Skip to main content
Top

17-04-2024 | Pancreatoduodenostomy

Robotic Surgeries in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease

Authors: Asmita Chopra, MD, Jiage Qian, MSPH, Adam Tcharni, BA, Alessandro Paniccia, MD

Published in: Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of review

Pancreatic resection stands as one of the most challenging abdominal surgeries, primarily indicated for pancreatic malignancies such as pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), pre-malignant conditions like intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and benign pathologies that manifest with significant symptoms, including intractable pain, often concomitant with endocrine or exocrine dysfunction. The inherent complexity and morbidity associated with pancreatic resection, exacerbated by the high risk of pancreatic anastomosis complications, including pancreatic leaks of amylase-rich fluid, is further amplified by the pancreas’s retroperitoneal location near vital anatomical structures. This underscores the imperative need for a thorough assessment of emerging surgical approaches, with particular attention to the application of robotic technology. This review appraises the impact of robotic-assisted surgery on the operative and oncological outcomes of patients afflicted with benign and malignant, pancreatic and peri-pancreatic, diseases.

Recent findings

Robotic surgery has exhibited a correlation with enhanced post-operative outcomes such as reduced morbidity and mortality following pancreatic resections. Furthermore, it has demonstrated a positive association with improved oncological resection and outcomes in patients diagnosed with pancreatic and peri-pancreatic cancer.

Summary

Minimally invasive surgery has substantially refined the landscape of pancreatic resections, offering diminished post-operative pain and reduced hospital stay. Robotic surgery, distinguished by its superior visualization and meticulous tissue handling capabilities, enables precise dissection and seamless anastomosis in the complex realm of pancreatic surgery. Consequently, this has translated into ameliorated morbidity and mortality in this patient cohort, emphasizing the critical role of surgeon proficiency and case volume.
Minimally invasive resection in the context of malignancy has demonstrated favorable oncological outcomes. This is potentially attributed to improved oncological resection (increased negative margins and lymph node yield) expedited post-operative recovery, facilitating prompt initiation of adjuvant therapy and attenuating surgical stress-induced tumorigenesis.
Nonetheless, future randomized controlled trials are indispensable to comprehensively elucidate the impact of robotic resection on the host immune response and long-term outcomes following pancreatic resections, encompassing both benign and malignant etiologies. Such investigations hold the promise of advancing our understanding and optimizing the role of robotic surgery in the context of pancreatic diseases.
Literature
4.
go back to reference • Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, et al. Learning curves in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and proposal of a standardization. Ann Surg Open. 2022;3(1):e111 Published 2022 Jan 27. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111. This systemic analysis describes the learning curves and phases associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.CrossRef • Müller PC, Kuemmerli C, Cizmic A, et al. Learning curves in open, laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review and proposal of a standardization. Ann Surg Open. 2022;3(1):e111 Published 2022 Jan 27. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​AS9.​0000000000000111​. This systemic analysis describes the learning curves and phases associated with open, laparoscopic and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference • AlMasri S, Kraftician J, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. Management of intra-operative hemorrhage and safe venous resection in robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: techniques to avoid open conversion. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(8):1753–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-023-05684-y. This paper presents methods for safe vascular resection and reconstruction in robotic pancreatic surgery and highlights the feasibility of this procedure.CrossRefPubMed • AlMasri S, Kraftician J, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. Management of intra-operative hemorrhage and safe venous resection in robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: techniques to avoid open conversion. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(8):1753–6. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11605-023-05684-y. This paper presents methods for safe vascular resection and reconstruction in robotic pancreatic surgery and highlights the feasibility of this procedure.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference •• Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590. These guidelines represent an international consensus on the use and outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resections, including robotic techniques.CrossRefPubMed •• Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003590​. These guidelines represent an international consensus on the use and outcomes of minimally invasive pancreatic resections, including robotic techniques.CrossRefPubMed
13.
24.
30.
go back to reference •• Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003550. This is the first large scale study of its kind to include the highest number of robotic pancreatoduodenectomies at a single institute, which established benchmarks for RPD.CrossRefPubMed •• Zureikat AH, Beane JD, Zenati MS, et al. 500 minimally invasive robotic pancreatoduodenectomies: one decade of optimizing performance. Ann Surg. 2021;273(5):966–72. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000003550​. This is the first large scale study of its kind to include the highest number of robotic pancreatoduodenectomies at a single institute, which established benchmarks for RPD.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference • Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, et al. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(2):1181–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09638-4. This study from a high-volume robotic pancreatectomy center reports superior oncological outcomes with robotic surgery when compared to the conventional open approach.CrossRefPubMed • Meyyappan T, Wilson GC, Zeh HJ, et al. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(2):1181–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00464-022-09638-4. This study from a high-volume robotic pancreatectomy center reports superior oncological outcomes with robotic surgery when compared to the conventional open approach.CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.CrossRefPubMed Chun YS, Pawlik TM, Vauthey JN. 8th Edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: pancreas and hepatobiliary cancers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(4):845–7.CrossRefPubMed
57.
go back to reference •• Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, et al. Ideal outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: a transatlantic evaluation of a harmonized composite outcome measure. Ann Surg. 2023;278(5):740–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006037. This international retrospective analysis utilized a large heterogenous population to establish the “ideal outcome” following pancreatoduodenectomy and subsequently developed a tool to assess surgeon and institutional outcomes.CrossRefPubMed •• Augustinus S, Mackay TM, Andersson B, et al. Ideal outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy: a transatlantic evaluation of a harmonized composite outcome measure. Ann Surg. 2023;278(5):740–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​SLA.​0000000000006037​. This international retrospective analysis utilized a large heterogenous population to establish the “ideal outcome” following pancreatoduodenectomy and subsequently developed a tool to assess surgeon and institutional outcomes.CrossRefPubMed
71.
go back to reference Kirks RC, Lorimer PD, Fruscione M, et al. Robotic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of clinical outcomes and cost to the open approach. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1832 Kirks RC, Lorimer PD, Fruscione M, et al. Robotic longitudinal pancreaticojejunostomy for chronic pancreatitis: comparison of clinical outcomes and cost to the open approach. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3). https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​rcs.​1832
Metadata
Title
Robotic Surgeries in Benign and Malignant Pancreatic Disease
Authors
Asmita Chopra, MD
Jiage Qian, MSPH
Adam Tcharni, BA
Alessandro Paniccia, MD
Publication date
17-04-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology
Print ISSN: 1092-8472
Electronic ISSN: 1534-309X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-024-00449-1
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.