Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 7/2017

01-07-2017 | Original paper

Percent mammographic density prediction: development of a model in the nurses’ health studies

Authors: Megan S. Rice, Bernard A. Rosner, Rulla M. Tamimi

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 7/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To develop a model to predict percent mammographic density (MD) using questionnaire data and mammograms from controls in the Nurses’ Health Studies’ nested breast cancer case–control studies. Further, we assessed the association between both measured and predicted percent MD and breast cancer risk.

Methods

Using data from 2,955 controls, we assessed several variables as potential predictors. We randomly divided our dataset into a training dataset (two-thirds of the dataset) and a testing dataset (one-third of the dataset). We used stepwise linear regression to identify the subset of variables that were most predictive. Next, we examined the correlation between measured and predicted percent MD in the testing dataset and computed the r 2 in the total dataset. We used logistic regression to examine the association between measured and predicted percent MD and breast cancer risk.

Results

In the training dataset, several variables were selected for inclusion, including age, body mass index, and parity, among others. In the testing dataset, the Spearman correlation coefficient between predicted and measured percent MD was 0.61. As the prediction model performed well in the testing dataset, we developed the final model in the total dataset. The final prediction model explained 41% of the variability in percent MD. Both measured and predicted percent MD were similarly associated with breast cancer risk adjusting for age, menopausal status, and hormone use (OR per five unit increase = 1.09 for both).

Conclusion

These results suggest that predicted percent MD may be useful for research studies in which mammograms are unavailable.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Byrne C et al (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(21):1622–1629CrossRefPubMed Byrne C et al (1995) Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87(21):1622–1629CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10(1):201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin LJ, Boyd NF (2008) Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res 10(1):201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Martin LJ et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(2):456–463CrossRefPubMed Martin LJ et al (2010) Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(2):456–463CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Boyd NF et al (2005) Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 6(10):798–808CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF et al (2005) Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 6(10):798–808CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sellers TA et al (2007) Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity, and diet with adult mammographic breast density. Am J Epidemiol 166(4):456–464CrossRefPubMed Sellers TA et al (2007) Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity, and diet with adult mammographic breast density. Am J Epidemiol 166(4):456–464CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Brisson J et al (1984) Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 119(3):371–381CrossRefPubMed Brisson J et al (1984) Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 119(3):371–381CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rice, M.S., et al., Immunoassay and Nb2 lymphoma bioassay prolactin levels and mammographic density in premenopausal and postmenopausal women the Nurses’ Health Studies. (1573–7217 (Electronic)) Rice, M.S., et al., Immunoassay and Nb2 lymphoma bioassay prolactin levels and mammographic density in premenopausal and postmenopausal women the Nurses Health Studies. (1573–7217 (Electronic))
10.
go back to reference Yaghjyan L et al (2016) Reproductive factors related to childbearing and mammographic breast density. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158(2):351–359CrossRefPubMed Yaghjyan L et al (2016) Reproductive factors related to childbearing and mammographic breast density. Breast Cancer Res Treat 158(2):351–359CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yaghjyan L et al (2012) Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald community cohort. Br J Cancer 106(5):996–1003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yaghjyan L et al (2012) Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald community cohort. Br J Cancer 106(5):996–1003CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bertrand KA et al (2015) Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and breast density in young women: a prospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res 17:95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bertrand KA et al (2015) Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and breast density in young women: a prospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res 17:95CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Rosner B (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25:165–172CrossRef Rosner B (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25:165–172CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126(6):1130–1137CrossRef Wolfe JN (1976) Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126(6):1130–1137CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wolfe JN (1976) Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5):2486–2492CrossRefPubMed Wolfe JN (1976) Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37(5):2486–2492CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Kato I et al (1995) A nested case–control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States). Cancer Causes Control 6(5):431–438CrossRefPubMed Kato I et al (1995) A nested case–control study of mammographic patterns, breast volume, and breast cancer (New York City, NY, United States). Cancer Causes Control 6(5):431–438CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Saftlas AF et al (1989) Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 129(3):518–526CrossRefPubMed Saftlas AF et al (1989) Mammographic parenchymal patterns as indicators of breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 129(3):518–526CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Brisson J et al (1982) Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 115(3):428–437CrossRefPubMed Brisson J et al (1982) Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol 115(3):428–437CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Boyd NF et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF et al (2007) Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356(3):227–236CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tice JA et al (2008) Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 148(5):337–347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tice JA et al (2008) Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med 148(5):337–347CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Darabi H et al (2012) Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res 14(1):R25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Darabi H et al (2012) Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res 14(1):R25CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Warwick J et al (2014) Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I. Breast Cancer Res 16(5):451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warwick J et al (2014) Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I. Breast Cancer Res 16(5):451CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Brentnall AR et al (2015) Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Brentnall AR et al (2015) Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort. Breast Cancer Res 17(1):147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Bertrand KA et al (2012) Determinants of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and development of prediction models in three US cohorts. Br J Nutr 108(10):1889–1896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bertrand KA et al (2012) Determinants of plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and development of prediction models in three US cohorts. Br J Nutr 108(10):1889–1896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Liu E et al (2010) Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D score and incident type 2 diabetes in the Framingham offspring study. Am J Clin Nutr 91(6):1627–1633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu E et al (2010) Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D score and incident type 2 diabetes in the Framingham offspring study. Am J Clin Nutr 91(6):1627–1633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Millen AE et al (2010) Predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations among postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Calcium plus Vitamin D clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 91(5):1324–1335CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Millen AE et al (2010) Predictors of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations among postmenopausal women: the Women’s Health Initiative Calcium plus Vitamin D clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 91(5):1324–1335CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Jung S et al (2014) Predicted 25(OH)D score and colorectal cancer risk according to vitamin D receptor expression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23(8):1628–1637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jung S et al (2014) Predicted 25(OH)D score and colorectal cancer risk according to vitamin D receptor expression. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23(8):1628–1637CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference McCormack VA, dos Santos I (2006) Silva, Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1159–1169CrossRefPubMed McCormack VA, dos Santos I (2006) Silva, Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1159–1169CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Eng A et al (2014) Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case–control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 16(5):439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Eng A et al (2014) Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case–control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 16(5):439CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Burton A et al (2016) Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems. Breast Cancer Res 18(1):130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Burton A et al (2016) Mammographic density assessed on paired raw and processed digital images and on paired screen-film and digital images across three mammography systems. Breast Cancer Res 18(1):130CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Percent mammographic density prediction: development of a model in the nurses’ health studies
Authors
Megan S. Rice
Bernard A. Rosner
Rulla M. Tamimi
Publication date
01-07-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 7/2017
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0898-7

Other articles of this Issue 7/2017

Cancer Causes & Control 7/2017 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine