Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012

01-03-2012 | Review

Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review

Authors: Giuseppe Turchetti, Ilaria Palla, Francesca Pierotti, Alfred Cuschieri

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Health technology assessment (HTA) is frequently used when a new and expensive technology is being introduced into clinical practice. This certainly is the case with the da Vinci surgical robot, with costs ranging from $1 to $2.5 million for each unit. This systematic review documents major variability in the reported cost evaluation studies of da Vinci robot-assisted operations compared with those performed by the direct manual laparoscopic approach.

Methods

Published studies in the English language related to the period 2000–2010 were searched using economic and clinical electronic databases.

Results

All 11 reports included some form of cost analysis, which made it possible for the authors to extract information on certain specific economic outcomes: operating room time, hospital stay, and total costs. With the exception of two studies, the reported operating room time was higher with the robotic approach than with manual laparoscopic surgery, and the hospital stay was the same for the two techniques. Robotic surgery is significantly more expensive if the purchase and maintenance costs of the robot system are included in the total costs. Only 3 of the 11 publications included these costs.

Conclusions

The disadvantage of robotic surgery is its higher costs related to purchase and maintenance of technology and its longer operating room time. However, emerging evidence shows that operating room time decreases with experience using the robot. From the HTA viewpoint, the result of this review is that the jury still is out on the HTA of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (1985) Assessing medical technologies. National Academy Press, Washington Institute of Medicine (1985) Assessing medical technologies. National Academy Press, Washington
2.
go back to reference Banta HD, Luce BR (1993) Health care technology and its assessment: an international perspective. Oxford University Press, New York Banta HD, Luce BR (1993) Health care technology and its assessment: an international perspective. Oxford University Press, New York
3.
go back to reference Goodman CS (2004) Introduction to health technology assessment. The Lewin Group, Falls Church Goodman CS (2004) Introduction to health technology assessment. The Lewin Group, Falls Church
4.
go back to reference Turchetti G, Spadoni E, Geisler E (2010) Health technology assessment: evaluation of biomedical innovative technologies. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 29:70–76PubMedCrossRef Turchetti G, Spadoni E, Geisler E (2010) Health technology assessment: evaluation of biomedical innovative technologies. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 29:70–76PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1998) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford Drummond MF, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW (1998) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford University Press, Oxford
6.
go back to reference Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs: the case of robot-assisted surgery. New Engl J Med 363:701–704PubMedCrossRef Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New technology and health care costs: the case of robot-assisted surgery. New Engl J Med 363:701–704PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Centre For Reviews Dissemination (2008) CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, York Centre For Reviews Dissemination (2008) CRD’s guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. University of York, York
8.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
9.
go back to reference Evers S, Goossens M, De Vet H, Van Tulder M, Ament A (2005) Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: consensus on health economic criteria. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 21:240–245 Evers S, Goossens M, De Vet H, Van Tulder M, Ament A (2005) Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: consensus on health economic criteria. Int J Tech Assess Health Care 21:240–245
10.
go back to reference Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT (2004) The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Urol 172:1431–1435PubMedCrossRef Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Gettman MT (2004) The new economics of radical prostatectomy: cost comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Urol 172:1431–1435PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Morino M, Beninca G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C (2004) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1742–1746PubMedCrossRef Morino M, Beninca G, Giraudo G, Del Genio GM, Rebecchi F, Garrone C (2004) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 18:1742–1746PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, van Dam R, van Gemert WG, Beets GL, Greve JWM, Jacobs MJHM, Bouvy ND (2006) First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci surgical system in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 22:426–431CrossRef Heemskerk J, van Dam R, van Gemert WG, Beets GL, Greve JWM, Jacobs MJHM, Bouvy ND (2006) First results after introduction of the four-armed da Vinci surgical system in fully robotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 22:426–431CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, Garrone C, Rebecchi F (2006) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 93:553–558PubMedCrossRef Morino M, Pellegrino L, Giaccone C, Garrone C, Rebecchi F (2006) Randomized clinical trial of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 93:553–558PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference El Nakadi I, Mélot C, Closset J, De Moor V, Bétroune K, Feron P, Lingier P, Gelin M (2006) Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication: clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg 30:1050–1054CrossRef El Nakadi I, Mélot C, Closset J, De Moor V, Bétroune K, Feron P, Lingier P, Gelin M (2006) Evaluation of da Vinci Nissen fundoplication: clinical results and cost minimization. World J Surg 30:1050–1054CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Heemskerk J, de Hoog DENM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CGMI, Greve JWM, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1825–1830PubMedCrossRef Heemskerk J, de Hoog DENM, van Gemert WG, Baeten CGMI, Greve JWM, Bouvy ND (2007) Robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparative study on costs and time. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1825–1830PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA (2008) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 247:987–993PubMedCrossRef Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA (2008) Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg 247:987–993PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300PubMedCrossRef Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G (2010) Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:92–96PubMedCrossRef Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, Schaer G (2010) Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:92–96PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Eurol 57:453–458 Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T, Ho R, Cadeddu JA, Roehrborn CG, Lotan Y (2010) Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur Eurol 57:453–458
21.
go back to reference de Souza AL, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Park JJ, Zimmern A, Abcarian H (2010) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1611–1617CrossRef de Souza AL, Prasad LM, Marecik SJ, Blumetti J, Park JJ, Zimmern A, Abcarian H (2010) Total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the potential advantage of robotic assistance. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1611–1617CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S, Chen XF (2011) Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi: 10.1002/rcs.380. Epub ahead of print PubMed PMID: 21412963 Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S, Chen XF (2011) Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. doi: 10.​1002/​rcs.​380. Epub ahead of print PubMed PMID: 21412963
23.
go back to reference D’Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Mazzocchi P, Lucandri G, Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Sovernigo G (2011) Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res 166:e113–e120. Epub 13 Dec 2010. PubMed PMID: 21227455 D’Annibale A, Pende V, Pernazza G, Monsellato I, Mazzocchi P, Lucandri G, Morpurgo E, Contardo T, Sovernigo G (2011) Full robotic gastrectomy with extended (D2) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: surgical technique and preliminary results. J Surg Res 166:e113–e120. Epub 13 Dec 2010. PubMed PMID: 21227455
24.
go back to reference Horiguchi A, Uyama I, Miyakawa S (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:287–291PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi A, Uyama I, Miyakawa S (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 18:287–291PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han SU (2010) Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:693–697PubMedCrossRef Hur H, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han SU (2010) Technical feasibility of robot-sewn anastomosis in robotic surgery for gastric cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 20:693–697PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Erdeljan P, Caumartin Y, Warren J, Nguan C, Nott L, Luke PP, Pautler SE (2010) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons. J Endourol 24:1447–1450PubMedCrossRef Erdeljan P, Caumartin Y, Warren J, Nguan C, Nott L, Luke PP, Pautler SE (2010) Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: follow-up of first Canadian experience with comparison of outcomes between experienced and trainee surgeons. J Endourol 24:1447–1450PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stádler P, Dvoracek L, Vitasek P, Matous P (2010) Robotic vascular surgery: 150 cases. Int J Med Robot 6:394–398PubMedCrossRef Stádler P, Dvoracek L, Vitasek P, Matous P (2010) Robotic vascular surgery: 150 cases. Int J Med Robot 6:394–398PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Stádler P (2009) Role of the robot in totally laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease. Acta Chir Belg 109:300–305PubMed Stádler P (2009) Role of the robot in totally laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease. Acta Chir Belg 109:300–305PubMed
29.
go back to reference Huettner F, Dynda D, Ryan M, Doubet J, Crawford DL (2010) Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a useful tool in resident training: the Peoria experience, 2002–2009. Int J Med Robot 6:386–393PubMedCrossRef Huettner F, Dynda D, Ryan M, Doubet J, Crawford DL (2010) Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery: a useful tool in resident training: the Peoria experience, 2002–2009. Int J Med Robot 6:386–393PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review
Authors
Giuseppe Turchetti
Ilaria Palla
Francesca Pierotti
Alfred Cuschieri
Publication date
01-03-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2012 Go to the issue