Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Otology

Predictable prosthesis length on a high-resolution CT scan before a stapedotomy

Authors: Emilie Gosselin, Ahlem Elblidi, Salman F. Alhabib, Marc-Elie Nader, George Wanna, Issam Saliba

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

(1) To assess the correlation between preoperative high-resolution CT (HRCT) imaging measurement from the long process of the incus to the footplate and the length of intraoperative selected prosthesis. (2) To determine if HRCT has a predictive value of prolapsed facial nerve during stapedotomy.

Materials and methods

We evaluated in our tertiary care center, in a retrospective case series, 94 patients undergoing primary stapedotomy. Preoperative temporal bone HRCT scans were reformatted in the plane of the stapes to measure on the same section the distance between the long process of the incus and the footplate. Measurement was performed by otolaryngology resident and neurotologist. We analyze the interobserver correlation and the mean length measured on the HRCT to the selected prosthesis size intraoperatively.

Results

Mean HRCT measurement of the incus long process/footplate distance assessed by the otolaryngology resident and neurotologist was 4.34 and 4.38 mm, respectively. Interobserver correlation was statistically significant [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.679 (p < 0.001)]. Mean selected prosthesis length intraoperatively was 4.36 mm. Correlation between the mean selected length prosthesis and the mean HRCT measurement was also statistically significant [ICC of 0.791 (p < 0.001)]. Postoperatively, a statistical improvement was shown in air conduction (p < 0.001), bone conduction (p < 0.001) and air–bone gap reduction (p < 0.001). 2 cases of facial nerve covering one-half of the oval window were identified by HRCT and confirmed intraoperatively.

