Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Advances in Therapy 9/2021

01-09-2021 | Pharmacokinetics | Original Research

Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Two Capecitabine Tablets in Patients with Colorectal or Breast Cancer Under Fed Conditions: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Period, and Reference-Replicated Crossover Study

Authors: Chen-jing Wang, Ting Li, Ping-ping Lin, Ye Tao, Xin Jiang, Xin Li, Qing Wen, Yu Cao

Published in: Advances in Therapy | Issue 9/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

In this study, we assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK), bioequivalence, and safety of 150 mg capecitabine compared to the branded reference formulation in colorectal or breast cancer patients receiving a high-fat diet.

Methods

This was a multicenter, open, random, balanced, three-period, three-sequence and semi-repetitive cross study with 48 subjects. In each study period, the eligible subject received the test or reference formulation, followed by a 1-day washout period. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetic assessment were collected at predose up to 8 h postdose. The plasma concentrations of capecitabine were analyzed by LC/MS–MS. Pharmacokinetic parameters (non-compartmental model) were assessed with WinNonlin software. The pharmacokinetic parameters assessed were the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the time of last measurable concentration (AUC0–t), the AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC0–∞), the peak plasma concentration of the drug (Cmax), the time needed to reach maximum concentration (Tmax), the elimination half-life (t1/2), and the terminal elimination rate (λz). All were analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model after logarithmic transformation of the data. To establish the bioequivalence (BE) for capecitabine, reference-scaled average bioequivalence (RSABE) acceptance criteria and average bioequivalence (ABE) acceptance criteria were used. Safety and tolerability were assessed during the entire study period.

Results

Reference scaled maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was higher than 0.294, permitting use of RSABE. The within-subject SDs of the reference intervention (SWR) for AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were < 0.294, meeting ABE criteria. The point estimate for the geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio for the point estimate of Cmax was 0.962, within the range of 0.80–1.25. The 90% upper confidence boundary for the test/reference of GLSM ratios was 97.84–105.40% for AUC0–t and 97.33–103.51% for AUC0–∞, all of which were within the prespecified limits. The 90% confidence intervals for AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ and 95% upper confidence limit for Cmax indicated bioequivalence. No serious adverse events were found among the subjects.

Conclusions

According to the criteria for bioequivalence, the test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference formulation in terms of the rate and extent of absorption under fed conditions by measurement of total capecitabine and was safe and well tolerated.

