Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2008

01-03-2008 | Original Paper

The Relationship Between Reinforcement and Gaming Machine Choice

Author: John Haw

Published in: Journal of Gambling Studies | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The present study assessed whether prior reinforcement experiences were related to gaming machine choice and the decision to change gaming machines during a session of gambling. Seventy undergraduate students (48 women, 22 men; mean age = 22.05 years) were presented with two visually identical simulated gaming machines in a practice phase. These simulated machines differed only in the rate of reinforcement. After the practice phase, participants were asked to choose a machine to play in the test phase and were allowed to change machines at will. Two measures of reinforcement were employed; frequency of wins and payback rate. Results indicated that neither measure of reinforcement was related to machine choice, but both were predictors of when participants changed machines. A post-hoc analysis of the 33 participants who changed machines during the test phase found a significant relationship between machine choice and prior reinforcement. For these participants, payback rate was significantly related to machine choice, unlike frequency of wins.
Literature
go back to reference Davey, G. (1989). Ecological learning theory. London: Routledge. Davey, G. (1989). Ecological learning theory. London: Routledge.
go back to reference Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker machine gambling. An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439.CrossRef Delfabbro, P. H., & Winefield, A. H. (1999). Poker machine gambling. An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439.CrossRef
go back to reference Dickerson, M., & Baron, E. (2000). Contemporary issues and future directions for research into pathological gambling. Addiction, 95(8), 1145–1159.PubMedCrossRef Dickerson, M., & Baron, E. (2000). Contemporary issues and future directions for research into pathological gambling. Addiction, 95(8), 1145–1159.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dickerson, M. G., Hinchy, J., England, S. L., Fabre, J., & Cunningham, R. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling I. High frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237–248.PubMed Dickerson, M. G., Hinchy, J., England, S. L., Fabre, J., & Cunningham, R. (1992). On the determinants of persistent gambling I. High frequency poker machine players. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 237–248.PubMed
go back to reference Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 232–236.PubMed Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 232–236.PubMed
go back to reference Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. (2002). Using a computerized video poker simulation for the collection of experimental data on gambling behaviour. The Psychological Record, 52, 417–428. Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. (2002). Using a computerized video poker simulation for the collection of experimental data on gambling behaviour. The Psychological Record, 52, 417–428.
go back to reference Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. W. (2004). Gender differences. In J. Grant, & M. N. Potenza (Eds), Pathological gambling: A clinical guide to treatment (pp. 97–109). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing. Grant, J. E., & Kim, S. W. (2004). Gender differences. In J. Grant, & M. N. Potenza (Eds), Pathological gambling: A clinical guide to treatment (pp. 97–109). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
go back to reference Griffiths, M. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–120.CrossRef Griffiths, M. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–120.CrossRef
go back to reference MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., & Hayes, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variable involved in gambling behavior. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 731–734. MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., & Hayes, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variable involved in gambling behavior. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 731–734.
go back to reference Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50. Weatherly, J. N., & Brandt, A. E. (2004). Participants’ sensitivity to percentage payback and credit value when playing a slot-machine simulation. Behavior and Social Issues, 13, 33–50.
Metadata
Title
The Relationship Between Reinforcement and Gaming Machine Choice
Author
John Haw
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies / Issue 1/2008
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3602
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-007-9073-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Journal of Gambling Studies 1/2008 Go to the issue