Conclusion

HRCT is a valuable tool to predict preoperatively the length of the stapedotomy prosthesis. Moreover, it might be helpful to identify a potential prolapsed facial nerve, to confirm the diagnosis of otosclerosis and to rule out other abnormalities. Ultimately, it may optimize the stapedotomy procedure planning.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Meyer TA, Lambert PR (2004) Primary and revision stapedectomy in elderly patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12(5):387–392PubMed Meyer TA, Lambert PR (2004) Primary and revision stapedectomy in elderly patients. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 12(5):387–392PubMed
2.
go back to reference Gros A, Vatovec J, Zargi M, Jenko K (2005) Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 26(6):1143–1148CrossRef Gros A, Vatovec J, Zargi M, Jenko K (2005) Success rate in revision stapes surgery for otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol 26(6):1143–1148CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Lippy WH, Battista RA, Berenholz L, Schuring AG, Burkey JM (2003) Twenty-year review of revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 24(4):560–566CrossRef Lippy WH, Battista RA, Berenholz L, Schuring AG, Burkey JM (2003) Twenty-year review of revision stapedectomy. Otol Neurotol 24(4):560–566CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bakhos D, Lescanne E, Charretier C, Robier A (2010) A review of 89 revision stapes surgeries for otosclerosis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 127(5):177–182CrossRef Bakhos D, Lescanne E, Charretier C, Robier A (2010) A review of 89 revision stapes surgeries for otosclerosis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 127(5):177–182CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M et al (2006) Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 27(8 Suppl 2):S25–S47CrossRef Vincent R, Sperling NM, Oates J, Jindal M et al (2006) Surgical findings and long-term hearing results in 3,050 stapedotomies for primary otosclerosis: a prospective study with the otology-neurotology database. Otol Neurotol 27(8 Suppl 2):S25–S47CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kosling S, Brandt S, Bloching M, Böhme S (2004) Indications of HR-CT in the early postoperative phase of stapedotomy. Rofo 176(8):1122–1126CrossRef Kosling S, Brandt S, Bloching M, Böhme S (2004) Indications of HR-CT in the early postoperative phase of stapedotomy. Rofo 176(8):1122–1126CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Marchica CL, Saliba I (2015) The relationship between stapes prosthesis length and rate of stapedectomy success. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat 8:23–31CrossRef Marchica CL, Saliba I (2015) The relationship between stapes prosthesis length and rate of stapedectomy success. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat 8:23–31CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):186–187 (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc) CrossRef Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of results of treatment of conductive hearing loss. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):186–187 (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Inc) CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Thiel G, Mills R (2011) Persistent and recurrent conductive deafness following stapedotomy. J Laryngol Otol 125(5):460–466CrossRef Thiel G, Mills R (2011) Persistent and recurrent conductive deafness following stapedotomy. J Laryngol Otol 125(5):460–466CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Babighian GG, Albu S (2009) Failures in stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(3):395–400CrossRef Babighian GG, Albu S (2009) Failures in stapedotomy for otosclerosis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 141(3):395–400CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vincent R, Rovers M, Zingade N, Oates J, Sperling N, Devèze A et al (2010) Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the Otology–Neurotology Database. Otol Neurotol 31(6):875–882CrossRef Vincent R, Rovers M, Zingade N, Oates J, Sperling N, Devèze A et al (2010) Revision stapedotomy: operative findings and hearing results. A prospective study of 652 cases from the Otology–Neurotology Database. Otol Neurotol 31(6):875–882CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Schimanski G, Schimanski E, Berthold MR (2011) Diagnostic findings in stapes revision surgery-a retrospective of 26 years. Otol Neurotol 32(3):373–383CrossRef Schimanski G, Schimanski E, Berthold MR (2011) Diagnostic findings in stapes revision surgery-a retrospective of 26 years. Otol Neurotol 32(3):373–383CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Spandow O, Soderberg O, Bohlin L (2000) Long-term results in otosclerotic patients operated by stapedectomy or stapedotomy. Scand Audiol 29(3):186–190CrossRef Spandow O, Soderberg O, Bohlin L (2000) Long-term results in otosclerotic patients operated by stapedectomy or stapedotomy. Scand Audiol 29(3):186–190CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Scierski W, Namysłowski G, Czerwińska G, Lisowska G, Kluczewska E, Bożek P (2012) Postoperative vertigo caused by too long stapes prosthesis–radiological diagnostics. Otolaryngol Pol 66(5):363–367CrossRef Scierski W, Namysłowski G, Czerwińska G, Lisowska G, Kluczewska E, Bożek P (2012) Postoperative vertigo caused by too long stapes prosthesis–radiological diagnostics. Otolaryngol Pol 66(5):363–367CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bruijn JA (2000) Clinical and audiological aspects of stapes surgery in otosclerosis. Acadmisch Proefschrift, Amsterdam Bruijn JA (2000) Clinical and audiological aspects of stapes surgery in otosclerosis. Acadmisch Proefschrift, Amsterdam
16.
go back to reference Battista RA, Wiet RJ, Joy J (2006) Revision stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 39(4):677–697 (v–vi) CrossRef Battista RA, Wiet RJ, Joy J (2006) Revision stapedectomy. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 39(4):677–697 (v–vi) CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Eftekharian A, Roozbahany N, Shomali S (2015) The distance between stapedial footplate and incus in otosclerosis surgery. J Otol 10:18–20CrossRef Eftekharian A, Roozbahany N, Shomali S (2015) The distance between stapedial footplate and incus in otosclerosis surgery. J Otol 10:18–20CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Silverstein H, Bendet E, Rosenberg S, Nichols M (1994) Revision stapes surgery with and without laser: a comparison. Laryngoscope 104(12):1431–1438CrossRef Silverstein H, Bendet E, Rosenberg S, Nichols M (1994) Revision stapes surgery with and without laser: a comparison. Laryngoscope 104(12):1431–1438CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Han WW et al (1997) Revision stapedectomy: intraoperative findings, results, and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 107(9):1185–1192CrossRef Han WW et al (1997) Revision stapedectomy: intraoperative findings, results, and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 107(9):1185–1192CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chan LL, Manolidis S, Taber KH, Hayman LA (2000) In vivo measurements of temporal bone on reconstructed clinical high-resolution computed tomography scans. Laryngoscope 110(8):1375–1378CrossRef Chan LL, Manolidis S, Taber KH, Hayman LA (2000) In vivo measurements of temporal bone on reconstructed clinical high-resolution computed tomography scans. Laryngoscope 110(8):1375–1378CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Alexander AE Jr, Caldemeyer KS, Rigby P (1998) Clinical and surgical application of reformatted high-resolution CT of the temporal bone. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 8(3):631–650PubMed Alexander AE Jr, Caldemeyer KS, Rigby P (1998) Clinical and surgical application of reformatted high-resolution CT of the temporal bone. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 8(3):631–650PubMed
22.
go back to reference Kursten R, Schneider B, Zrunek M (1994) Long-term results after stapedectomy versus stapedotomy. Am J Otol 15(6):804–806PubMed Kursten R, Schneider B, Zrunek M (1994) Long-term results after stapedectomy versus stapedotomy. Am J Otol 15(6):804–806PubMed
23.
go back to reference Bozzato A, Struffert T, Hertel V, Iro H, Hornung J (2010) Analysis of the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography techniques for the measurement of stapes prostheses. Eur Radiol 20(3):566–571CrossRef Bozzato A, Struffert T, Hertel V, Iro H, Hornung J (2010) Analysis of the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography techniques for the measurement of stapes prostheses. Eur Radiol 20(3):566–571CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Li D, Cao Y (1996) Facial canal dehiscence: a report of 1,465 stapes operations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):467–471CrossRef Li D, Cao Y (1996) Facial canal dehiscence: a report of 1,465 stapes operations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 105(6):467–471CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Neff BA, Lippy WH, Schuring AG, Rizer FM (2004) Stapedectomy in patients with a prolapsed facial nerve. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(5):597–603CrossRef Neff BA, Lippy WH, Schuring AG, Rizer FM (2004) Stapedectomy in patients with a prolapsed facial nerve. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130(5):597–603CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Kwok P, Fisch U, Strutz J, May J (2002) Stapes surgery: how precisely do different prostheses attach to the long process of the incus with different instruments and different surgeons? Otol Neurotol 23(3):289–295CrossRef Kwok P, Fisch U, Strutz J, May J (2002) Stapes surgery: how precisely do different prostheses attach to the long process of the incus with different instruments and different surgeons? Otol Neurotol 23(3):289–295CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Skinner M, Honrado C, Prasad M, Kent HN, Selesnick SH (2003) The incudostapedial joint angle: implications for stapes surgery prosthesis selection and crimping. Laryngoscope 113(4):647–653CrossRef Skinner M, Honrado C, Prasad M, Kent HN, Selesnick SH (2003) The incudostapedial joint angle: implications for stapes surgery prosthesis selection and crimping. Laryngoscope 113(4):647–653CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Predictable prosthesis length on a high-resolution CT scan before a stapedotomy
Authors
Emilie Gosselin
Ahlem Elblidi
Salman F. Alhabib
Marc-Elie Nader
George Wanna
Issam Saliba
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5075-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2018 Go to the issue