Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Urology 5/2018

Open Access 01-05-2018 | Topic Paper

Poor reproducibility of PIRADS score in two multiparametric MRIs before biopsy in men with elevated PSA

Authors: Stig Müller, Gunder Lilleaasen, Tor Erik Sand, Lars Løfsgaard, Manuela Estop-Garanto, Dan Helgø, Peter Sund, Vegard Mygland

Published in: World Journal of Urology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Since January 2015, all men referred to urologists in Norway due to elevated PSA or other suspicion of prostate cancer underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before prostate biopsy. At our hospital, patients and the initial MRI were assessed by an urologist and if deemed necessary, patients were referred to another institution for MR/US fusion biopsies. Before MR/US biopsy, patients underwent a second mpMRI. Since we noticed disagreement of these two mpMRIs before biopsy, we retrospectively assessed the level of agreement between the two mpMRIs from the two institutions.

Methods

During the first 6 months of 2015, 292 patients were referred to our outpatient clinic. We referred 126 patients of these to the other institution for MR/US fusion biopsy. The 2 mpMRIs were performed within 4 weeks. We analyzed MR reports and schematics for number of lesions and highest PIRADS score per side of the prostate and histological result of the biopsies. Bland–Altman’s plot was used to compare the level of agreement between the two mpMRIs of the same patient before biopsy.

Results

There was a poor level of agreement between the two mpMRIs and a statistically significant difference in PIRADS scores. Regression analysis showed that there was no proportional or systematic bias.

Conclusion

In unselected patients with elevated PSA, there seems to be a significant variation of mpMRI results across institutions. The PIRADS scoring system needs to be validated with regards to MR equipment, mpMRI protocols and inter-reader variability of radiologists.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71(4):618–629CrossRefPubMed Mottet N et al (2017) EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol 71(4):618–629CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baco E et al (2016) A randomized controlled trial to assess and compare the outcomes of two-core prostate biopsy guided by fused magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images and traditional 12-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol 69(1):149–156CrossRefPubMed Baco E et al (2016) A randomized controlled trial to assess and compare the outcomes of two-core prostate biopsy guided by fused magnetic resonance and transrectal ultrasound images and traditional 12-core systematic biopsy. Eur Urol 69(1):149–156CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Panebianco V et al (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study. Urol Oncol 33(1):17CrossRefPubMed Panebianco V et al (2015) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. standard care in men being evaluated for prostate cancer: a randomized study. Urol Oncol 33(1):17CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Tonttila PP et al (2016) Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer based on elevated prostate-specific antigen values: results from a randomized prospective blinded controlled trial. Eur Urol 69(3):419–425CrossRefPubMed Tonttila PP et al (2016) Prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy-naive men with suspected prostate cancer based on elevated prostate-specific antigen values: results from a randomized prospective blinded controlled trial. Eur Urol 69(3):419–425CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ahmed HU et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389(10071):815–822CrossRefPubMed Ahmed HU et al (2017) Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study. Lancet 389(10071):815–822CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Barentsz JO et al (2016) Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use. Eur Urol 69(1):41–49CrossRefPubMed Barentsz JO et al (2016) Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use. Eur Urol 69(1):41–49CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8(2):135–160CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8(2):135–160CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hamoen EHJ et al (2015) Use of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(6):1112–1121CrossRefPubMed Hamoen EHJ et al (2015) Use of the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(6):1112–1121CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Scheltema MJ et al (2017) Utilization of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice and focal therapy: report from a Delphi consensus project. World J Urol 35(5):695–701CrossRefPubMed Scheltema MJ et al (2017) Utilization of multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice and focal therapy: report from a Delphi consensus project. World J Urol 35(5):695–701CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Radtke JP et al (2016) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Eur Urol 70(5):846–853CrossRefPubMed Radtke JP et al (2016) Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen. Eur Urol 70(5):846–853CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kuhl CK et al (2017) Abbreviated biparametric prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen. Radiology 285(2):493–505CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK et al (2017) Abbreviated biparametric prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen. Radiology 285(2):493–505CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Scialpi M et al (2017) Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI with Non-endorectal Coil at 3T in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 37(3):1263–1271CrossRefPubMed Scialpi M et al (2017) Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI with Non-endorectal Coil at 3T in the detection and localization of prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 37(3):1263–1271CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Arumainayagam N et al (2013) Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. Radiology 268(3):761–769CrossRefPubMed Arumainayagam N et al (2013) Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard. Radiology 268(3):761–769CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Moore CM et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations-a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 71(4):648–655CrossRefPubMed Moore CM et al (2017) Reporting magnetic resonance imaging in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer: the PRECISE recommendations-a report of a European School of Oncology Task Force. Eur Urol 71(4):648–655CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Poor reproducibility of PIRADS score in two multiparametric MRIs before biopsy in men with elevated PSA
Authors
Stig Müller
Gunder Lilleaasen
Tor Erik Sand
Lars Løfsgaard
Manuela Estop-Garanto
Dan Helgø
Peter Sund
Vegard Mygland
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
World Journal of Urology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0724-4983
Electronic ISSN: 1433-8726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2252-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

World Journal of Urology 5/2018 Go to the issue