Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Otology

Cholesteatoma vs granulation tissue: a differential diagnosis by DWI-MRI apparent diffusion coefficient

Authors: M. Cavaliere, Antonella Miriam Di Lullo, E. Cantone, G. Scala, A. Elefante, C. Russo, L. Brunetti, G. Motta, M. Iengo

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To diagnose cholesteatoma when it is not visible through tympanic perforation, imaging techniques are necessary. Recently, the combination of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging has proven effective to diagnose middle ear cholesteatoma. In particular, diffusion weighted images have integrated the conventional imaging for the qualitative assessment of cholesteatoma. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to obtain a quantitative analysis of cholesteatoma calculating the apparent diffusion coefficient value. So, we investigated whether it could differentiate cholesteatoma from other inflammatory tissues both in a preoperative and in a postoperative study.

Methods

This study included 109 patients with clinical suspicion of primary or residual/recurrent cholesteatoma. All patients underwent preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion sequences before primary or second-look surgery to calculate the apparent diffusion coefficient value.

Results

We found that the apparent diffusion coefficient values of cholesteatoma were significantly lower than those of non cholesteatoma. In particular, the apparent diffusion coefficient median value of the cholesteatoma group (0.84 × 10− 3 mm2/s) differed from the inflammatory granulation tissue (2.21 × 10− 3 mm2/s) group (p < 2.2 × 10− 16). Furthermore, we modeled the probability of cholesteatoma by means of a logistic regression and we determined an optimal cut-off probability value of ~ 0.86 (specificity = 1.0, sensitivity = 0.97), corresponding to an apparent diffusion coefficient cut-off value of 1.37 × 10− 3 mm2/s.

