrantz AB et al (2020) Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Urol 17:41–61CrossRefPubMed Stabile A, Giganti F, Rosenkrantz AB et al (2020) Multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer diagnosis: current status and future directions. Nat Rev Urol 17:41–61CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chen FK, de Castro Abreu AL, Palmer SL (2016) Utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of prostate cancer: state of the art. J Nucl Med 57:13s–18sCrossRefPubMed Chen FK, de Castro Abreu AL, Palmer SL (2016) Utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of prostate cancer: state of the art. J Nucl Med 57:13s–18sCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ashrafi AN, Nassiri N, Gill IS, Gulati M, Park D, de Castro Abreu AL (2018) Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in focal therapy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 19:87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ashrafi AN, Nassiri N, Gill IS, Gulati M, Park D, de Castro Abreu AL (2018) Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in focal therapy for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep 19:87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Salib A, Halpern E, Eisenbrey J et al (2023) The evolving role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in urology: a review. World J Urol 41:673–678CrossRefPubMed Salib A, Halpern E, Eisenbrey J et al (2023) The evolving role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in urology: a review. World J Urol 41:673–678CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Tyloch DJ, Tyloch JF, Adamowicz J (2018) Elastography in prostate gland imaging and prostate cancer detection. Med Ultrason 20:515–523CrossRefPubMed Tyloch DJ, Tyloch JF, Adamowicz J (2018) Elastography in prostate gland imaging and prostate cancer detection. Med Ultrason 20:515–523CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Klotz L, Lughezzani G, Maffei D et al (2021) Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a multicenter, prospective analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 15:E11–e16PubMed Klotz L, Lughezzani G, Maffei D et al (2021) Comparison of micro-ultrasound and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: a multicenter, prospective analysis. Can Urol Assoc J 15:E11–e16PubMed
7.
go back to reference Grey A, Ahmed HU (2016) Multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 26:114–119CrossRefPubMed Grey A, Ahmed HU (2016) Multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 26:114–119CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kaneko M, Lenon MSL, Storino Ramacciotti L et al (2022) Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis. Ther Adv Urol 14:17562872221145624CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kaneko M, Lenon MSL, Storino Ramacciotti L et al (2022) Multiparametric ultrasound of prostate: role in prostate cancer diagnosis. Ther Adv Urol 14:17562872221145624CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396CrossRefPubMed McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRefPubMed Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990CrossRefPubMed Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH (2005) Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 58:982–990CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893CrossRefPubMed Deeks JJ, Macaskill P, Irwig L (2005) The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. J Clin Epidemiol 58:882–893CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dwamena BA (2009) Evidence-based radiology: step 3–diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis (critical appraisal). Semin Roentgenol 44:170–179CrossRefPubMed Dwamena BA (2009) Evidence-based radiology: step 3–diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis (critical appraisal). Semin Roentgenol 44:170–179CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Brock M, Eggert T, Palisaar RJ et al (2013) Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer. J Urol 189:93–98CrossRefPubMed Brock M, Eggert T, Palisaar RJ et al (2013) Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer. J Urol 189:93–98CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chang Y, Yang J, Hong H, Ma H, Cui X, Chen L (2018) The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography combined with real-time strain elastography in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Aging Dis 9:480–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chang Y, Yang J, Hong H, Ma H, Cui X, Chen L (2018) The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography combined with real-time strain elastography in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Aging Dis 9:480–488CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Remmers S et al (2019) Multiparametric ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization: correlation of B-mode, shear wave elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound with radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 202:1166–1173CrossRefPubMed Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Remmers S et al (2019) Multiparametric ultrasound for prostate cancer detection and localization: correlation of B-mode, shear wave elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound with radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 202:1166–1173CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Wang Y, Feng Y, Yang X et al (2022) Enhanced transrectal ultrasound, real-time sonoelastography, and contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in heavily prescreened Chinese men with naive and repetitive biopsy: a comparison of detection rate of prostate cancer per man and per lesion. Ultrasound Q 38:237–245CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Feng Y, Yang X et al (2022) Enhanced transrectal ultrasound, real-time sonoelastography, and contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound in heavily prescreened Chinese men with naive and repetitive biopsy: a comparison of detection rate of prostate cancer per man and per lesion. Ultrasound Q 38:237–245CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wildeboer RR, Mannaerts CK, van Sloun RJG et al (2020) Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics. Eur Radiol 30:806–815CrossRefPubMed Wildeboer RR, Mannaerts CK, van Sloun RJG et al (2020) Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics. Eur Radiol 30:806–815CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zhang M, Tang J, Luo Y et al (2019) Diagnostic performance of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound in localized prostate cancer: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 38:1823–1830CrossRefPubMed Zhang M, Tang J, Luo Y et al (2019) Diagnostic performance of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound in localized prostate cancer: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 38:1823–1830CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zhang X, Hong H, Liang D (2022) The combined value of mpUS and mpMRI-TRUS fusion for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Cancer Imaging 22:60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang X, Hong H, Liang D (2022) The combined value of mpUS and mpMRI-TRUS fusion for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Cancer Imaging 22:60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Chen T, Wang F, Chen HB et al (2022) Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems. BMC Urol 22:64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen T, Wang F, Chen HB et al (2022) Multiparametric transrectal ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral zone prostate cancer and clinically significant prostate cancer: novel scoring systems. BMC Urol 22:64CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA et al (2019) Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. Eur Urol 76:340–351CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kundavaram CR, Halpern EJ, Trabulsi EJ (2012) Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 22:303–309CrossRefPubMed Kundavaram CR, Halpern EJ, Trabulsi EJ (2012) Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in prostate cancer. Curr Opin Urol 22:303–309CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Wildeboer RR, Postema AW, Demi L, Kuenen MPJ, Wijkstra H, Mischi M (2017) Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 27:3226–3234CrossRefPubMed Wildeboer RR, Postema AW, Demi L, Kuenen MPJ, Wijkstra H, Mischi M (2017) Multiparametric dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 27:3226–3234CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Zhao HX, Xia CX, Yin HX, Guo N, Zhu Q (2013) The value and limitations of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 82:e641–e647CrossRefPubMed Zhao HX, Xia CX, Yin HX, Guo N, Zhu Q (2013) The value and limitations of contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasonography for the detection of prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol 82:e641–e647CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gao Y, Liao XH, Ma Y, Lu L, Wei LY, Yan X (2017) Prostate ultrasound imaging: evaluation of a two-step scoring system in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Discov Med 24:295–303PubMed Gao Y, Liao XH, Ma Y, Lu L, Wei LY, Yan X (2017) Prostate ultrasound imaging: evaluation of a two-step scoring system in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Discov Med 24:295–303PubMed
28.
go back to reference Seitz M, Gratzke C, Schlenker B et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 29:295–301CrossRefPubMed Seitz M, Gratzke C, Schlenker B et al (2011) Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 29:295–301CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7:1303–1329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7:1303–1329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Zhang B, Ma X, Zhan W et al (2014) Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 40:1400–1407CrossRefPubMed Zhang B, Ma X, Zhan W et al (2014) Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 40:1400–1407CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Anbarasan T, Wei C, Bamber JC, Barr RG, Nabi G (2021) Characterisation of prostate lesions using transrectal shear wave elastography (SWE) ultrasound imaging: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 13:122CrossRefPubMed Anbarasan T, Wei C, Bamber JC, Barr RG, Nabi G (2021) Characterisation of prostate lesions using transrectal shear wave elastography (SWE) ultrasound imaging: a systematic review. Cancers (Basel) 13:122CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F et al (2021) Positive predictive value of prostate imaging reporting and data System version 2 for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 4:697–713CrossRefPubMed Mazzone E, Stabile A, Pellegrino F et al (2021) Positive predictive value of prostate imaging reporting and data System version 2 for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol 4:697–713CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Carlsen JF, Pedersen MR, Ewertsen C et al (2015) A comparative study of strain and shear-wave elastography in an elasticity phantom. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(3):W236–W242CrossRefPubMed Carlsen JF, Pedersen MR, Ewertsen C et al (2015) A comparative study of strain and shear-wave elastography in an elasticity phantom. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(3):W236–W242CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK (2013) Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(2):W347–W356CrossRefPubMed Chang JM, Won JK, Lee KB, Park IA, Yi A, Moon WK (2013) Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201(2):W347–W356CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Papageorgiou I, Valous NA, Hadjidemetriou S, Teichgräber U, Malich A (2022) Quantitative assessment of breast-tumor stiffness using shear-wave elastography histograms. Diagnostics (Basel) 12(12):3140 Papageorgiou I, Valous NA, Hadjidemetriou S, Teichgräber U, Malich A (2022) Quantitative assessment of breast-tumor stiffness using shear-wave elastography histograms. Diagnostics (Basel) 12(12):3140
36.
go back to reference Thon A, Teichgräber U, Tennstedt-Schenk C et al (2017) Computer aided detection in prostate cancer diagnostics: a promising alternative to biopsy? A retrospective study from 104 lesions with histological ground truth. PLoS One 12(10):e0185995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thon A, Teichgräber U, Tennstedt-Schenk C et al (2017) Computer aided detection in prostate cancer diagnostics: a promising alternative to biopsy? A retrospective study from 104 lesions with histological ground truth. PLoS One 12(10):e0185995CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU et al (2019) A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health 1:e271–e297CrossRefPubMed Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU et al (2019) A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digit Health 1:e271–e297CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Morris DC, Chan DY, Lye TH et al (2020) Multiparametric ultrasound for targeting prostate cancer: combining ARFI, SWEI, QUS and B-mode. Ultrasound Med Biol 46:3426–3439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Morris DC, Chan DY, Lye TH et al (2020) Multiparametric ultrasound for targeting prostate cancer: combining ARFI, SWEI, QUS and B-mode. Ultrasound Med Biol 46:3426–3439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Wysock JS, Xu A, Orczyk C, Taneja SS (2017) HistoScanning(TM) to detect and characterize prostate cancer-a review of existing literature. Curr Urol Rep 18:97CrossRefPubMed Wysock JS, Xu A, Orczyk C, Taneja SS (2017) HistoScanning(TM) to detect and characterize prostate cancer-a review of existing literature. Curr Urol Rep 18:97CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Yun Tang
Xingsheng Li
Qing Jiang
Lingyun Zhai
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Vienna
Published in
Insights into Imaging / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1869-4101
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01543-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Insights into Imaging 1/2023 Go to the issue