Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2/2024

16-12-2023 | Pancreatic Cancer | Original Article

Emergency Presentations Predict Worse Outcomes Among Patients with Pancreatic Cancer

Authors: Natalia Khalaf, Basim Ali, Yan Liu, Jennifer R. Kramer, Hashem El-Serag, Fasiha Kanwal, Hardeep Singh

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Emergency presentation (EP) of cancer, a new cancer diagnosis made following an emergency department (ED) visit, is associated with worse patient outcomes and greater organizational stress on healthcare systems. Pancreatic cancer has the highest rate of EPs among European studies but remains understudied in the U.S.

Aims

To evaluate the association between pancreatic cancer EPs and cancer stage, treatment, and survival.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2007 to 2019 at a tertiary-care Veterans Affairs medical center. Electronic health records were reviewed to identify EP cases, defined as a new pancreatic cancer diagnosis made within 30 days of an ED visit where cancer was suspected. We used multivariate logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazards models to examine the associations between EPs and cancer stage, treatment, and survival.

Results

Of 243 pancreatic cancer patients, 66.7% had EPs. There was no difference in stage by EP status. However, patients diagnosed through EPs were 72% less likely to receive cancer treatment compared to non-emergency presenters (adjusted OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.13–0.57). Patients with EPs also had a 73% higher mortality risk (adjusted HR 1.73; 95% CI 1.29–2.34). This difference in mortality remained statistically significant after adjusting for cancer stage and receipt of cancer treatment (adjusted HR 1.47; 95% CI 1.09–1.99).

Conclusions

Pancreatic cancer EPs are common and independently associated with lower treatment rates and survival. Enhanced understanding of process breakdowns that lead to EPs can help identify care gaps and inform future quality improvement efforts.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lyratzopoulos G, Saunders CL, Abel GA. Are emergency diagnoses of cancer avoidable? A proposed taxonomy to motivate study design and support service improvement. Future Oncol Lond Engl 2014;10:1329–1333.CrossRef Lyratzopoulos G, Saunders CL, Abel GA. Are emergency diagnoses of cancer avoidable? A proposed taxonomy to motivate study design and support service improvement. Future Oncol Lond Engl 2014;10:1329–1333.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Elliss-Brookes L, McPhail S, Ives A et al. Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets. Br J Cancer 2012;107:1220–1226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Elliss-Brookes L, McPhail S, Ives A et al. Routes to diagnosis for cancer - determining the patient journey using multiple routine data sets. Br J Cancer 2012;107:1220–1226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Abel GA, Mendonca SC, McPhail S et al. Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 2017;67:e377–e387.CrossRef Abel GA, Mendonca SC, McPhail S et al. Emergency diagnosis of cancer and previous general practice consultations: insights from linked patient survey data. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract 2017;67:e377–e387.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pham TM, Gomez-Cano M, Salika T et al. Diagnostic route is associated with care satisfaction independently of tumour stage: evidence from linked English cancer patient experience survey and cancer registration data. Cancer Epidemiol 2019;61:70–78.CrossRefPubMed Pham TM, Gomez-Cano M, Salika T et al. Diagnostic route is associated with care satisfaction independently of tumour stage: evidence from linked English cancer patient experience survey and cancer registration data. Cancer Epidemiol 2019;61:70–78.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Herbert A, Abel GA, Winters S et al. Are inequalities in cancer diagnosis through emergency presentation narrowing, widening or remaining unchanged? Longitudinal analysis of English population-based data 2006–2013. J Epidemiol Community Health 2019;73:3–10.CrossRefPubMed Herbert A, Abel GA, Winters S et al. Are inequalities in cancer diagnosis through emergency presentation narrowing, widening or remaining unchanged? Longitudinal analysis of English population-based data 2006–2013. J Epidemiol Community Health 2019;73:3–10.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913–2921.CrossRefPubMed Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res 2014;74:2913–2921.CrossRefPubMed
11.
12.
go back to reference McPhail S, Swann R, Johnson SA et al. Risk factors and prognostic implications of diagnosis of cancer within 30 days after an emergency hospital admission (emergency presentation): an International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:587–600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McPhail S, Swann R, Johnson SA et al. Risk factors and prognostic implications of diagnosis of cancer within 30 days after an emergency hospital admission (emergency presentation): an International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2022;23:587–600.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force, Owens DK, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for Pancreatic Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322:438–444. US Preventive Services Task Force, Owens DK, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for Pancreatic Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Reaffirmation Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2019; 322:438–444.
14.
go back to reference Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1817–1825.CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1817–1825.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Paniccia A, Hosokawa P, Henderson W et al. Characteristics of 10-Year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 2015;150:701–710.CrossRefPubMed Paniccia A, Hosokawa P, Henderson W et al. Characteristics of 10-Year survivors of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JAMA Surg 2015;150:701–710.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
18.
go back to reference Hawn MT, Graham LA, Richman JS et al. Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA 2013;310:1462–1472.CrossRefPubMed Hawn MT, Graham LA, Richman JS et al. Risk of major adverse cardiac events following noncardiac surgery in patients with coronary stents. JAMA 2013;310:1462–1472.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Miao B, Hernandez AV, Alberts MJ et al. Incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic disease or multiple risk factors. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e014402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Miao B, Hernandez AV, Alberts MJ et al. Incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic disease or multiple risk factors. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e014402.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Lapham GT, Achtmeyer CE, Williams EC et al. Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support. Med Care 2012;50:179–187.CrossRefPubMed Lapham GT, Achtmeyer CE, Williams EC et al. Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support. Med Care 2012;50:179–187.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Zhou Y, Abel GA, Hamilton W et al. Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency: a critical review of current evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;14:45–56.CrossRefPubMed Zhou Y, Abel GA, Hamilton W et al. Diagnosis of cancer as an emergency: a critical review of current evidence. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2017;14:45–56.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hargarten SW, Richards MJ, Anderson AJ. Cancer presentation in the emergency department: a failure of primary care. Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:290–293.CrossRefPubMed Hargarten SW, Richards MJ, Anderson AJ. Cancer presentation in the emergency department: a failure of primary care. Am J Emerg Med 1992;10:290–293.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Singhi AD, Koay EJ, Chari ST et al. Early detection of pancreatic cancer: opportunities and challenges. Gastroenterology 2019;156:2024–2040.CrossRefPubMed Singhi AD, Koay EJ, Chari ST et al. Early detection of pancreatic cancer: opportunities and challenges. Gastroenterology 2019;156:2024–2040.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Tataru D, Jack RH, Lind MJ et al. The effect of emergency presentation on surgery and survival in lung cancer patients in England, 2006–2008. Cancer Epidemiol 2015;39:612–616.CrossRefPubMed Tataru D, Jack RH, Lind MJ et al. The effect of emergency presentation on surgery and survival in lung cancer patients in England, 2006–2008. Cancer Epidemiol 2015;39:612–616.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Comber H, Sharp L, de Camargo CM et al. Causes and outcomes of emergency presentation of rectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2016;139:1031–1039.CrossRefPubMed Comber H, Sharp L, de Camargo CM et al. Causes and outcomes of emergency presentation of rectal cancer. Int J Cancer 2016;139:1031–1039.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Danckert B, Falborg AZ, Christensen NL et al. Routes to diagnosis and the association with the prognosis in patients with cancer - A nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol 2021;74:101983.CrossRefPubMed Danckert B, Falborg AZ, Christensen NL et al. Routes to diagnosis and the association with the prognosis in patients with cancer - A nationwide register-based cohort study in Denmark. Cancer Epidemiol 2021;74:101983.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Nakata B, Amano R, Kimura K et al. Comparison of prognosis between patients of pancreatic head cancer with and without obstructive jaundice at diagnosis. Int J Surg Lond Engl 2013;11:344–349.CrossRef Nakata B, Amano R, Kimura K et al. Comparison of prognosis between patients of pancreatic head cancer with and without obstructive jaundice at diagnosis. Int J Surg Lond Engl 2013;11:344–349.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sjo OH, Larsen S, Lunde OC et al. Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 2009;11:733–739. Sjo OH, Larsen S, Lunde OC et al. Short term outcome after emergency and elective surgery for colon cancer. Colorectal Dis Off J Assoc Coloproctology G B Irel 2009;11:733–739.
31.
32.
33.
go back to reference Placido D, Yuan B, Hjaltelin JX et al. A deep learning algorithm to predict risk of pancreatic cancer from disease trajectories. Nat Med 2023;29:1113–1122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Placido D, Yuan B, Hjaltelin JX et al. A deep learning algorithm to predict risk of pancreatic cancer from disease trajectories. Nat Med 2023;29:1113–1122.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Schmidt-Hansen M, Berendse S, Hamilton W. Symptoms of pancreatic cancer in primary care: a systematic review. Pancreas 2016;45:814–818.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt-Hansen M, Berendse S, Hamilton W. Symptoms of pancreatic cancer in primary care: a systematic review. Pancreas 2016;45:814–818.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Emergency Presentations Predict Worse Outcomes Among Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
Authors
Natalia Khalaf
Basim Ali
Yan Liu
Jennifer R. Kramer
Hashem El-Serag
Fasiha Kanwal
Hardeep Singh
Publication date
16-12-2023
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-08207-6

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 2/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.