Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 4/2020

01-04-2020 | Pantoprazole | Original

Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial

Authors: Anders Granholm, Søren Marker, Mette Krag, Fernando G. Zampieri, Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer, Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Theis Lange, Jørn Wetterslev, Anders Perner, Morten Hylander Møller

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 4/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in the Intensive Care Unit (SUP-ICU) trial compared prophylactic pantoprazole with placebo in 3291 adult ICU patients at risk of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (CIB). As a predefined subgroup analysis suggested increased 90-day mortality with pantoprazole in the most severely ill patients, we aimed to further explore whether heterogenous treatment effects (HTE) were present.

Methods

We assessed HTE in subgroups defined according to illness severity by SAPS II quintiles and the total number of risk factors for CIB using Bayesian hierarchical models, and on the continuous scale using Bayesian logistic regression models with interactions. Estimates were presented as posterior probability distributions of odds ratios (ORs), probabilities of different effect sizes, and marginal effects plots.

Results

We observed potential HTE for 90-day mortality according to illness severity (median subgroup OR range 0.90–1.09) with higher risk in the most severely ill, but not with different numbers of risk factors (1.00–1.02). We observed potential HTE of pantoprazole for clinically important events (0.86–1.18) and infectious adverse events (0.88–1.27) with higher risk in patients with greater illness severity and in those with more risk factors for CIB. Pantoprazole substantially and consistently reduced the risk of CIB with no indications of HTE (0.53–0.63).

Conclusions

In this post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial, we found indications of HTE with increased risks of serious adverse events in patients with greater illness severity or more risk factors for CIB allocated to pantoprazole. These findings are hypothesis-generating and warrant further prospective investigation.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier

