Top

Published in:

01-09-2014 | Original Paper

Predictors of Return Rate Discrimination in Slot Machine Play

Authors: Ewan Coates, Alex Blaszczynski

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 3/2014

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which accurate estimates of payback percentages and volatility combined with prior learning, enabled players to successfully discriminate between multi-line/multi-credit slot machines that provided differing rates of reinforcement. The aim was to determine if the capacity to discriminate structural characteristics of gaming machines influenced player choices in selecting ‘favourite’ slot machines. Slot machine gambling history, gambling beliefs and knowledge, impulsivity, illusions of control, and problem solving style were assessed in a sample of 48 first year undergraduate psychology students. Participants were subsequently exposed to a choice paradigm where they could freely select to play either of two concurrently presented PC-simulated slot machines programmed to randomly differ in expected player return rates (payback percentage) and win frequency (volatility). Results suggest that prior learning and cognitions (particularly gambler’s fallacy) but not payback, were major contributors to the ability of a player to discriminate volatility between slot machines. Participants displayed a general tendency to discriminate payback, but counter-intuitively placed more bets on the slot machine with lower payback percentage rates.

Abbott, M. W. (2001). Problem and non-problem gamblers in New Zealand: A report on phase two of the 1999 national prevalence survey. Report number six of the New Zealand gaming survey. Wellington: Department of Internal Affairs.

Blaszczynski, A., & Nower, L. (2002). A pathways model of problem and pathological gambling. Addiction, 97, 487–499.PubMedCrossRef

Brandt, A. E., & Pietras, C. J. (2008). Gambling on a simulated slot machine under conditions of repeated play. The Psychological Record, 58, 405–426.

Chóliz, M. (2010). Experimental analysis of the game in pathological gamblers: Effect of the immediacy of the reward in slot machines. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 249–256.PubMedCrossRef

Cokely, E. T., & Kelley, C. M. (2009). Cognitive abilities and superior decision making under risk: A protocol analysis and process model evaluation. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 20–33.

Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2008). Clarifying the role of personality dispositions in risk for increased gambling behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 503–508.

Cyders, M. A., Smith, G. T., Spillane, N. S., Fischer, S., Annus, A. M., & Peterson, C. (2007). Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency. Psychological Assessment, 19, 107–118.

Delfabbro, P. (2004). The stubborn logic of regular gamblers: Obstacles and dilemmas in cognitive gambling research. Journal of Gambling Studies, 20, 1–21.

Delfabbro, P., Falzon, K., & Ingram, T. (2005). The effects of parameter variations in electronic gambling simulations: Results of a laboratory-based pilot intervention. Gambling Research, 17(1), 7–25.

Dickerson, M. G. (1979). FI schedules and persistence at gambling in the UK betting office. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 12, 315–323.CrossRef

Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods, 38, 232–236.PubMedCrossRef

Dixon, M. R., Harrigan, K. A., Sandhu, R., Collins, K., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2010). Losses disguised as wins in modern multi-line video slot machines. Addiction, 105, 1819–1824.PubMedCrossRef

Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2005). Electronic gaming machines: Are they the ‘crack-cocaine’ of gambling? Addiction, 100, 33–45.PubMedCrossRef

Fischer, S., & Smith, G. T. (2008). Binge eating, problem drinking, and pathological gambling: Linking behavior to shared traits and social learning. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 789–800.

Frederick, S. (2005). Reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.

Gilliland, J. A., & Ross, N. A. (2005). Opportunities for video lottery terminal gambling in Montréal: An environmental analysis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96, 55–59.PubMed

Götestam, K. G., & Johansson, A. (2003). Characteristics of gambling and problematic gambling in the Norwegian context: A DSM-IV-based telephone interview study. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 189–197.PubMedCrossRef

Griffiths, M. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 15, 265–283.PubMedCrossRef

Habib, R., & Dixon, M. R. (2010). Neurobehavioral evidence for the “near-miss” effect in pathological gamblers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 93, 313–328.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Harrigan, K. A. (2007). Slot machine structural characteristics: Distorted player views of payback percentages. Journal of Gambling Issues, 20, 215–234.CrossRef

Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2009). PAR Sheets, probabilities, and slot machine play: Implications for problem and non-problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23, 159–174.

Harrigan, K. A., & Dixon, M. (2010). Government sanctioned “tight” and “loose” slot machines: How having multiple versions of the same slot machine game may impact problem gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26(1), 159–174.PubMedCrossRef

Haw, J. (2008a). Random-ratio schedules of reinforcement: The role of early wins and unreinforced trials. Journal of Gambling Issues, 21, 56–67.CrossRef

Haw, J. (2008b). The relationship between reinforcement and gaming machine choice. Journal of Gambling Studies, 24, 55–61.PubMedCrossRef

Le Pelley, M. E. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and hybrid model. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B(3), 193–243.CrossRef

Linnet, J., Thomsen, K. R., Møller, A., & Callesen, M. B. (2010). Event frequency, excitement and desire to gamble, among pathological gamblers. International Gambling Studies, 10(2), 177–188.CrossRef

Lo, R. (2000). Optimism and illusion of control in gambling. Journal of the National Association for Gambling Studies, 12, 18–23.

Loba, P., Stewart, S. H., Klein, R. M., & Blackburn, J. M. (2002). Manipulations of the features of standard video lottery terminal (VLT) games: Effects in pathological and non-pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 17(4), 297–320.CrossRef

Lund, I. (2006). Gambling and problem gambling in Norway: What part does the gambling machine play? Addiction Research and Theory, 14, 475–491.CrossRef

Morgan, M. J. (1974). Effects of random reinforcement sequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 301–310.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Peters, H., Hunt, M., & Harper, D. (2010). An animal model of slot machine gambling: The effect of structural characteristics on response latency and persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies, 26, 521–531.PubMedCrossRef

Productivity Commission. (2009). Australia’s gambling industries. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.

Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Steenbergh, T. A., Meyers, A. W., May, R. K., & Whelan, J. P. (2002). Development and validation of the Gambler’s Belief Questionnaire. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 143–149.

Turner, N., & Horbay, R. (2004). How do slot machines and other electronic gaming machines actually work? Journal of Gambling Issues, 11, 10–50.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–233.CrossRef

Volberg, R. A., & Abbott, M. W. (1994). Lifetime prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Zealand. International Journal of Epidemiology, 23, 976–983.PubMedCrossRef

Walker, M. B. (2003). “The seductiveness of poker machines”. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of the National Association for Gambling Studies (pp. 12–26), Canberra.

Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.CrossRef

Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: Using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689.

Zlomke, K. R., & Dixon, M. R. (2006). Modification of slot-machine preferences through the use of a conditional discrimination paradigm. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 39, 351–361.CrossRef

Title: Predictors of Return Rate Discrimination in Slot Machine Play
Authors: Ewan Coates
Alex Blaszczynski
Publication date: 01-09-2014
Publisher: Springer US
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 3/2014
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9375-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Predictors of Return Rate Discrimination in Slot Machine Play

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2014

Effects of Gambling-Related Cues on the Activation of Implicit and Explicit Gambling Outcome Expectancies in Regular Gamblers

Expressing Gambling-Related Cognitive Biases in Motor Behaviour: Rolling Dice to Win Prizes

Prize Level and Debt Size: Impact on Gambling Behaviour

Gambling Harms and Gambling Help-Seeking Amongst Indigenous Australians

Internet Gambling Among High School Students in Hong Kong

Blue Gum Gaming Machine: An Evaluation of Responsible Gambling Features