Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018

01-11-2018 | Brief Report

Population-based validation of the National Cancer Comprehensive Network recommendations for breast cancer staging

Author: Omar Abdel-Rahman

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the performance characteristics of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) staging recommendations for breast cancer with regard to the detection of lung, bone, and liver metastases.

Methods

Surveillance, epidemiology, and end points (SEER) database (2010–2015) was accessed, and patients with breast cancer and complete information about T stage and clinical N stage, ER status, Her2 status, and metastatic sites were extracted. Performance characteristics evaluated for the current study included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), number needed to investigate (NNI), and accuracy.

Results

A total of 239,196 patients were included in the analysis. For the overall cohort, the required PPV (for the recognition of lung metastases) is 10.6% and NNI to detect one case of lung metastasis is 9.4. Likewise, PPV (for the recognition of bone metastases) is 18.6% and NNI to detect one case of bone metastasis is 5.3. Moreover, PPV (for the recognition of liver metastases) is 7.6% and NNI to detect one case of liver metastasis is 13.1. When changing the threshold for baseline imaging to includeT2N1 patients, a better balance between sensitivity and specificity among ER+/Her2− patients (> 92% for both sensitivity and specificity for the three metastatic sites) was observed. On the other hand, the proposed change improved sensitivity while it lowers significantly the specificity among Her2+ and triple negative subtypes (specificity < 84% for Her2+ disease for the three metastatic sites; specificity < 87% for triple negative disease for the three metastatic sites).

Conclusion

The current NCCN recommendations for breast cancer staging have an excellent NPV and miss only few patients with lung, liver, or bone metastases. Future studies incorporating the subtype of breast cancer as a determinant of staging pathway is needed.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bagaria SP, Ray PS, Sim MS, Ye X, Shamonki JM, Cui X et al (2014) Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA Surg 149(2):125–129CrossRef Bagaria SP, Ray PS, Sim MS, Ye X, Shamonki JM, Cui X et al (2014) Personalizing breast cancer staging by the inclusion of ER, PR, and HER2. JAMA Surg 149(2):125–129CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sonnenblick A, Fumagalli D, Sotiriou C, Piccart M (2014) Is the differentiation into molecular subtypes of breast cancer important for staging, local and systemic therapy, and follow up? Cancer Treat Rev 40(9):1089–1095CrossRef Sonnenblick A, Fumagalli D, Sotiriou C, Piccart M (2014) Is the differentiation into molecular subtypes of breast cancer important for staging, local and systemic therapy, and follow up? Cancer Treat Rev 40(9):1089–1095CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Henry NL, Braun TM, Breslin TM, Gorski DH, Silver SM, Griggs JJ (2017) Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry. Cancer 123(15):2975–2983CrossRef Henry NL, Braun TM, Breslin TM, Gorski DH, Silver SM, Griggs JJ (2017) Variation in the use of advanced imaging at the time of breast cancer diagnosis in a statewide registry. Cancer 123(15):2975–2983CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Park HS, Kim S, Kim K, Yoo H, Chae BJ, Bae JS et al (2012) Pattern of distant recurrence according to the molecular subtypes in Korean women with breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol 10:4CrossRef Park HS, Kim S, Kim K, Yoo H, Chae BJ, Bae JS et al (2012) Pattern of distant recurrence according to the molecular subtypes in Korean women with breast cancer. World J Surg Oncol 10:4CrossRef
5.
go back to reference De Placido S, De Angelis C, Giuliano M, Pizzi C, Ruocco R, Perrone V et al (2017) Imaging tests in staging and surveillance of non-metastatic breast cancer: changes in routine clinical practice and cost implications. Br J Cancer 116(6):821–827CrossRef De Placido S, De Angelis C, Giuliano M, Pizzi C, Ruocco R, Perrone V et al (2017) Imaging tests in staging and surveillance of non-metastatic breast cancer: changes in routine clinical practice and cost implications. Br J Cancer 116(6):821–827CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Giordano SH, Elias AD, Gradishar WJ (2018) NCCN guidelines updates: breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16(5 s):605–610CrossRef Giordano SH, Elias AD, Gradishar WJ (2018) NCCN guidelines updates: breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 16(5 s):605–610CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wu Q, Li J, Zhu S, Wu J, Chen C, Liu Q et al (2017) Breast cancer subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastases: a SEER based study. Oncotarget 8(17):27990–27996PubMedPubMedCentral Wu Q, Li J, Zhu S, Wu J, Chen C, Liu Q et al (2017) Breast cancer subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastases: a SEER based study. Oncotarget 8(17):27990–27996PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Abdel-Rahman O (2017) Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:269–275CrossRef Abdel-Rahman O (2017) Validation of the 8th AJCC prognostic staging system for breast cancer in a population-based setting. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:269–275CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Molnar IA, Molnar BA, Vizkeleti L, Fekete K, Tamas J, Deak P et al (2017) Breast carcinoma subtypes show different patterns of metastatic behavior. Virchows Arch 470(3):275–283CrossRef Molnar IA, Molnar BA, Vizkeleti L, Fekete K, Tamas J, Deak P et al (2017) Breast carcinoma subtypes show different patterns of metastatic behavior. Virchows Arch 470(3):275–283CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cortesi L, De Matteis E, Cirilli C, Marcheselli L, Proietto M, Federico M (2012) Outcome evaluation in pre-trastuzumab era between different breast cancer phenotypes: a population-based study on Italian women. Tumori 98(6):743–750CrossRef Cortesi L, De Matteis E, Cirilli C, Marcheselli L, Proietto M, Federico M (2012) Outcome evaluation in pre-trastuzumab era between different breast cancer phenotypes: a population-based study on Italian women. Tumori 98(6):743–750CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Population-based validation of the National Cancer Comprehensive Network recommendations for breast cancer staging
Author
Omar Abdel-Rahman
Publication date
01-11-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-4893-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine