Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Positron Emission Tomography | Research

Reliability of predicting low-burden (≤ 2) positive axillary lymph nodes indicating sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary operable breast cancer — a retrospective comparative study with PET/CT and breast MRI

Authors: Chayanee Sae-lim, Wen-Pei Wu, Ming-Che Chang, Hung-Wen Lai, Shu-Tian Chen, Chen-Te Chou, Chiung‑Ying Liao, Hsin-I Huang, Shou-Tung Chen, Dar-Ren Chen, Che-Lun Hung

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of care for axillary staging in early breast cancer patients with low-burden axillary metastasis (≤ 2 positive nodes). This study aimed to determine the diagnostic performances of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and breast magnetic resonance imaging in detecting axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases and the reliability to predict ALN burden.

Methods

A total of 275 patients with primary operable breast cancer receiving preoperative PET/CT and upfront surgery from January 2001 to December 2022 in a single institution were enrolled. A total of 244 (88.7%) of them also received breast MRI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of PET/CT and breast MRI were assessed. The predictive values to determine ALN burden were evaluated using radio-histopathological concordance.

Results

PET/CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 53.4%, specificity of 82.1%, PPV of 65.5%, NPV of 73.5%, and accuracy of 70.9% for detecting ALN metastasis, and the corresponding values for MRI were 71.8%, 67.8%, 56%, 80.8%, and 69.2%, respectively. Combining PET/CT and MRI showed a significantly higher PPV than MRI (72.7% vs 56% for MRI alone, p = 0.037) and a significantly higher NPV than PET/CT (84% vs 73.5% for PET/CT alone, p = 0.041). For predicting low-burden axillary metastasis (1–2 positive nodes), the PPVs were 35.9% for PET/CT, 36.7% for MRI, and 55% for combined PET/CT and MRI. Regarding patients with 0–2 positive ALNs in imaging, who were indicated for SLNB, the predictive correctness was 96.1% for combined PET/CT and MRI, 95.7% for MRI alone, and 88.6% for PET/CT alone.

Conclusions

PET/CT and breast MRI exhibit high predictive values for identifying low-burden axillary metastasis in patients with operable breast cancer with ≦ 2 positive ALNs on imaging.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–8.CrossRefPubMed Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, Brown AM, Harlow SP, Ashikaga T, et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–8.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:426–32; discussion 32-3.CrossRefPubMed Giuliano AE, McCall L, Beitsch P, Whitworth PW, Blumencranz P, Leitch AM, et al. Locoregional recurrence after sentinel lymph node dissection with or without axillary dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2010;252:426–32; discussion 32-3.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, Beitsch PD, Brennan MB, Kelemen PR, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:918–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giuliano AE, Ballman KV, McCall L, Beitsch PD, Brennan MB, Kelemen PR, et al. Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:918–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981–22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1303–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Donker M, van Tienhoven G, Straver ME, Meijnen P, van de Velde CJ, Mansel RE, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer (EORTC 10981–22023 AMAROS): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1303–10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Bartels SAL, Donker M, Poncet C, Sauvé N, Straver ME, van de Velde CJH, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized controlled EORTC 10981–22023 AMAROS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:2159–65.CrossRefPubMed Bartels SAL, Donker M, Poncet C, Sauvé N, Straver ME, van de Velde CJH, et al. Radiotherapy or surgery of the axilla after a positive sentinel node in breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized controlled EORTC 10981–22023 AMAROS trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:2159–65.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Miller CL, Specht MC, Skolny MN, Horick N, Jammallo LS, O’Toole J, et al. Risk of lymphedema after mastectomy: potential benefit of applying ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:71–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miller CL, Specht MC, Skolny MN, Horick N, Jammallo LS, O’Toole J, et al. Risk of lymphedema after mastectomy: potential benefit of applying ACOSOG Z0011 protocol to mastectomy patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:71–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Man V, Luk WP, Fung LH, Kwong A. The role of pre-operative axillary ultrasound in assessment of axillary tumor burden in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022;196:245–54.CrossRefPubMed Man V, Luk WP, Fung LH, Kwong A. The role of pre-operative axillary ultrasound in assessment of axillary tumor burden in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022;196:245–54.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Xu Y, Bai X, Chen Y, Jiang L, Hu B, Yu L. Application of real-time elastography ultrasound in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xu Y, Bai X, Chen Y, Jiang L, Hu B, Yu L. Application of real-time elastography ultrasound in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Sci Rep. 2018;8:10234.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference An YS, Lee DH, Yoon JK, Lee SJ, Kim TH, Kang DK, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Nuklearmedizin. 2014;53:89–94.CrossRefPubMed An YS, Lee DH, Yoon JK, Lee SJ, Kim TH, Kang DK, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT, ultrasonography and MRI. Detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer patients. Nuklearmedizin. 2014;53:89–94.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hwang SO, Lee SW, Kim HJ, Kim WW, Park HY, Jung JH. The comparative study of ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced MRI, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:315–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hwang SO, Lee SW, Kim HJ, Kim WW, Park HY, Jung JH. The comparative study of ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced MRI, and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting axillary lymph node metastasis in T1 breast cancer. J Breast Cancer. 2013;16:315–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Riegger C, Koeninger A, Hartung V, Otterbach F, Kimmig R, Forsting M, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed Riegger C, Koeninger A, Hartung V, Otterbach F, Kimmig R, Forsting M, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic value of FDG-PET/CT and axillary ultrasound for the detection of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. Acta Radiol. 2012;53:1092–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Chang JM, Leung JWT, Moy L, Ha SM, Moon WK. Axillary nodal evaluation in breast cancer: state of the art. Radiology. 2020;295:500–15.CrossRefPubMed Chang JM, Leung JWT, Moy L, Ha SM, Moon WK. Axillary nodal evaluation in breast cancer: state of the art. Radiology. 2020;295:500–15.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhang X, Liu Y, Luo H, Zhang J. PET/CT and MRI for identifying axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;52:1840–51.CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Liu Y, Luo H, Zhang J. PET/CT and MRI for identifying axillary lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;52:1840–51.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3271–7.CrossRefPubMed Kennecke H, Yerushalmi R, Woods R, Cheang MC, Voduc D, Speers CH, et al. Metastatic behavior of breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:3271–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hortobagyi G, Connolly J. Breast. In: Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2016. Hortobagyi G, Connolly J. Breast. In: Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2016.
17.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Pu S, Jiang S, Li D, Li S, Liu Y, et al. The prognostic significance of further axillary dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases in female breast cancer: a competing risk analysis using the SEER database. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1012646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhou Y, Pu S, Jiang S, Li D, Li S, Liu Y, et al. The prognostic significance of further axillary dissection for sentinel lymph node micrometastases in female breast cancer: a competing risk analysis using the SEER database. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1012646.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Ecanow JS, Abe H, Newstead GM, Ecanow DB, Jeske JM. Axillary staging of breast cancer: what the radiologist should know. Radiographics. 2013;33:1589–612.CrossRefPubMed Ecanow JS, Abe H, Newstead GM, Ecanow DB, Jeske JM. Axillary staging of breast cancer: what the radiologist should know. Radiographics. 2013;33:1589–612.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual and the Future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stadnik TW, Everaert H, Makkat S, Sacré R, Lamote J, Bourgain C. Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging–initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2153–60.CrossRefPubMed Stadnik TW, Everaert H, Makkat S, Sacré R, Lamote J, Bourgain C. Breast imaging. Preoperative breast cancer staging: comparison of USPIO-enhanced MR imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDC) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for axillary lymph node staging–initial findings. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:2153–60.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Choi YJ, Shin YD, Kang YH, Lee MS, Lee MK, Cho BS, et al. The effects of preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients in comparison to the conventional imaging study. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15:441–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Choi YJ, Shin YD, Kang YH, Lee MS, Lee MK, Cho BS, et al. The effects of preoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT in breast cancer patients in comparison to the conventional imaging study. J Breast Cancer. 2012;15:441–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Fukushima K, Miyoshi Y, Katsuura T, Igarashi Y, Kawanaka Y, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34:220–8.CrossRefPubMed Kitajima K, Fukushima K, Miyoshi Y, Katsuura T, Igarashi Y, Kawanaka Y, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in patients with breast cancer. Jpn J Radiol. 2016;34:220–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Orsaria P, Chiaravalloti A, Caredda E, Marchese PV, Titka B, Anemona L, et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for nodal staging of breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:6639–52.CrossRefPubMed Orsaria P, Chiaravalloti A, Caredda E, Marchese PV, Titka B, Anemona L, et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for nodal staging of breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2018;38:6639–52.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kutluturk K, Simsek A, Comak A, Gonultas F, Unal B, Kekilli E. Factors affecting the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating axillary metastases in invasive breast cancer. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22:63–8.CrossRefPubMed Kutluturk K, Simsek A, Comak A, Gonultas F, Unal B, Kekilli E. Factors affecting the accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating axillary metastases in invasive breast cancer. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22:63–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Assi HI, Alameh IA, Khoury J, Bou Zerdan M, Akiki V, Charafeddine M, et al. Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT scan as compared to US-guided FNA in prediction of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2021;11:740336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Assi HI, Alameh IA, Khoury J, Bou Zerdan M, Akiki V, Charafeddine M, et al. Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT scan as compared to US-guided FNA in prediction of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2021;11:740336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Kim SH, Shin HJ, Shin KC, Chae EY, Choi WJ, Cha JH, et al. Diagnostic performance of fused diffusion-weighted imaging using T1-weighted imaging for axillary nodal staging in patients with early breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:154–63.CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Shin HJ, Shin KC, Chae EY, Choi WJ, Cha JH, et al. Diagnostic performance of fused diffusion-weighted imaging using T1-weighted imaging for axillary nodal staging in patients with early breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:154–63.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference van Nijnatten TJA, Schipper RJ, Lobbes MBI, van Roozendaal LM, Vöö S, Moossdorff M, et al. Diagnostic performance of gadofosveset-enhanced axillary MRI for nodal (re)staging in breast cancer patients: results of a validation study. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:168–75.CrossRefPubMed van Nijnatten TJA, Schipper RJ, Lobbes MBI, van Roozendaal LM, Vöö S, Moossdorff M, et al. Diagnostic performance of gadofosveset-enhanced axillary MRI for nodal (re)staging in breast cancer patients: results of a validation study. Clin Radiol. 2018;73:168–75.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Ahn HS, Jang M, Kim SM, La Yun B, Lee SH. Usefulness of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging with a dedicated axillary sequence for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early ductal breast cancer. Radiol Med. 2019;124:1220–8.CrossRefPubMed Ahn HS, Jang M, Kim SM, La Yun B, Lee SH. Usefulness of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging with a dedicated axillary sequence for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with early ductal breast cancer. Radiol Med. 2019;124:1220–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Guvenc I, Whitman GJ, Liu P, Yalniz C, Ma J, Dogan BE. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging increases diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging for predicting axillary metastases in breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2019;25:47–55.CrossRefPubMed Guvenc I, Whitman GJ, Liu P, Yalniz C, Ma J, Dogan BE. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging increases diagnostic accuracy of breast MR imaging for predicting axillary metastases in breast cancer patients. Breast J. 2019;25:47–55.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ramírez-Galván YA, Cardona-Huerta S, Elizondo-Riojas G, Álvarez-Villalobos NA, Campos-Coy MA, Ferrara-Chapa CM. Does axillary lymph node size predict better metastatic involvement than apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer? Acta Radiol. 2020;61:1494–504.CrossRefPubMed Ramírez-Galván YA, Cardona-Huerta S, Elizondo-Riojas G, Álvarez-Villalobos NA, Campos-Coy MA, Ferrara-Chapa CM. Does axillary lymph node size predict better metastatic involvement than apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer? Acta Radiol. 2020;61:1494–504.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kurt N, Binboga Kurt B, Gulsaran U, Uslu B, Celik AO, Sut N, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging on axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022;28:329–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kurt N, Binboga Kurt B, Gulsaran U, Uslu B, Celik AO, Sut N, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging on axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022;28:329–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Cooper KL, Meng Y, Harnan S, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:iii–iv, 1–134.CrossRefPubMed Cooper KL, Meng Y, Harnan S, Ward SE, Fitzgerald P, Papaioannou D, et al. Positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:iii–iv, 1–134.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Zhang C, Liang Z, Liu W, Zeng X, Mo Y. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2023;23:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zhang C, Liang Z, Liu W, Zeng X, Mo Y. Comparison of whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI for distant metastases in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2023;23:37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Lu XR, Qu MM, Zhai YN, Feng W, Gao Y, Lei JQ. Diagnostic role of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the TNM staging of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:4328–37.CrossRefPubMed Lu XR, Qu MM, Zhai YN, Feng W, Gao Y, Lei JQ. Diagnostic role of 18F-FDG PET/MRI in the TNM staging of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:4328–37.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Han S, Choi JY. Impact of 18F-FDG PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI on staging and management as an initial staging modality in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:271–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han S, Choi JY. Impact of 18F-FDG PET, PET/CT, and PET/MRI on staging and management as an initial staging modality in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nucl Med. 2021;46:271–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, et al. The evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21:1–10.CrossRefPubMed Paydary K, Seraj SM, Zadeh MZ, Emamzadehfard S, Shamchi SP, Gholami S, et al. The evolving role of FDG-PET/CT in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of breast cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2019;21:1–10.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Gajjala SR, Hulikal N, Kadiyala S, Kottu R, Kalawat T. Whole-body (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: a prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in South India. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147:256–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gajjala SR, Hulikal N, Kadiyala S, Kottu R, Kalawat T. Whole-body (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography ((18)F-FDG PET/CT) for staging locally advanced breast cancer: a prospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in South India. Indian J Med Res. 2018;147:256–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
go back to reference Xu G, Zhao L, He Z. Performance of whole-body PET/CT for the detection of distant malignancies in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1847–54.CrossRefPubMed Xu G, Zhao L, He Z. Performance of whole-body PET/CT for the detection of distant malignancies in various cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1847–54.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Zhang XH, Xiao C. Diagnostic value of nineteen different imaging methods for patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46:2041–55.CrossRefPubMed Zhang XH, Xiao C. Diagnostic value of nineteen different imaging methods for patients with breast cancer: a network meta-analysis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46:2041–55.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Reliability of predicting low-burden (≤ 2) positive axillary lymph nodes indicating sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary operable breast cancer — a retrospective comparative study with PET/CT and breast MRI
Authors
Chayanee Sae-lim
Wen-Pei Wu
Ming-Che Chang
Hung-Wen Lai
Shu-Tian Chen
Chen-Te Chou
Chiung‑Ying Liao
Hsin-I Huang
Shou-Tung Chen
Dar-Ren Chen
Che-Lun Hung
Publication date
01-12-2024

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2024 Go to the issue