Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021

01-07-2021 | Obesity

Does antrum size matter in sleeve gastrectomy? A prospective randomized study

Authors: Francesco Pizza, Dario D’Antonio, Francesco Saverio Lucido, Claudio Gambardella, Juan Antonio Carbonell Asíns, Chiara Dell’Isola, Salvatore Tolone

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 7/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a safe and effective bariatric procedure in terms of excess weight loss. Nevertheless, controversies still exist on several technical and operative aspects of LSG. The aim of this study is to evaluate variations in anthropometric features in subjects with a LSG gastric resection starting from 2 cm or 6 cm from the pylorus. Secondary aim was the evaluation of differences in morbidity, food tolerance, and GERD incidence studied with upper endoscopy (UE) and GERD Health-Related Quality-of-Life score.

Methods

Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: Group A (at 2 cm proximally to the pylorus) and Group B (at 6 cm proximally to the pylorus). All patients were followed-up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. UE was performed in all patients at 12 or 24 months.

Results

One hundred and fifty met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in the study. The anthropometric features (BMI, %EWL, %TWL) resulted statistically different in the first 12 months (24.2 ± 3.4 vs 27.5 ± 4.3, 63.7 ± 14.1 vs 59.6 ± 12.5 and 42.9 ± 7.4 vs 38.2 ± 6.2), in favor of group A. At 24 months the differences disappeared (25.2 ± 4.4 vs 26.2 ± 3.3, 62.8 ± 13.1 vs 61.6 ± 10.5 and 41.9 ± 7.4 vs 40.2 ± 6.2). An increased GERD was found in both groups postoperatively with a higher incidence in group A at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Performing the LSG with a radical antrectomy could improve weight loss at 12-month follow-up but expose to lower food tolerance and higher transitory GERD. The differences seem to be reduced to a 24-month.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(4):750–756CrossRef Gagner M, Hutchinson C, Rosenthal R (2016) Fifth International Consensus Conference: current status of sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(4):750–756CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ferrer-Marquez M, Belda-Lozano R, Ferrer-Ayza M (2012) Technical controversies in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 22:182–187CrossRef Ferrer-Marquez M, Belda-Lozano R, Ferrer-Ayza M (2012) Technical controversies in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 22:182–187CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Avlanmis O, Isil RG, Burcu B (2019) Effect of resection distance from pylorus on weight loss outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 29(9):2731–2738CrossRef Avlanmis O, Isil RG, Burcu B (2019) Effect of resection distance from pylorus on weight loss outcomes in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 29(9):2731–2738CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N et al (2005) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg 15:1124–1128CrossRef Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N et al (2005) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg 15:1124–1128CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP (2005) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg 15:1030–1033CrossRef Mognol P, Chosidow D, Marmuse JP (2005) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as an initial bariatric operation for high-risk patients: initial results in 10 patients. Obes Surg 15:1030–1033CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pilone V, Tramontano S, Renzulli M, Zulli C, Schiavo L (2019) Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy: new onset and effect on symptoms on a prospective evaluation. Obes Surg 29(11):3638–3645CrossRef Pilone V, Tramontano S, Renzulli M, Zulli C, Schiavo L (2019) Gastroesophageal reflux after sleeve gastrectomy: new onset and effect on symptoms on a prospective evaluation. Obes Surg 29(11):3638–3645CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20(2):130–134CrossRef Velanovich V (2007) The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus 20(2):130–134CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cerqueira RM, Correia M, Vilar H, Manso MC (2018) Cumulative Helicobacter pylori eradication rates by adopting first- and second-line regimens proposed by the maastricht IV consensus in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 28(3):743–747CrossRef Cerqueira RM, Correia M, Vilar H, Manso MC (2018) Cumulative Helicobacter pylori eradication rates by adopting first- and second-line regimens proposed by the maastricht IV consensus in obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg 28(3):743–747CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL et al (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92CrossRef Armstrong D, Bennett JR, Blum AL et al (1996) The endoscopic assessment of esophagitis: a progress report on observer agreement. Gastroenterology 111:85–92CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, van Veldhuisen SL, Martin AS, Xiao Y, Galvao M et al (2019) Defining global benchmarks in bariatric surgery: a retrospective multicenter analysis of minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 270(5):859–867CrossRef Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, van Veldhuisen SL, Martin AS, Xiao Y, Galvao M et al (2019) Defining global benchmarks in bariatric surgery: a retrospective multicenter analysis of minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 270(5):859–867CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Major P, Matłok M, Pędziwiatr M et al (2015) Quality of life after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 25:1703–1710CrossRef Major P, Matłok M, Pędziwiatr M et al (2015) Quality of life after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg 25:1703–1710CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Ryan KK, Tremaroli V, Clemmensen C et al (2014) FXR is a molecular target for the effects of vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Nature 509(7499):183–188CrossRef Ryan KK, Tremaroli V, Clemmensen C et al (2014) FXR is a molecular target for the effects of vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Nature 509(7499):183–188CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brethauer SA, Hammel J, Schauer PR (2009) Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as a staging and primary bariatric operation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:469–475CrossRef Brethauer SA, Hammel J, Schauer PR (2009) Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as a staging and primary bariatric operation. Surg Obes Relat Dis 5:469–475CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sundbom M (2014) Laparoscopic revolution in bariatric surgery. World J Gastroenterol WJG 20:15135–15143CrossRef Sundbom M (2014) Laparoscopic revolution in bariatric surgery. World J Gastroenterol WJG 20:15135–15143CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Omarov T, Samadov E, Coskun AK, Unlu A (2020) Comparison of weight loss in sleeve gastrectomy patients with and without antrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Obes Surg 30(2):446–450CrossRef Omarov T, Samadov E, Coskun AK, Unlu A (2020) Comparison of weight loss in sleeve gastrectomy patients with and without antrectomy: a prospective randomized study. Obes Surg 30(2):446–450CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Robert M, Pasquer A, Pelascini E, Valette PJ, Gouillat C, Disse E (2016) Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):1286–1291CrossRef Robert M, Pasquer A, Pelascini E, Valette PJ, Gouillat C, Disse E (2016) Impact of sleeve gastrectomy volumes on weight loss results: a prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):1286–1291CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L et al (2008) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:528–533CrossRef Parikh M, Gagner M, Heacock L et al (2008) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect mean %EWL? Short-term outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis 4:528–533CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Spivak H (2014) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie. Obes Surg 24:1095CrossRef Spivak H (2014) Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy using 42-French versus 32-French bougie. Obes Surg 24:1095CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Obeidat FW, Shanti HA, Mismar AA, Elmuhtaseb MS, Al-Qudah MS (2014) Volume of resected stomach as a predictor of excess weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 24:1904–1908CrossRef Obeidat FW, Shanti HA, Mismar AA, Elmuhtaseb MS, Al-Qudah MS (2014) Volume of resected stomach as a predictor of excess weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg 24:1904–1908CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Pawanindra L, Vindal A, Midha M et al (2015) Early post-operative weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy correlates with the volume of the excised stomach and not with that of the sleeve! Preliminary data from a multi-detector computed tomography-based study. Surg Endosc 29:2921–2927CrossRef Pawanindra L, Vindal A, Midha M et al (2015) Early post-operative weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy correlates with the volume of the excised stomach and not with that of the sleeve! Preliminary data from a multi-detector computed tomography-based study. Surg Endosc 29:2921–2927CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Youssef T, Abdallah H, Ellatif MA, Lotfy A, Youssef M, Elganash A, Moatamed A, Morshed M, Farid M (2014) Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg 24(10):1587–1594CrossRef Abdallah E, El Nakeeb A, Youssef T, Abdallah H, Ellatif MA, Lotfy A, Youssef M, Elganash A, Moatamed A, Morshed M, Farid M (2014) Impact of extent of antral resection on surgical outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity (a prospective randomized study). Obes Surg 24(10):1587–1594CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Borbely Y, Schaffner E, Zimmermann L et al (2019) De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: role of preoperative silent reflux. Surg Endosc 33:789–793CrossRef Borbely Y, Schaffner E, Zimmermann L et al (2019) De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy: role of preoperative silent reflux. Surg Endosc 33:789–793CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Felsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M et al (2017) Reflux, sleeve dilation, and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up. Obes Surg 27:3092–3101CrossRef Felsenreich DM, Kefurt R, Schermann M et al (2017) Reflux, sleeve dilation, and Barrett’s esophagus after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: long-term follow-up. Obes Surg 27:3092–3101CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Boru CE, Greco F, Giustacchini P et al (2018) Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy conversion to R-Y gastric bypass: multi-center retrospective study. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 403:473–479CrossRef Boru CE, Greco F, Giustacchini P et al (2018) Short-term outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy conversion to R-Y gastric bypass: multi-center retrospective study. Langenbeck's Arch Surg 403:473–479CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J et al (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 319:241–254CrossRef Salminen P, Helmio M, Ovaska J et al (2018) Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA 319:241–254CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Tolone S, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, Docimo L (2019) Sleeve gastrectomy, GERD, and Barrett's esophagus: it is time for objective testing. Obes Surg 29(7):2312–2313CrossRef Tolone S, Savarino E, De Bortoli N, Docimo L (2019) Sleeve gastrectomy, GERD, and Barrett's esophagus: it is time for objective testing. Obes Surg 29(7):2312–2313CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Del Genio G, Tolone S, Gambardella C et al (2020) Sleeve gastrectomy and anterior fundoplication (D-SLEEVE) prevents gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Obes Surg 30(5):1642–1652CrossRef Del Genio G, Tolone S, Gambardella C et al (2020) Sleeve gastrectomy and anterior fundoplication (D-SLEEVE) prevents gastroesophageal reflux in symptomatic GERD. Obes Surg 30(5):1642–1652CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Del Genio G, Tolone S, Limongelli P et al (2014) Sleeve gastrectomy and development of "de novo" gastroesophageal reflux. Obes Surg 24(1):71–77CrossRef Del Genio G, Tolone S, Limongelli P et al (2014) Sleeve gastrectomy and development of "de novo" gastroesophageal reflux. Obes Surg 24(1):71–77CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does antrum size matter in sleeve gastrectomy? A prospective randomized study
Authors
Francesco Pizza
Dario D’Antonio
Francesco Saverio Lucido
Claudio Gambardella
Juan Antonio Carbonell Asíns
Chiara Dell’Isola
Salvatore Tolone
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07811-1

Other articles of this Issue 7/2021

Surgical Endoscopy 7/2021 Go to the issue