Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2018

01-08-2018 | Original Paper

Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones

Authors: Onur Kaygısız, Hakan Kılıçarslan, Ahmet Mert, Burhan Coşkun, Yakup Kordan

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of the study to compare low and intermediate shock wave frequency rates in terms of success and complications for treating pediatric kidney stones. This retrospective study was performed on 58 consecutive pediatric patients (24 girls, 34 boys) who underwent shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for kidney stones with an electrohydraulic lithotripter between April 2014 and March 2016. In the first year, all children underwent SWL with a frequency of 90 SWs/min as an intermediate frequency (Group 90), and in the second year all children were treated by SWL using 60 SWs/min as a low frequency (Group 60). The mean age of the patients was 5.87 ± 4.5 years. There were no significant differences in age, gender, stone characteristics and SWL energy level between the groups. Stone-free status was achieved in 14, 6 and 4 children in group 60; and in 10, 6 and 4 children in group 90 after one, two and three sessions, respectively. The stone-free rates were 80 and 74.1% after SWL and 90 and 88.9% after additional treatment in groups 60 and 90, respectively. The total median shock pulses were 2000 and 3600 in groups 60 and 90, respectively (p = 0.115). Efficiency quotients were 51.93 and 44.47 in groups 60 and 90, respectively. The mean total anesthesia times and complication rates did not differ between the groups. The low and intermediate frequency of SWL provided similar stone clearance in pediatric renal stones with similar anesthesia times. However, low SWL tended to need fewer shock pulses (2000/3600) for stone clearance, but the trend was not significant.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tekgül S, Doğan HS, Erdem E, Hoebeke P, Kocvara R, Nijman JM, Radmayr C, Sılay MS, Stein R, Undre S (2015) Urınary stone disease. EAU Guidel Paediatr Urol March:51–58 Tekgül S, Doğan HS, Erdem E, Hoebeke P, Kocvara R, Nijman JM, Radmayr C, Sılay MS, Stein R, Undre S (2015) Urınary stone disease. EAU Guidel Paediatr Urol March:51–58
4.
6.
go back to reference Li WM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Liu CC, Wang CJ, Huang CH, Lee YC (2007) Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int 79(2):124–128CrossRefPubMed Li WM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Liu CC, Wang CJ, Huang CH, Lee YC (2007) Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int 79(2):124–128CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
go back to reference Ather MH, Memon A (2000) Therapeutic efficacy of Dornier MPL 9000 for prevesical calculi as judged by efficiency quotient. J Endourol 14(7):551–553CrossRefPubMed Ather MH, Memon A (2000) Therapeutic efficacy of Dornier MPL 9000 for prevesical calculi as judged by efficiency quotient. J Endourol 14(7):551–553CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Paterson RF, Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, Connors BA, Fineberg NS, Williams JC Jr, McAteer JA (2002) Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model. J Urol 168(5):2211–2215CrossRefPubMed Paterson RF, Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, Connors BA, Fineberg NS, Williams JC Jr, McAteer JA (2002) Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model. J Urol 168(5):2211–2215CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Greenstein A, Matzkin H (1999) Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation? Urology 54(3):430–432CrossRefPubMed Greenstein A, Matzkin H (1999) Does the rate of extracorporeal shock wave delivery affect stone fragmentation? Urology 54(3):430–432CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Evan AP, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE (2007) Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery. BJU Int 100(3):624–627 (discussion 627-8) CrossRefPubMed Evan AP, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE (2007) Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery. BJU Int 100(3):624–627 (discussion 627-8) CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Pishchalnikova IV, Vonderhaar RJ (2006) Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol 20(8):537–541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Pishchalnikova IV, Vonderhaar RJ (2006) Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol 20(8):537–541CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of intermediate- and low-frequency shock wave lithotripsy for pediatric kidney stones
Authors
Onur Kaygısız
Hakan Kılıçarslan
Ahmet Mert
Burhan Coşkun
Yakup Kordan
Publication date
01-08-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1002-1

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Urolithiasis 4/2018 Go to the issue