Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Paper

Procedural sedation and analgesia for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy: a 10 year experience of single institution

Authors: Banu Cevik, Murat Tuncer, Kutlu Hakan Erkal, Bilal Eryildirim, Kemal Sarica

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate anesthesia practice for pediatric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) according to the age groups and discuss the anesthetic management of these patients. Pediatric patients treated with ESWL because of urolithiasis under anesthesia in our department between December 2007 and January 2017 were evaluated retrospectively. A total of 251 patients were divided into two groups as Group PS: preschool children (<6 years) and Group S: school children (≥6 years). Groups were compared according to ketamine and midazolam doses, extra anesthetic agent requirement, duration of procedure, procedural and postprocedural complications due to anesthesia, as well as mean number of sessions and calculus diameter. A total of 408 sessions of ESWL were applied to 251 children included in the study. Overall, mean age of the patients was 4.5 ± 3.2 years (7 months–14 years). In school children (Group S), mean ketamine and midazolam doses were significantly higher than the preschool group (p < 0.01 and p = 0.04, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference in additional anesthetic agent requirement (p = 0.35) as well as mean number of SWL sessions (p = 0.23), duration of anesthesia (p = 0.93), stone size (p = 0.20), and stone laterality (p = 0.71) in both preschool and school children. No severe complications were observed in both groups. In pediatric ESWL patients, ketamine–midazolam combination is an effective and safety choice for outpatient anesthesia. Appropriate dose adjustment in a monitorized and well-equipped setting is essential.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–96PubMedPubMedCentral Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12(2–3):e86–96PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Sarica K (2006) Pediatric urolithiasis: etiology, specific pathogenesis and medical treatment. Urol Res 34:96–101CrossRefPubMed Sarica K (2006) Pediatric urolithiasis: etiology, specific pathogenesis and medical treatment. Urol Res 34:96–101CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Newman DM, Coury T, Lingeman JE et al (1986) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol 136:238–240CrossRefPubMed Newman DM, Coury T, Lingeman JE et al (1986) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy experience in children. J Urol 136:238–240CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Sarilar O et al (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis. J Urol 170:2405–2408CrossRefPubMed Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A, Sarilar O et al (2003) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment alternative for urinary tract stones in children: a large scale retrospective analysis. J Urol 170:2405–2408CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shouman AM, Ziada AM, Ghoneim IA et al (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal Stones >25 mm in children. Urology 74:109–111CrossRefPubMed Shouman AM, Ziada AM, Ghoneim IA et al (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal Stones >25 mm in children. Urology 74:109–111CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Turna B, Tekin A, Yağmur İ et al (2015) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants less than 12-month old. Urolithiasis 44:435–440CrossRefPubMed Turna B, Tekin A, Yağmur İ et al (2015) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in infants less than 12-month old. Urolithiasis 44:435–440CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Azili MN, Ozturk F, Inozu M (2015) Management of stone disease in infants. Urolithiasis 43:513–519CrossRefPubMed Azili MN, Ozturk F, Inozu M (2015) Management of stone disease in infants. Urolithiasis 43:513–519CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Badawy AA, Saleem MD, Abolyosr A et al (2012) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 44:661–666CrossRefPubMed Badawy AA, Saleem MD, Abolyosr A et al (2012) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy as first line treatment for urinary tract stones in children: outcome of 500 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 44:661–666CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Adanur S, Ziypak T, Yılmaz AH et al (2014) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy under sedoanalgesia for treatment of kidney stones in infants: a single-center experience with 102 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 46:2095–2101CrossRefPubMed Adanur S, Ziypak T, Yılmaz AH et al (2014) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy under sedoanalgesia for treatment of kidney stones in infants: a single-center experience with 102 cases. Int Urol Nephrol 46:2095–2101CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D et al (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417–420CrossRefPubMed Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D et al (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417–420CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Erden IA, Artukoglu F, Gozacan A et al (2007) Comparison of propofol/fentanyl and ketamine anesthesia in children during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Saudi Med J 28:364–368PubMed Erden IA, Artukoglu F, Gozacan A et al (2007) Comparison of propofol/fentanyl and ketamine anesthesia in children during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Saudi Med J 28:364–368PubMed