NCT02467621
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cook DJ, Griffith LE, Walter SD et al (2001) The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care 5:368–375CrossRef Cook DJ, Griffith LE, Walter SD et al (2001) The attributable mortality and length of intensive care unit stay of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care 5:368–375CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Granholm A, Zeng L, Dionne JC et al (2019) Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 45:1347–1359CrossRef Granholm A, Zeng L, Dionne JC et al (2019) Predictors of gastrointestinal bleeding in adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 45:1347–1359CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2015) Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med 41:833–845CrossRef Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2015) Prevalence and outcome of gastrointestinal bleeding and use of acid suppressants in acutely ill adult intensive care patients. Intensive Care Med 41:833–845CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRef Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRef
5.
go back to reference MacLaren R, Reynolds PM, Allen RR (2014) Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit. JAMA Intern Med 174:564–574CrossRef MacLaren R, Reynolds PM, Allen RR (2014) Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract haemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit. JAMA Intern Med 174:564–574CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Charlot M, Ahlehoff O, Norgaard ML et al (2010) Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risk independent of clopidogrel use: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Intern Med 153:378–386CrossRef Charlot M, Ahlehoff O, Norgaard ML et al (2010) Proton-pump inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risk independent of clopidogrel use: a nationwide cohort study. Ann Intern Med 153:378–386CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Krag M, Marker S, Perner A et al (2018) Pantoprazole in patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU. N Engl J Med 379:2199–2208CrossRef Krag M, Marker S, Perner A et al (2018) Pantoprazole in patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU. N Engl J Med 379:2199–2208CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wetterslev J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C (2017) Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 17:39CrossRef Wetterslev J, Jakobsen JC, Gluud C (2017) Trial Sequential Analysis in systematic reviews with meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol 17:39CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Barbateskovic M, Marker S, Granholm A et al (2019) Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med 45:143–158CrossRef Barbateskovic M, Marker S, Granholm A et al (2019) Stress ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors or histamin-2 receptor antagonists in adult intensive care patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Intensive Care Med 45:143–158CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Marker S, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2019) Pantoprazole prophylaxis in ICU patients with high severity of disease: a post hoc analysis of the placebo-controlled SUP-ICU trial. Intensive Care Med 45:609–618CrossRef Marker S, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2019) Pantoprazole prophylaxis in ICU patients with high severity of disease: a post hoc analysis of the placebo-controlled SUP-ICU trial. Intensive Care Med 45:609–618CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Marker S, Krag M, Perner A et al (2019) Pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding—1-year mortality in the SUP-ICU trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:1184–1190CrossRef Marker S, Krag M, Perner A et al (2019) Pantoprazole in ICU patients at risk for gastrointestinal bleeding—1-year mortality in the SUP-ICU trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:1184–1190CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kent DM, Steyerberg E, van Klaveren D (2018) Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects. BMJ 364:k4245CrossRef Kent DM, Steyerberg E, van Klaveren D (2018) Personalized evidence based medicine: predictive approaches to heterogeneous treatment effects. BMJ 364:k4245CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Iwashyna TJ, Burke JF, Sussman JB et al (2015) Implications of heterogeneity of treatment effect for reporting and analysis of randomized trials in critical care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192:1045–1051CrossRef Iwashyna TJ, Burke JF, Sussman JB et al (2015) Implications of heterogeneity of treatment effect for reporting and analysis of randomized trials in critical care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192:1045–1051CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Granholm A, Marker S, Krag M et al (2019) Heterogeneity of treatment effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients: a secondary analysis protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:1251–1256CrossRef Granholm A, Marker S, Krag M et al (2019) Heterogeneity of treatment effect of stress ulcer prophylaxis in ICU patients: a secondary analysis protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 63:1251–1256CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Writing Group for the Alveolar Recuitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA et al (2017) Effect of lung recruitment and titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1335–1345CrossRef Writing Group for the Alveolar Recuitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (ART) Investigators, Cavalcanti AB, Suzumura ÉA et al (2017) Effect of lung recruitment and titrated Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) vs low PEEP on mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome - a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:1335–1345CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Zampieri FG, Costa EL, Iwashyna TJ et al (2019) Heterogeneous effects of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a machine learning reanalysis of the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial. Br J Anaesth 123:88–95CrossRef Zampieri FG, Costa EL, Iwashyna TJ et al (2019) Heterogeneous effects of alveolar recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a machine learning reanalysis of the Alveolar Recruitment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial. Br J Anaesth 123:88–95CrossRef
17.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2008) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol 61:344–349CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sung L, Hayden J, Greenberg ML, Koren G, Feldman BM, Tomlinson GA (2005) Seven items were identified for inclusion when reporting a Bayesian analysis of a clinical study. J Clin Epidemiol 58:261–268CrossRef Sung L, Hayden J, Greenberg ML, Koren G, Feldman BM, Tomlinson GA (2005) Seven items were identified for inclusion when reporting a Bayesian analysis of a clinical study. J Clin Epidemiol 58:261–268CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2016) Stress ulcer prophylaxis with a proton pump inhibitor versus placebo in critically ill patients (SUP-ICU trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 17:205CrossRef Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2016) Stress ulcer prophylaxis with a proton pump inhibitor versus placebo in critically ill patients (SUP-ICU trial): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 17:205CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2017) Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit trial: detailed statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61:859–868CrossRef Krag M, Perner A, Wetterslev J et al (2017) Stress ulcer prophylaxis in the intensive care unit trial: detailed statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 61:859–868CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J et al (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4:1686CrossRef Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J et al (2019) Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw 4:1686CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kruschke JK (2015) Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, UK Kruschke JK (2015) Doing Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, UK
25.
go back to reference Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963 (Erratum, JAMA 1994;271:1321)CrossRef Le Gall J-R, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F (1993) A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 270:2957–2963 (Erratum, JAMA 1994;271:1321)CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bürkner P-C (2018) Advanced bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R J 10:395–411CrossRef Bürkner P-C (2018) Advanced bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. R J 10:395–411CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Norton EC, Dowd BE, Maciejewski ML (2019) Marginal effects—quantifying the effect of changes in risk factors in logistic regression models. JAMA 27:187–209 Norton EC, Dowd BE, Maciejewski ML (2019) Marginal effects—quantifying the effect of changes in risk factors in logistic regression models. JAMA 27:187–209
28.
go back to reference Vesin A, Azoulay E, Ruckly S et al (2013) Reporting and handling missing values in clinical studies in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 39:1396–1404CrossRef Vesin A, Azoulay E, Ruckly S et al (2013) Reporting and handling missing values in clinical studies in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 39:1396–1404CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Spiegelhalter D, Myles J, Jones D, Abrams K (2000) Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. Health Technol Assess 4:1–130CrossRef Spiegelhalter D, Myles J, Jones D, Abrams K (2000) Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review. Health Technol Assess 4:1–130CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Vincent J-L, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRef Vincent J-L, Moreno R, Takala J et al (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Alhazzani W, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Intensive Care Med 44:1–11CrossRef Alhazzani W, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E et al (2018) Efficacy and safety of stress ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. Intensive Care Med 44:1–11CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Cook D, Guyatt G (2018) Prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal bleeding in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 378:2506–2516CrossRef Cook D, Guyatt G (2018) Prophylaxis against upper gastrointestinal bleeding in hospitalized patients. N Engl J Med 378:2506–2516CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Barkun A, Bardou M (2018) Proton-pump inhibitor prophylaxis in the ICU - Benefits worth the risks? N Engl J Med 379:2263–2264CrossRef Barkun A, Bardou M (2018) Proton-pump inhibitor prophylaxis in the ICU - Benefits worth the risks? N Engl J Med 379:2263–2264CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Henderson NC, Louis TA, Wang C, Varadhan R (2016) Bayesian analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects for patient-centered outcomes research. Heal Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 16:213–233CrossRef Henderson NC, Louis TA, Wang C, Varadhan R (2016) Bayesian analysis of heterogeneous treatment effects for patient-centered outcomes research. Heal Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 16:213–233CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Heterogeneity of treatment effect of prophylactic pantoprazole in adult ICU patients: a post hoc analysis of the SUP-ICU trial
Authors
Anders Granholm
Søren Marker
Mette Krag
Fernando G. Zampieri
Hans-Christian Thorsen-Meyer
Benjamin Skov Kaas-Hansen
Iwan C. C. van der Horst
Theis Lange
Jørn Wetterslev
Anders Perner
Morten Hylander Møller
Publication date
01-04-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05903-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2020

Intensive Care Medicine 4/2020 Go to the issue

Less is more in Intensive Care

“Less is More” in mechanical ventilation