Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Research

Pediatric Insulin Injection Technique: A Multi-Country Survey and Clinical Practice Implications

Authors: Sanjay Kalra, Laurence J. Hirsch, Anders Frid, Asma Deeb, Kenneth W. Strauss

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

The 2015 Insulin Injection Technique Questionnaire survey involving 13,289 patients included 898 (6.8%) patients in the pediatric age range (≤ 18 years).

Methods

The younger patients included in the questionnaire survey were grouped according to age: Group 1 (G1), 0–6 years, n = 85; Group 2(G2), 7–13, n = 423; Group 3 (G3), 14–18, n = 390. The injection technique was evaluated by means of a questionnaire and nurse assessment.

Results

Nurses found lipohypertrophy at injection sites in 41.3, 45.2, and 47.3% of patients in G1, G2, and G3, respectively. Unexpected hypoglycemia was common, ranging from 23.8 to 48.1% of patients, and glucose variability was even more common (61.0% in G1, 45.9% in G2, and 52.5% in G3); both conditions were associated with lipohypertrophy. While increasing numbers of patients were using the recommended 4-mm needles, large percentages still used longer ones (33.3% in G1, 45.9% in G2, and 61.5% in G3). The reuse of needles was also common, ranging from 21.1 to 32.5% in the three age groups. Excessive reuse, defined as using a single needle more than five times, was reported by 9.4–21.8% of patients in the three age group. The percentages of patients who had not received any injection training in the last 12 months ranged from 21.2 to 26.8% in the three groups.

Conclusion

Implications of our study are as follows: (1) pediatric patients should use 4-mm pen needles or 6-mm syringes (inserted at a 45° angle); (2) patients aged ≤ 6 years should always inject into a raised skin fold regardless of which device is used; (3) all patients should rotate sites and use needles only once to avoid lipohypertrophy.

Funding

Becton–Dickinson (BD) diabetes care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Guerci B, Sauvanet JP. Subcutaneous insulin: pharmacokinetic variability and glycemic variability. Diabetes Metab. 2005;31:4S7–24.CrossRef Guerci B, Sauvanet JP. Subcutaneous insulin: pharmacokinetic variability and glycemic variability. Diabetes Metab. 2005;31:4S7–24.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Frid A, Hirsch L, Gaspar R, et al. New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36[Suppl 2]:S3–18.CrossRef Frid A, Hirsch L, Gaspar R, et al. New injection recommendations for patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2010;36[Suppl 2]:S3–18.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Frid A, Hirsch L, Menchior A, Morel D, Strauss K. Worldwide injection technique questionnaire study: population parameters and injection practices. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2016;91:1212–23.CrossRef Frid A, Hirsch L, Menchior A, Morel D, Strauss K. Worldwide injection technique questionnaire study: population parameters and injection practices. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2016;91:1212–23.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Frid A, Hirsch L, Menchior A, Morel D, Strauss K. Worldwide injection technique questionnaire study: injecting complications and role of the professional. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2016;91:1224–30.CrossRef Frid A, Hirsch L, Menchior A, Morel D, Strauss K. Worldwide injection technique questionnaire study: injecting complications and role of the professional. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2016;91:1224–30.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Frid A, Kreugel G, Grassi G, et al. New insulin delivery recommendations. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2016;91:1231–55.CrossRef Frid A, Kreugel G, Grassi G, et al. New insulin delivery recommendations. Mayo Clinic Proc. 2016;91:1231–55.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lo Presti D, Ingegnosi C, Strauss K. Skin and subcutaneous thickness at injecting sites in children with diabetes: ultrasound findings and recommendations for giving injection. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(7):525–33.CrossRef Lo Presti D, Ingegnosi C, Strauss K. Skin and subcutaneous thickness at injecting sites in children with diabetes: ultrasound findings and recommendations for giving injection. Pediatr Diabetes. 2012;13(7):525–33.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith CP, Sargent MA, Wilson BP, Price DA. Subcutaneous or intramuscular insulin injections. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66(7):879–82.CrossRef Smith CP, Sargent MA, Wilson BP, Price DA. Subcutaneous or intramuscular insulin injections. Arch Dis Child. 1991;66(7):879–82.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Polak M, Beregszaszi M, Belarbi N, et al. Subcutaneous or intra-muscular injections of insulin in children: are we injecting where we think we are? Diabetes Care. 1996;19(12):1434–6.CrossRef Polak M, Beregszaszi M, Belarbi N, et al. Subcutaneous or intra-muscular injections of insulin in children: are we injecting where we think we are? Diabetes Care. 1996;19(12):1434–6.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hofman PL, Derraik JG, Pinto TE, et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1940–4.CrossRef Hofman PL, Derraik JG, Pinto TE, et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1940–4.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vaag A, Handberg A, Lauritzen L, et al. Variation in absorption of NPH insulin due to Intramuscular injection. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:74–6.CrossRef Vaag A, Handberg A, Lauritzen L, et al. Variation in absorption of NPH insulin due to Intramuscular injection. Diabetes Care. 1990;13:74–6.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Vaag A, Damgaard Pedersen K, Lauritzen M, Hildebrandt P, Beck-Nielsen H. Intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection of unmodified insulin; consequences for blood glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Med. 1990;7(4):335–42.CrossRef Vaag A, Damgaard Pedersen K, Lauritzen M, Hildebrandt P, Beck-Nielsen H. Intramuscular versus subcutaneous injection of unmodified insulin; consequences for blood glucose control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetic Med. 1990;7(4):335–42.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hirsch L, Klaff L, Bailey T, et al. Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm\32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1531–41.CrossRef Hirsch L, Klaff L, Bailey T, et al. Comparative glycemic control, safety and patient ratings for a new 4 mm\32G insulin pen needle in adults with diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:1531–41.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Birkebaek NH, Solvig J, Hansen B, Jorgensen C, Smedegaard J, Christiansen JS. A 4-mm needle reduces the risk of intramuscular injections without increasing backflow to skin surface in lean diabetic children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(9):e65.CrossRef Birkebaek NH, Solvig J, Hansen B, Jorgensen C, Smedegaard J, Christiansen JS. A 4-mm needle reduces the risk of intramuscular injections without increasing backflow to skin surface in lean diabetic children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(9):e65.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Strauss K, Hannet I, McGonigle J, et al. Ultra-short (5 mm) insulin needles: trial results and clinical recommendations. Pract Diabetes Int. 1999;16:218–21.CrossRef Strauss K, Hannet I, McGonigle J, et al. Ultra-short (5 mm) insulin needles: trial results and clinical recommendations. Pract Diabetes Int. 1999;16:218–21.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hofman PL, Derraik JG, Pinto TE, et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1940–4.CrossRef Hofman PL, Derraik JG, Pinto TE, et al. Defining the ideal injection techniques when using 5-mm needles in children and adults. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1940–4.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hofman PL, Lawton SA, Peart JM, et al. An angled insertion technique using 6-mm needles markedly reduces the risk of intramuscular injections in children and adolescents. Diabet Med. 2007;24(12):1400–5.CrossRef Hofman PL, Lawton SA, Peart JM, et al. An angled insertion technique using 6-mm needles markedly reduces the risk of intramuscular injections in children and adolescents. Diabet Med. 2007;24(12):1400–5.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Blanco M, Hernández MT, Strauss KW, Amaya M. Prevalence and risk factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39(5):445–53.CrossRef Blanco M, Hernández MT, Strauss KW, Amaya M. Prevalence and risk factors of lipohypertrophy in insulin-injecting patients with diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2013;39(5):445–53.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara YP, et al. Forum for injection technique (FIT), India: The Indian recommendations 2.0, for best practice in insulin injection technique, 2015. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(3):317. Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara YP, et al. Forum for injection technique (FIT), India: The Indian recommendations 2.0, for best practice in insulin injection technique, 2015. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2015;19(3):317.
29.
go back to reference Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara YP, Baruah MP, Chadha M, Chandalia HB, et al. Forum for injection technique and therapy expert recommendations, India: the Indian recommendations for best practice in insulin injection technique, 2017. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(4):600.CrossRef Tandon N, Kalra S, Balhara YP, Baruah MP, Chadha M, Chandalia HB, et al. Forum for injection technique and therapy expert recommendations, India: the Indian recommendations for best practice in insulin injection technique, 2017. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2017;21(4):600.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Frid A, Gunnarson R, Guntner P, Linde P. Effects of accidental intramuscular injection on insulin absorption in IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:41–5.CrossRef Frid A, Gunnarson R, Guntner P, Linde P. Effects of accidental intramuscular injection on insulin absorption in IDDM. Diabetes Care. 1988;11:41–5.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Thow J, Johnson A, Fulcher G, Home P. Different absorption of isophane (NPH) insulin from subcutaneous and intramuscular sites suggests a need to reassess recommended insulin injection technique. Diabet Med. 1990;7(3):600–2.CrossRef Thow J, Johnson A, Fulcher G, Home P. Different absorption of isophane (NPH) insulin from subcutaneous and intramuscular sites suggests a need to reassess recommended insulin injection technique. Diabet Med. 1990;7(3):600–2.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pediatric Insulin Injection Technique: A Multi-Country Survey and Clinical Practice Implications
Authors
Sanjay Kalra
Laurence J. Hirsch
Anders Frid
Asma Deeb
Kenneth W. Strauss
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0514-1

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

Diabetes Therapy 6/2018 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.