12.
go back to reference Ali AR, El Ghoneimy MN (2010) Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvant to propofol: comparative study in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:1058–1064CrossRefPubMed Ali AR, El Ghoneimy MN (2010) Dexmedetomidine versus fentanyl as adjuvant to propofol: comparative study in children undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27:1058–1064CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vardi A, Salem Y, Padeh S et al (2002) Is propofol safe for procedural sedation in children? A prospective evaluation of propofol versus ketamine in pediatric critical care. Crit Care Med 30:1231–1236CrossRefPubMed Vardi A, Salem Y, Padeh S et al (2002) Is propofol safe for procedural sedation in children? A prospective evaluation of propofol versus ketamine in pediatric critical care. Crit Care Med 30:1231–1236CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Parker RI, Mahan RA, Giugliano D et al (1997) Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children. Pediatrics 99:427–431CrossRefPubMed Parker RI, Mahan RA, Giugliano D et al (1997) Efficacy and safety of intravenous midazolam and ketamine as sedation for therapeutic and diagnostic procedures in children. Pediatrics 99:427–431CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Krivutza DM (2000) Midazolam: effects on amnesia and anxiety in children. Anesthesiology 93:676–684CrossRefPubMed Kain ZN, Mayes LC, Krivutza DM (2000) Midazolam: effects on amnesia and anxiety in children. Anesthesiology 93:676–684CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Green SM, Nakamura R, Johnson NE (1990) Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 1, A prospective series. Ann Emerg Med 19:1024–1032CrossRefPubMed Green SM, Nakamura R, Johnson NE (1990) Ketamine sedation for pediatric procedures: Part 1, A prospective series. Ann Emerg Med 19:1024–1032CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Chudnofsky CR, Je Weber, Stoyanoff PJ et al (2000) A combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 7:228–235CrossRefPubMed Chudnofsky CR, Je Weber, Stoyanoff PJ et al (2000) A combination of midazolam and ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in adult emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 7:228–235CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Cohen VG, Krauss B (2006) Recurrent episodes of intractable laryngospasm during dissociative sedation with intramuscular ketamine. Pediatr Emerg Care 22:247–249CrossRefPubMed Cohen VG, Krauss B (2006) Recurrent episodes of intractable laryngospasm during dissociative sedation with intramuscular ketamine. Pediatr Emerg Care 22:247–249CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Melendez E, Bachur R (2009) Serious adverse events during procedural sedation with ketamine. Pediatr Emerg Care 25:325–328CrossRefPubMed Melendez E, Bachur R (2009) Serious adverse events during procedural sedation with ketamine. Pediatr Emerg Care 25:325–328CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Slonim AD, Ognibene FP (1998) Sedation for pediatric procedures using ketamine and midazolam, in a primarily adult intensive care unit: a retrospective evaluation. Crit Care Med 26:1900–1904CrossRefPubMed Slonim AD, Ognibene FP (1998) Sedation for pediatric procedures using ketamine and midazolam, in a primarily adult intensive care unit: a retrospective evaluation. Crit Care Med 26:1900–1904CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Luo MP et al (2001) The use of midazolam and small-dose for sedation and analgesia during local anesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:1174–1177CrossRefPubMed Deng XM, Xiao WJ, Luo MP et al (2001) The use of midazolam and small-dose for sedation and analgesia during local anesthesia. Anesth Analg 93:1174–1177CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Tobias JD, Leder M et al (2011) Procedural sedation: a review of sedative agents, monitoring and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth 5:395–410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tobias JD, Leder M et al (2011) Procedural sedation: a review of sedative agents, monitoring and management of complications. Saudi J Anaesth 5:395–410CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Procedural sedation and analgesia for pediatric shock wave lithotripsy: a 10 year experience of single institution
Authors
Banu Cevik
Murat Tuncer
Kutlu Hakan Erkal
Bilal Eryildirim
Kemal Sarica
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-0992-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Urolithiasis 4/2018 Go to the issue