Conclusions

Our study has demonstrated that apparent diffusion coefficient values constitute a valuable quantitative parameter for preoperative differentiation of cholesteatomas from other middle ear inflammatory diseases and for postoperative diagnosis of recurrent/residual cholesteatomas.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Tierney PA, Pracy P, Blaney SP et al (1999) An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic ‘second look’ in intact canal wall mastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24:274–276CrossRefPubMed Tierney PA, Pracy P, Blaney SP et al (1999) An assessment of the value of the preoperative computed tomography scans prior to otoendoscopic ‘second look’ in intact canal wall mastoid surgery. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 24:274–276CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Thiriat S, Riehm S, Kremer S, Martin E, Veillon F (2009) Apparent diffusion coefficient values of middle ear cholesteatoma differ from abscess and cholesteatoma admixed infection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1123–1126CrossRefPubMed Thiriat S, Riehm S, Kremer S, Martin E, Veillon F (2009) Apparent diffusion coefficient values of middle ear cholesteatoma differ from abscess and cholesteatoma admixed infection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:1123–1126CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cavaliere M, Di Lullo AM, Caruso A et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted intensity magnetic resonance in the preoperative diagnosis of cholesteatoma. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 76:212–221CrossRef Cavaliere M, Di Lullo AM, Caruso A et al (2014) Diffusion-weighted intensity magnetic resonance in the preoperative diagnosis of cholesteatoma. J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 76:212–221CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Maheshwari S, Mukherji SK (2002) Diffusion-weighted Imaging for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after mastoidectomy: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:847–849PubMed Maheshwari S, Mukherji SK (2002) Diffusion-weighted Imaging for differentiating recurrent cholesteatoma from granulation tissue after mastoidectomy: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:847–849PubMed
5.
go back to reference Li PM, Linos E, Gurgel RK, Fischbein NJ, Blevins NH (2013) Evaluating the utility of non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 123:1247–1250CrossRefPubMed Li PM, Linos E, Gurgel RK, Fischbein NJ, Blevins NH (2013) Evaluating the utility of non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 123:1247–1250CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Elefante A, Cavaliere M, Russo C et al (2015) Diffusion weighted MR imaging of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma: an assessment by readers with different expertise. BioMed Res Int 2015:597896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elefante A, Cavaliere M, Russo C et al (2015) Diffusion weighted MR imaging of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma: an assessment by readers with different expertise. BioMed Res Int 2015:597896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Lingam RK, Khatri P, Hughes J, Singh A (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficients for detecting of postoperative middle ear cholesteatoma on non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted images. Radiology 269:504–510CrossRefPubMed Lingam RK, Khatri P, Hughes J, Singh A (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficients for detecting of postoperative middle ear cholesteatoma on non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted images. Radiology 269:504–510CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Jindal M, Riskalla A, Jiang D, Connor S, O’ Connor AF (2011) A systematic review of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of postoperative cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 32:1243–1249CrossRefPubMed Jindal M, Riskalla A, Jiang D, Connor S, O’ Connor AF (2011) A systematic review of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of postoperative cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 32:1243–1249CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Muzaffar J, Metcalfe C, Colley S, Coulson C (2017) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for residual and recurrent cholesteatoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 42:536–543CrossRefPubMed Muzaffar J, Metcalfe C, Colley S, Coulson C (2017) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for residual and recurrent cholesteatoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol 42:536–543CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Yigiter AC, Pinar E, Imre A, Erdoga N (2015) Value of echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting tympanomastoid cholesteatoma. J Int Adv Otol 11:53–57CrossRefPubMed Yigiter AC, Pinar E, Imre A, Erdoga N (2015) Value of echo-planar diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for detecting tympanomastoid cholesteatoma. J Int Adv Otol 11:53–57CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ganaha A, Outa S, Kyuuna A et al (2011) Efficacy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma. Auris Nasus Larynx 38:329–334CrossRefPubMed Ganaha A, Outa S, Kyuuna A et al (2011) Efficacy of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of middle ear cholesteatoma. Auris Nasus Larynx 38:329–334CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Pouillon M, Somers T, Casselman J, Officiers E (2006) The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients. Eur Radiol 16:1461–1467CrossRefPubMed Vercruysse JP, De Foer B, Pouillon M, Somers T, Casselman J, Officiers E (2006) The value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis of primary acquired and residual cholesteatoma: a surgical verified study of 100 patients. Eur Radiol 16:1461–1467CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jeunen G, Desloovere C, Hermans R, Vandecaveye V (2008) The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of residual or recurrent acquired cholesteatoma after canal wall-up tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 29:16–18CrossRefPubMed Jeunen G, Desloovere C, Hermans R, Vandecaveye V (2008) The value of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of residual or recurrent acquired cholesteatoma after canal wall-up tympanoplasty. Otol Neurotol 29:16–18CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Dundar Y, Akcan FA, Dilli A, Tatar E, Korkmaz H, Ozdek A (2015) Does diffusion-weighted MR imaging change the follow-up strategy in cases with residual cholesteatoma? J Int Adv Otol 11:58–62CrossRefPubMed Dundar Y, Akcan FA, Dilli A, Tatar E, Korkmaz H, Ozdek A (2015) Does diffusion-weighted MR imaging change the follow-up strategy in cases with residual cholesteatoma? J Int Adv Otol 11:58–62CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2007) The value of single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of middle ear cholesteatoma. Neuroradiology 49:841–848CrossRefPubMed De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2007) The value of single-shot turbo spin-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of middle ear cholesteatoma. Neuroradiology 49:841–848CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Russo C, Elefante A, Di Lullo AM et al (2018) ADC benchmark range for correct diagnosis of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma. BioMed Res Int 2018:7945482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Russo C, Elefante A, Di Lullo AM et al (2018) ADC benchmark range for correct diagnosis of primary and recurrent middle ear cholesteatoma. BioMed Res Int 2018:7945482CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Huins CT, Singh A, Lingam RK, Kalan A (2010) Detecting cholesteatoma with non-echo planar (HASTE) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143:141–146CrossRefPubMed Huins CT, Singh A, Lingam RK, Kalan A (2010) Detecting cholesteatoma with non-echo planar (HASTE) diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 143:141–146CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2010) Middle ear cholesteatoma: non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging-value in detection. Radiology 255:866–872CrossRefPubMed De Foer B, Vercruysse JP, Bernaerts A et al (2010) Middle ear cholesteatoma: non-echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus delayed gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging-value in detection. Radiology 255:866–872CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Cholesteatoma vs granulation tissue: a differential diagnosis by DWI-MRI apparent diffusion coefficient
Authors
M. Cavaliere
Antonella Miriam Di Lullo
E. Cantone
G. Scala
A. Elefante
C. Russo
L. Brunetti
G. Motta
M. Iengo
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-5082-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 9/2018 Go to the issue