Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Short Communication

Offering Results to Participants in a Diabetes Survey

Effects on Survey Response Rates

Authors: Dr Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss, Nilay D. Shah, James R. Deming, Holly K. Van Houten, Steven A. Smith, Timothy J. Beebe

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: There are many reasons why an investigator may choose to share results with survey respondents; however, the practice is not universal. Moreover, while there is some evidence that the practice increases response rates, it is of limited generalizability.
Objective: The aim of this study was to determine both the impact on survey response rates of offering study results to participants, and the extent to which surveyed individuals with diabetes mellitus want results reported back from a postal questionnaire.
Methods: In November–December 2009, we surveyed 4796 randomly selected individuals from a US Midwestern health system diabetes registry. Half of the sample was randomized to receive an offer of survey results as an incentive. Response rates were compared across the two groups. Within the group offered results, we compared those that requested them with those that declined with respect to demographic characteristics, self-reported diabetes severity, and characterization of care received for diabetes.
Results: The overall response rate was 42.8% (n = 2055). Offering survey results did not impact response rates overall or within specific subpopulations. Of those randomized to the offer of results, 62.1% requested the results (n = 618). Requests for results differed by educational attainment and the rating of diabetes care as poor, although only education remained a significant predictor in multivariate analysis. There were no differences in rates of requests by disease severity or overall health status.
Conclusion: Offering survey results to potential respondents did not increase the likelihood of response among a patient population with diabetes. Of those that were offered results and returned the survey, 62.1% requested that they receive study results, indicating a potentially important educational opportunity. However, as result requests were driven more by educational attainment than by health status, investigators may want to send results to everyone, not just those that request them.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cockayne S, Torgerson DJ. A randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 34PubMedCrossRef Cockayne S, Torgerson DJ. A randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005; 5: 34PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Partridge A, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002; 288: 363–5PubMedCrossRef Partridge A, Winer EP. Informing clinical trial participants about study results. JAMA 2002; 288: 363–5PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 8(3): MR000008 Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 8(3): MR000008
4.
go back to reference Institutional Review Boards, 56 Federal Register 28003, 45 CFR46(1991) Institutional Review Boards, 56 Federal Register 28003, 45 CFR46(1991)
5.
go back to reference Mullner RM, Levy PS, Byre CS, et al. Effects of characteristics of the survey instrument on response rates to a mail survey of community hospitals. Public Health Rep 1982; 97: 465–9PubMed Mullner RM, Levy PS, Byre CS, et al. Effects of characteristics of the survey instrument on response rates to a mail survey of community hospitals. Public Health Rep 1982; 97: 465–9PubMed
6.
go back to reference Morrison DS, Thomson H, Petticrew M. Effects of disseminating research findings on response rates in a community survey: a randomized controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 536–7PubMedCrossRef Morrison DS, Thomson H, Petticrew M. Effects of disseminating research findings on response rates in a community survey: a randomized controlled trial. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003; 57: 536–7PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stata [statistical software]. Release 11.0. College Station (TX): StataCorp LP, 2009 Stata [statistical software]. Release 11.0. College Station (TX): StataCorp LP, 2009
Metadata
Title
Offering Results to Participants in a Diabetes Survey
Effects on Survey Response Rates
Authors
Dr Jeanette Y. Ziegenfuss
Nilay D. Shah
James R. Deming
Holly K. Van Houten
Steven A. Smith
Timothy J. Beebe
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11595850-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2011 Go to the issue

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.