Trial Registration

NCT04420871.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takebayashi Y, Akiyama S, Akiba S, et al. Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of an angiogenic factor, thymidine phosphorylase, in human colorectal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(16):1110–7.CrossRef Takebayashi Y, Akiyama S, Akiba S, et al. Clinicopathologic and prognostic significance of an angiogenic factor, thymidine phosphorylase, in human colorectal carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88(16):1110–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M, et al. Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(8):1274–81.CrossRef Miwa M, Ura M, Nishida M, et al. Design of a novel oral fluoropyrimidine carbamate, capecitabine, which generates 5-fluorouracil selectively in tumours by enzymes concentrated in human liver and cancer tissue. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34(8):1274–81.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cassidy J, Twelves C, Van Cutsem E, et al. First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(4):566–75.CrossRef Cassidy J, Twelves C, Van Cutsem E, et al. First-line oral capecitabine therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a favorable safety profile compared with intravenous 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(4):566–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(22):2147–59.CrossRef Masuda N, Lee SJ, Ohtani S, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine for breast cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(22):2147–59.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Thomas K, Voros BA, Meadows-Taylor M, et al. Outcomes of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) in advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Cancers. 2020;12(1):206.CrossRef Thomas K, Voros BA, Meadows-Taylor M, et al. Outcomes of capecitabine and temozolomide (CAPTEM) in advanced neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). Cancers. 2020;12(1):206.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Strickler JH, Rushing CN, Niedzwiecki D, et al. A phase Ib study of capecitabine and ziv-aflibercept followed by a phase II single-arm expansion cohort in chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1032.CrossRef Strickler JH, Rushing CN, Niedzwiecki D, et al. A phase Ib study of capecitabine and ziv-aflibercept followed by a phase II single-arm expansion cohort in chemotherapy refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):1032.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nishimura J, Hasegawa J, Kato T, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as perioperative therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;82(4):707–16.CrossRef Nishimura J, Hasegawa J, Kato T, et al. Phase II trial of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as perioperative therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2018;82(4):707–16.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Shah VP, Yacobi A, Barr WH, et al. Evaluation of orally administered highly variable drugs and drug formulations. Pharm Res. 1996;13(11):1590–4.CrossRef Shah VP, Yacobi A, Barr WH, et al. Evaluation of orally administered highly variable drugs and drug formulations. Pharm Res. 1996;13(11):1590–4.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Chen X, Tang Y, et al. Bioequivalence of generic alendronate sodium tablets (70 mg) to Fosamax((R)) tablets (70 mg) in fasting, healthy volunteers: a randomized, open-label, three-way, reference-replicated crossover study. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2017;11:2109–19.CrossRef Zhang Y, Chen X, Tang Y, et al. Bioequivalence of generic alendronate sodium tablets (70 mg) to Fosamax((R)) tablets (70 mg) in fasting, healthy volunteers: a randomized, open-label, three-way, reference-replicated crossover study. Drug Des Dev Ther. 2017;11:2109–19.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L, Arieta AG. Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(11):725–43.CrossRef Tothfalusi L, Endrenyi L, Arieta AG. Evaluation of bioequivalence for highly variable drugs with scaled average bioequivalence. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009;48(11):725–43.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cassidy J, Twelves C, Cameron D, et al. Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of capecitabine and exploration of age, gender, body surface area, and creatinine clearance as factors influencing systemic exposure in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;44(6):453–60.CrossRef Cassidy J, Twelves C, Cameron D, et al. Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of capecitabine and exploration of age, gender, body surface area, and creatinine clearance as factors influencing systemic exposure in cancer patients. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1999;44(6):453–60.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Scheithauer W, Kornek GV, Raderer M, et al. Intermittent weekly high-dose capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I/II study in first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(10):1583–9.CrossRef Scheithauer W, Kornek GV, Raderer M, et al. Intermittent weekly high-dose capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin: a phase I/II study in first-line treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(10):1583–9.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P, et al. Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(6):1190–7.CrossRef Van Cutsem E, Hoff PM, Harper P, et al. Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(6):1190–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Yamazaki K, Matsumoto S, Imamura CK, et al. Clinical impact of baseline renal function on safety and early discontinuation of adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with resected colon cancer: a multicenter post-marketing surveillance study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50(2):122–8.PubMed Yamazaki K, Matsumoto S, Imamura CK, et al. Clinical impact of baseline renal function on safety and early discontinuation of adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in elderly patients with resected colon cancer: a multicenter post-marketing surveillance study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020;50(2):122–8.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Chachad S, Purandare S, Malhotra G, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of two capecitabine tablet formulations in patients with colon, colorectal or breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(2):287–92.CrossRef Chachad S, Purandare S, Malhotra G, et al. Comparison of pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of two capecitabine tablet formulations in patients with colon, colorectal or breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013;71(2):287–92.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Machado Matos M, Bosio-Guimaraes RA, Schmidt Niederauer AJ, et al. Capecitabine bioequivalence in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;56(10):482–92.CrossRef Machado Matos M, Bosio-Guimaraes RA, Schmidt Niederauer AJ, et al. Capecitabine bioequivalence in healthy volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;56(10):482–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Walko CM, Lindley C. Capecitabine: a review. Clin Ther. 2005;27(1):23–44.CrossRef Walko CM, Lindley C. Capecitabine: a review. Clin Ther. 2005;27(1):23–44.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Soo RA, Syn N, Lee SC, et al. Pharmacogenetics-guided phase I study of capecitabine on an intermittent schedule in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27826.CrossRef Soo RA, Syn N, Lee SC, et al. Pharmacogenetics-guided phase I study of capecitabine on an intermittent schedule in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumours. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27826.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference General Assembly of the World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81(3):14–8. General Assembly of the World Medical A. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Coll Dent. 2014;81(3):14–8.
20.
go back to reference Switula D. Principles of good clinical practice (GCP) in clinical research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2000;6(1):71–7.CrossRef Switula D. Principles of good clinical practice (GCP) in clinical research. Sci Eng Ethics. 2000;6(1):71–7.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pharmacokinetic and Safety Comparison of Two Capecitabine Tablets in Patients with Colorectal or Breast Cancer Under Fed Conditions: A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Three-Period, and Reference-Replicated Crossover Study
Authors
Chen-jing Wang
Ting Li
Ping-ping Lin
Ye Tao
Xin Jiang
Xin Li
Qing Wen
Yu Cao
Publication date
01-09-2021
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Advances in Therapy / Issue 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Electronic ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-021-01817-4

Other articles of this Issue 9/2021

Advances in Therapy 9/2021 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.