Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 7/2019

01-07-2019 | Pacemaker | Molecular Imaging (J Wu and P Nguyen, Section Editors)

MRI of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices

Authors: Jessica A. Martinez, Daniel B. Ennis

Published in: Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports | Issue 7/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

The purpose of this review is to clarify the risks associated with MRI exams for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and to provide information regarding the MRI examination protocol for patients with CIEDs.

Recent Findings

Several prospective studies evaluated the feasibility of MRI exams for patients with CIEDs and reported no adverse events. These studies suggest that by following a specific MRI examination protocol and monitoring both CIED parameters and the patient’s symptoms, an MRI exam can be performed by appropriately trained personnel with an acceptable benefit-to-risk ratio.

Summary

Both MR unsafe and MR conditional CIEDs are commercially available, but there are no MR safe CIEDs. The potential risks faced by patients with CIEDs during an MRI exam are always present and warrant careful monitoring. Three magnetic fields in the MRI scanner interact with the device in ways that can damage the CIED or harm the patient. Due to safety concerns and out of an abundance of caution, the majority of MRI exams for patients with CIEDs are currently denied. However, when following a specific MRI exam protocol, these risks can be mitigated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association 426. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association 426.
2.
go back to reference Guidance for industry and FDA staff: Establishing safety and compatibility of passive implants in the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. U.S. Food and Drug Administration web site. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh. 3. Establishing safety and compatibility of passive implants in the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. Guidance for industry and FDA staff: Establishing safety and compatibility of passive implants in the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. U.S. Food and Drug Administration web site. http://​www.​fda.​gov/​cdrh. 3. Establishing safety and compatibility of passive implants in the magnetic resonance (MR) environment.
3.
go back to reference Kalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:326–8.CrossRef Kalin R, Stanton MS. Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005;28:326–8.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shellock R & D Services, Inc. and Frank G. Shellock, Ph.D. (2019) Shellock R & D Services, Inc. and Frank G. Shellock, Ph.D. (2019)
5.
go back to reference Ferreira AM, Costa F, Tralhão A, Marques H, Cardim N, Adragão P. MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:115–24. Ferreira AM, Costa F, Tralhão A, Marques H, Cardim N, Adragão P. MRI-conditional pacemakers: current perspectives. Med Devices (Auckl). 2014;7:115–24.
6.
go back to reference Pavlicek W, Geisinger M, Castle L, Borkowski GP, Meaney TF, Bream BL, et al. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance on patients with cardiac pacemakers. Radiology. 1983;147:149–53.CrossRef Pavlicek W, Geisinger M, Castle L, Borkowski GP, Meaney TF, Bream BL, et al. The effects of nuclear magnetic resonance on patients with cardiac pacemakers. Radiology. 1983;147:149–53.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference • Panych LP, Madore B. The physics of MRI safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:28–43 A clear explanation of the interactions and risks between the mRI scanner and medical devices.CrossRef • Panych LP, Madore B. The physics of MRI safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:28–43 A clear explanation of the interactions and risks between the mRI scanner and medical devices.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Luechinger R, Duru F, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R. Force and torque effects of a 1.5-tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:199–205.CrossRef Luechinger R, Duru F, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P, Candinas R. Force and torque effects of a 1.5-tesla MRI scanner on cardiac pacemakers and ICDs. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001;24:199–205.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kalb B, Indik JH, Ott P, Martin DR. MRI of patients with implanted cardiac devices. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:595–603.CrossRef Kalb B, Indik JH, Ott P, Martin DR. MRI of patients with implanted cardiac devices. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:595–603.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tandri H, Zviman MM, Wedan SR, Lloyd T, Berger RD, Halperin H. Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:462–8.CrossRef Tandri H, Zviman MM, Wedan SR, Lloyd T, Berger RD, Halperin H. Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5:462–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann W, Gufler H, Weiler G. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace. 2005;7:353–65.CrossRef Irnich W, Irnich B, Bartsch C, Stertmann W, Gufler H, Weiler G. Do we need pacemakers resistant to magnetic resonance imaging? Europace. 2005;7:353–65.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Calcagnini G, Triventi M, Censi F, Mattei E, Bartolini P, Kainz W, et al. In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: role of implant geometry. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:879–86.CrossRef Calcagnini G, Triventi M, Censi F, Mattei E, Bartolini P, Kainz W, et al. In vitro investigation of pacemaker lead heating induced by magnetic resonance imaging: role of implant geometry. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28:879–86.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nordbeck P, Weiss I, Ehses P, Ritter O, Warmuth M, Fidler F, et al. Measuring RF-induced currents inside implants: impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:570–8.CrossRef Nordbeck P, Weiss I, Ehses P, Ritter O, Warmuth M, Fidler F, et al. Measuring RF-induced currents inside implants: impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. Magn Reson Med. 2009;61:570–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Mattei E, Calcagnini G, Censi F, Triventi M, Bartolini P. Role of the lead structure in MRI-induced heating: in vitro measurements on 30 commercial pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67:925–35.CrossRef Mattei E, Calcagnini G, Censi F, Triventi M, Bartolini P. Role of the lead structure in MRI-induced heating: in vitro measurements on 30 commercial pacemaker/defibrillator leads. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67:925–35.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH, et al. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2014;37:1284–90.CrossRef Higgins JV, Gard JJ, Sheldon SH, et al. Safety and outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with abandoned pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol PACE. 2014;37:1284–90.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Allison J, Yanasak N. What MRI sequences produce the highest specific absorption rate (SAR), and is there something we should be doing to reduce the SAR during standard examinations? Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W140.CrossRef Allison J, Yanasak N. What MRI sequences produce the highest specific absorption rate (SAR), and is there something we should be doing to reduce the SAR during standard examinations? Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W140.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nordbeck P, Ritter O, Weiss I, Warmuth M, Gensler D, Burkard N, et al. Impact of imaging landmark on the risk of MRI-related heating near implanted medical devices like cardiac pacemaker leads. MRM 2011;65:44–50.CrossRef Nordbeck P, Ritter O, Weiss I, Warmuth M, Gensler D, Burkard N, et al. Impact of imaging landmark on the risk of MRI-related heating near implanted medical devices like cardiac pacemaker leads. MRM 2011;65:44–50.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Acikel V, Magrath P, Parker SE, Hu P, Wu HH, Finn JP, et al. RF induced heating of pacemaker/ICD lead-tips during MRI scans at 1.5T and 3T: evaluation in cadavers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:O121.CrossRef Acikel V, Magrath P, Parker SE, Hu P, Wu HH, Finn JP, et al. RF induced heating of pacemaker/ICD lead-tips during MRI scans at 1.5T and 3T: evaluation in cadavers. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:O121.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shah AD, Morris MA, Hirsh DS, Warnock M, Huang Y, Mollerus M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging safety in nonconditional pacemaker and defibrillator recipients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1001–8.CrossRef Shah AD, Morris MA, Hirsh DS, Warnock M, Huang Y, Mollerus M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging safety in nonconditional pacemaker and defibrillator recipients: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1001–8.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Korutz AW, Obajuluwa A, Lester MS, McComb EN, Hijaz TA, Collins JD, et al. Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:2222–30.CrossRef Korutz AW, Obajuluwa A, Lester MS, McComb EN, Hijaz TA, Collins JD, et al. Pacemakers in MRI for the Neuroradiologist. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38:2222–30.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Mitka M. First MRI-safe pacemaker receives conditional approval from FDA. JAMA. 2011;305:985–6.CrossRef Mitka M. First MRI-safe pacemaker receives conditional approval from FDA. JAMA. 2011;305:985–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Celentano E, Caccavo V, Santamaria M, et al. Access to magnetic resonance imaging of patients with magnetic resonance-conditional pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems: results from the really ProMRI study. EP Eur. 2018;20:1001–9. Celentano E, Caccavo V, Santamaria M, et al. Access to magnetic resonance imaging of patients with magnetic resonance-conditional pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator systems: results from the really ProMRI study. EP Eur. 2018;20:1001–9.
23.
go back to reference Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation. 2006;114:1277–84.CrossRef Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, et al. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla. Circulation. 2006;114:1277–84.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference •• Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, et al. Assessing the risks associated with mri in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:755–64 This is the first multicenter study that studies safety of MR unsafe CIEDs during MRI examinations. This is done while following the first MR examination protocol for patients with CIEDs.CrossRef •• Russo RJ, Costa HS, Silva PD, et al. Assessing the risks associated with mri in patients with a pacemaker or defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:755–64 This is the first multicenter study that studies safety of MR unsafe CIEDs during MRI examinations. This is done while following the first MR examination protocol for patients with CIEDs.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Russo RJ. Determining the risks of clinically indicated nonthoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design of the MagnaSafe registry. Am Heart J. 2013;165:266–72.CrossRef Russo RJ. Determining the risks of clinically indicated nonthoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: rationale and design of the MagnaSafe registry. Am Heart J. 2013;165:266–72.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Horwood L, Attili A, Luba F, Ibrahim E-SH, Parmar H, Stojanovska J, Gadoth-Goodman S, Fette C, Oral H, Bogun F (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Europace euw122. Horwood L, Attili A, Luba F, Ibrahim E-SH, Parmar H, Stojanovska J, Gadoth-Goodman S, Fette C, Oral H, Bogun F (2016) Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices: focus on contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging protocols. Europace euw122.
27.
go back to reference Shah AD, Patel AU, Knezevic A, et al. Clinical performance of magnetic resonance imaging conditional and nonconditional cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:467–75.CrossRef Shah AD, Patel AU, Knezevic A, et al. Clinical performance of magnetic resonance imaging conditional and nonconditional cardiac implantable electronic devices. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40:467–75.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference •• Nazarian S, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA, Weltin V, McVeigh D, Gucuk Ipek E, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2555–64 This is another major study that evaluated safety of MR unsafe CIEDs during MRI examinations.CrossRef •• Nazarian S, Hansford R, Rahsepar AA, Weltin V, McVeigh D, Gucuk Ipek E, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:2555–64 This is another major study that evaluated safety of MR unsafe CIEDs during MRI examinations.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Gopinathannair R, Mar PL, Gandhi G, Leiserowitz A, Tripuraneni A, Lakkireddy D, et al. Incidence and predictors of MRI scan utilization in MRI-conditional pacemaker recipients: a multicenter experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:1519–25.CrossRef Gopinathannair R, Mar PL, Gandhi G, Leiserowitz A, Tripuraneni A, Lakkireddy D, et al. Incidence and predictors of MRI scan utilization in MRI-conditional pacemaker recipients: a multicenter experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41:1519–25.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Verma A, Ha ACT, Dennie C, Essebag V, Exner DV, Khan N, et al. Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014;65:290–300.CrossRef Verma A, Ha ACT, Dennie C, Essebag V, Exner DV, Khan N, et al. Canadian Heart Rhythm Society and Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2014;65:290–300.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lowe MD, Plummer CJ, Manisty CH, Linker NJ. Safe use of MRI in people with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart. 2015;101:1950–3.CrossRef Lowe MD, Plummer CJ, Manisty CH, Linker NJ. Safe use of MRI in people with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart. 2015;101:1950–3.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Epstein Andrew E, DiMarco John P, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. Circulation. 2008;117:e350–408.PubMed Epstein Andrew E, DiMarco John P, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. Circulation. 2008;117:e350–408.PubMed
33.
go back to reference Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non–pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation. 2006;114:1285–92.CrossRef Sommer T, Naehle CP, Yang A, Zeijlemaker V, Hackenbroch M, Schmiedel A, et al. Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non–pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations. Circulation. 2006;114:1285–92.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Katritsis DG, Hossein-Nia M, Anastasakis A, Poloniecki J, Holt DW, Camm AJ, et al. Myocardial injury induced by radiofrequency and low energy ablation: a quantitative study of CK isoforms, CK-MB, and troponin-T concentrations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1410–6.CrossRef Katritsis DG, Hossein-Nia M, Anastasakis A, Poloniecki J, Holt DW, Camm AJ, et al. Myocardial injury induced by radiofrequency and low energy ablation: a quantitative study of CK isoforms, CK-MB, and troponin-T concentrations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1410–6.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Higgins JV, Watson RE, Jaffe AS, Dalzell C, Acker N, Felmlee JP, et al. Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythm Pacing. 2016;45:91–7.CrossRef Higgins JV, Watson RE, Jaffe AS, Dalzell C, Acker N, Felmlee JP, et al. Cardiac troponin T in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. J Interv Card Electrophysiol Int J Arrhythm Pacing. 2016;45:91–7.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31:1241–5.CrossRef Mollerus M, Albin G, Lipinski M, Lucca J. Cardiac biomarkers in patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators undergoing an MRI scan. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008;31:1241–5.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Padmanabhan D, Kella DK, Mehta R, Kapa S, Deshmukh A, Mulpuru S, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with legacy pacemakers and defibrillators and abandoned leads. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:228–33.CrossRef Padmanabhan D, Kella DK, Mehta R, Kapa S, Deshmukh A, Mulpuru S, et al. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with legacy pacemakers and defibrillators and abandoned leads. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:228–33.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-tesla. JACC. 2004;43:1315–24.CrossRef Martin ET, Coman JA, Shellock FG, Pulling CC, Fair R, Jenkins K. Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-tesla. JACC. 2004;43:1315–24.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Nitz WR, Brinker G, Diehl D, Frese G. Specific absorption rate as a poor indicator of magnetic resonance-related implant heating. Investig Radiol. 2005;40:773–6.CrossRef Nitz WR, Brinker G, Diehl D, Frese G. Specific absorption rate as a poor indicator of magnetic resonance-related implant heating. Investig Radiol. 2005;40:773–6.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
MRI of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices
Authors
Jessica A. Martinez
Daniel B. Ennis
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports / Issue 7/2019
Print ISSN: 1941-9066
Electronic ISSN: 1941-9074
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12410-019-9502-8

Other articles of this Issue 7/2019

Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports 7/2019 Go to the issue

CARDIAC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (B CHOW AND G SMALL, SECTION EDITORS)

Cardiovascular CT in Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease

Intravascular Imaging (A Truesdell, Section Editor)

IVUS and OCT: Current State-of-the-Art in Intravascular Coronary Imaging

Molecular Imaging (J Wu and P Nguyen, Section Editors)

Molecular Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease