Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a mediation analysis

Authors: Megan S. Rice, Kimberly A. Bertrand, Tyler J. VanderWeele, Bernard A. Rosner, Xiaomei Liao, Hans-Olov Adami, Rulla M. Tamimi

Published in: Breast Cancer Research | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

High mammographic density (MD) is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. However, it is unclear whether high MD is an intermediate phenotype or whether breast cancer risk factors influence breast cancer risk and MD independently.

Methods

Our study population included 1290 invasive breast cancer cases and 3422 controls from the Nurses’ Health Studies. We estimated the percent of the total association between the risk factor and breast cancer that was mediated by MD.

Results

In both pre- and postmenopausal women, the association between history of biopsy-confirmed benign breast disease and risk was partially mediated by percent MD (percent mediated (PM) = 17 %, p < 0.01 and PM = 33 %, p = 0.04, respectively). In premenopausal women, the associations between early life body size (adolescent somatotype and BMI at age 18) and breast cancer risk were substantially mediated by percent MD (PM = 73 %, p = 0.05 and PM = 82 %, p = 0.04, respectively). In postmenopausal women, the proportion of the associations of childhood somatotype and adolescent somatotype that were mediated by percent MD were lower (PM = 26 %, p = 0.01 for both measures). Hormone therapy use at mammogram was significantly mediated by percent MD in postmenopausal women (PM = 22 %, p < 0.01). Associations with other risk factors, such as age at menarche or family history of breast cancer, were not mediated by percent MD.

