Skip to main content
Top
Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2011

01-12-2011 | Original Research Article

Can Patients Diagnosed with Schizophrenia Complete Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Tasks?

Authors: John F. P. Bridges, Elizabeth T. Kinter, Annette Schmeding, Ina Rudolph, Axel Mühlbacher

Published in: The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research | Issue 4/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background: Schizophrenia is a severe mental illness associated with hallucinations, delusions, apathy, poor social functioning, and impaired cognition. Researchers and funders have been hesitant to focus efforts on treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia because of the perceived cognitive burden that research methods, such as conjoint analysis, place on them.
Objective: The objective of this study was to test if patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were able to complete a choice-based conjoint analysis (often referred to as discrete-choice experiments) and to test if meaningful trade-offs were being made.
Methods: German outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia were eligible to participate in this study if they were aged 18–65 years, had received treatment for at least 1 year and were not experiencing acute symptoms. Conjoint analysis tasks were based on six attributes, each with two levels, which were identified via a literature review and focus groups. A psychologist in a professional interview facility presented each respondent with the eight tasks with little explanation. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to verify that respondents understood the tasks. Preferences were assessed using logistic regression, with a correction for clustering.
Results: We found evidence that the 21 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia participating in the study could complete conjoint analysis tasks in a meaningful way. Patients not only related to the scenarios presented in conjoint tasks, but explicitly stated that they used their own preferences to judge which scenarios were better. Statistical analysis confirmed all hypotheses about the attributes (i.e. all attributes had the expected sign). Having a supportive physician, not feeling slowed, and improvements in stressful situations (p<0.01) were the most important attributes.
Conclusions: We found that patients diagnosed with schizophrenia can complete conjoint analysis tasks, that they base their decisions on their own preferences, and that patients make trade-offs between attributes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Costello CG, editor. Symptoms of schizophrenia. New York: Wiley, 1993 Costello CG, editor. Symptoms of schizophrenia. New York: Wiley, 1993
2.
go back to reference Shurman B, Horan WP, Nuechterlein KH. Schizophrenia patients demonstrate a distinctive pattern of decision-making impairment on the Iowa Gambling Task. Schizophr Res 2005; 72: 215–24PubMedCrossRef Shurman B, Horan WP, Nuechterlein KH. Schizophrenia patients demonstrate a distinctive pattern of decision-making impairment on the Iowa Gambling Task. Schizophr Res 2005; 72: 215–24PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bandelow B, Muller P, Gaebel W, et al. Depressive syndromes in schizophrenic patients after discharge from hospital. ANI Study Group Berlin, Dusseldorf, Gottingen, Munich. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1990; 240: 113–20PubMedCrossRef Bandelow B, Muller P, Gaebel W, et al. Depressive syndromes in schizophrenic patients after discharge from hospital. ANI Study Group Berlin, Dusseldorf, Gottingen, Munich. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 1990; 240: 113–20PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R. A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med 1983; 13: 177–83PubMedCrossRef Hogan TP, Awad AG, Eastwood R. A self-report scale predictive of drug compliance in schizophrenics: reliability and discriminative validity. Psychol Med 1983; 13: 177–83PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Rosenheck R, Stroup S, Keefe R, et al. Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 529–36PubMedCrossRef Rosenheck R, Stroup S, Keefe R, et al. Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 2005; 187: 529–36PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Vogt F, Schwappach D, Bridges J. Accounting for tastes: a German perspective on the inclusion of patient preferences in health care. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24(5): 419–23PubMedCrossRef Vogt F, Schwappach D, Bridges J. Accounting for tastes: a German perspective on the inclusion of patient preferences in health care. Pharmacoeconomics 2006; 24(5): 419–23PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Klag M, MacKenzie E, Carswell C, et al. The role of The Patient in promoting patient-centered outcomes research. Patient 2008; 1(1): 1–3PubMedCrossRef Klag M, MacKenzie E, Carswell C, et al. The role of The Patient in promoting patient-centered outcomes research. Patient 2008; 1(1): 1–3PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bridges J, Jones C. Patient based health technology assessment: a vision of what might one day be possible. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23(1): 30–5PubMedCrossRef Bridges J, Jones C. Patient based health technology assessment: a vision of what might one day be possible. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2007; 23(1): 30–5PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bridges J, Cohen JP, Grist PG, et al. International experience with comparative effectiveness research: case studies from England/Wales and Germany. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 2010; 22: 29–50PubMedCrossRef Bridges J, Cohen JP, Grist PG, et al. International experience with comparative effectiveness research: case studies from England/Wales and Germany. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res 2010; 22: 29–50PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference The National Institute of Mental Health. The National Institute of Mental Health strategic plan. Washington, DC: NIMH, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/ about/strategic-planning-reports/nimh-strategic-plan-2008.pdf [Accessed 2011 Aug 25] The National Institute of Mental Health. The National Institute of Mental Health strategic plan. Washington, DC: NIMH, 2008 [online]. Available from URL: http://​www.​nimh.​nih.​gov/​ about/strategic-planning-reports/nimh-strategic-plan-2008.pdf [Accessed 2011 Aug 25]
11.
go back to reference Fraenkel L. Conjoint analysis at the individual patient level: issues to consider as we move from a research to a clinical tool. Patient 2008; 1(4): 251–3PubMedCrossRef Fraenkel L. Conjoint analysis at the individual patient level: issues to consider as we move from a research to a clinical tool. Patient 2008; 1(4): 251–3PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kinter E, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, et al. Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient centered health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009; 25(1): 35–41PubMedCrossRef Kinter E, Schmeding A, Rudolph I, et al. Identifying patient-relevant endpoints among individuals with schizophrenia: an application of patient centered health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2009; 25(1): 35–41PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Bridges JFP, Slawik L, Schmeding A, et al. A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia. Health Expect. Epub 2011 Jun 14 Bridges JFP, Slawik L, Schmeding A, et al. A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia. Health Expect. Epub 2011 Jun 14
14.
go back to reference Green PE, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implication for research and practice. J Mark 1990; 54(4): 3–19CrossRef Green PE, Srinivasan V. Conjoint analysis in marketing: new developments with implication for research and practice. J Mark 1990; 54(4): 3–19CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fischer EP, Shumway M, Owen RR. Priorities of consumers, providers, and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53(6): 724–9PubMedCrossRef Fischer EP, Shumway M, Owen RR. Priorities of consumers, providers, and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2002; 53(6): 724–9PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Shumway M. Preference weights for cost-outcome analyses of schizophrenia treatments: comparison of four stakeholder groups. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29(2): 257–66PubMedCrossRef Shumway M. Preference weights for cost-outcome analyses of schizophrenia treatments: comparison of four stakeholder groups. Schizophr Bull 2003; 29(2): 257–66PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shumway M, Saunders T, Shern D, et al. Preferences for schizophrenia treatment outcomes among public policy makers, consumers, families and providers. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(8): 1124–8PubMedCrossRef Shumway M, Saunders T, Shern D, et al. Preferences for schizophrenia treatment outcomes among public policy makers, consumers, families and providers. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(8): 1124–8PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2(1): 55–64PubMed Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2(1): 55–64PubMed
19.
go back to reference Bridges J, Kinter E, Kidane L, et al. Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: recent trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1970–2007. Patient 2008; 1(4): 273–82PubMedCrossRef Bridges J, Kinter E, Kidane L, et al. Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: recent trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1970–2007. Patient 2008; 1(4): 273–82PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Marshall D, Bridges J, Hauber AB, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 2010; 3(4): 249–56PubMedCrossRef Marshall D, Bridges J, Hauber AB, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: how are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. Patient 2010; 3(4): 249–56PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(8): 661–77PubMedCrossRef Lancsar E, Louviere J. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide. Pharmacoeconomics 2008; 26(8): 661–77PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bridges JF. Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2(4): 213–24PubMed Bridges JF. Stated preference methods in health care evaluation: an emerging methodological paradigm in health economics. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2003; 2(4): 213–24PubMed
23.
go back to reference Street DJ, Burgess L, Viney R, et al. Designing discrete choice experiments for health care. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care: the economics of non-market goods and resources. Vol. 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008 Street DJ, Burgess L, Viney R, et al. Designing discrete choice experiments for health care. In: Ryan M, Gerard K, Amaya-Amaya M, editors. Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care: the economics of non-market goods and resources. Vol. 11. Dordrecht: Springer, 2008
24.
go back to reference Viney R, Lancsar E, Louviere J. Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2002; 2(4): 89–96CrossRef Viney R, Lancsar E, Louviere J. Discrete choice experiments to measure consumer preferences for health and healthcare. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2002; 2(4): 89–96CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Maddala T, Phillips CA, Johnson FR. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences. Health Econ 2003; 12: 1035–47PubMedCrossRef Maddala T, Phillips CA, Johnson FR. An experiment on simplifying conjoint analysis designs for measuring preferences. Health Econ 2003; 12: 1035–47PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2011; 20(3): 273–86PubMedCrossRef Bech M, Kjaer T, Lauridsen J. Does the number of choice sets matter? Results from a web survey applying a discrete choice experiment. Health Econ 2011; 20(3): 273–86PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Louviere J, Islam T, Wasi N, et al. Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price? J Consum Res 2008; 35: 360–75CrossRef Louviere J, Islam T, Wasi N, et al. Designing discrete choice experiments: do optimal designs come at a price? J Consum Res 2008; 35: 360–75CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Kinter E. Identifying treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia in Germany: an application of patient-centered care [doctoral dissertation]. Baltimore (MD): The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2009 Kinter E. Identifying treatment preferences of patients with schizophrenia in Germany: an application of patient-centered care [doctoral dissertation]. Baltimore (MD): The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 2009
29.
go back to reference Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRef Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated choice methods: analysis and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Akkazieva B, Gulacsi L, Brandtmuller A, et al. Patients’ preferences for health care system reform in Hungary: a conjoint analysis study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2006; 5(3): 189–98PubMedCrossRef Akkazieva B, Gulacsi L, Brandtmuller A, et al. Patients’ preferences for health care system reform in Hungary: a conjoint analysis study. Appl Health Econ Health Policy 2006; 5(3): 189–98PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hauber AB, Mohamed AF, Johnson FR, et al. Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis. Qual Life Res 2010; 19(5): 701–9PubMedCrossRef Hauber AB, Mohamed AF, Johnson FR, et al. Estimating importance weights for the IWQOL-Lite using conjoint analysis. Qual Life Res 2010; 19(5): 701–9PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press, 1967: 221–33 Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press, 1967: 221–33
33.
go back to reference White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980; 48: 817–38CrossRef White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 1980; 48: 817–38CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Donaldson C, Shackley P. Does ‘process utility’ exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholesystectomy. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 699–707PubMedCrossRef Donaldson C, Shackley P. Does ‘process utility’ exist? A case study of willingness to pay for laparoscopic cholesystectomy. Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 699–707PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilization. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 535–46PubMedCrossRef Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilization. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 535–46PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Allison DB, Mackell JA, McDonnell DD. The impact of weight gain on quality of life among persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(4): 565–7PubMedCrossRef Allison DB, Mackell JA, McDonnell DD. The impact of weight gain on quality of life among persons with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv 2003; 54(4): 565–7PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Awad AG, Voruganti LN. Body weight, image and self-esteem evaluation questionnaire: development and validation of a new scale. Schizophr Res 2004; 70(1): 63–7PubMedCrossRef Awad AG, Voruganti LN. Body weight, image and self-esteem evaluation questionnaire: development and validation of a new scale. Schizophr Res 2004; 70(1): 63–7PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Can Patients Diagnosed with Schizophrenia Complete Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis Tasks?
Authors
John F. P. Bridges
Elizabeth T. Kinter
Annette Schmeding
Ina Rudolph
Axel Mühlbacher
Publication date
01-12-2011
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research / Issue 4/2011
Print ISSN: 1178-1653
Electronic ISSN: 1178-1661
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/11589190-000000000-00000

Other articles of this Issue 4/2011

The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 4/2011 Go to the issue

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.