Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Head and Neck Pathology 4/2022

11-05-2022 | osteosarcoma | Original Paper

MDM2 Gene Amplification and Expression of MDM2 and CDK4 are Rare in Ossifying Fibroma of Craniofacial Bones

Authors: Dorukhan H. Bahceci, Richard C. K. Jordan, Andrew E. Horvai

Published in: Head and Neck Pathology | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Ossifying fibroma of the craniofacial bones is a fibro-osseous lesion characterized by varied patterns of bone formation in a fibroblastic stroma. Ossifying fibroma is a putatively benign lesion with no reports of malignant transformation or metastasis. Differentiation from other fibro-osseous lesions can be challenging necessitating synthesis of clinical, radiological and pathological findings. The molecular pathogenesis of ossifying fibroma is poorly understood but recent studies have reported MDM2 gene amplification and chromosomal copy number changes in a subset of ossifying fibromas. MDM2 amplification in ossifying fibroma, if true, presents a diagnostic problem because this genetic event, at least among craniofacial fibro-osseous lesions, was previously considered specific for low-grade osteosarcoma. In the present study, we investigated the utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification, in the diagnosis of 44 craniofacial bone ossifying fibromas. Focal MDM2 and CDK4 nuclear immunoreactivity was found in 11 and 1 ossifying fibromas, respectively, but none demonstrated MDM2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. A single tumor displayed MDM2 amplification without nuclear immunoreactivity to either MDM2 or CDK4. Our data suggest that while focal MDM2 and CDK4 nuclear expression may be detected in a minority of ossifying fibromas, this expression does not correlate with MDM2 amplification. In addition, MDM2 amplification is extremely rare in ossifying fibroma so the detection of this genetic abnormality should continue to raise concern for osteosarcoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference El Mofty SK, Nelson B, Toyosawa S. Fibro-osseous and osteochondromatous lesions. In: WHO classification of head and neck tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017. p. 251–5. El Mofty SK, Nelson B, Toyosawa S. Fibro-osseous and osteochondromatous lesions. In: WHO classification of head and neck tumors. Lyon: IARC Press; 2017. p. 251–5.
2.
go back to reference Hameed M, Horvai AE, Jordan RCK. Soft tissue special issue: gnathic fibro-osseous lesions and osteosarcoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(1):70–82.CrossRef Hameed M, Horvai AE, Jordan RCK. Soft tissue special issue: gnathic fibro-osseous lesions and osteosarcoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(1):70–82.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Koury ME, Regezi JA, Perrott DH, Kaban LB. “Atypical” fibroosseous lesions: diagnostic challenges and treatment concepts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24:162–9.CrossRef Koury ME, Regezi JA, Perrott DH, Kaban LB. “Atypical” fibroosseous lesions: diagnostic challenges and treatment concepts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;24:162–9.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Shi RR, Li XF, Zhang R, Chen Y, Li TJ. GNAS mutational analysis in differentiating fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fibroma of the jaw. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:1023–31.CrossRef Shi RR, Li XF, Zhang R, Chen Y, Li TJ. GNAS mutational analysis in differentiating fibrous dysplasia and ossifying fibroma of the jaw. Mod Pathol. 2013;26:1023–31.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Horvai E, Jordan ACR. Fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial bones: β-catenin immunohistochemical analysis and CTNNB1 and APC mutation analysis [published correction appears in Head Neck Pathol. 2014 Sep;8(3):369]. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8(3):291–7. Horvai E, Jordan ACR. Fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial bones: β-catenin immunohistochemical analysis and CTNNB1 and APC mutation analysis [published correction appears in Head Neck Pathol. 2014 Sep;8(3):369]. Head Neck Pathol. 2014;8(3):291–7.
6.
go back to reference Carpten JD, Robbins CM, Villablanca A, et al. HRPT2, encoding parafibromin, is mutated in hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome. Nat Genet. 2002;32:676–80.CrossRef Carpten JD, Robbins CM, Villablanca A, et al. HRPT2, encoding parafibromin, is mutated in hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome. Nat Genet. 2002;32:676–80.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Junior AT, de Abreu AF, Pinto CA, Carvalho AL, Kowalski LP, Lopes MA. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of twenty-five head and neck osteosarcomas. Oral Oncol. 2003;39(5):521–30.CrossRef Junior AT, de Abreu AF, Pinto CA, Carvalho AL, Kowalski LP, Lopes MA. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical analysis of twenty-five head and neck osteosarcomas. Oral Oncol. 2003;39(5):521–30.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lopes MA, Nikitakis NG, Ord RA, Sauk J Jr. Amplification and protein expression of chromosome 12q13-15 genes in osteosarcomas of the jaws. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(7):566–71.CrossRef Lopes MA, Nikitakis NG, Ord RA, Sauk J Jr. Amplification and protein expression of chromosome 12q13-15 genes in osteosarcomas of the jaws. Oral Oncol. 2001;37(7):566–71.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Guerin M, Thariat J, Ouali M, Bouvier C, Decouvelaere AV, Cassagnau E, et al. A new subtype of high-grade mandibular osteosarcoma with RASAL1/MDM2 amplification. Hum Pathol. 2016;50:70–8.CrossRef Guerin M, Thariat J, Ouali M, Bouvier C, Decouvelaere AV, Cassagnau E, et al. A new subtype of high-grade mandibular osteosarcoma with RASAL1/MDM2 amplification. Hum Pathol. 2016;50:70–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dujardin F, Binh MB, Bouvier C, Gomez-Brouchet A, Larousserie F, Muret A, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcomas and other primary fibro-osseous lesions of the bone. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(5):624–37.CrossRef Dujardin F, Binh MB, Bouvier C, Gomez-Brouchet A, Larousserie F, Muret A, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in the differential diagnosis of low-grade osteosarcomas and other primary fibro-osseous lesions of the bone. Mod Pathol. 2011;24(5):624–37.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yoshida A, Ushiku T, Motoi T, Shibata T, Beppu Y, Fukayama M, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of MDM2 and CDK4 distinguishes low-grade osteosarcoma from benign mimics. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(9):1279–88.CrossRef Yoshida A, Ushiku T, Motoi T, Shibata T, Beppu Y, Fukayama M, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of MDM2 and CDK4 distinguishes low-grade osteosarcoma from benign mimics. Mod Pathol. 2010;23(9):1279–88.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Limbach AL, Lingen MW, McElherne J, et al. The utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry and MDM2 FISH in craniofacial osteosarcoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(4):889–98.CrossRef Limbach AL, Lingen MW, McElherne J, et al. The utility of MDM2 and CDK4 immunohistochemistry and MDM2 FISH in craniofacial osteosarcoma. Head Neck Pathol. 2020;14(4):889–98.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tabareau-Delalande F, Collin C, Gomez-Brouchet A, et al. Chromosome 12 long arm rearrangement covering MDM2 and RASAL1 is associated with aggressive craniofacial juvenile ossifying fibroma and extracranial psammomatoid fibro-osseous lesions. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(1):48–56.CrossRef Tabareau-Delalande F, Collin C, Gomez-Brouchet A, et al. Chromosome 12 long arm rearrangement covering MDM2 and RASAL1 is associated with aggressive craniofacial juvenile ossifying fibroma and extracranial psammomatoid fibro-osseous lesions. Mod Pathol. 2015;28(1):48–56.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ma M, Liu L, Shi R, et al. Copy number alteration profiling facilitates differential diagnosis between ossifying fibroma and fibrous dysplasia of the jaws. Int J Oral Sci. 2021;13(1):21.CrossRef Ma M, Liu L, Shi R, et al. Copy number alteration profiling facilitates differential diagnosis between ossifying fibroma and fibrous dysplasia of the jaws. Int J Oral Sci. 2021;13(1):21.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sirvent N, Coindre JM, Maire G, et al. Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(10):1476–89. Sirvent N, Coindre JM, Maire G, et al. Detection of MDM2-CDK4 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 200 paraffin-embedded tumor samples: utility in diagnosing adipocytic lesions and comparison with immunohistochemistry and real-time PCR. Am J Surg Pathol. 2007;31(10):1476–89.
16.
go back to reference Tarkkanen M, Böhling T, Gamberi G, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of low-grade central osteosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 1998;11(5):421–6. Tarkkanen M, Böhling T, Gamberi G, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of low-grade central osteosarcoma. Mod Pathol. 1998;11(5):421–6.
17.
go back to reference He X, Pang Z, Zhang X, et al. Consistent amplification of FRS2 and MDM2 in low-grade osteosarcoma: a genetic study of 22 cases with clinicopathologic analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(9):1143–55.CrossRef He X, Pang Z, Zhang X, et al. Consistent amplification of FRS2 and MDM2 in low-grade osteosarcoma: a genetic study of 22 cases with clinicopathologic analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42(9):1143–55.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Furrer D, Sanschagrin F, Jacob S, Diorio C. Advantages and disadvantages of technologies for HER2 testing in breast cancer specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;144(5):686–703.CrossRef Furrer D, Sanschagrin F, Jacob S, Diorio C. Advantages and disadvantages of technologies for HER2 testing in breast cancer specimens. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;144(5):686–703.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Binh MB, Sastre-Garau X, Guillou L, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(10):1340–7.CrossRef Binh MB, Sastre-Garau X, Guillou L, et al. MDM2 and CDK4 immunostainings are useful adjuncts in diagnosing well-differentiated and dedifferentiated liposarcoma subtypes: a comparative analysis of 559 soft tissue neoplasms with genetic data. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(10):1340–7.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Koelsche C, Benhamida JK, Kommoss FKF, et al. Intimal sarcomas and undifferentiated cardiac sarcomas carry mutually exclusive MDM2, MDM4, and CDK6 amplifications and share a common DNA methylation signature. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(12):2122–9.CrossRef Koelsche C, Benhamida JK, Kommoss FKF, et al. Intimal sarcomas and undifferentiated cardiac sarcomas carry mutually exclusive MDM2, MDM4, and CDK6 amplifications and share a common DNA methylation signature. Mod Pathol. 2021;34(12):2122–9.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Schrijver W, van der Groep P, Hoefnagel L, et al. Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(12):1460–70.CrossRef Schrijver W, van der Groep P, Hoefnagel L, et al. Influence of decalcification procedures on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in breast cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016;29(12):1460–70.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weaver J, Downs-Kelly E, Goldblum JR, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification as a diagnostic tool in lipomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(8):943–9.CrossRef Weaver J, Downs-Kelly E, Goldblum JR, et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MDM2 gene amplification as a diagnostic tool in lipomatous neoplasms. Mod Pathol. 2008;21(8):943–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
MDM2 Gene Amplification and Expression of MDM2 and CDK4 are Rare in Ossifying Fibroma of Craniofacial Bones
Authors
Dorukhan H. Bahceci
Richard C. K. Jordan
Andrew E. Horvai
Publication date
11-05-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Head and Neck Pathology / Issue 4/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1936-0568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-022-01454-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

Head and Neck Pathology 4/2022 Go to the issue