Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Original Article

Patients’ Age Rather Than Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predicts Survival After Liver Transplantation

Authors: Yaara Leibovici-Weissman, Eytan Mor, Moshe Leshno, Amir Shlomai

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is the standard tool for prioritizing patients awaiting liver transplantation. There is currently no definite high cutoff score reflecting disease severity that might exclude patients from transplantation. Furthermore, the age limit that used to disqualify patients from eligibility to transplantation was recently withdrawn in several countries.

Aims

The aims of this study were to assess the effects of MELD score and age at time of transplantation on patients’ short- and long-term survival.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective single-center study on a cohort of patients transplanted for the first time due to non-fulminant liver failure.

Results

Four hundred and seventeen patients (mean age 50.2 years, 63% males) who underwent liver transplantation for the first time were included. Both higher patients’ and donors’ age were significantly associated with increased long-term mortality (p = 0.007, 95% CI 1.006–1.038 for patient age, p = 0.02, 95% CI 1.002–1.023 for donor age). Patients’ age remained significantly associated with survival at 1 year post-transplantation, as well. We found no association between higher MELD score at transplantation and long-term mortality (p = 0.189, 95% CI 0.99–1.051) irrespective of patients’ age. Specifically, when patients were divided according to their MELD score at transplantation (MELD < 15, MELD 15–25 and MELD > 25), no significant differences in long-term survival were detected between these three subgroups. Results did not differ significantly in a subgroup analysis of patients without hepatocellular carcinoma at the time of transplantation.

Conclusions

Patients’ and donors’ age rather than patients’ MELD score at transplantation determine survival following liver transplantation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–871.CrossRefPubMed Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, et al. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–871.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, et al. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transplant. 2001;7:567–580.CrossRef Wiesner RH, McDiarmid SV, Kamath PS, et al. MELD and PELD: application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transplant. 2001;7:567–580.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:91–96.CrossRefPubMed Wiesner R, Edwards E, Freeman R, et al. Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) and allocation of donor livers. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:91–96.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Freeman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transplant. 2002;8:851–858.CrossRef Freeman RB Jr, Wiesner RH, Harper A, et al. The new liver allocation system: moving toward evidence-based transplantation policy. Liver Transplant. 2002;8:851–858.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gleisner AL, Munoz A, Brandao A, et al. Survival benefit of liver transplantation and the effect of underlying liver disease. Surgery. 2010;147:392–404.CrossRefPubMed Gleisner AL, Munoz A, Brandao A, et al. Survival benefit of liver transplantation and the effect of underlying liver disease. Surgery. 2010;147:392–404.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, et al. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:307–313.CrossRefPubMed Merion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, et al. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:307–313.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Belle SH, Beringer KC, Detre KM. An update on liver transplantation in the United States: recipient characteristics and outcome. Clin Transpl. 1995;19–33. Belle SH, Beringer KC, Detre KM. An update on liver transplantation in the United States: recipient characteristics and outcome. Clin Transpl. 1995;19–33.
9.
go back to reference Su F, Yu L, Berry K, et al. Aging of liver transplant registrants and recipients: trends and impact on waitlist outcomes, post-transplantation outcomes, and transplant-related survival benefit. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:441–453.e446. quiz e416.CrossRefPubMed Su F, Yu L, Berry K, et al. Aging of liver transplant registrants and recipients: trends and impact on waitlist outcomes, post-transplantation outcomes, and transplant-related survival benefit. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:441–453.e446. quiz e416.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Aduen JF, Sujay B, Dickson RC, et al. Outcomes after liver transplant in patients aged 70 years or older compared with those younger than 60 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:973–978.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Aduen JF, Sujay B, Dickson RC, et al. Outcomes after liver transplant in patients aged 70 years or older compared with those younger than 60 years. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:973–978.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Bjoro K, Hockerstedt K, Ericzon BG, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over 60 years of age. Transpl Int. 2000;13:S165–170.CrossRefPubMed Bjoro K, Hockerstedt K, Ericzon BG, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over 60 years of age. Transpl Int. 2000;13:S165–170.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Cross TJ, Antoniades CG, Muiesan P, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over 60 and 65 years: an evaluation of long-term outcomes and survival. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:1382–1388.CrossRefPubMed Cross TJ, Antoniades CG, Muiesan P, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over 60 and 65 years: an evaluation of long-term outcomes and survival. Liver Transpl. 2007;13:1382–1388.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Garcia CE, Garcia RF, Mayer AD, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over sixty years of age. Transplantation. 2001;72:679–684.CrossRefPubMed Garcia CE, Garcia RF, Mayer AD, et al. Liver transplantation in patients over sixty years of age. Transplantation. 2001;72:679–684.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lipshutz GS, Hiatt J, Ghobrial RM, et al. Outcome of liver transplantation in septuagenarians: a single-center experience. Arch Surg. 2007;142:775–781. discussion 781–784.CrossRefPubMed Lipshutz GS, Hiatt J, Ghobrial RM, et al. Outcome of liver transplantation in septuagenarians: a single-center experience. Arch Surg. 2007;142:775–781. discussion 781–784.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pirsch JD, Kalayoglu M, D’Alessandro AM, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation in patients 60 years of age and older. Transplantation. 1991;51:431–433.CrossRefPubMed Pirsch JD, Kalayoglu M, D’Alessandro AM, et al. Orthotopic liver transplantation in patients 60 years of age and older. Transplantation. 1991;51:431–433.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Chen HP, Tsai YF, Lin JR, et al. Recipient age and mortality risk after liver transplantation: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152324.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen HP, Tsai YF, Lin JR, et al. Recipient age and mortality risk after liver transplantation: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0152324.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Wang P, Wang C, Li H, et al. Impact of age on the prognosis after liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:3775–3781.PubMedPubMedCentral Wang P, Wang C, Li H, et al. Impact of age on the prognosis after liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-center experience. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:3775–3781.PubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Klein KB, Stafinski TD, Menon D. Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80661.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klein KB, Stafinski TD, Menon D. Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80661.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Massie AB, Chow EK, Wickliffe CE, et al. Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:659–667.CrossRefPubMed Massie AB, Chow EK, Wickliffe CE, et al. Early changes in liver distribution following implementation of Share 35. Am J Transplant. 2015;15:659–667.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nekrasov V, Matsuoka L, Rauf M, et al. National outcomes of liver transplantation for model for end-stage liver disease score ≥40: the impact of share 35. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:2912–2924. Nekrasov V, Matsuoka L, Rauf M, et al. National outcomes of liver transplantation for model for end-stage liver disease score ≥40: the impact of share 35. Am J Transplant. 2016;16:2912–2924.
22.
go back to reference Busuttil RW, Tanaka K. The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:651–663.CrossRefPubMed Busuttil RW, Tanaka K. The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2003;9:651–663.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kimura F, Miyazaki M, Suwa T, et al. Reduction of hepatic acute phase response after partial hepatectomy in elderly patients. Res Exp Med (Berl). 1996;196:281–290.CrossRef Kimura F, Miyazaki M, Suwa T, et al. Reduction of hepatic acute phase response after partial hepatectomy in elderly patients. Res Exp Med (Berl). 1996;196:281–290.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gehrau RC, Mas VR, Dumur CI, et al. Donor hepatic steatosis induce exacerbated ischemia-reperfusion injury through activation of innate immune response molecular pathways. Transplantation. 2015;99:2523–2533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gehrau RC, Mas VR, Dumur CI, et al. Donor hepatic steatosis induce exacerbated ischemia-reperfusion injury through activation of innate immune response molecular pathways. Transplantation. 2015;99:2523–2533.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Grande L, Matus D, Rimola A, et al. Expanded liver donor age over 60 years for hepatic transplantation. Clin Transpl. 1998;12:297–301. Grande L, Matus D, Rimola A, et al. Expanded liver donor age over 60 years for hepatic transplantation. Clin Transpl. 1998;12:297–301.
26.
go back to reference Hoofnagle JH, Lombardero M, Zetterman RK, et al. Donor age and outcome of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1996;24:89–96.CrossRefPubMed Hoofnagle JH, Lombardero M, Zetterman RK, et al. Donor age and outcome of liver transplantation. Hepatology. 1996;24:89–96.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Wall WJ, Mimeault R, Grant DR, et al. The use of older donor livers for hepatic transplantation. Transplantation. 1990;49:377–381.CrossRefPubMed Wall WJ, Mimeault R, Grant DR, et al. The use of older donor livers for hepatic transplantation. Transplantation. 1990;49:377–381.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patients’ Age Rather Than Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predicts Survival After Liver Transplantation
Authors
Yaara Leibovici-Weissman
Eytan Mor
Moshe Leshno
Amir Shlomai
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-016-4423-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2017 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.