Conclusions

Percent MD partially mediated some of the associations between risk factors and breast cancer, though the magnitude varied by risk factor and menopausal status. These findings suggest that high MD may be an intermediate in some biological pathways for breast cancer development.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1159–69.CrossRefPubMed McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(6):1159–69.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Byrne C, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(21):1622–9.CrossRefPubMed Byrne C, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87(21):1622–9.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Martin LJ, Boyd NF. Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(1):201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Martin LJ, Boyd NF. Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10(1):201.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Martin LJ, et al. Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(2):456–63.CrossRefPubMed Martin LJ, et al. Family history, mammographic density, and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19(2):456–63.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(10):798–808.CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(10):798–808.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Sellers TA, et al. Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity, and diet with adult mammographic breast density. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(4):456–64.CrossRefPubMed Sellers TA, et al. Association of childhood and adolescent anthropometric factors, physical activity, and diet with adult mammographic breast density. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(4):456–64.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Brisson J, et al. Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119(3):371–81.PubMed Brisson J, et al. Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119(3):371–81.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(5):961–6.CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15(5):961–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schernhammer ES, et al. Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(3):699–704.CrossRefPubMed Schernhammer ES, et al. Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factors, their binding proteins, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14(3):699–704.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Tworoger SS, Sluss P, Hankinson SE. Association between plasma prolactin concentrations and risk of breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women. Cancer Res. 2006;66(4):2476–82.CrossRefPubMed Tworoger SS, Sluss P, Hankinson SE. Association between plasma prolactin concentrations and risk of breast cancer among predominately premenopausal women. Cancer Res. 2006;66(4):2476–82.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Hankinson SE, et al. Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1393–6.CrossRefPubMed Hankinson SE, et al. Circulating concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 1998;351(9113):1393–6.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Rosner B. Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics. 1983;25:165–72.CrossRef Rosner B. Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics. 1983;25:165–72.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bertrand KA, et al. Urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites and mammographic density in premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(1):277–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bertrand KA, et al. Urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites and mammographic density in premenopausal women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;136(1):277–87.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Rosner B, et al. Determination of blood pressure percentiles in normal-weight children: some methodological issues. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(6):653–66.CrossRefPubMed Rosner B, et al. Determination of blood pressure percentiles in normal-weight children: some methodological issues. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(6):653–66.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Rosner B. Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(10):950–64.CrossRefPubMed Colditz GA, Rosner B. Cumulative risk of breast cancer to age 70 years according to risk factor status: data from the Nurses' Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152(10):950–64.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Lin DY, Fleming TR, De Gruttola V. Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker. Stat Med. 1997;16(13):1515–27.CrossRefPubMed Lin DY, Fleming TR, De Gruttola V. Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker. Stat Med. 1997;16(13):1515–27.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference VanderWeele TJ. Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. xvi. 706. VanderWeele TJ. Explanation in causal inference: methods for mediation and interaction. New York: Oxford University Press; 2015. xvi. 706.
23.
go back to reference Palmer JR, et al. A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(9):1795–802.CrossRefPubMed Palmer JR, et al. A prospective study of body size and breast cancer in black women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007;16(9):1795–802.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Michels KB, Terry KL, Willett WC. Longitudinal study on the role of body size in premenopausal breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2395–402.CrossRefPubMed Michels KB, Terry KL, Willett WC. Longitudinal study on the role of body size in premenopausal breast cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(21):2395–402.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Magnusson CM, et al. Body fatness and physical activity at young ages and the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(7):817–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Magnusson CM, et al. Body fatness and physical activity at young ages and the risk of breast cancer in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 2005;93(7):817–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Baer HJ, et al. Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and incidence of breast cancer in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(3):R314–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Baer HJ, et al. Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and incidence of breast cancer in premenopausal women: a prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(3):R314–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Magnusson C, et al. Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer. 1998;76(1):29–34.CrossRefPubMed Magnusson C, et al. Body size in different periods of life and breast cancer risk in post-menopausal women. Int J Cancer. 1998;76(1):29–34.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Le Marchand L, et al. Body size at different periods of life and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(1):137–52.PubMed Le Marchand L, et al. Body size at different periods of life and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1988;128(1):137–52.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Samimi G, et al. Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses' Health Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109(1):113–22.CrossRefPubMed Samimi G, et al. Measures of energy balance and mammographic density in the Nurses' Health Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;109(1):113–22.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference McCormack VA, et al. Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(5):852–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McCormack VA, et al. Life-course body size and perimenopausal mammographic parenchymal patterns in the MRC 1946 British birth cohort. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(5):852–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
go back to reference Jeffreys M, et al. Life course breast cancer risk factors and adult breast density (United Kingdom). Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(9):947–55.CrossRefPubMed Jeffreys M, et al. Life course breast cancer risk factors and adult breast density (United Kingdom). Cancer Causes Control. 2004;15(9):947–55.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Lope V, et al. Childhood factors associated with mammographic density in adult women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(3):965–74.CrossRefPubMed Lope V, et al. Childhood factors associated with mammographic density in adult women. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;130(3):965–74.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Andersen ZJ, et al. Birth weight, childhood body mass index, and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(1):R4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Andersen ZJ, et al. Birth weight, childhood body mass index, and height in relation to mammographic density and breast cancer: a register-based cohort study. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(1):R4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Bertrand KA, et al. Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and breast density in young women: a prospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bertrand KA, et al. Body fatness during childhood and adolescence and breast density in young women: a prospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res. 2015;17:95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
36.
go back to reference Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000;9(1):15–24.CrossRefPubMed Boyd NF, et al. Mammographic densities and the prevalence and incidence of histological types of benign breast disease. Reference Pathologists of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2000;9(1):15–24.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference McTiernan A, et al. Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(18):1366–76.CrossRefPubMed McTiernan A, et al. Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(18):1366–76.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Greendale GA, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(1):30–7.CrossRefPubMed Greendale GA, et al. Postmenopausal hormone therapy and change in mammographic density. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95(1):30–7.CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Chlebowski RT, et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003;289(24):3243–53.CrossRefPubMed Chlebowski RT, et al. Influence of estrogen plus progestin on breast cancer and mammography in healthy postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2003;289(24):3243–53.CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference VanderWeele TJ, Valeri L, Ogburn EL. The role of measurement error and misclassification in mediation analysis: mediation and measurement error. Epidemiology. 2012;23(4):561–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral VanderWeele TJ, Valeri L, Ogburn EL. The role of measurement error and misclassification in mediation analysis: mediation and measurement error. Epidemiology. 2012;23(4):561–4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a mediation analysis
Authors
Megan S. Rice
Kimberly A. Bertrand
Tyler J. VanderWeele
Bernard A. Rosner
Xiaomei Liao
Hans-Olov Adami
Rulla M. Tamimi
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Breast Cancer Research / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1465-542X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0750-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Breast Cancer Research 1/2016 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine